Skip to main content
. 2004 Jun 16;75(2):338–345. doi: 10.1086/423147

Table 2.

TMRCA Estimates and 95% CIs of Y-Chromosomal Lineages in North Africa[Note]

TMRCA [in KY] (95% CI)
SampledLineages Mutation No. of Chromosomes 30 Years/Generation)a 25 Years/Generation)b
All 390 13.95 (8.08–24.67) 25.87 (20.47–30.99
E M145 237 9.70 (5.98–14.33) 19.66 (15.31–21.12)
E3a M2 8 2.96 (1.83–4.25) 5.06 (3.01–7.61)
E1 M33 3 3.38 (2.11–5.25) 5.6 (2.79–9.38)
E3b1 M78 38 4.48 (3.01–6.16) 8.10 (5.42–10.71)
E3b M35 226 8.26 (5.18–12.37) 14.33 (9.32–19.19)
E3b2 M81 165 4.15 (2.84–5.97) 6.90 (5.91–8.19)
F M89 152 9.77 (6.47–14..84) 19.05 (15.30–22.61)
J 12f2 93 6.78 (4.38–11.10) 7.86 (6.63–9.13)
J2 M172 14 3.67 (2.50–5.25) 4.98 (4.10–6.06)
R M173 27 4.44 (3.04–6.62) 10.24 (8.54–12.94)
I M170 2 2.83 (1.68–4.32) 5.29 (3.19–9.16)
K M9 38 7.10 (4.38–11.1) 15.09 (11.56–18.16)

Note.— TMRCA estimates based on 8 STRs (DYS19, DYS388, DYS389b, DYS389I, DYS390, DYS391, DYS392, and DYS393) in nine North African populations (those from the present study and the Moroccan samples of Bosch et al. 2001). In these calculations, we incorporated the information from binary markers.

a

The two parameters describing the population growth (alpha and beta) have been set as alpha prior uniform (0.03, 0.05) and beta prior uniform (0.10, 0.20), the microsatellite mutation rates used were from Weale et al. (2001) or gamma (2,1000) for the loci for which published estimates of mutation rates were not available.

b

The two parameters describing the population growth (alpha and beta) have been set as in footnote a, the microsatellite mutation rate used was from Zhivotovsky et al. (2004).

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure