Skip to main content
[Preprint]. 2025 Jun 3:2025.05.31.656892. [Version 1] doi: 10.1101/2025.05.31.656892

Table 2:

CKMRnn performance with varying levels of spatial sampling bias, as depicted in Figure 4a. Here, the population sizes of both the tested simulations and the simulations used to train the model were constant in time (i.e., no population trend). Relative absolute error is calculated as |true − predicted| /true and relative error as (true − predicted) /true. Separate results are shown for simulations with true N above and below 12,000.

CKMRnn performance with sampling bias
Spatial sampling bias Mean relative absolute error (MRAE) MRAE N < 12000 MRAE N ≥ 12000 Mean relative error (MRE) MRE N < 12000 MRE N ≥ 12000
uniform 0.063 0.064 0.060 0.011 0.034 −0.039
medium 0.051 0.052 0.049 0.001 0.014 −0.024
high 0.050 0.053 0.046 0.013 0.025 −0.011