Table 5.
Summary of the Hazard Ratios for Physical Disability Worsening (Specifically EDSS Progression) of Different Predictive Cutoff Values of pRNFL and GCIPL Baseline
| Retinal layer thresholds | Cutoff chosen | Hazard ratio and 95% CI | p Value | I2 test | Egger test |
| Cross-sectional predictive cutoff | |||||
| pRNFL | |||||
| High vs low baseline thickness | 87–100 μm | 2.028 (1.699–2.42) | <0.001 | 0% | 0.016 |
| Baseline pRNFL | 87–88 μm | 2.258 (1.752–2.909) | <0.001 | 0% | 0.042 |
| GCIPL | |||||
| High vs low baseline thickness | 70–77 μm | 2.519 (1.905–3.328) | <0.001 | 0% | 0.76 |
| Baseline GCIPL | 77 μm | 2.66 (1.815–3.915) | <0.001 | 15% | 0.69 |
| Baseline GCIPL | 70 μm | 2.493 (1.48–4.19) | 0.001 | 0% | — |
Abbreviations: alGCIPL = annualized loss of GCIPL; aLpRNFL = annualized loss of pRNFL; CI = confidence interval; GCIPL = macular ganglion cell/inner plexiform layer; EDSS = Expanded Disability Status Scale; pRNFL = peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer; μm/y = micrometer per year.