Skip to main content
. 2008 May 17;134(12):1347–1354. doi: 10.1007/s00432-008-0414-2

Table 3.

Univariate and multivariate prognostic analysis of DFS/OS in patients with ER−/PgR+ tumors

DFS OS
Univariate Multivariate Univariate Multivariate
P value P value HR (95% CI)a P value P value HR (95% CI)
Meno
Post versus Pre 0.624 0.048 0.33 (0.11–0.99) 0.805 0.556
Age
<50 year versus ≥50 year 0.634 0.926 0.676 0.685
Size
T0-1 versus T2 versus T3 0.093 0.341 0.158 0.787
Stage
III versus II versus 0-I 0.004 0.116 0.587 0.801
Pathol
Invasive versus Non-invasive 0.315 0.810 0.862 0.651
ALN
Positive versus Negative <0.001 <0.001 3.87 (2.18-6.85) 0.002 0.003 2.72 (1.39-5.30)
AC
Yes versus No 0.858 0.117 0.475 0.857
AE
Yes versus No 0.628 0.221 0.111 0.100
HER-2b
Positive versus Negative 0.433 0.795 0.567 0.586

Meno menopausal status, Pathol Pathologic, AC Adjuvant chemotherapy, AE Adjuvant endocrine therapy of TAM

a HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval

bPositive indicating HER-2 ++~+++ by IHC; negative indicating HER-2 −~+ by IHC