Abstract
Background
Bitter taste receptor gene TAS2R38 determines our ability to perceive the bitter substances phenylthiocarbamide (PTC) and propylthiouracil (PROP). Despite being extensively investigated, its potential correlations with dietary and health outcomes remain inconclusive. This study aims to validate previous findings observed in small studies and explore novel associations using publicly available summary results statistics from large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS).
Methods
We examine the associations between three TAS2R38 variants (rs713598, rs1726866, and rs10246939) and 139 food liking traits and 29 food intake traits using GWAS data from the UK Biobank (N up to 445,779 individuals of European ancestry). We further search for their associations with health outcomes in published GWASs using three online platforms OpenGWAS, Open Targets, and GWAS Atlas.
Results
The bitter sensitive alleles were associated with reduced preferences for and/or consumption of horseradish, salty food, grapefruit, and alcohol (but only for whiskey, red wine, and spirits), increased preferences for cucumber and melon, and increased consumption of tea (p < Bonferroni-corrected threshold of 0.00128). We identified novel associations between bitter sensitive alleles and impaired renal function, indicated by increased serum creatinine levels (p = 9.80 × 10–5), decreased urinary proline betaine levels (p = 3.18 × 10–3), and an elevated risk of bipolar disorder (p = 4.01 × 10–5).
Conclusion
This study highlights the potential impact of the TAS2R38 genotype on food preference, consumption, renal function, and bipolar disorder. Further research on genetic links will facilitate the development of targeted interventions and public health strategies to mitigate diet-related health risks.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00394-025-03718-6.
Keywords: TAS2R38, Supertaster, Genome-wide association studies, Phenome-wide association studies, UK Biobank, Food intake
Introduction
Taste plays a critical role in shaping human food choices and food consumption [1–5]. The ability to perceive different chemical compounds in the mouth and distinguish between taste modalities (i.e., sweetness, bitterness, saltiness, sourness, and umami) depends on distinct receptor cells that trigger neuronal signals to generate specific taste sensations [6]. The bitter taste receptors, also known as TAS2Rs, are specialized receptors commonly present in the oral epithelium and responsible for identifying various bitter compounds [7]. Humans possess approximately 26 functional TAS2R genes, with variations in these genes affecting individual differences in bitter taste perception [7–9]. Three single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs; rs713598, rs1726866, and rs10246939) within the TAS2R38 gene determine a person’s ability to taste the bitter compounds phenylthiocarbamide (PTC) and propylthiouracil (PROP), which account for 50–80% of phenotypic variance in the detection thresholds [10–12] and 35–60% of phenotypic variance in the suprathreshold intensity or bitterness [13–15]. Based on the suprathreshold responses, approximately one-third of the population find these bitter compounds tasteless (referred to as “non-tasters”), whilst others find them extremely bitter (referred to as “tasters” or “supertasters”) [10, 16, 17]. Other factors contributing to the phenotypic variance include the expression of TAS2R38 [18, 19], the number of fungiform papillae [20], and the genotype of the nearby TAS2R4 [15].
There has been extensive research on the relationship between PTC/PROP taste perception and TAS2R38 genotype and eating behaviour (Fig. 1; Supplementary Table 1). Apart from a trend showing PTC/PROP tasters or TAS2R38 tasters (i.e. carriers of TAS2R38 bitter sensitive alleles) drinking less alcohol and consuming less bitter cruciferous vegetables, many associations remain inconsistent across studies [2, 21–25]. For instance, some studies reported tasters drinking less coffee due to increased perceived bitterness, whilst others found the opposite or no association with coffee consumption [26–33]. Other inconsistent associations include but are not limited to, consumption or liking of a variety of sweet, salty, and fatty foods [3, 4, 4, 34–36]. These inconsistencies could be attributed to differences in the study design, such as variations in phenotypes (e.g., coffee drinker status versus cups of coffee consumed per day among drinkers) and sample characteristics (e.g., sex, age, and ethnicity). Furthermore, several previous studies have utilized small sample sizes, making them underpowered to detect subtle effects accurately. Reporting bias towards significant findings, even without an actual effect, may exacerbate these discrepancies [37]. Therefore, it is necessary to validate these results in larger samples.
Fig. 1.
Key findings from the literature on the association between TAS2R38 genotype and phenylthiocarbamide/propylthiouracil taste perception and dietary behaviour. The direction of association is based on TAS2R38 bitter sensitive alleles (rs713598 G, rs1726866 G, and rs10246939 C) or PAV haplotype or individuals with increased perceived intensity/bitterness of phenylthiocarbamide or propylthiouracil. Numbers indicate the number of studies. Only studies with a sample size > 100 and age > 18 are included in the Figure but the full results are available in Supplementary Table 1
Given that food selection and nutritional status are risk factors for several health conditions, there has also been a great interest in understanding the potential relationship between PTC/PROP taste perception and TAS2R38 genotype and health outcomes [38] (Fig. 2; Supplementary Table 2). The TAS2R38 genotype has been linked to the risk of several chronic conditions, such as obesity, cardiometabolic diseases, and colorectal cancer, potentially through its influence on dietary intake [35, 39–42]. TAS2Rs are expressed in extra-oral organs and tissues, including the stomach [43, 44], kidney [45], respiratory tract [46, 47], heart [48], placenta [49] and brain [50], suggesting their potential functions other than taste perception [51, 52]. For example, TAS2R38 receptors play a role in the innate defence of the respiratory system, mainly by increasing mucociliary clearance [46, 53], with different studies showing an association between the TAS2R38 bitter sensitive alleles and a lower risk of respiratory infections or chronic rhinosinusitis [54–57]. Additionally, both PTC/PROP taste perception and TAS2R38 genotype have been associated with neurodegenerative diseases, including Parkinson’s disease and schizophrenia, with tasters having a lower risk of these conditions [58–64]. Nevertheless, many findings remain inconsistent across studies, and the mechanisms underlying the association between taster status and health outcomes have yet to be elucidated.
Fig. 2.
Key findings from the literature on the association between TAS2R38 genotype and phenylthiocarbamide/propylthiouracil taste perception and health conditions. The direction of association is based on TAS2R38 bitter sensitive alleles (rs713598 G, rs1726866 G, and rs10246939 C) or PAV haplotype or individuals with increased perceived intensity/bitterness of phenylthiocarbamide or propylthiouracil. Numbers indicate the number of studies. Only studies with a sample size > 100 and age > 18 are included in the Figure but the full results are available in Supplementary Table 2
To validate previous findings and explore novel associations, we utilize publicly available summary results statistics from large-scale genome-wide associations studies (GWAS), which examine the associations between millions of genetic variants across the human genomes and traits of interest. Specifically, we investigate the relationship between TAS2R38 genotype and dietary behaviour using summary results statistics of recent GWASs of food preference and food consumption from the UK Biobank [65, 66], a genetically informative cohort with half a million people from the UK. We further perform a phenome-wide exploratory analysis using three online platforms—OpenGWAS [67], Open Targets [68], and GWAS Atlas [69]—to examine the TAS2R38 genotype associations across more than a thousand GWASs, covering a broad range of traits, including chronic disease risk and other health-related outcomes.
Materials and methods
A flow diagram for the study design is shown in Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Study design. TAS2R38 genetic variants were searched for their associations with (i) dietary traits in GWASs of food liking and food intake using data from the UK Biobank, and (ii) all disease and health outcomes in publicly available summary results statistics aggregated in the IEU OpenGWAS, Open Targets and GWAS Atlas
TAS2R38 genetic variants of interest
Our analyses were performed using the three TAS2R38 SNPs that are the primary factor influencing a person’s PTC/PROP taste perception, namely rs713598, rs1726866, and rs10246939, which correspond to the allele changes of C>G, A>G, and T>C, respectively, corresponding to the amino acid changes of A49P, V262 A, and I296 V. Genotypes of these three SNPs are highly correlated (r2 > 0.85 in Europeans) and have been commonly investigated as a haplotype difference between AVI (non-taster) versus PAV (taster). rs713598 G, rs1726866 G, and rs10246939 C refer to “bitter sensitive alleles” associated with an increased bitterness perception of PTC/PROP. Here we investigated the associations for each of the three SNPs and reported the effect of the bitter sensitive alleles.
Food preference and consumption in UK Biobank
We examined the associations between the three TAS2R38 SNPs in the published GWASs of food liking [65] and food intake [66], both of which used data from the UK Biobank [70]. In brief, the UK Biobank is a population-based prospective study consisting of over 500,000 participants (aged 40–69 years; 54.4% females; 5% of those invited) recruited across 22 assessment centres in the United Kingdom between 2006 and 2010. Participants responded to questionnaires to provide broad information on health and lifestyle in a baseline survey, took part in clinical assessments, and provided biological samples for biomarker and genetic assays.
Dietary intake in UK Biobank was assessed using a touchscreen dietary frequency questionnaire, which included questions about the frequency of consumption of specific foods and beverages over the past year. A total of 29 food consumption traits were included in the GWAS (See Supplementary Tables A and B in Pirastu et al. (2022) for details [66]). Food liking traits were collected through an online questionnaire comprising 152 items, including 139 food and drink items plus additional non-food items that captured liking for health-related behaviours such as physical activity. Participants rated their liking on a 9-point Hedonic scale, with 1 corresponding to “Extremely dislike” and 9 to “Extremely like”. The questionnaire was administered in 2019 to all UK Biobank participants who had agreed to be recontacted by the study. Both studies included only individuals of European ancestry, resulting in up to 445,779 for the food intake GWAS and up to 161,625 participants for the food liking GWAS. Summary results statistics were downloaded from the NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog [71] on December 11, 2022, for food liking (GCST90094772; May-Wilson et al. [65]) and food intake (GCST90096926; Pirastu et al. [66]). For the food liking traits, only analyses of rs1726866 and rs10246939 were performed because rs713598 was not available in the GWAS summary statistics.
To account for multiple tests for a large number of correlated traits, the original GWAS of food liking performed eigen decomposition of the genetic correlation matrix and identified 34 independent components that together accounted for > 95% of the overall variance [65]. Similarly, the original GWAS of food intake performed a clustering analysis of all food intake traits and identified 5 main food groups [66]. This study summed the numbers used to account for multiple tests from these studies and set a Bonferroni-corrected significance threshold at p = 0.00128 (0.05/39). Power calculations showed that we had 80% power (alpha level = 0.00128) to detect an association when the TAS2R38 genotype accounts for > 0.01% of the variance in a food liking trait and > 0.004% of the variance in a food intake trait [72].
Phenome-wide exploratory analysis
We searched for the three TAS2R38 SNPs in published GWASs using three online platforms—the OpenGWAS [67], Open Targets [68], and GWAS Atlas [69]. These platforms aggregate human GWAS data, including those from the UK Biobank [70], FinnGen [73], and/or GWAS Catalog [71] summary statistics repository. The three platforms curate summary results statistics from a variety of studies. Our search on disease and health-related traits was performed in February 2023. IEU OpenGWAS only reports associations with a p-value < 0.001, whereas the Open Targets Genetics and GWAS Atlas report those with a p-value < 0.005 and < 0.05, respectively. The effect sizes of SNPs are reported in beta without units and/or odds ratio (OR). The effect sizes are not reported in the GWAS Atlas and are unavailable for some traits in the IEU OpenGWAS. We derived 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for OR using OR and p-value. For associations with missing information (i.e. beta or OR), we downloaded the raw GWAS summary results statistics to extract these data manually. We expected to observe a true association for the same trait in different GWASs or similar traits across GWASs.
Results
Food preference and consumption in UK Biobank
The bitter sensitive allele rs1726866 G was significantly associated with reduced preferences for alcohol (including red wine, whiskey, and spirits), horseradish, grapefruit, added salt, salty pretzels, soy sauce, and salty food, and increased preferences for cucumber (Fig. 4). In the food consumption analyses, the bitter sensitive allele was associated with lower consumption of added salt and red wine but not with other types of alcoholic beverages; the taster allele was associated with higher consumption of tea (Fig. 5). The association patterns for the other two SNPs rs713598 and rs10246939 were very similar, except that the rs713598 G allele was further associated with an increased liking for broad bean, broccoli, and melon (Supplementary Tables 3 and 4). No association was observed for food items in the categories of fish, sweet drinks, and sweets. We did not observe many previously reported associations, including coffee, Brussels sprouts, meat, pickles, and cheese, although some of their subcategories reached the uncorrected significance threshold of p < 0.05. For example, rs1726866 G was associated with lower consumption of salad (p = 0.002) and instant coffee (p = 0.002) but not with total vegetables or total coffee consumption (p > 0.05).
Fig. 4.
The effect of the bitter sensitive allele rs1726886 G allele on food preference in up to 161,625 participants in the UK Biobank. Solid squares indicate that the association is significant for all three TAS2R38 variants. Empty squares indicate the association is only significant for rs173598. *Soya milk is categorized with dairy as a milk alternative
Fig. 5.
The effect of the bitter sensitive allele rs1726886 G allele on food consumption in up to 445,779 participants in the UK Biobank. Significantly associated traits (solid squares) are the same for both rs1726866 and rs10246939 (rs713598 is not available from the analysis of food intake)
Phenome-wide exploratory analysis
The bitter sensitive allele rs1726866 G was associated with more than 130 traits with p < 0.05, including 24 traits with p < 0.001 (Table 1; Supplementary Tables 5–7). The strongest association was with a higher risk of bipolar disorder (OR [95% CI] = 1.102 [1.051, 1.155]; p = 4.09 × 10–5). The same association with bipolar disorder was observed in another independent study (OR = 1.034 [1.00, 1.070], p = 0.026; Supplementary Table 5); both studies were of European ancestry. Other psychiatric traits associated with the bitter sensitive alleles include increased risk of personality disorder or mental health problems (OR = 1.342 [1.123, 1.603], p = 6.08 × 10–4), and lower irritability (beta = − 0.003, p = 3.20 × 10–4). Notably, we did not identify any association with Parkinson’s disease, and the association with schizophrenia was only nominally significant in the study that jointly analyzed schizophrenia and bipolar disorder (OR = 1.024 [1.009, 1.039], p = 0.012). Further, we observed a few associations with the volume of brain regions, including the bitter sensitive allele being associated with a larger thalamus (beta = 25.228, p = 1.99 × 10–4).
Table 1.
Associations with P < 0.0001 from the phenome-wide exploratory analysis for the TAS2R38 rs1726886 G allele using online platforms Open Targets Genetics (OTG), IEU OpenGWAS Project (IOGP), and GWAS Atlas (GA)
| Trait | Beta | SE | OR (95% CI) | P | N cases | N overall | Study | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bipolar disorder | 0.097 | 0.024 | 1.102 (1.051, 1.155) | 4.09 × 10–5 | 7647 | 34,950 | Hou et al. [100] | OTG; GA |
| Creatinine levels | 0.008 | 9.80 × 10–5 | 437,660 | Barton et al. [126] | OTG | |||
| OTU97_65 (parabacteroides) prevalence | − 0.216 | 0.055 | 1.01 × 10–4 | 8956 | Ruhlemann MC et al. [101] | IOGP; OTG | ||
| Open wounds of head; neck; and trunk | 0.089 | 1.093 (1.042, 1.146) | 1.16 × 10–4 | 3837 | 404,263 | UKB SAIGE | OTG | |
| Qualifications: a levels/AS levels or equivalent | − 0.004 | 0.001 | 1.50 × 10–4 | 334,070 | UKB Neale v1 | IOGP | ||
| Loud music exposure frequency | 0.082 | 0.022 | 1.67 × 10–4 | UKB Pan-Ancestry Broad | IOGP | |||
| Anisometropia | − 0.430 | 0.651 (0.514, 0.824) | 1.80 × 10–4 | 155 | 405,809 | UKB SAIGE | OTG | |
| Thalamus volume | 25.228 | 6.780 | 1.99 × 10–4 | 10,431 | Hibar et al. [122] | IOGP | ||
| Thyrotoxicosis with toxic multinodular goitre | 0.194 | 0.053 | 1.214 (1.094, 1.346) | 2.21 × 10–4 | FINNGEN_R5 | IOGP | ||
| Leukocyte count | 0.018 | 2.27 × 10–4 | 350,470 | UKB Neale v2 | OTG | |||
| Leg pain on walking | 0.006 | 0.002 | 2.40 × 10–4 | 151,553 | UKB MRC-IEU v2 | IOGP | ||
| Cerebral atherosclerosis | 0.350 | 1.419 (1.166, 1.728) | 2.46 × 10–4 | 224 | 399,241 | UKB SAIGE | OTG | |
| OTU99_72 (parabacteroides) prevalence | − 0.203 | 0.056 | 2.71 × 10–4 | 8956 | Ruhlemann et al. [123] | IOGP; OTG | ||
| Irritability | − 0.003 | 0.001 | 3.20 × 10–4 | 442,169 | UKB MRC-IEU v2 | IOGP | ||
| Early age-related macular degeneration | 0.050 | 0.014 | 1.051 (1.023, 1.081) | 4.85 × 10–4 | 14,034 | 105,248 | Winkler et al. [124] | IOGP; OTG |
| Hair colour (natural, before greying): red | 0.962 (0.942, 0.983) | 5.19 × 10–4 | 385,603 | Watanabe et al. [69] | GA | |||
| Prospective memory test—time to answer | 1.235 (0.535, 1.936) | 5.47 × 10–4 | 128,912 | Watanabe et al. [69] | GA | |||
| CD28 + CD45RA—CD8 + T cell Absolute count | 0.088 | 0.026 | 5.81 × 10–4 | 3408 | Orru et al. [125] | IOGP | ||
| Arthropathies | 0.024 | 1.024 (1.01, 1.039) | 5.99 × 10–4 | 86,991 | 260,405 | FINNGEN_R6 | OTG | |
| A personality disorder|mental health problems ever diagnosed by a professional | 0.294 | 1.342 (1.123, 1.603) | 6.08 × 10–4 | 274 | 117,707 | UKB Neale v2 | OTG | |
| Pain type(s) experienced in last month: knee pain | 0.003 | 0.001 | 6.70 × 10–4 | 461,857 | UKB MRC-IEU v2 | IOGP | ||
| Operation code: ectopic pregnancy surgery | 0.001 | 0.000 | 7.70 × 10–4 | 462,933 | UKB MRC-IEU v2 | IOGP | ||
| Time spent using computer | − 0.006 | 0.002 | 8.30 × 10–4 | 360,895 | UKB MRC-IEU v2 | IOGP | ||
| Carbohydrate | − 2.151 | 8.97 × 10–4 | 51,453 | UKB Neale v2 | OTG |
UKB Neale v1/2, Neale lab analysis of UK Biobank phenotypes, round 1/2; UKB Pan-Ancestry Broad, Pan-ancestry genetic analysis of the UK Biobank performed at the Broad Institute; UKB SAIGE, GWAS of binary traits in the UK Biobank using the software SAIGE; FINNGEN_R5/6, FinnGen biobank analysis round 5/6; UKB MRC-IEU v2, MRC IEU UK Biobank GWAS pipeline version 2. Empty cells indicate that the information is unavailable
SE standard error, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, P p-value, N sample size
The second strongest association was between the bitter sensitive allele and increased serum creatinine levels (beta = 0.008, p = 9.80 × 10–5), a biomarker for renal function. Interestingly, the bitter sensitive allele was also associated with many other biomarkers for renal health, including serum non-albumin protein levels (beta = − 0.012, p = 8.95 × 10–3), decreased urinary proline betaine levels (beta = − 0.136, p = 3.18 × 10–3), and glomerular filtration rate (beta = − 0.008, p = 0.015). Additionally, we identified an association between the bitter sensitive allele and an increased risk of chronic kidney disease (OR = 1.020 [1.006, 1.035], p = 3.08 × 10–3), potentially suggestive of a role of TAS2R38 in kidney health and function.
Moreover, we identified several associations with sensory traits. The bitter sensitive allele was associated with increased leg pain on walking (beta = 0.006, p = 2.40 × 10–4) and knee pain (beta = 0.003, p = 6.70 × 10–4) as well as a higher risk of early age-related macular degeneration (OR = 1.051 [1.023, 1.081], p = 4.85 × 10–4), a lower risk of anisometropia, a condition characterized by asymmetrical refraction between both eyes (beta = − 0.43, p = 1.80 × 10–4), and a higher exposure frequency to loud music (beta = 0.082, p = 1.67 × 10–4).
Although the TAS2R38 genotype has previously been linked to respiratory tract conditions, we only found weak evidence for an association with respiratory illness or function, such as the risk of hay fever/rhinitis (OR = 1.021 [1.001, 1.041], p = 0.040). However, we did find a trend of the bitter sensitive allele being associated with higher counts of several immune cells, including neutrophil (beta = 0.006, p = 0.004), leukocyte (beta = 0.018, p = 2.27 × 10–4) and T lymphocyte counts (beta = 0.008, p = 0.003).
The bitter sensitive allele was associated with a few diet-related traits, including lower daily intake of carbohydrates (beta = − 2.151, p = 8.94 × 10–4) and the abundance of Parabacteroides in the gut microbiome (OTU97: beta = − 0.216, p = 1.04 × 10–4; OTU99: beta = − 0.203, p = 2.71 × 10–4). We did not identify any association with body mass index (BMI) or other body composition traits. We observed a few associations between the bitter sensitive allele and cardiovascular traits (cerebral atherosclerosis: beta = 0.350, p = 2.46 × 10–4; atrial fibrillation: OR = 1.015 [1.002, 1.09] p = 0.023; hypertension: OR = 1.014 [1.001, 1.027], p = 0.041), but there was no association with the risk of cardiovascular disease. The bitter sensitive allele was also associated with an increased risk of toxic multinodular goiter, a common cause of hyperthyroidism (OR = 1.214 [1.094, 1.346], p = 2.21 × 10–4), a decreased risk of oesophagus cancer (OR = 0.858 [0.766, 0.961], p = 4.16 × 10–3) and nominally associated with the risk of gastric cancer (p = 1.84 × 10–2, unknown direction).
Discussion
Following a long history of research on TAS2R38 genotype and PTC/PROP taste perception, this study is the first of its kind to utilize GWAS summary results statistics to investigate the effect of TAS2R38 genotype on a wide range of phenotypes. This approach is highly cost-efficient as it allows for examining the TAS2R38 associations in hundreds of thousands of individuals without performing sensory tests or collecting individual genotype and phenotype data. In contrast to traditional lab-based studies that provide more in-depth sensory profiles, GWASs leverage the use of a broader phenotype definition to accrue much larger sample sizes to enable a much larger power to detect small effects. We also discuss the limitations of phenome-wide association analyses and using data from published GWASs.
In the analyses using GWASs of food preference and food consumption among UK Biobank participants of European ancestry, we found that the strongest association was between the bitter sensitive alleles and decreased preferences for adding salt to food. These results support earlier findings showing that PROP tasters found salty food saltier than non-tasters and added less salt to food [3], suggesting a true association among Europeans. Interestingly, while PROP tasters were less likely to salt their food, they tended to consume more salt [3, 74], which could be due to salt’s bitterness-masking and flavor-enhancing effects [3]. The second strongest association detected in this study was between the bitter sensitive alleles and decreased preferences for horseradish, a member of the cruciferous vegetables that contain glucosinolates, a precursor of isothiocyanates whose isothiocyanates (N–C=S) group is responsible for the bitterness of cruciferous vegetables as well as PTC and PROP [75, 76]. Hence, horseradish may carry an extra hint of bitterness, increasing the dislike among tasters. The taste profiles of salt and horseradish may be relatively simple compared to those of other food traits, making them less susceptible to the loss of resolution inherent in food frequency questionnaires and food liking surveys. As expected, we also found a strong association between the bitter sensitive alleles and decreased preferences for grapefruit, which contains a bitter chemical called naringin, which aligns with findings from earlier studies of small sample sizes [77–80]. Surprisingly, we identified a positive association between bitter sensitive alleles and the preference for cucumber, contrasting with previous studies that reported an inverse association in children [1] or limited evidence for an association in a Malaysian cohort [81]. Hence, more work is required to understand the relationship between cucumber preference and TAS2R38 genotype.
We, however, did not observe the classic association between the TAS2R38 genotype and preference for Brussels sprouts, a bitter-tasting cruciferous vegetable, due to its high concentration of glucosinolates [82–85]. A possible explanation is that the UK Biobank is an older cohort (median age 58 years old), and taste perception often diminishes with age, potentially due to reduced taste bud numbers and impaired cognitive function [86]. The effect of the TAS2R38 genotype on PROP perception and vegetable preferences is stronger among children than adults [87]. Furthermore, starting with work by Dutch researcher Hans van Doorn in the 1990 s [88, 89], the food industry has routinely removed bitter compounds like glucosinolates from plant-based foods through selective breeding and other debittering processes [90], possibly affecting results given the UK Biobank’s 2019 food liking survey timing. This could also explain the null association reported in another recent study [21]. Cooking cruciferous vegetables can reduce their bitter taste by denaturing myrosinase, the enzyme responsible for converting glucosinolates to bitter isothiocyanates [91].
As for alcohol drinking behaviour, our results based on the UK Biobank suggest that the effects of the TAS2R38 genotype vary by the alcoholic beverage. We found associations between bitter sensitive alleles and decreased preferences for red wine, whisky, and spirits, possibly due to these alcohols tasting more bitter and less sweet to PROP tasters than non-tasters [77, 92]. We did not find an association with beer preference in this large cohort, which could explain the inconsistent reports for beer in the literature [77, 93, 94]. As for alcohol consumption, the TAS2R38 genotype was only associated with red wine consumption but not with spirits consumption. It was reported that increased intake of alcohol was only higher among individuals who were homozygous for the bitter sensitive alleles and similar between those who were heterozygous and homozygous for the bitter non-sensitive alleles [95]. Therefore, a standard GWAS using an additive model rather than a dominant model may lose the power to detect such an effect. It is worth noting that the prevalence of tasters is higher among frequent drinkers compared to the general population, suggesting that while tasters may find alcohol more bitter initially, they may eventually develop a taste for alcoholic beverages, potentially drinking more than frequent drinkers who are non-tasters [21, 96, 97].
We found no association for both preference and consumption of coffee. As the bitterness of coffee can be masked by adding sweeteners and/or milk and other dairy alternatives (e.g., soy milk and almond milk), the relationship between bitter taste perception and coffee drinking behaviour might differ according to the type of coffee (e.g., black coffee vs latte). Interestingly, we did find that bitter sensitive alleles are positively associated with the consumption (but not preference) of another caffeinated beverage—tea. A previous study using data from the UK Biobank showed a negative relationship between the consumption intake of coffee and tea (r = − 0.3) and suggested that PROP tasters are more likely to drink tea than coffee [29]. The same study also reported that the primary taste determinant for the consumption of both coffee and tea is the perception of caffeine rather than the perception of PTC/PROP. This suggests that bitter taste receptors other than TAS2R38 may play a more critical role in determining the drinking behaviour of caffeinated beverages [14]. Furthermore, we note that food flavours are determined by not only bitter taste but also other tastes and smells. Human perception of different foods can be regulated by genetic variations in other sensory receptor genes, such as liking for cilantro, which was associated with a cluster of olfactory receptors on chromosome 11 [98].
While the analyses of food preference and consumption have further reinforced the effects of TAS2R38 on specific foods and drinks, our phenome-wide exploratory analysis did not find evidence for associations with obesity, BMI or body weight. GWASs of these phenotypes have been performed in extremely large samples, including a GWAS of BMI from 700,000 Europeans [99], and their results are available on the three online platforms. The lack of evidence for an association provides us with confidence that, at the population level, the PROP/PTC taste perception and TAS2R38 genotype are unlikely to be a predictor for obesity in Europeans. Likewise, we found no strong evidence supporting previously reported associations with cardiovascular disease.
The strongest association in the phenome-wide exploratory analysis was with bipolar disorder, with the bitter sensitive alleles being associated with a 10% increase in the odds of having this condition in a study of 7,647 cases and 27,303 controls [100]. An independent study also identified this association with 20,129 cases and 54,065 controls [101]. While abnormal taste perception can occur during acute episodes of bipolar disorder [102] and changes in the expression of another bitter taste receptor gene TAS2R5, 181 kilobases upstream of TAS2R38, have been observed in manic episodes in patients with bipolar disorder [103], our study provides the first evidence linking TAS2R38 genotype to bipolar disorder. Given that TAS2R38 is also expressed in the brain [50], future investigations are needed to understand the mechanisms underlying the association.
The second strongest association in the exploratory analysis was between the bitter sensitive alleles and higher serum creatinine levels, a biomarker of renal toxicity and poor kidney function [104]. Notably, the bitter sensitive alleles were also nominally associated with chronic kidney diseases and a range of markers of kidney health, including urinary proline betaine levels, glomerular filtration rate, serum non-albumin protein, and glucose levels 2 h after an oral glucose challenge. While the function of bitter taste receptors, including TAS2R38, in human kidney tissue is yet to be elucidated, mouse studies have suggested a potential role of bitter taste receptors in maintaining the structure of renal cells and consequent homeostasis in bodily fluids and electrolytes [49, 105]. Since PROP tasters tend to consume more salts [3, 74], this result warrants further research into how bitter taste receptors regulate kidney function in humans, e.g., through diet or other mechanistic pathways.
While human TAS2R38 receptors are involved in the innate defence system in the upper respiratory system and the bitter sensitive alleles have been previously associated with decreased susceptibility to gram-negative upper respiratory infection and less severe symptoms of chronic rhinosinusitis [46, 53, 55, 56], our exploratory analysis only identified nominal associations with the risk of hay fever and rhinitis and no association with chronic rhinosinusitis. Interestingly, we observed a trend of associations between the bitter sensitive alleles and higher counts of immune cells (i.e., neutrophils, leukocytes, and lymphocytes), which play a crucial part in innate immunity. Together with the recent discovery of TAS2R38 expression in peripheral immune cells [106–108], our results suggest that TAS2R38 could help control immune responses by regulating immune cell counts.
Finally, we found a novel association between the bitter sensitive alleles and increased prevalence of Parabacteroides, gram-negative bacteria in the gut microbiome. Certain species of Parabacteroides were associated with human diseases, with a reduced abundance being associated with an increased risk of obesity [109], inflammatory bowel disease [110], metabolic syndrome [111] and many other conditions. Parabacteroides also benefit the host by regulating immunity, relieving inflammation, metabolising carbohydrates, secreting short-chain fatty acids, and influencing antibiotic resistance [110–116]. Hence, they play a crucial role in maintaining the host-intestine homeostasis. Our results suggest that TAS2R38 could be involved in regulating the homeostasis of the gastrointestinal tract, possibly through the effect of taste perception on food consumption, which in turn affects gut microbiota. We also found bitter sensitive alleles being associated with other gastrointestinal traits, including oesophagus cancer (with up to 16.5% lower risk) and gastric cancer (unknown direction). Although this contrasts with findings from earlier research suggesting that tasters may avoid bitter cruciferous vegetables and that an unhealthy diet might increase susceptibility to cancer, recent studies propose a diet-independent mechanism, which hypothesizes that the TAS2R38 genotype may serve as a biomarker for gastrointestinal function and non-tasters may inadequately eliminate harmful chemicals from the gastrointestinal tract [42, 117, 118]. Nevertheless, more research is needed to understand the role of TAS2R38 in gastrointestinal health and function.
This study had a few limitations. First, the analyses on food preferences and consumption were based on data from the UK Biobank participants of European ancestry, so whether our results can be generalized to other populations requires further investigation. The UK Biobank participants were generally older, predominantly female, less socioeconomically deprived, and healthier than the general UK population. These factors need to be considered when comparing our results with other studies [70, 119]. The dietary data were collected using Food Liking and Food Frequency Questionnaires, which are prone to measurement errors due to recall bias, the low resolution of the data (e.g. Food Frequency Questionnaires ask a limited number of foods with limited detail about food preparation), and that the 9-point Hedonic scale with no reference data might not be the most appropriate scale. Further, our exploratory analysis could have been more extensive by the presence of GWAS summary results statistics on the three online platforms and the level of detail provided. For example, the absence of associations for some traits of interest might be due to the p-values failing to reach the reporting thresholds, which vary between platforms. Given that the effect sizes (or direction of association) were not reported for some GWASs or included in the GWAS Atlas [69], the relationships between the bitter sensitive alleles and specific health conditions still need to be clarified. Another challenge in phenome-wide association studies is accounting for multiple testing to reduce type 1 errors [120]. Calculating the degree of false-positive results is not straightforward as there are potential correlations between traits aggregated in the databases. While we are more confident in associations identified in independent studies, they still need to be validated with hypothesis-driven research. In this study, we evaluated the effect of TAS2R38 genotypes rather than the TAS2R38 diplotypes. Since the three TAS2R38 SNPs are highly correlated, the effect of a bitter sensitive allele would correspond to the effect of the TAS2R38 PAV taster haplotype. Notably, our phenome-wide association results were based on the additivity assumption of genetic effect sizes (consistent with polygenic models and GWAS common variant effect size interpretations) when probing the relationship between specific dietary trait/disease phenotypes against the three highly correlated TAS2R38 SNPs. While we could not evaluate the effect of rare haplotypes such as AAI, this haplotype has a similar effect as PAV haplotype [17] and is present in less than 3% of the population [121].
Conclusion
Through a cost-efficient approach using summary results statistics from large-scale GWASs, this study extends current knowledge of the associations of TAS2R38 genotype and PTC/PROP taste perception for dietary and health outcomes and reveals novel associations, i.e., bipolar disorder, kidney health and gut microbiome, which provide new research directions for understanding the role of this bitter taster receptor gene in human health.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Acknowledgements
This work and Liang-Dar Hwang are supported by an Australian Research Council Discovery Early Career Researcher Award (DE240100014). Jue-Sheng Ong is supported by an Australian NHMRC Investigator grant (2018420). Caroline Brito Nunes, Amanda Wei-Yin Lim and Quimbe Dy are supported by scholarships from the University of Queensland. We thank Nicola Pirastu for providing the GWAS summary results statistics for the food intake and food liking and Danielle Reed for helpful comments on the manuscript.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions.
Declarations
Conflict of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
References
- 1.Bell KI, Tepper BJ (2006) Short-term vegetable intake by young children classified by 6-n-propylthoiuracil bitter-taste phenotype. Am J Clin Nutr 84:245–251. 10.1093/ajcn/84.1.245 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Duffy VB, Hayes JE, Davidson AC et al (2010) Vegetable intake in college-aged adults is explained by oral sensory phenotypes and TAS2R38 genotype. Chemosens Percept 3:137–148. 10.1007/s12078-010-9079-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hayes JE, Sullivan BS, Duffy VB (2010) Explaining variability in sodium intake through oral sensory phenotype, salt sensation and liking. Physiol Behav 100:369–380. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2010.03.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Keller KL, Olsen A, Cravener TL et al (2014) Bitter taste phenotype and body weight predict children’s selection of sweet and savory foods at a palatable test-meal. Appetite 77:113–121. 10.1016/j.appet.2014.02.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Reed DR, Mainland JD, Arayata CJ (2019) Sensory nutrition: the role of taste in the reviews of commercial food products. Physiol Behav 209:112579. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.112579 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lundstrom JN, Gordon AR, Wise P, Frasnelli J (2012) Individual differences in the chemical senses: is there a common sensitivity? Chem Senses 37:371–378. 10.1093/chemse/bjr114 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Conte C, Ebeling M, Marcuz A et al (2002) Identification and characterization of human taste receptor genes belonging to the TAS2R family. Cytogenet Genome Res 98:45–53. 10.1159/000068546 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Shi P, Zhang J, Yang H, Zhang Y (2003) Adaptive diversification of bitter taste receptor genes in mammalian evolution. Mol Biol Evol 20:805–814. 10.1093/molbev/msg083 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lang T, Di Pizio A, Risso D et al (2023) Activation profile of TAS2R2, the 26th human bitter taste receptor. Mol Nutr Food Res 67:e2200775. 10.1002/mnfr.202200775 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wooding S (2006) Phenylthiocarbamide: a 75-year adventure in genetics and natural selection. Genetics 172:2015–2023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kim U, Jorgenson E, Coon H et al (2003) Positional cloning of the human quantitative trait locus underlying taste sensitivity to phenylthiocarbamide. Science 299:1221–1225. 10.1126/science.1080190 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Drayna D, Coon H, Kim U-K et al (2003) Genetic analysis of a complex trait in the Utah Genetic Reference Project: a major locus for PTC taste ability on chromosome 7q and a secondary locus on chromosome 16p. Hum Genet 112:567–572. 10.1007/s00439-003-0911-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Behrens M, Gunn HC, Ramos PCM et al (2013) Genetic, functional, and phenotypic diversity in TAS2R38-mediated bitter taste perception. Chem Senses 38:475–484. 10.1093/chemse/bjt016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hwang L-D, Gharahkhani P, Breslin PAS et al (2018) Bivariate genome-wide association analysis strengthens the role of bitter receptor clusters on chromosomes 7 and 12 in human bitter taste. BMC Genomics 19:678. 10.1186/s12864-018-5058-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Nolden AA, Behrens M, McGeary JE et al (2024) Differential activation of TAS2R4 may recover ability to taste propylthiouracil for some TAS2R38 AVI homozygotes. Nutrients 16:1357. 10.3390/nu16091357 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bartoshuk LM, Duffy VB, Miller IJ (1994) PTC/PROP tasting: anatomy, psychophysics, and sex effects. Physiol Behav 56:1165–1171. 10.1016/0031-9384(94)90361-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bufe B, Breslin PAS, Kuhn C et al (2005) The molecular basis of individual differences in phenylthiocarbamide and propylthiouracil bitterness perception. Curr Biol 15:322–327. 10.1016/j.cub.2005.01.047 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lipchock SV, Mennella JA, Spielman AI, Reed DR (2013) Human bitter perception correlates with bitter receptor messenger RNA expression in taste cells. Am J Clin Nutr 98:1136–1143. 10.3945/ajcn.113.066688 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lipchock SV, Spielman AI, Mennella JA et al (2017) Caffeine bitterness is related to daily caffeine intake and bitter receptor mRNA abundance in human taste tissue. Perception 46:245–256. 10.1177/0301006616686098 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hayes JE, Bartoshuk LM, Kidd JR, Duffy VB (2008) Supertasting and PROP bitterness depends on more than the TAS2R38 gene. Chem Senses 33:255–265. 10.1093/chemse/bjm084 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Fu D, Riordan S, Kieran S et al (2019) Complex relationship between TAS2 receptor variations, bitterness perception, and alcohol consumption observed in a population of wine consumers. Food Funct 10:1643–1652. 10.1039/c8fo01578c [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ramos-Lopez O, Roman S, Martinez-Lopez E et al (2015) Association of a novel TAS2R38 haplotype with alcohol intake among Mexican-Mestizo population. Ann Hepatol 14:729–734 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bajec MR, Pickering GJ (2010) Association of thermal taste and PROP responsiveness with food liking, neophobia, body mass index, and waist circumference. Food Qual Prefer 21:589–601. 10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.03.007 [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sacerdote C, Guarrera S, Smith GD et al (2007) Lactase persistence and bitter taste response: instrumental variables and mendelian randomization in epidemiologic studies of dietary factors and cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol 166:576–581. 10.1093/aje/kwm113 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Mezzavilla M, Notarangelo M, Concas MP et al (2019) Investigation of the link between PROP taste perception and vegetables consumption using FAOSTAT data. Int J Food Sci Nutr 70:484–490. 10.1080/09637486.2018.1519527 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Drewnowski A, Henderson SA, Barratt-Fornell A (2001) Genetic taste markers and food preferences. Drug Metab Dispos 29:535–538 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Drewnowski A, Kristal A, Cohen J (2001) Genetic taste responses to 6-n-propylthiouracil among adults: a screening tool for epidemiological studies. Chem Senses 26:483–489. 10.1093/chemse/26.5.483 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Mikołajczyk-Stecyna J, Malinowska AM, Chmurzynska A (2017) TAS2R38 and CA6 genetic polymorphisms, frequency of bitter food intake, and blood biomarkers among elderly woman. Appetite 116:57–64. 10.1016/j.appet.2017.04.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ong J-S, Hwang L-D, Zhong VW et al (2018) Understanding the role of bitter taste perception in coffee, tea and alcohol consumption through Mendelian randomization. Sci Rep 8:16414. 10.1038/s41598-018-34713-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ly A, Drewnowski A (2001) PROP (6-n-propylthiouracil) tasting and sensory responses to caffeine, sucrose, neohesperidin dihydrochalcone and chocolate. Chem Senses 26:41–47. 10.1093/chemse/26.1.41 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Keller M, Liu X, Wohland T et al (2013) TAS2R38 and its influence on smoking behavior and glucose homeostasis in the German Sorbs. PLoS ONE 8:e80512. 10.1371/journal.pone.0080512 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Pirastu N, Kooyman M, Traglia M et al (2014) Association analysis of bitter receptor genes in five isolated populations identifies a significant correlation between TAS2R43 variants and coffee liking. PLoS ONE 9:e92065. 10.1371/journal.pone.0092065 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Masi C, Dinnella C, Monteleone E, Prescott J (2015) The impact of individual variations in taste sensitivity on coffee perceptions and preferences. Physiol Behav 138:219–226. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.10.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Yeomans MR, Prescott J, Gould NJ (2009) Acquired hedonic and sensory characteristics of odours: influence of sweet liker and propylthiouracil taster status. Q J Exp Psychol 62:1648–1664. 10.1080/17470210802557793 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Smith JL, Estus S, Lennie TA et al (2020) TAS2R38 PAV haplotype predicts vegetable consumption in community-dwelling Caucasian adults at risk for cardiovascular disease. Biol Res Nurs 22:326–333. 10.1177/1099800420913935 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Duffy VB, Davidson AC, Kidd JR et al (2004) Bitter receptor gene (TAS2R38), 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) bitterness and alcohol intake. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 28:1629–1637. 10.1097/01.alc.0000145789.55183.d4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Dwan K, Gamble C, Williamson PR et al (2013) Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias—an updated review. PLoS ONE 8:e66844. 10.1371/journal.pone.0066844 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Guo SW, Reed DR (2001) The genetics of phenylthiocarbamide perception. Ann Hum Biol 28:111–142. 10.1080/03014460151056310 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ortega FJ, Agüera Z, Sabater M et al (2016) Genetic variations of the bitter taste receptor TAS2R38 are associated with obesity and impact on single immune traits. Mol Nutr Food Res 60:1673–1683. 10.1002/mnfr.201500804 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Chupeerach C, Tapanee P, On-Nom N et al (2021) The influence of TAS2R38 bitter taste gene polymorphisms on obesity risk in three racially diverse groups. Biomedicine (Taipei) 11:43–49. 10.37796/2211-8039.1175 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Smith JL, Estus S, Lennie TA et al (2016) Abstract 19630: TASR genotype is associated with adherence to dietary sodium recommendations in adults with cardiovascular disease risk factors. Circulation 134:A19630–A19630. 10.1161/circ.134.suppl_1.19630 [Google Scholar]
- 42.Carrai M, Steinke V, Vodicka P et al (2011) Association between TAS2R38 gene polymorphisms and colorectal cancer risk: a case-control study in two independent populations of Caucasian origin. PLoS ONE 6:e20464. 10.1371/journal.pone.0020464 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Dotson CD, Zhang L, Xu H et al (2008) Bitter taste receptors influence glucose homeostasis. PLoS ONE 3:e3974. 10.1371/journal.pone.0003974 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Rozengurt E (2006) Taste receptors in the gastrointestinal tract. I. Bitter taste receptors and alpha-gustducin in the mammalian gut. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 291:G171-177. 10.1152/ajpgi.00073.2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Liang J, Chen F, Gu F et al (2017) Expression and functional activity of bitter taste receptors in primary renal tubular epithelial cells and M-1 cells. Mol Cell Biochem 428:193–202. 10.1007/s11010-016-2929-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Lee RJ, Xiong G, Kofonow JM et al (2012) T2R38 taste receptor polymorphisms underlie susceptibility to upper respiratory infection. J Clin Invest 122:4145–4159. 10.1172/JCI64240 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Deshpande DA, Wang WCH, McIlmoyle EL et al (2010) Bitter taste receptors on airway smooth muscle bronchodilate by localized calcium signaling and reverse obstruction. Nat Med 16:1299–1304. 10.1038/nm.2237 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Foster SR, Porrello ER, Purdue B et al (2013) Expression, regulation and putative nutrient-sensing function of taste GPCRs in the heart. PLoS ONE 8:e64579. 10.1371/journal.pone.0064579 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Wölfle U, Elsholz FA, Kersten A et al (2016) Expression and functional activity of the human bitter taste receptor TAS2R38 in human placental tissues and JEG-3 cells. Molecules 21:306. 10.3390/molecules21030306 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Singh N, Vrontakis M, Parkinson F, Chelikani P (2011) Functional bitter taste receptors are expressed in brain cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 406:146–151. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.02.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Depoortere I (2014) Taste receptors of the gut: emerging roles in health and disease. Gut 63:179–190. 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-305112 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Lu P, Zhang C-H, Lifshitz LM, ZhuGe R (2017) Extraoral bitter taste receptors in health and disease. J Gen Physiol 149:181–197. 10.1085/jgp.201611637 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Lee RJ, Kofonow JM, Rosen PL et al (2014) Bitter and sweet taste receptors regulate human upper respiratory innate immunity. J Clin Invest 124:1393–1405. 10.1172/JCI72094 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Lee RJ, Cohen NA (2015) Role of the bitter taste receptor T2R38 in upper respiratory infection and chronic rhinosinusitis. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 15:14–20. 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Adappa ND, Zhang Z, Palmer JN et al (2014) The bitter taste receptor T2R38 is an independent risk factor for chronic rhinosinusitis requiring sinus surgery. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 4:3–7. 10.1002/alr.21253 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Adappa ND, Truesdale CM, Workman AD et al (2016) Correlation of T2R38 taste phenotype and in vitro biofilm formation from nonpolypoid chronic rhinosinusitis patients. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 6:783–791. 10.1002/alr.21803 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Workman AD, Brooks SG, Kohanski MA et al (2018) Bitter and sweet taste tests are reflective of disease status in chronic rhinosinusitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 6:1078–1080. 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.09.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Cossu G, Melis M, Sarchioto M et al (2018) 6-n-propylthiouracil taste disruption and TAS2R38 nontasting form in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 33:1331–1339. 10.1002/mds.27391 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Moberg PJ, McGue C, Kanes SJ et al (2007) Phenylthiocarbamide (PTC) perception in patients with schizophrenia and first-degree family members: relationship to clinical symptomatology and psychophysical olfactory performance. Schizophr Res 90:221–228. 10.1016/j.schres.2006.11.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Moberg PJ, Balderston CC, Rick JH et al (2007) Phenylthiocarbamide (PTC) perception in Parkinson disease. Cogn Behav Neurol 20:145. 10.1097/WNN.0b013e31812570c3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Moberg PJ, Roalf DR, Balderston CC et al (2005) Phenylthiocarbamide perception in patients with schizophrenia and first-degree family members. Am J Psychiatry 162:788–790. 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.4.788 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Brewer WJ, Lin A, Moberg PJ et al (2012) Phenylthiocarbamide (PTC) perception in ultra-high risk for psychosis participants who develop schizophrenia: testing the evidence for an endophenotypic marker. Psychiatry Res 199:8–11. 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.03.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Ansoleaga B, Garcia-Esparcia P, Pinacho R et al (2015) Decrease in olfactory and taste receptor expression in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in chronic schizophrenia. J Psychiatr Res 60:109–116. 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.09.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Garcia-Esparcia P, Schlüter A, Carmona M et al (2013) Functional genomics reveals dysregulation of cortical olfactory receptors in Parkinson disease: novel putative chemoreceptors in the human brain. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 72:524–539. 10.1097/NEN.0b013e318294fd76 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.May-Wilson S, Matoba N, Wade KH et al (2022) Large-scale GWAS of food liking reveals genetic determinants and genetic correlations with distinct neurophysiological traits. Nat Commun 13:2743. 10.1038/s41467-022-30187-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Pirastu N, McDonnell C, Grzeszkowiak EJ et al (2022) Using genetic variation to disentangle the complex relationship between food intake and health outcomes. PLoS Genet 18:e1010162. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1010162 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Elsworth B, Lyon M, Alexander T et al (2020) The MRC IEU OpenGWAS data infrastructure. bioRxiv 10.1101/2020.08.10.244293
- 68.Ochoa D, Hercules A, Carmona M et al (2023) The next-generation Open Targets Platform: reimagined, redesigned, rebuilt. Nucleic Acids Res 51:D1353–D1359. 10.1093/nar/gkac1046 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Watanabe K, Stringer S, Frei O et al (2019) A global overview of pleiotropy and genetic architecture in complex traits. Nat Genet 51:1339–1348. 10.1038/s41588-019-0481-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Sudlow C, Gallacher J, Allen N et al (2015) UK Biobank: an open access resource for identifying the causes of a wide range of complex diseases of middle and old age. PLoS Med 12:e1001779. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001779 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Sollis E, Mosaku A, Abid A et al (2022) The NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog: knowledgebase and deposition resource. Nucleic Acids Res 51:D977–D985. 10.1093/nar/gkac1010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Purcell S, Cherny SS, Sham PC (2003) Genetic Power Calculator: design of linkage and association genetic mapping studies of complex traits. Bioinformatics 19:149–150. 10.1093/bioinformatics/19.1.149 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Kurki MI, Karjalainen J, Palta P et al (2023) FinnGen provides genetic insights from a well-phenotyped isolated population. Nature 613:508–518. 10.1038/s41586-022-05473-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Inoue H, Kuwano T, Yamakawa-Kobayashi K et al (2017) Perceived 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) bitterness is associated with dietary sodium intake in female Japanese college students. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo) 63:167–173. 10.3177/jnsv.63.167 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Tepper BJ, Nurse RJ (1997) Fat perception is related to PROP taster status. Physiol Behav 61:949–954. 10.1016/s0031-9384(96)00608-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.McNaughton SA, Marks GC (2003) Development of a food composition database for the estimation of dietary intakes of glucosinolates, the biologically active constituents of cruciferous vegetables. Br J Nutr 90:687–697. 10.1079/bjn2003917 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Lanier SA, Hayes JE, Duffy VB (2005) Sweet and bitter tastes of alcoholic beverages mediate alcohol intake in of-age undergraduates. Physiol Behav 83:821–831. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.10.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Gous AGS, Almli VL, Coetzee V, de Kock HL (2019) Effects of varying the color, aroma, bitter, and sweet levels of a grapefruit-like model beverage on the sensory properties and liking of the consumer. Nutrients 11:464. 10.3390/nu11020464 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Drewnowski A, Henderson SA, Barratt-Fornell A (1998) Genetic sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil and sensory responses to sugar and fat mixtures. Physiol Behav 63:771–777. 10.1016/s0031-9384(97)00540-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Drewnowski A, Henderson SA, Shore AB (1997) Taste responses to naringin, a flavonoid, and the acceptance of grapefruit juice are related to genetic sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil. Am J Clin Nutr 66:391–397. 10.1093/ajcn/66.2.391 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Ooi S-X, Lee P-L, Law H-Y, Say Y-H (2010) Bitter receptor gene (TAS2R38) P49A genotypes and their associations with aversion to vegetables and sweet/fat foods in Malaysian subjects. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 19:491–498 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Shen Y, Kennedy OB, Methven L (2016) Exploring the effects of genotypical and phenotypical variations in bitter taste sensitivity on perception, liking and intake of brassica vegetables in the UK. Food Qual Prefer 50:71–81. 10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.01.005 [Google Scholar]
- 83.Drewnowski A, Henderson SA, Levine A, Hann C (1999) Taste and food preferences as predictors of dietary practices in young women. Public Health Nutr 2:513–519. 10.1017/s1368980099000695 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Dinehart ME, Hayes JE, Bartoshuk LM et al (2006) Bitter taste markers explain variability in vegetable sweetness, bitterness, and intake. Physiol Behav 87:304–313. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.10.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Kaminski LC, Henderson SA, Drewnowski A (2000) Young women’s food preferences and taste responsiveness to 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP). Physiol Behav 68:691–697. 10.1016/S0031-9384(99)00240-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Ogawa T, Annear MJ, Ikebe K, Maeda Y (2017) Taste-related sensations in old age. J Oral Rehabil 44:626–635. 10.1111/joor.12502 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Mennella JA, Pepino MY, Duke FF, Reed DR (2010) Age modifies the genotype-phenotype relationship for the bitter receptor TAS2R38. BMC Genet 11:60. 10.1186/1471-2156-11-60 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Van Doorn HE, Van Der Kruk GC, Van Holst G-J et al (1998) The glucosinolates sinigrin and progoitrin are important determinants for taste preference and bitterness of Brussels sprouts. J Sci Food Agric 78:30–38. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199809)78:1%3c30::AID-JSFA79%3e3.0.CO;2-N [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.van Doorn HE, van der Kruk GC, van Holst GJ (1999) Large scale determination of glucosinolates in brussels sprouts samples after degradation of endogenous glucose. J Agric Food Chem 47:1029–1034. 10.1021/jf9808170 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Drewnowski A, Gomez-Carneros C (2000) Bitter taste, phytonutrients, and the consumer: a review123. Am J Clin Nutr 72:1424–1435. 10.1093/ajcn/72.6.1424 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Cavallo C, Cicia G, Del Giudice T et al (2019) Consumers’ perceptions and preferences for bitterness in vegetable foods: the case of extra-virgin olive oil and brassicaceae—a narrative review. Nutrients 11:1164. 10.3390/nu11051164 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Carrai M, Campa D, Vodicka P et al (2017) Association between taste receptor (TAS) genes and the perception of wine characteristics. Sci Rep 7:9239. 10.1038/s41598-017-08946-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Beckett EL, Duesing K, Boyd L et al (2017) A potential sex dimorphism in the relationship between bitter taste and alcohol consumption. Food Funct 8:1116–1123. 10.1039/c6fo01759b [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Perna S, Riva A, Nicosanti G et al (2018) Association of the bitter taste receptor gene TAS2R38 (polymorphism RS713598) with sensory responsiveness, food preferences, biochemical parameters and body-composition markers. A cross-sectional study in Italy. Int J Food Sci Nutr 69:245–252. 10.1080/09637486.2017.1353954 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Hayes JE, Wallace MR, Knopik VS et al (2011) Allelic variation in TAS2R bitter receptor genes associates with variation in sensations from and ingestive behaviors toward common bitter beverages in adults. Chem Senses 36:311–319. 10.1093/chemse/bjq132 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Hayes JE, Pickering GJ (2012) Wine expertise predicts taste phenotype. Am J Enol Vitic 63:80–84. 10.5344/ajev.2011.11050 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Pickering GJ, Jain AK, Bezawada R (2013) Super-tasting gastronomes? Taste phenotype characterization of foodies and wine experts. Food Qual Prefer 28:85–91. 10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.07.005 [Google Scholar]
- 98.Eriksson N, Wu S, Do CB et al (2012) A genetic variant near olfactory receptor genes influences cilantro preference. Flavour 1:22. 10.1186/2044-7248-1-22 [Google Scholar]
- 99.Yengo L, Sidorenko J, Kemper KE et al (2018) Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for height and body mass index in ∼700000 individuals of European ancestry. Hum Mol Genet 27:3641–3649. 10.1093/hmg/ddy271 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Hou L, Bergen SE, Akula N et al (2016) Genome-wide association study of 40,000 individuals identifies two novel loci associated with bipolar disorder. Hum Mol Genet 25:3383–3394. 10.1093/hmg/ddw181 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Bipolar Disorder and Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (2018) Genomic dissection of bipolar disorder and schizophrenia, including 28 subphenotypes. Cell 173:1705-1715.e16. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.05.046 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Parker G, Paterson A, Romano M, Graham R (2017) Altered sensory phenomena experienced in bipolar disorder. Am J Psychiatry 174:1146–1150. 10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.16121379 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Lee Y-C, Chao Y-L, Chang C-E et al (2019) Transcriptome changes in relation to manic episode. Front Psychiatry 10:280. 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00280 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Waikar SS, Betensky RA, Emerson SC, Bonventre JV (2012) Imperfect gold standards for kidney injury biomarker evaluation. J Am Soc Nephrol 23:13–21. 10.1681/ASN.2010111124 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Liu X, Gu F, Jiang L et al (2015) Expression of bitter taste receptor Tas2r105 in mouse kidney. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 458:733–738. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.01.089 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Maurer S, Wabnitz GH, Kahle NA et al (2015) Tasting pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms: human neutrophils express the bitter receptor T2R38 as sensor for the quorum sensing molecule n-(3-oxododecanoyl)-l-homoserine lactone. Front Immunol 6:369. 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00369 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Malki A, Fiedler J, Fricke K et al (2015) Class I odorant receptors, TAS1R and TAS2R taste receptors, are markers for subpopulations of circulating leukocytes. J Leukoc Biol 97:533–545. 10.1189/jlb.2A0714-331RR [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Tran HTT, Herz C, Ruf P et al (2018) Human T2R38 bitter taste receptor expression in resting and activated lymphocytes. Front Immunol 9:2949. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02949 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Gallardo-Becerra L, Cornejo-Granados F, García-López R et al (2020) Metatranscriptomic analysis to define the secrebiome, and 16S rRNA profiling of the gut microbiome in obesity and metabolic syndrome of Mexican children. Microb Cell Fact 19:61. 10.1186/s12934-020-01319-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Zitomersky NL, Atkinson BJ, Franklin SW et al (2013) Characterization of adherent bacteroidales from intestinal biopsies of children and young adults with inflammatory bowel disease. PLoS ONE 8:e63686. 10.1371/journal.pone.0063686 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Haro C, Garcia-Carpintero S, Alcala-Diaz JF et al (2016) The gut microbial community in metabolic syndrome patients is modified by diet. J Nutr Biochem 27:27–31. 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2015.08.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Karlowsky JA, Walkty AJ, Adam HJ et al (2012) Prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among clinical isolates of bacteroides fragilis group in Canada in 2010–2011: CANWARD surveillance study. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:1247–1252. 10.1128/AAC.05823-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Ahmed S, Busetti A, Fotiadou P et al (2019) In vitro characterization of gut microbiota-derived bacterial strains with neuroprotective properties. Front Cell Neurosci 13:402. 10.3389/fncel.2019.00402 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Cui Y, Zhang L, Wang X et al (2022) Roles of intestinal Parabacteroides in human health and diseases. FEMS Microbiol Lett 369:fnac072. 10.1093/femsle/fnac072 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Kverka M, Zakostelska Z, Klimesova K et al (2011) Oral administration of Parabacteroides distasonis antigens attenuates experimental murine colitis through modulation of immunity and microbiota composition. Clin Exp Immunol 163:250–259. 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2010.04286.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Cekanaviciute E, Yoo BB, Runia TF et al (2017) Gut bacteria from multiple sclerosis patients modulate human T cells and exacerbate symptoms in mouse models. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114:10713–10718. 10.1073/pnas.1711235114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Schembre SM, Cheng I, Wilkens LR et al (2013) Variations in bitter-taste receptor genes, dietary intake, and colorectal adenoma risk. Nutr Cancer 65:982–990. 10.1080/01635581.2013.807934 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Choi J-H, Lee J, Choi IJ et al (2016) Genetic variation in the TAS2R38 bitter taste receptor and gastric cancer risk in Koreans. Sci Rep 6:26904. 10.1038/srep26904 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Fry A, Littlejohns TJ, Sudlow C et al (2017) Comparison of sociodemographic and health-related characteristics of UK Biobank participants with those of the general population. Am J Epidemiol 186:1026–1034. 10.1093/aje/kwx246 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Pendergrass SA, Brown-Gentry K, Dudek SM et al (2011) The use of phenome-wide association studies (PheWAS) for exploration of novel genotype-phenotype relationships and pleiotropy discovery. Genet Epidemiol 35:410–422. 10.1002/gepi.20589 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Hwang L-D, Breslin PAS, Reed DR et al (2016) Is the association between sweet and bitter perception due to genetic variation? Chem Senses 41:737–744. 10.1093/chemse/bjw083 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Hibar DP, Stein JL, Renteria ME et al (2015) Common genetic variants influence human subcortical brain structures. Nature 520:224–229. 10.1038/nature14101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Rühlemann MC, Hermes BM, Bang C et al (2021) Genome-wide association study in 8,956 German individuals identifies influence of ABO histo-blood groups on gut microbiome. Nat Genet 53:147–155. 10.1038/s41588-020-00747-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Winkler TW, Grassmann F, Brandl C et al (2020) Genome-wide association meta-analysis for early age-related macular degeneration highlights novel loci and insights for advanced disease. BMC Med Genomics 13:120. 10.1186/s12920-020-00760-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Orrù V, Steri M, Sidore C et al (2020) Complex genetic signatures in immune cells underlie autoimmunity and inform therapy. Nat Genet 52:1036–1045. 10.1038/s41588-020-0684-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Barton AR, Sherman MA, Mukamel RE et al (2021) Whole-exome imputation within UK Biobank powers rare coding variant association and fine-mapping analyses. Nat Genet 53:1260–1269. 10.1038/s41588-021-00892-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.





