Skip to main content
. 2006 Jan 14;132(5):327–331. doi: 10.1007/s00432-005-0071-7

Table 3.

Analysis of associations between GSTM1 and CYP1A1 genotypes and LC risk: crude and adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals

Groups GSTM1 genotypesa CYP1A1 genotypes Combined GSTM1/CYP1A1 genotypes
GSTM1(+) GSTM1(-) CYP1A1*2 non-carriers CYP1A1*2 carriers GSTM1(+) CYP1A1*2 non-carriers GSTM1(-) CYP1A1*2 non-carriers GSTM1(+) CYP1A1*2 carriers GSTM1(-) CYP1A1*2 carriers
Crude ORs
LC versus HD 1.0 0.94 (0.61–1.45) 1.0 1.33 (0.80–2.21) 1.0 1.03 (0.63–1.69) 1.66 (0.78–3.57) 1.15 (0.57–2.30)
LC versus ED 1.0 1.39 (0.92–2.11) 1.0 1.39 (0.85–2.27) 1.0 1.32 (0.82–2.13) 1.26 (0.63–2.46) 2.16 (1.04–4.47)
SCC versus HD 1.0 1.08 (0.62–1.87) 1.0 2.08 (1.14–3.76) 1.0 1.15 (0.59–2.25) 2.49 (0.98–6.16) 2.07 (0.90–4.69)
SCC versus ED 1.0 1.58 (0.92–2.71) 1.0 2.18 (1.21–3.88) 1.0 1.47 (0.76–2.85) 1.88 (0.79–4.32) 3.91 (1.65–9.06)
Non-SCC versus HD 1.0 0.83 (0.48–1.43) 1.0 0.76 (0.36–1.52) 1.0 0.95 (0.52–1.73) 1.09 (0.39–2.88) 0.51 (0.16–1.41)
Non-SCC versus ED 1.0 1.22 (0.72–2.08) 1.0 0.80 (0.39–1.57) 1.0 1.22 (0.68–2.19) 0.83 (0.31–2.02) 0.96 (0.30–2.71)
ORs adjusted for gender and smoking history
LC versus HD 1.0 1.13 (0.68–1.87) 1.0 1.27 (0.70–2.30) 1.0 1.33 (0.75–2.37) 2.06 (0.79–5.41) 1.20 (0.54–2.65)
LC versus ED 1.0 1.54 (0.96–2.48) 1.0 1.37 (0.78–2.40) 1.0 1.58 (0.92–2.71) 1.43 (0.65–3.15) 2.08 (0.92–4.73)
SCC versus HD 1.0 1.25 (0.65–2.41) 1.0 2.22 (1.06–4.63) 1.0 1.51 (0.69–3.30) 3.99 (1.11–14.32) 2.21 (0.84–5.77)
SCC versus ED 1.0 1.79 (0.96–3.35) 1.0 2.27 (1.14–4.52) 1.0 1.78 (0.84–3.78) 2.25 (0.82–6.19) 3.85 (1.43–10.33)
Non-SCC versus HD 1.0 0.97 (0.54–1.73) 1.0 0.72 (0.34–1.55) 1.0 1.17 (0.61–2.24) 1.33 (0.44–4.06) 0.53 (0.17–1.59)
Non-SCC versus ED 1.0 1.32 (0.75–2.30) 1.0 0.80 (0.38–1.66) 1.0 1.41 (0.76–2.61) 0.96 (0.36–2.55) 0.92 (0.30–2.82)

aGSTM1 genotypes are designated as GSTM1(-) for the null and GSTM1(+) for the non-null