Skip to main content
. 2005 Sep 17;331(7517):602. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38565.415000.E01

Table 2.

Clinical outcomes and user satisfaction of patients with a first episode of psychotic illness who received integrated treatment or standard treatment. Values are means (SD) unless stated otherwise

1 year follow-up (n=419)
2 year follow-up (n=369)
Integrated treatment (n=227) Standard treatment (n=192) Estimated mean difference (95% CI) P value of difference Integrated treatment (n=205) Standard treatment (n=164) Estimated mean difference (95% CI) P value of difference
Psychopathology*:
    Psychotic dimension 1.09 (1.27) 1.35 (1.39) -0.31 (-0.55 to -0.07) 0.02 1.06 (1.26) 1.27 (1.40) -0.32 (-0.58 to -0.06) 0.02
    Negative dimension 1.68 (1.10) 2.02 (1.12) -0.36 (-0.54 to -0.17) <0.001 1.41 (1.15) 1.82 (1.23 -0.45 (-0.67 to -0.22 <0.001
    Disorganised dimension 0.40 (0.59) 0.42 (0.56) -0.04 (-0.14 to 0.07) 0.5 0.37 (0.56) 0.50 (0.73) -0.12 (-0.25 to 0.00) 0.06
    GAF, symptom 48.2 (14.9) 44.9 (16.0) 3.00 (0.37 to 5.63) 0.03 51.18 (15.01) 48.67 (15.92) 2.45 (-0.32 to 5.22) 0.08
    GAF, function 51.7 (15.1) 49.4 (14.6) 2.61 (0.11 to 5.15) 0.04 55.16 (15.15) 51.13 (15.92) 3.12 (0.37 to 5.88) 0.03
User satisfaction 24.9 (4.5) 23.0 (7.2) 1.88 (0.73 to 3.02) 0.001 26.1 (3.7) 22.9 (5.2) 3.09 (2.10 to 4.04) <0.001

GAF=global assessment of functioning.

*

Estimated mean differences are based on a repeated measurements model with treatment site, sex, substance misuse, diagnosis at baseline, and baseline values of the scale included as covariates (see text for details).

Based on client satisfaction questionnaire score. Estimated mean differences calculated by analysis of variance with treatment site as covariate.