Skip to main content
. 2025 May 27;12(4):e200416. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000200416

Table 5.

Summary of the Hazard Ratios for Physical Disability Worsening (Specifically EDSS Progression) of Different Predictive Cutoff Values of pRNFL and GCIPL Baseline

Retinal layer thresholds Cutoff chosen Hazard ratio and 95% CI p Value I2 test Egger test
Cross-sectional predictive cutoff
 pRNFL
  High vs low baseline thickness 87–100 μm 2.028 (1.699–2.42) <0.001 0% 0.016
  Baseline pRNFL 87–88 μm 2.258 (1.752–2.909) <0.001 0% 0.042
 GCIPL
  High vs low baseline thickness 70–77 μm 2.519 (1.905–3.328) <0.001 0% 0.76
  Baseline GCIPL 77 μm 2.66 (1.815–3.915) <0.001 15% 0.69
  Baseline GCIPL 70 μm 2.493 (1.48–4.19) 0.001 0%

Abbreviations: alGCIPL = annualized loss of GCIPL; aLpRNFL = annualized loss of pRNFL; CI = confidence interval; GCIPL = macular ganglion cell/inner plexiform layer; EDSS = Expanded Disability Status Scale; pRNFL = peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer; μm/y = micrometer per year.