Table 4.

Average measures and post hoc Tukey's results with p-values based on two-way ANOVA for two factors and interaction (right central incisor).

		Mesial enamel thickness	Distal enamel thickness	Total enamel thickness	Total dentine thickness	Mesiodistal width	Mesial enamel density	Distal enamel density	Total enamel density
Cleft type	UCLP	0.60 ± 0.19 a	0.68 ± 0.18a	1.28 ± 0.33a	6.21 ± 0.68	7.49 ± 0.67a	2567 ± 280a	2437 ± 390a	2502 ± 304a
	BCLP	0.55 ± 0.14 ab	0.51 ± 0.28ab	1.05 ± 0.40ab	6.12 ± 0.28	7.18 ± 0.58ab	2390 ± 336ab	2020 ± 608b	2205 ± 414b
	Control	0.84 ± 0.16 c	1.04 ± 0.27 c	1.88 ± 0.36c	6.52 ± 0.63	8.41 ± 0.58 c	2689 ± 281ac	2887 ± 240c	2789 ± 202ac
p-values based on two-way ANOVA with interaction
Factors	Cleft type	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	0.082	< 0.001	0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001
	Gender	0.075	0.251	0.089	0.059	0.356	0.004F	0.086	0.008F
	Cleft type x gender	0.027	0.166	0.040	0.795	0.608	0.317	0.006	0.052

Averages with different letters are significantly different at the 5 % level of significance.

"F" indicates that females have a significantly higher average at the 5 % level of significance.

Enamel thickness, dentine thickness, and mesiodistal width (in mm); and enamel density (HU).