Skip to main content
. 2005 Jan 19;131(5):289–299. doi: 10.1007/s00432-004-0643-y

Table 3.

Type of combination effect observed in vitro

Group no.a Treatmentb O/E ratiosc Mean O/E ratio ± SDd Type of interactione
1 A MTA 0.04→GEM 0.04 0.75 0.73±0.04 More than additive
B MTA 0.04→GEM 0.16 0.66
C MTA 0.04→GEM 0.64 0.73
D MTA 0.04→GEM 2.56 0.73
E MTA 0.04→GEM 10.24 0.77
2 A GEM 0.02→MTA 0.02 1.15 1.08±0.13 Additive
B GEM 0.02→MTA 0.08 1.27
C GEM 0.02→MTA 0.34 1.04
D GEM 0.02→MTA 1.36 0.94
E GEM 0.02→MTA 5.43 1.01
3 A MTA 0.02 + GEM 0.04 1.29 1.29±0.03 Less than additive
B MTA 0.02 + GEM 0.16 1.28
C MTA0.02 + GEM 0.64 1.26
D MTA 0.02 + GEM 2.56 1.33
E MTA 0.02 + GEM 10.24 1.31
4 A GEM 0.04 + MTA 0.02 1.29 1.25±0.05 Less than additive
B GEM 0.04 + MTA 0.08 1.32
C GEM 0.04 + MTA 0.34 1.23
D GEM 0.04 + MTA 1.36 1.18
E GEM 0.04 + MTA 5.43 1.24

aGroup numbers correspond to Table  1

bDetails of treatment are given in Table 1

cO/E = ratio of observed versus expected treatment effect

dMean O/E ratio with standard deviation

eAn O/E ratio equal to unity (±0.14) was considered an additive combination effect, an O/E ratio <0.86 was considered a more than additive combination effect, and an O/E ratio >1.14 was considered a less than additive combination effect