Skip to main content
. 2025 Jan 23;12(7):nwaf029. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwaf029

Table 2.

Summary of redox-active organic species reported in aqueous batteries.

Redox-active organic molecules Supporting electrolytes Redox potential Solubility Ref.
TEMPO/Phenazine NaCl 0.6 V vs. Ag/AgCl NA [111]
Viologen/TEMPO NaCl + buffer 0.67 V vs. Ag/AgCl 1 g L−1 [112]
Fe(CN)64− ZnSO4 + PVA 0.6 V vs. SHE NA [113]
(2,7-AQDS)/NaI NaI + I2 + Na2SO4 catholyte 0.62 V vs. SHE 0.1 M [114]
K4Fe(CN)64− KCl catholyte 0.45 V vs. SHE 0.8 M [115]
NMe–TEMPO NaCl 0.94 V vs. NHE 0.5 M [116]
Pyr–TEMPO ZnCl2 + NH4Cl 0.84 V vs. SHE 0.1 M [117]
TEMPTMA NaCl 0.79 V vs. Ag/AgCl 3.2 M [118]
FcNCl NaCl 0.61 V vs. NHE 4 M [119]
(SPr)2V KCl –0.43 V vs. NHE 2 M [120]
DHPS KOH –1 V vs. Ag/AgCl 0.1 M [121]
DHBQ KOH –0.7 V vs. SHE 4.3 M [122]
FQH2/FQ H2SO4 0.7 V vs. SHE 1.4 M [123]
THAQ KOH − 0.86 V vs. Ag/AgCl 1.88 M [124]