Table 2.

Average measures and post hoc Tukey's results with p-values based on two-way ANOVA for two factors and interaction (left central incisor).

		Mesial enamel thickness	Distal enamel thickness	Total enamel thickness	Total dentine Thickness	Mesiodistal width	Mesial enamel density	Distal enamel density	Total enamel density
Cleft type	UCLP	0.76 ± 0.18a	0.76 ± 0.13a	1.52 ± 0.25a	6.13 ± 0.63	7.65 ± 0.63a	2690 ± 386a	2655 ± 282a	2673 ± 264a
	BCLP	0.59 ± 0.22b	0.73 ± 0.20ab	1.32 ± 0.34ab	6.17 ± 0.85	7.48 ± 0.87ab	2256 ± 559b	2419 ± 318b	2337 ± 364b
	Control	0.88 ± 0.20c	1.05 ± 0.22c	1.94 ± 0.32c	6.51 ± 0.50	8.44 ± 0.54c	2803 ± 305ac	2769 ± 278ac	2786 ± 241ac
p-values based on two-way ANOVA with interaction
Factors	Cleft type	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	0.060	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001
	Gender	0.138	0.806	0.408	< 0.002M	0.011M	< 0.001F	0.024F	< 0.001F
	Cleft type x Gender	0.007	0.028	0.002	0.040	0.703	0.001	0.003	< 0.001

Averages with different letters (a–c) are significantly different at the 5 % level of significance.

"M" indicates that males have a significantly higher average at the 5 % level of significance.

"F" indicates that females have a significantly higher average at the 5 % level of significance.

Enamel thickness, dentine thickness, and mesiodistal width (in mm); and enamel density (HU).