Skip to main content
Food Chemistry: X logoLink to Food Chemistry: X
. 2025 May 28;28:102595. doi: 10.1016/j.fochx.2025.102595

Characterization of aroma profiles of Tanyang Congou black tea with flowery-fruity flavor: Insights from sensory evaluation and HS-SPME-GC-O-MS

Di Zhou a,1, Xin-yu Liu a,b,1, Miao-qin Xie a,c, Hao-jie Xu a, Huai-hui Yi a, Da-xiang Li a, Ru-yan Hou a, Hui-mei Cai a, Xiao-chun Wan a, Daniel Granato d,, Chuan-yi Peng a,b,⁎⁎
PMCID: PMC12163174  PMID: 40520693

Abstract

Tanyang Congou black tea, renowned for its distinctive floral and fruity aroma, is meticulously produced using the shaking technique. However, the specific aroma profile and the key odor-active compounds responsible for this characteristic fragrance have not been fully elucidated. This study integrated sensory evaluation with molecular sensory science approaches to identify and characterize the principal odorants contributing to the tea's aroma. Sensory analysis confirmed that the prepared black tea exhibited typical high-quality attributes, with a prominent floral and fruity aroma markedly reduced in lower-grade samples. A total of 70 volatile compounds were detected, among which 29 key aroma-active compounds were identified across all three quality grades using aroma extract dilution analysis (AEDA) and gas chromatography-olfactometry-mass spectrometry (GC-O-MS). Of these, 16 volatiles exhibited high flavor dilution (FD) factors (≥8), and 11 compounds showed relative odor activity values (ROAV) greater than 1. Notably, seven compounds—(E)-β-ionone, (E)-nerolidol, geraniol, citral, linalool, hexanal, and phenylacetaldehyde—were identified as the primary contributors to the characteristic floral-fruity aroma of Tanyang Congou black tea. These findings provide comprehensive insight into the aroma profile of Tanyang Congou black tea, offering a scientific basis for quality assessment and targeted aroma modulation in tea production.

Keywords: Electronic nose, Flower and fruit aroma, Key aroma compounds, GC-O-MS, Aroma extract dilution analysis, Chemometrics

Highlights

  • 29 key aroma compounds were identified across all three quality grades.

  • 16 aroma volatiles demonstrated higher FD values above 8.

  • 11 compounds with ROAVs greater than 1 were calculated.

  • 7 compounds largely contributed to the floral-fruity aroma of Tanyang Congou black tea.

1. Introduction

Tea is a widely consumed beverage known for its unique flavor and numerous health benefits (Peng et al., 2022; Ren et al., 2023). Based on their respective manufacturing techniques, dried leaves from the evergreen tea tree are classified into several types: green tea, black tea, oolong tea, white tea, yellow tea, and brick tea (Peng et al., 2022). Of these, the typical manufacturing stages of black tea involve withering, rolling, fermentation, and drying (Chen et al., 2022), classifying it as a fully oxidized tea (Dong et al., 2024). Due to its unique, pleasant flavor and various health benefits, black tea has gained significant popularity among consumers, accounting for 75 % of global tea consumption (Chen et al., 2022; Ouyang et al., 2024).

Chinese black tea is renowned for its extraordinary aroma characteristics, distinguished by a ruby-red infusion and leaves, often accompanied by sweet, honey, or floral aromas (Dong et al., 2024). The aroma profile of black tea varies significantly by region and is influenced by factors such as tea cultivars, climate, soil composition, and manufacturing methods (Su et al., 2022; Yao et al., 2023). For instance, Keemun black tea is noted for its distinctive “Keemun aroma”, featuring floral and honey notes (Su et al., 2022), while Darjeeling black tea is recognized for its muscatel scent (Kang et al., 2019). Xinyang black tea has a honey-sugar-like aroma (Yao et al., 2023), and Hunan black tea is celebrated for its floral-honeyed fragrance (Yin et al., 2023). Aroma is a crucial factor in assessing the quality of black tea, significantly influencing consumer preferences and acceptance. High-quality black tea with floral and fruity aromas is increasingly gaining popularity. Various strategies have been explored to enhance the aroma of black tea through innovations in manufacturing, including rotation (Wang et al., 2024), red-light treatment during withering (Li et al., 2022), and the introduction of urea oxidase after crushing (Qiao et al., 2023).

Previous studies have elucidated that rotation, also known as bruising and withering, is a distinctive manufacturing technique used in the production of oolong tea. This process significantly influences the development of its floral and fruity aromas during manufacturing (Hu et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2023a). During the bruising and withering process, the tea leaves undergo ongoing mechanical damage, which encourages the accumulation of volatile aroma compounds. This transformation is essential in developing the distinctive aroma characteristic of oolong tea (Ye et al., 2023). Innovations in tea manufacturing continue to emerge, aiming to enhance flavor quality. One notable development involves integrating the shaking process used in oolong tea into the traditional manufacturing methods of white, black, and green teas to improve aroma quality (Xue et al., 2022; Wang et al., 2023a; Wang et al., 2023b; Yin et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2024). Tanyang Congou black tea, with its flowery-fruity flavor, is meticulously crafted using this innovative process (DB35/T 632., 2022). However, the aroma profile and key aroma compounds of Tanyang Congou black tea with flowery-fruity flavor remain inadequately understood.

Molecular sensory science and technology can dissect the aroma components of tea, primarily encompassing sensory evaluation and analytical detection (Zhai et al., 2022). Sensory evaluation techniques include quantitative descriptive analysis (QDA), aroma extract dilution analysis (AEDA), odor activity values (OAV), aroma addition and omission experiments, etc. (Feng et al., 2019; Zhai et al., 2022). Analytical detection techniques primarily include gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS), gas chromatography-olfactometry (GC-O), internal standard semi-quantitative method, standard addition quantitative method, and stable isotope dilution analysis (SIDA), among others (Zhai et al., 2022). The study used Camellia sinensis vs. Jin Mudan tea variety as raw materials to prepare different Tanyang Congou black tea grades with flowery-fruity flavors in accordance with the Provincial Standards (DB35/T 632., 2022). Molecular sensory science analysis techniques were employed to construct the aroma profile, identify key aroma compounds responsible for the floral and fruity notes, and analyze the possible formation mechanism of this characteristic aroma during manufacturing. The aim was to establish a foundation for aroma quality control of Tanyang Congou black tea, characterized by a flowery-fruity flavor.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Reagents and materials

Chromatography-grade n-alkanes (C7-C40) were purchased from Shanghai Aladdin Bio-Chem Technology Co., Ltd. Sodium chloride was obtained from the China National Pharmaceutical Group, and deionized water (18.2 MΩ cm) was prepared using a Milli-Q Gradient system (Billerica, MA, USA).

2.2. Preparation of Tanyang congou black tea with flowery-fruity flavor

The fresh tea leaves were plucked from the Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze vs Jin Mudan variety tea garden in Xiaoyang Town, Fu'an City, Fujian Province. According to the grading of fresh tea leaves for Tanyang Congou black tea (floral and fruity type) specified in DB35/T 632–2022 “Technical Specifications for Processing Tanyang Congou Black Tea,” fresh leaves of first grade (FG), second grade (SG), and third grade (TG) were collected, respectively. The fresh leaves were processed through a series of steps: withering, light shaking, rolling, fermentation, drying, and re-drying. Samples were frozen and stored in an ultra-low temperature freezer at −80 °C. The collected samples were dried in a vacuum freeze dryer at −50 °C for 72 h. After drying, samples were ground into a powder using a pre-frozen mortar and pestle, sieved through a 40-mesh screen, and stored at −22 °C for future use. The first-grade Tanyang Congou black tea, characterized by a flowery-fruity flavor (Fig. 1), was selected to investigate the mechanisms of aroma formation. Each grade of tea sample and manufacturing sample were prepared in triplicate.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

The manufacturing of Tanyang Congou black tea with flowery-fruity flavor.

2.3. Analytical method

2.3.1. Sensory evaluation

Ethics committee approval was not required for human sensory evaluations at Anhui Agricultural University. Nevertheless, the sensory evaluation was conducted in strict accordance with ethical guidelines (e.g., Declaration of Helsinki) to ensure the protection of participants' rights and privacy. All participants were fully informed about the study's purpose, procedures, and any potential risks before participation. Written and verbal informed consent was obtained from each participant before the analysis. Participation was entirely voluntary, and individuals were free to withdraw from the study at any point without penalty. All personal data were treated with strict confidentiality. According to the tea sensory evaluation guidelines (GB/T 23776 2018), the assessment was conducted by a panel of four experienced tea tasters. The evaluation criteria included appearance (25 %), liquor color (10 %), aroma (25 %), taste (30 %), and infused leaf (10 %), utilizing a confidential scoring method. The overall score was calculated as follows: total score = appearance score * 0.25 + liquor color score * 0.1 + aroma score * 0.25 + taste score * 0.3 + infused leaf score * 0.1. Each sample was evaluated and commented on three times. The final score was calculated as the average of the scores provided by the four skilled experts.

2.3.2. Electronic nose analysis

Following the method described by Song et al. (2023), 0.3 g of the sample was accurately weighed and placed into a 20 mL headspace vial. Then, 10 mL of boiling water was added, and the mixture was allowed to soak for 60 min to eliminate water vapor in the vial and ensure gas saturation before measurement. The sensor cleaning time was 110 s, with a zeroing time of 5 s, a sampling interval of 2 s, and a measurement duration of 70 s. Pre-sampling lasts 4 s, and the injection flow rate was maintained at 300 mL/min. The electronic nose (PEN3, AIRSENSE, Germany) features an array of 10 metal oxide sensors, with their performance detailed in Table S1.

2.3.3. Extraction of volatile compounds

To extract volatile substances from tea samples, a modified version of the method was employed (Wang et al., 2023a; Zhai et al., 2022; Zeng et al., 2022). The procedure involved the following steps: freeze-dried tea samples were ground using a pre-frozen mortar and pestle. Then, 0.1 g of the tea powder and 0.2 g of solid sodium chloride were weighed into a 20 mL headspace vial. Then, 5 mL of boiling ultrapure water, a magnetic stir bar, and 10 μL of a 10 mg/L ethyl decanoate internal standard were added. After equilibrating at 60 °C for 15 min under sealed conditions, an aged 50/30 μm CAR/PDMS/DVB extraction fiber was used to adsorb the aroma for 30 min in the headspace vial until equilibrium was reached. Finally, the extraction fiber was inserted into the gas chromatograph injection port and desorbed at 250 °C for 5 min utilizing a splitless injection method.

2.3.4. Analysis of volatile compounds by GC–MS and GC-olfactometry

The GC–MS analysis conditions, adapted from Yao et al. (2023), were as follows: a low-bleed gas chromatography column (DB-5MS, 30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm) was used for separation, with the injection port temperature set at 250 °C. The initial column temperature was set at 40 °C and held for 5 min, followed by a ramp of 6 °C/min to 130 °C, which was held for an additional 5 min. The temperature then increases at a rate of 6 °C/min to reach 250 °C. Helium gas (purity ≥99.999 %) was the carrier gas at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The mass spectrometry conditions include electron impact ionization mode with an energy setting of 70 eV, an ion source temperature of 230 °C, a quadrupole temperature of 150 °C, and a mass spectrometry interface temperature of 250 °C. The scan range was set from 35 to 450 amu. The extraction was split into a 1:1 ratio for detection by both the mass spectrometer and the olfactory detector following gas chromatography separation. The airflow rate was set at 60 mL/min (humidified). The olfactory detector (7890-5977B Sniffer, Agilent) is maintained at 180 °C.

2.3.5. Qualitative and quantitative methods

Based on the target peak mass spectral information obtained from GC–MS, a comparison was made with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) standard spectral library for identification. Retention indices were calculated, and qualitative analysis was performed by comparing these indices with those reported in the literature and relevant databases. Ethyl decanoate was used as an internal standard for relative quantification analysis.

2.3.6. Aroma extract dilution analysis (AEDA) and relative odor activity values (ROAV) calculation

Aroma extract dilution analysis (AEDA) was conducted to assess the intensity of different aroma compounds, and the flavor dilution factor (FD) was evaluated (Wang et al., 2024). The aroma compounds adsorbed by HS-SPME were used to dilute the samples by adjusting the GC inlet split ratio (1:1, 3:1, 7:1, 15:1, etc.), three panelists sniffed from low to high dilutions until no odor could be detected. The panelist records the time the odor is sniffed for subsequent identification of the aroma compounds. The final FD is the highest dilution factor at which two or more panelists can sniff the odor.

Additionally, the relative odor activity values (ROAVs) were calculated according to Eq. (1) (Ma et al., 2024; Wang et al., 2024).

ROAVi = Ci/OTi (Eq. 1).

whereby Ci represents the mass concentration of the volatile compound (μg/L), and OTi represents the odor threshold of the volatile compound in water (μg/L).

2.4. Data processing and analysis

A single-factor ANOVA test was conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics 26 software, with significance analysis performed through Duncan's multiple comparisons (P < 0.05). Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Orthogonal Projections to Latent Structures Discriminant Analysis (OPLS-DA) were performed on aroma volatile compound data using SIMCA 14.1. PCA analysis for electronic nose data was performed using MetaboAnalyst (www.metaboanalyst.ca). Origin 2021 software and TBtools were also utilized to generate plots and heat maps.

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Sensory evaluation

The appearance, liquor color, and infused leaf of Tanyang Congou black tea with flowery-fruity flavor across different grades were shown in Fig. 2. Its appearance features tightly twisted, plump tea leaves that exhibit a dark, lustrous color; the aroma showcases floral, fruity, and honey-like notes; the tea infusion is a bright, clear, and vibrant red, offering a fresh, brisk, and mellow taste that lingers on the palate; the infusion reveals a distinct aroma, while the brewed leaves maintain a bright red hue after steeping. As shown in Table S2, the overall score, as well as appearance, aroma, liquor color, taste, and leaf bottom, diminished as the quality of black tea declined. The third-grade tea received the highest score (90.47), indicating that its flavor quality surpasses that of the second-grade tea (85.87) and the third-grade tea (75.30). The sensory score of black tea is closely linked to the tenderness of fresh leaves (Li et al., 2023). Sensory evaluation indicated that the black tea exhibited a typical aromatic quality characterized by floral and fruity flavors, and complied with the requirements in the standards (DB35/T 632., 2022).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

The appearance and infusion of Tanyang Congou black tea with flowery-fruity flavor.

3.2. Odor compounds analysis using electronic nose

The odor components of Tanyang Congou black tea, characterized by a flowery-fruity flavor, were analyzed using an electronic nose; the radar chart of the electronic nose sensor responses is presented in Fig. 3A. The signal response of sensor W5S (nitrogen oxide) to Tanyang Congou black tea with flowery-fruity flavor was significantly higher than that of other sensors, indicating its sensitivity to nitrogen compounds. Following W5S, the response values were ranked as W1W (sulfide), W1C (aromatic substances, benzene derivatives), W3C (aromatic substances, amines), W5C (short-chain aliphatic aromatic substances), and W2S (alcohols, aldehydes and ketones). All 10 sensors demonstrated response values across samples of different grades. The odor components of the second grade tea and third grade tea were relatively consistent; however, the sensors were unable to differentiate between the second and third grades (Fig. 3B).,The PCA analysis results were aligned with the radar chart of the electronic nose sensor response signals, similar results were obtainted from the black tea discrimination (Yan et al., 2022). The main sensors that highlight the differences in odor composition among the three grades were W5S, W1C, W3, W5C, and W2S.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Analysis of Tanyang Congou black tea odor components with flowery-fruity flavor. (A) Electronic nose radar chart; (B) PCA score plot of the electronic nose.

3.3. Aroma profiles of Tanyang congou black tea with flowery-fruity flavor

3.3.1. Analysis of volatile compounds

Three different grades of Tanyang Congou black tea, characterized by a flowery-fruity flavor, were found to contain 70 volatile compounds using HS-SPME coupled with GC–MS. The detailed relative contents of the identified volatiles are listed in Table 1, comprising 8 alcohols, 14 aldehydes, 15 esters, 7 ketones, 21 terpenes, and 5 heterocyclic compounds. Among them, alcohols (695.22 μg/L), aldehydes (610.13 μg/L), and esters (601.67 μg/L) are the main volatile components, accounting for 30.17 %, 26.48 %, and 26.11 % of the total content, respectively. The research results indicated that alcohols and ketones, aldehydes, and esters primarily contributed to the floral aroma, citrus-like and green flavor, and sweet and coconut-like odor of tea (Wang et al., 2024; Zhai et al., 2022). It can be observed that the relative contents of the top volatile compounds in three different grades are geraniol, 2-phenylethanol, (E)-nerolidol, 2-hexenal, benzaldehyde, phenylacetaldehyde, citral, methyl salicylate, hexanoic acid geraniol ester, (E)-β-ionone, and β-laurene (Table 1). It has been reported that geraniol, methyl salicylate, and (E)-β-ionone are the most important aroma compounds in Keemun, Assam, Darjeeling, and Ceylon black teas (Kang et al., 2019).

Table 1.

Relative content of volatile compounds in Tanyang Congou black tea with flowery-fruity flavor.

NO Compounds CAS Odor descriptions* Qualitative method DB-5MS RI-nist Relative content (μg/L)
FG SG TG
Alcohols
1 linalool 78–70-6 Citrus-like, flowery MS, RI, O 1100 1101 8.21 ± 0.97a 7.26 ± 3.83a 7.74 ± 0.87a
2 3,5-octadien-2-ol 69,668–82-2 / MS, RI 1073 1090 0.97 ± 0.17a 1.46 ± 0.82a ND
3 2-phenylethanol 60–12-8 Flowery, honey-like MS, RI, O 1121 1112 36.73 ± 6.14a 35.62 ± 13.23a 29.23 ± 8.38a
4 (E)-linalool oxides
(pyranoid)
39,028–58-5 Woody MS, RI, O 1176 1173 1.25 ± 0.13a ND ND
5 geraniol 106–24-1 Rose-like, citrus-like MS, RI, O 1247 1256 179.22 ± 5.59a 147.28 ± 28.80ab 120.12 ± 29.44b
6 (E)-nerolidol 40,716–66-3 Woody, flowery MS, RI, O 1563 1562 16.98 ± 2.32b 41.62 ± 12.45a 36.18 ± 8.96ab
7 cypress alcohol 77–53-2 Sweet MS, RI, O 1615 1607 1.27 ± 0.23a 0.85 ± 0.25ab 0.58 ± 0.10b
8 benzyl alcohol 100–51-6 Bitter almond-like, fruity MS, RI 1043 1030 ND 1.65 ± 1.30a ND
Aldehydes
9 hexanal 66–25-1 Green, grassy MS, RI, O 802 801 7.68 ± 1.10a 13.08 ± 1.53b 7.99 ± 0.38a
10 (E)-2-hexenal 6728-26-3 Green apple-like, bitter
almond-like
MS, RI, O 855 850 12.03 ± 3.49b 21.16 ± 4.83a 14.37 ± 1.87ab
11 heptanal 111–71-7 Citrus-like, fatty MS, RI, O 904 901 1.22 ± 0.10a 2.17 ± 0.40a 1.62 ± 0.79a
12 2-heptenal 57,266–86-1 Green, fatty MS, RI, O 961 958 1.27 ± 0.41b 2.97 ± 1.14a 1.54 ± 0.62ab
13 benzaldehyde 100–52-7 Bitter almond-like, marzipan-like MS, RI, O 966 964 44.49 ± 3.64a 57.80 ± 18.17a 53.78 ± 4.71a
14 (E,E)-2,4-heptadienal 4313-03-5 Fatty, flowery MS, RI, O 1022 995 6.31 ± 2.66b 25.23 ± 9.48a 6.40 ± 1.91b
15 phenylacetaldehyde 122–78-1 Honey-like, beeswax-like MS, RI, O 1047 1051 64.69 ± 8.13a 62.01 ± 19.58a 74.46 ± 12.27a
16 nonanal 124–19-6 Citrus-like, soapy MS,RI,O 1105 1102 3.74 ± 0.37b 15.35 ± 2.17a 4.17 ± 2.98b
17 β-cyclcitral 432–25-7 Tropical, saffron, herbal, tobacco-like MS,RI,O 1219 1217 1.69 ± 0.05a 3.01 ± 1.31a 1.79 ± 0.60a
18 (Z)-3,7-dimethyl-2,6-octadienal 106–26-3 Citrus-like, fruity MS,RI,O 1237 1238 2.87 ± 0.47a 3.47 ± 0.78a 2.99 ± 1.16a
19 citral 5392-40-5 Fruity MS,RI,O 1265 1240.5 27.85 ± 1.70a 18.17 ± 4.13b 15.19 ± 2.74b
20 (E)-2-butyl-2-octenal 13,019–16-4 / MS,RI 1370 1378 0.97 ± 0.33a ND ND
21 (E)-2-octenal 2548-87-0 Fatty, nutty MS,RI 1060 1062 ND 5.15 ± 0.91b 3.04 ± 0.35a
22 2,4-dimethylbenzaldehyde 15,764–16-6 / MS,RI 1181 1181 ND 3.2 ± 1.55a 1.47 ± 0.84a
Esters
23 (E)-hex-3-enyl butanoate 53,398–84-8 / MS,RI 1184 1185 7.87 ± 0.17a 8.66 ± 1.36a 10.49 ± 2.56a
24 methyl salicylate 119–36-8 Mint-like MS,RI,O 1195 1193 163.34 ± 9.35a 122.91 ± 19.59b 108.90 ± 3.46b
25 (Z)-3-hexen-2-yl butanoate 53,398–85-9 Herb, sweet MS,RI,O 1227 1233.5 3.38 ± 0.64b 5.34 ± 0.95a 4.61 ± 0.57ab
26 geranyl acetate 1189-09-9 / MS,RI 1319 1321 1.73 ± 0.03a ND ND
27 hex-3-enyl hexanoate 84,434–19-5 / MS,RI 1374 1376 0.59 ± 0.03a ND ND
28 hexanoic acid geraniol ester 31,501–11-8 Fruity MS,RI,O 1378 1376 26.12 ± 3.46b 47.86 ± 9.73a 36.57 ± 2.91ab
29 hexyl hexanoate 6378-65-0 Fruity MS,RI,O 1383 1384 5.10 ± 0.47a 5.99 ± 1.87a 5.49 ± 0.87a
30 N-hexanoic acid ((E)-2-hexenyl) ester 53,398–86-0 / MS,RI 1387 1391 3.59 ± 0.72a 4.01 ± 1.67a 3.35 ± 1.76a
31 isobutyric acid phenethyl ester 103–48-0 / MS,RI 1447 1449 3.90 ± 0.17a ND ND
32 2-methylbutyric acid phenethyl ester 24,817–51-4 / MS,RI 1488 1488 6.51 ± 0.72c 54.52 ± 11.46a 26.15 ± 3.74b
33 (Z)-3-hexen-1-ol benzoate 25,152–85-6 / MS,RI 1583 1567 1.20 ± 0.04a ND 4.21 ± 1.71b
34 2,2,4-trimethyl-1,3-pentanediol diisobutyrate 6846-50-0 / MS,RI 1587 1587.5 1.44 ± 0.12a ND 1.17 ± 0.14a
35 butyric acid phenethyl ester 103–52-6 / MS,RI 1220 1219 ND 24.79 ± 5.02a ND
36 dihydroactinidiolide 17,092–92-1 Musty, pungent MS,RI 1533 1522 ND 1.86 ± 1.21a ND
37 methyl jasmonate 042536–97-0 Jasmine-like, flowery MS,RI 1654 1684.5 ND 3.44 ± 1.65a ND
Ketones
38 jasmone 488–10-8 Flowery MS,RI 1397 1394 1.26 ± 0.26c 10.38 ± 0.83a 5.87 ± 0.88b
39 α-ionone 127–41-3 Flowery, violet-like MS,RI,O 1424 1424 1.08 ± 0.35b 1.39 ± 0.47ab 2.31 ± 0.52a
40 geranyl acetone 3796-70-1 Flowery MS,RI 1452 1428 3.13 ± 0.46a 2.80 ± 0.09a 2.31 ± 0.52a
41 (E)-β-ionone 79–77-6 Flowery, violet-like MS,RI,O 1481 1485 15.29 ± 3.30ab 18.41 ± 3.79a 11.51 ± 0.21b
42 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one 110–93-0 Citrus-like, fruity MS,RI,O 984 986 ND 6.88 ± 1.07 a 4.42 ± 1.10 a
43 3,5-octadien-2-one 38,284–27-4 / MS,RI 1075 1090 ND 5.36 ± 3.11a ND
44 2-methyl-6-methylene-1,7-octadien-3-one 41,702–60-7 / MS,RI 1319 1345 ND 3.07 ± 1.26a ND
Olefins
45 β-laurene 123–35-3 Fatty MS,RI,O 989 988 18.35 ± 1.34a 11.91 ± 3.44b 10.43 ± 0.87b
46 pinene 586–63-0 Pine woody MS,RI,O 1017 1055 0.75 ± 0.12a ND ND
47 (+)-dipentene 5989–27-5 Citrus-like, carrot-like MS,RI 1030 1030 2.94 ± 0.30a 1.75 ± 0.91a 1.91 ± 0.15a
48 (E)-Β-basilene 3779-61-1 Terpene-like MS,RI,O 1036 1044 3.48 ± 0.54a 2.20 ± 1.23a 2.54 ± 0.98a
49 2,4-dimethyl styrene 1195-32-0 / MS,RI 1092 1089 1.47 ± 0.28a 1.24 ± 0.43a 0.94 ± 0.36a
50 isoborneol 7216-56-0 / MS,RI,O 1129 1131 2.55 ± 0.81a ND ND
51 tetradecane 629–59-4 / MS,RI 1398 1399 0.75 ± 0.12a ND ND
52 (E)-β-acacia olefin 18,794–84-8 / MS,RI 1454 1460 2.47 ± 0.13b 7.58 ± 2.87a 4.62 ± 1.18ab
53 pentadecane 629–62-9 / MS,RI 1499 1497 0.66 ± 0.11a ND ND
54 α-farnesene 502–61-4 Citrus-like, flowery, Woody MS,RI,O 1504 1504 1.93 ± 0.93c 8.41 ± 0.57a 4.76 ± 0.99b
55 β-copaene 495–61-4 / MS,RI 1508 1510 0.60 ± 0.17a 1.61 ± 0.79a 0.94 ± 0.48a
56 Δ-juniperene 483–76-1 / MS,RI 1520 1523 0.25 ± 0.07b 0.78 ± 0.34a 0.79 ± 0.05a
57 Α-dihydrocalamenene 21,391–99-1 / MS,RI 1545 1541 0.25 ± 0.06a ND ND
58 hexadecane 544–76-3 / MS,RI 1599 1599 1.12 ± 0.23a ND 0.86 ± 0.28a
59 newly synthesized diene 504–96-1 / MS,RI 1838 1836 0.52 ± 0.12a ND ND
60 5-ethyl-m-xylene 934–74-7 / MS,RI 1025 1059 ND 3.01 ± 1.28a 2.47 ± 0.44a
61 Β-nitrophenylethane 6125-24-2 / MS,RI 1303 1300 ND 41.77 ± 8.72a ND
62 α-cedrene 469–61-4 / MS,RI 1503 1504 ND 0.61 ± 0.34a ND
63 α-caryophyllene 25,532–79-0 / MS,RI 1542 1544.6 ND 0.72 ± 0.26a ND
64 styrene 100–42-5 / MS,RI 890 886 1.01 ± 0.15a ND ND
65 (E)-calamenene 73,209–42-4 / MS,RI 1524 1530 0.57 ± 0.11a ND ND
Heterocycles
66 (E)-2-(2-pentenyl)furan 3208-16-0 / MS,RI 999 1001 1.30 ± 0.44a ND ND
67 phenylacetonitrile 140–29-4 / MS,RI 1145 1150 26.79 ± 3.52c 126.90 ± 16.60a 60.21 ± 3.14b
68 naphthalene 91–20-3 / MS,RI 1191 1186 5.86 ± 1.97a 3.42 ± 0.68a 4.46 ± 0.92a
69 indole 120–72-9 Fecal-like, mothball-like MS,RI 1343 1327 ND 21.15 ± 2.23a ND
70 (Z)-2-(2-pentenyl)furan 70,424–14-5 / MS,RI 999 1001 ND 0.54 ± 0.29a ND

Note: RI represents the retention index of volatile compounds, calculated based on the retention times of volatile compounds on a DB-5MS capillary column and the retention times of n-alkanes ranging from C7 to C40; RI-nistrefers to the retention index as represented in the NIST mass spectrometry database; MS、RI and O represent qualitative methods of NIST Mass Spectrometry Database, Retention Index and Olfactory, respectively; *: Odor descriptions are obtained from the literature, flavornet database or odorant database, /: no odor descriptions were found; ND: not detected; FG (first grade), SG (second grade), TG (third grade). The different letters indicate significant differences at P < 0.05.

3.3.2. PCA and OPLS-DA analysis

Unsupervised Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was performed on the GC–MS-identified volatile compounds. As shown in Fig. 4A, the three Tanyang Congou black tea grades with flowery-fruity flavor were effectively distinguished with R2X = 0.846 and Q2 = 0.406 model parameters. Subsequently, supervised orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) was conducted based on the PCA results, with model parameters of R2X = 0.948, R2Y = 0.974, and Q2 = 0.887. Fig. 4B showed that the three grades of Tanyang Congou black tea with their flowery-fruity flavor were more distinctly separated, indicating significant differences in the volatile compounds among the various tea grades.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

PCA and OPLS-DA analysis of Tanyang Congou black tea with flowery-fruity flavor. (A) PCA score graph; (B) OPLS-DA score plot; (C) Variable importance values of OPLS-DA; (D) 200 permutation tests.

Variable Importance in the Projection (VIP) in the OPLS-DA model characterizes the differential contributions of compounds in the samples. A VIP value greater than 1 indicates that a compound makes a significant contribution to the differences between the samples (Wei et al., 2023). Through OPLS-DA analysis, 16 differential volatile compounds with VIP values greater than 1 have been analyzed (Fig. 4C). These compounds included linalool, methyl salicylate, benzonitrile, (E)-linalool oxide, indole, phenethyl benzoate, β-nitrostyrene, (E,E)-2,4-heptadienal, hexyl salicylate, 2-methylbut-2-yl benzoate, benzaldehyde, citral, nonanal, (E)-β-ionone, 2-phenylethanol, and β-caryophyllene. Additionally, 200 permutation tests were conducted to assess the reliability of the OPLS-DA model. The intercept for R2 is 0.633, and the intercept for Q2 is −0.55, indicating no overfitting for the model. This demonstrated that the model exhibits high credibility and predictability (Fig. 4D). It is well known that each aroma compound in tea presents a unique aroma profile with varying sensory thresholds. Merely having a high relative content of aromatic compounds does not guarantee a significant contribution to the overall aroma quality of the tea. Therefore, to identify the key aroma compounds in Tanyang Congou black tea with a flowery-fruity flavor, it is necessary to conduct relative odor activity value calculations and aroma extract dilution analysis, coupled with GC-O-MS analysis.

3.4. Key aroma compounds of Tanyang congou black tea with flowery-fruity flavor

3.4.1. AEDA and GC-O-MS analysis

The AEDA and GC-O-MS analysis was carried out to further identify key aroma compounds of Tanyang Congou black tea with flowery-fruity flavor. A total of 29 aroma compounds were identified across all three grades, among them, 16 aroma volatiles, such as geraniol, (E)-linalool oxide (pyranoid), linalool, (E)-nerolidol, hexanal, benzaldehyde, (E,E)-2,4-heptadienal, phenylacetaldehyde, (E)-3-hexenyl butanoate, (Z)-3-hexenyl hexanoate, 3,5-octadien-2-one, (Z)-3,7-dimethyl-2,6-octadienal, citral, (E)-β-ionone, methyl salicylate, and isoborneol have higher FD values over 8 in all three black tea grades (Fig. 5) and were selected as key aroma compounds. The higher the FD values of compounds, the greater their contribution to the tea aroma (Wang et al., 2024). Linalool (512, 512, 512; citrus-like, flowery), phenylacetaldehyde (512, 512, 512; honey-like, beeswax-like), citral (512, 512, 512; fruity) and geraniol (512, 512, 512; rose-like, citrus-like) were the most intensely perceived in Tanyang Congou black tea with flowery-fruity flavor, followed by hexanal (256, 512, 256; green, grassy), (E)-β-ionone (512, 128, 128; flowery, violet-like) and (E)-nerolidol (512, 128, 128; woody, flowery), methyl salicylate (256, 256, 128; mint-like) and (Z)-3,7-dimethyl-2,6-octadienal (256, 256, 128; citrus-like, fruity), benzaldehyde (128, 64, 64; bitter almond-like, marzipan-like) and (Z)-3-Hexenyl hexanoate (8, 128, 64, fruity), and the other 5 aroma compounds also received strongly positive response (FD ≥ 8). These aroma compounds are likely essential components that contribute to the overall aroma profile of Tanyang Congou black tea, characterized by a flowery-fruity flavor. The FD values of (E)-β-ionone, (E)-nerolidol, benzaldehyde, and (E)-linalool oxide (pyranoid) in first-grade black tea were higher than those in second- and third-grade teas. This could be a primary reason for the superior floral and fruity aroma of first-grade tea compared to second and third-grade teas, and the results were consistent with the sensory evaluation.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

16 volatiles (FD ≥ 8) in Tanyang Congou black tea with flowery-fruity flavor by GC–O–MS and AEDA.

3.4.2. Screening for key aroma compounds and ROAV calculation

A high concentration of volatiles does not necessarily indicate a significant contribution. Herein, the volatile compounds identified by GC–MS were further quantified using ROAV calculation, the larger the ROAV, the greater the contribution to the tea aroma. As shown in Table 2, 11 compounds with ROAV >1 were calculated, including geraniol, linalool, (E)-nerolidol, hexanal, phenylacetaldehyde, nonanal, citral, (E,E)-2,4-heptadienal, (E)-β-ionone, α-ionone and β-laurene.

Table 2.

Aroma compounds (relative odor activity value ≥1) and odor attributes of Tanyang Congou black tea samples.

NO Compounds Odor descriptions* Threshold values (μg/L) ROAV
FG SG TG
1 Geraniol Rose-like, citrus-like 3.2 56.00 ± 1.74a 46.02 ± 9.00ab 37.53 ± 9.20b
2 Linalool Citrus-like, flowery 0.6 13.68 ± 1.62b 12.11 ± 6.38b 23.52 ± 8.43a
3 (E)-nerolidol Woody, flowery 10 1.69 ± 0.23b 5.67 ± 2.03a 3.61 ± 0.89ab
4 Hexanal Green, grassy 2.4 3.20 ± 0.45a 6.45 ± 2.00a 4.74 ± 2.45a
5 Phenylacetaldehyde Honey-like, beeswax-like 5.2 12.44 ± 1.93a 17.57 ± 9.79a 14.31 ± 2.36a
6 Nonanal Citrus-like, soapy 2.8 1.33 ± 0.13b 5.48 ± 0.77a 1.49 ± 1.06b
7 Citral Fruity 5 27.85 ± 1.70a 3.63 ± 0.82b 3.03 ± 0.54b
8 (E,E)-2,4-heptadienal Fatty, flowery 0.032 197.49 ± 83.37b 788.47 ± 96.32a 280.85 ± 56.3b
9 (E)-β-ionone Flowery, violet-like 0.021 728.43 ± 57.21a 625.05 ± 54.74a 407.79 ± 43.28a
10 α-ionone Flowery, violet-like 0.4 2.70 ± 0.88a 3.47 ± 1.19a 2.83 ± 1.05a
11 β-laurene Fatty 1.2 15.29 ± 1.12a 9.92 ± 2.86b 8.69 ± 0.72b

Note: FG (first grade), SG (second grade), TG (third grade). The different letters indicate significant differences at P < 0.05. *: Odor descriptions are obtained from the literature, flavornet database or odorant database.

(E)-β-ionone (flowery, violet-like) presented the highest ROAV values (> 400), followed by (E,E)-2,4-heptadienal (fatty, flowery, > 100), linalool (citrus-like, flowery), geraniol (rose-like, citrus-like) and phenylacetaldehyde (honey-like, beeswax-like,10–100), and the OAVs of other 6 compounds, i.e., (E)-nerolidol (woody, flowery), hexanal (green, grassy), nonanal (citrus-like, soapy), citral (fruity), α-ionone (flowery, violet-like) and β-laurene (fruity) were 1–10. The ROAVs of (E)-β-ionone, citral and geraniol in the first grade were higher than that of the second- and third-grade teas (Table 2), which was consistent with the results obtained from the sensory evaluation and AEDA analysis. Overall, (E)-β-ionone, (E)-nerolidol, geraniol, citral, linalool, hexanal, and phenylacetaldehyde are characteristic aromatic compounds contributing to the “floral and fruity” aroma profile of Tanyang Congou black tea based on ROAV and FD. Aromatic profiles were categorized for the aroma compounds identified by GC-O analysis, and the aromatic flavor wheel for Tanyang Congou black tea with flowery-fruity flavor was shown in Fig. 6. Floral and fruity are predominantly characterized, and aroma compounds constitute a significant proportion, accounting for 27 % and 46 %, respectively. Fruity flavor characteristics of black tea prepared from Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze cv. Jinmudan were identified in previous study, and (Z)-methyl epi-jasmonate, phenylacetaldehyde, linalool, geraniol and jasmine lactone were the main aroma active compounds (Li et al., 2022). For the Congou black tea using traditional manufacturing methods, floral flavor did not manifest and linalool, (Z)-pyran linalool oxide, (E)-furan linalool oxide, β-laurene, methyl salicylate, and 2-phenylethanol were identified as key contributors to the aromatic flavors (Mao et al., 2018). Shaking is an innovative technology employed in black tea manufacturing to enhance floral flavor (Wang et al., 2024), incorporating the shaking in the early withering process into Hunan black tea can promote the intensities of indole and methyl jasmonate, contributing to the formation of floral aromas (Yin et al., 2023). Shaking and standing treatment significantly improved the floral and sweet quality of summer black tea, with high ROAVs of linalool, (E)-β-ionone, geraniol, β-myrcene, (E)-2-hexenal, phenylacetaldehyde, (Z)-3-hexenyl hexanoate, 1-hexanol, and 2-phenylethanol (Wang et al., 2024). Eight key differential aromatic odorants, i.e., geraniol, citral, (E)-nerolidol, 2,6-dimethyl-2,4,6-octantriene, (Z)-hexanoic acid-3-hexenyl ester, ethyl hexanoate, decanal, and (E)-β-ionone, were identified in shaking treatment black tea (Wang et al., 2022a).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

The aroma wheel of Tanyang Congou black tea with flowery-fruity flavor.

3.5. The possible mechanism of floral and fruity aroma during manufacturing

An essential factor in the formation of tea aroma lies in aroma precursors, which undergo complex chemical reactions and biosynthetic pathways during tea manufacturing, such as carotenoid oxidation and degradation, fatty acid oxidation and degradation, glycoside hydrolysis, Maillard reaction, and biosynthesis of volatile terpenoids (Chen et al., 2022; Zhai et al., 2022). Shaking technology enhances cell fragmentation by flipping the leaves, which increases the contact between enzymes like oxidase and hydrolase and their substrates, as well as biochemical reaction induced by abiotic stress. This process promotes the oxidation of polyphenols, the hydrolysis of glycosides and secondary metabolic biosynthesis, contributing to the formation of floral and fruit aromas (Wang et al., 2023a; Wang et al., 2024; Hu et al., 2018). The manufacturing samples of Tanyang Congou black tea with flowery-fruity flavor at different stages, including fresh leaf (FL), withering (W), shaking (S), rolling (R), fermention (F), drying (D), and re-drying (ReD), were collected, respectively. HS-SPME-GC–MS analysis was used to investigate the key aromatic compounds to elucidate the possible mechanism of formation of floral and fruity aroma compounds. Floral and fruity aroma profiles are generally associated with four kinds of pathways, i.e., terpenoid biosynthesis pathway ((E)-geraniol, linalool, citral, geraniol), fatty acid derivative pathway (hexanal), carotenoid derivative pathway ((E)-β-ionone), and volatile phenylpropane/benzenoid pathway (phenylacetaldehyde) (Chen et al., 2019; Chen et al., 2022; Yang et al., 2013), as shown in Fig. S1 – Supplementary materials.

As illustrated in Fig. 7, the contents of (E)-nerolidol, (E)-β-ionone, and phenylacetaldehyde were significantly increased during the tea manufacturing (P < 0.05). β-carotene cleavage dioxygenases catalyze the oxidation of β-carotene (Chen et al., 2024; Wang et al., 2020), leading to the continuous accumulation of (E)-β-ionone during withering and subsequent tea manufacturing stages. Phenylacetaldehyde is a volatile compound that is produced from phenylalanine via a deamination reaction. From the fermenting to the re-drying, there is a significant increase in the content of phenylacetaldehyde (P < 0.05). This could be attributed to the intense deamination reaction of phenylalanine under heating conditions, causing a rapid conversion of phenylalanine to phenylacetaldehyde (Ho et al., 2015). During the manufacturing, the relative content of linalool initially increased and then declined, peaking during the shaking. At this stage, the cell walls of the tea leaves are nearly intact, and endogenous hydrolytic enzymes and bound glycosides would not undergo hydrolysis due to the different locations. Therefore, linalool is likely not formed by the hydrolysis of its glycosides, but rather synthesized de novo (Zeng et al., 2017). Geraniol has the highest relative content and peaks during the rolling through geraniol glycosidase hydrolysis (P < 0.05). Tea leaf cell walls are minimally damaged, allowing hydrolytic enzymes and glycosides sufficient contact to interact effectively (Cui et al., 2016; Zeng et al., 2017). Endogenous glycosides are hydrolyzed to release a large amount of geraniol (P < 0.05). The content of hexanal significantly increased (P < 0.05) after shaking. Mechanical damage induced by the shaking process activated the expression of structural genes in the lipoxygenase pathway of unsaturated fatty acids (Hu et al., 2018). Additionally, dehydration stress on the leaves triggers enhanced fatty acid metabolism during withering, promoting lipoxygenase-mediated lipid oxidation (Wang et al., 2019). Remarkably, the re-drying process significantly increases the content of (E)-geraniol, citral, and phenylacetaldehyde, contributing to the development of the floral and fruity aroma profile in Tanyang Congou black tea and enhancing its aromatic quality. Studies have shown that drying step played a crucial role in the formation of sweet and fruity aromas for black tea because of the Maillard reaction (Ma et al., 2024; Qu et al., 2019), aroma compunds of hexanal, 1-hexanol, (Z)-3-hexen-1-ol, (E,E)-2,4-heptadienal, methyl salicylate and β-damascenone with ROAVs >10 were found to have increased significantly (P < 0.01) after drying (Ma et al., 2024).

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

The content changes of key aromatic compounds during the manufacturing.

Numerous methods have been implemented to explore the feasibility of aroma enhancement of black tea, including withering technology (Huang et al., 2022), light irradiation during withering (Li et al., 2022), fermentation time optimization (Wang et al., 2021), processing technology (Chen et al., 2023; Chen et al., 2024) and external β-glucosidase assistance during fermentation (Supriyadi et al., 2021). Sun withering significantly improved the floral and fruity aroma of Keemun black tea with high ROAV values of linalool and geraniol (Huang et al., 2022). Red light significantly increased the activity of glycosidase and expression of LIS, FAS, LOX and ADH during withering stage, improving the main floral aroma components of summer-autumn black tea (Li et al., 2022). 3 h was the optimal fermentation time for Yunnan Congou black tea with most abundant of aroma compounds (linalool, phenylacetaldehyde, methyl salicylate, benzaldehyde, 2-pentyl-furan, and (E)-β-ionone) (Wang et al., 2021). The addition of external β-glucosidase during fermentation significantly increased the precursors of linalool, geraniol, and methyl salicylate (Supriyadi et al., 2021). Re-rolling processing technology are beneficial to enriching small-leaf Congou black tea aroma, because it significantly increased the levels of aldehydic and ester fatty acid-derived volatiles, amino acid-derived volatiles, carotenoid-derived volatiles, and alkene volatile terpenoid (Chen et al., 2023). In comparison to these methods, shaking technology is straightforward and does not require specific types of tea leaves, but it effectively stimulate endogenous biochemical reaction and generate a higher concentration of aroma compounds or precursors.

4. Conclusions

In this study, the aroma profiles of Tanyang Congou Black Tea with a characteristic flowery-fruity flavor were systematically analyzed using sensory evaluation, an electronic nose (E-Nose), and headspace solid-phase microextraction gas chromatography-olfactometry-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-O-MS) . The sensory evaluation confirmed the presence of distinct floral and fruity attributes, validating the tea's preparation process. A total of 29 aroma compounds were identified, among which 16 volatiles exhibited flavor dilution values greater than 8, and 11 compounds had relative odor activity values exceeding 1. Seven key aroma-contributing compounds were identified: (E)-β-ionone, (E)-nerolidol, geraniol, citral, linalool, hexanal, and phenylacetaldehyde. These findings provide a comprehensive understanding of the aroma composition of Tanyang Congou Black Tea and offer a theoretical foundation for optimizing the manufacturing of high-aroma black teas.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Di Zhou: Writing – original draft, Methodology, Investigation, Conceptualization. Xin-yu Liu: Writing – original draft, Methodology, Formal analysis. Miao-qin Xie: Writing – original draft, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis. Hao-jie Xu: Writing – original draft, Methodology, Investigation. Huai-hui Yi: Writing – original draft, Methodology, Investigation. Da-xiang Li: Writing – original draft, Methodology, Investigation. Ru-yan Hou: Writing – original draft, Methodology, Formal analysis. Hui-mei Cai: Writing – original draft, Project administration, Methodology, Investigation, Conceptualization. Xiao-chun Wan: Writing – original draft, Methodology, Investigation, Conceptualization. Daniel Granato: Writing – original draft, Conceptualization. Chuan-yi Peng: Writing – original draft, Supervision, Project administration, Methodology, Investigation, Conceptualization.

Declaration of competing interest

We confirm that the work described in this submission has not been published previously. The manuscript has been read and approved by all named authors, as well as by the relevant authorities at the institutions where the research was conducted. We also confirm that all authors have agreed upon the order of authors listed in the manuscript. The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could be perceived as influencing the work reported in this paper. We have carefully considered the protection of intellectual property related to this work and confirm that there are no obstacles to publication, including timing issues concerning intellectual property. We affirm that we have adhered to the regulations of our institution regarding intellectual property. Additionally, no animal studies are involved in this manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The present work was financially supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (32172636), the Agriculture Research System of China of MOF and MARA (CARS-19), Anhui Province Excellent Research and Innovation Team (2022AH010055), and Fujian Province Young and Middle-aged Teachers' Educational Research Projects (JAT231302).

Footnotes

Appendix A

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fochx.2025.102595.

Contributor Information

Daniel Granato, Email: daniel.granato@ul.ie.

Chuan-yi Peng, Email: pcy0917@ahau.edu.cn.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

Supplementary material.

mmc1.docx (77KB, docx)

Data availability

Data will be made available on request.

References

  1. Chen Q., Fu Y., Heng W. Re-rolling treatment in the fermentation process improves the taste and liquor color qualities of black tea. Food Chemistry: X. 2024;21 doi: 10.1016/j.fochx.2024.101143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chen Q., Yu P., Li Z., Wang Y., Liu Y., Zhu Y., Fu H. Re-rolling treatment in the fermentation process improves the aroma quality of black tea. Foods. 2023:3702. doi: 10.3390/foods12193702. Article 12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen Q., Zhu Y., Dai W. Aroma formation and dynamic changes during white tea processing. Food Chemistry. 2019;274:915–924. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.09.072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen Q., Zhu Y., Liu Y. Black tea aroma formation during the fermentation period. Food Chemistry. 2022;374 doi: 10.1016/j.fochx.2023.100616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cui J., Katsuno T., Totsuka K. Characteristic fluctuations in glycosidically bound volatiles during tea processing and identification of their unstable derivatives. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2016;64(5):1151–1157. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b05072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. DB35/T 632. Fujian provincial tea industry standardization technical Committee of the People's Republic of China. 2022. http://down.foodmate.net/standard/yulan.php?itemid=127676 Tanyang Congou black tea-Technical specification for processing.
  7. Dong H.Y., Li Y.H., Lai X.F., Hao M.J., Sun L.L., Li Q.H.…Liu X.H. Effects of fermentation duration on the flavour quality of large leaf black tea based on metabolomics. Food Chemistry. 2024;444 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.138680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Feng Z., Li Y., Li M., Wang Y., Zhang L., Wan X., Yang X. Tea aroma formation from six model manufacturing processes. Food Chemistry. 2019;285:347–354. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.01.174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. GB/T 23776 . 2018. Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China. Methodology for sensory evaluation of tea.http://down.foodmate.net/standard/yulan.php?itemid=52614 [Google Scholar]
  10. Ho C., Zheng X., Li S. Tea aroma formation. Food Science and Human Wellness. 2015;4(1):9–27. doi: 10.1016/j.fshw.2015.04.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hu C.J., Li D., Ma Y.X., Zhang W., Lin C., Zheng X.Q.…Lu J.L. Formation mechanism of the oolong tea characteristic aroma during bruising and withering treatment. Food Chemistry. 2018;269:202–211. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.07.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Huang W.J., Fang S.M., Wang J., Zhuo C., Luo Y.H., Yu Y.L., Li L.Q., Wang Y.J., Deng W.W., Ning J.M. Sensomics analysis of the effect of the withering method on the aroma components of Keemun black tea. Food Chemistry. 2022;395 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.133549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kang S., Yan H., Zhu Y., Liu X., Lv H., Zhang Y. Identification and quantification of key odorants in the world’s four most famous black teas. Food Research International. 2019;121:73–83. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Li J.Y., Hao C.H., Jia H.Y., Zhang J., Wu H.T., Ning J.M., Wang R.J., Deng W.W. Aroma characterization and their changes during the processing of black teas from the cultivar, Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze cv. Jinmudan. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis. 2022;108 [Google Scholar]
  15. Li L.Q., Chen Y.R., Dong S., Shen J.F., Cao S.C., Cui Q.Q., Song Y., Ning J.M. Rapid and comprehensive grade evaluation of Keemun black tea using efficient multidimensional data fusion. Food Chemistry: X. 2023;20 doi: 10.1016/j.fochx.2023.100924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Li Y., Li C., Yu X., Zhou J., Ntezimana B., Yu Z. Study on improving aroma quality of summer-autumn black tea by red-light irradiation during withering. LWT-Food Science Technology. 2022;154 doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112597. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ma J., Wang Y., Li J. Aroma formation mechanism by the drying step during congou black tea processing: Analyses by HP-SPME and SAFE with GC-MS. LWT-food. Science and Technology. 2024;198:116019. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2024.116019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mao S., Lu C., Li M. Identification of key aromatic compounds in congou black tea by partial least-square regression with variable importance of projection scores and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry/gas chromatography-olfactometry. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2018;98(14):5278–5286. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.9066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ouyang, J., Jiang, R. G., Xu, H., Wen, S., Liu, C. W., Liu, Y., Chen, H. Y., Zhai, Y. K., He, X., Chen, J. H., Li, S., Wang, K. B., Liu, Z. H., & Huang, J. A. (2024). Insights into the flavor profiles of different grades of Huangpu black tea using sensory histology techniques and metabolomics. Food Chemistry: X, 23,Article 101600. doi: 10.1016/j.fochx.2024.101600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  20. Peng C.Y., Ren Y.F., Ye Z.H., Y., Zhu, H. Y., Liu, X. Q., Chen, X. T., Hou, R. Y., Granato, G., & Cai, H. M. A comparative UHPLC-Q/TOF-MS-based metabolomics approach coupled with machine learning algorithms to differentiate Keemun black teas from narrow-geographic origins. Food Research International. 2022;158 doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Qiao X., Zhang S., He S., Liu S. Urate oxidase treatment increases the quality of autumn yellowish Yinghong 9 black tea. LWT - Food Science and Technology. 2023;184 doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2023.115092. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Qu F., Zhu X., Ai Z., Ai Y., Qiu F., Ni D. Effect of different drying methods on the sensory quality and chemical components of black tea. LWT-Food Science Technology. 2019;99:112–118. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2018.09.036. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ren Y.F., Ye Z.H., Liu X.Q., Xia W.J., Yuan Y., Zhu H.Y.…Peng C.Y. Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy-based metabolomics for the discrimination of Keemun black teas coupled with chemometrics. LWT-Food Science Technology. 2023;181 doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2023.114742. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Song H., Liu J. GC-O-MS technique and its applications in food flavor analysis. Food Research International. 2018;114:187–198. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.07.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Su D., He J.J., Zhou Y.Z., Li Y.L., Zhou H.J. Aroma effects of key volatile compounds in Keemun black tea at different grades: HS-SPME-GC-MS, sensory evaluation, and chemometrics. Food Chemistry. 2022;373(B) doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Supriyadi S., Nareswari A.R., Fitriani A., Gunadi R. Enhancement of black tea aroma by adding the β-glucosidase enzyme during fermentation on black tea processing. International Journal of Food Science. 2021;2021:1–9. doi: 10.1155/2021/5542109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Wang H., Hua J., Jiang Y. Influence of fixation methods on the chestnut-like aroma of green tea and dynamics of key aroma substances. Food Research International. 2020;136:109479. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wang H.J., Shen S., Wang J.J., Jiang Y.W., Li J., Yang Y.Q.…Yuan H.B. Novel insight into the effect of fermentation time on quality of Yunnan congou black tea. LWT-food. Science and Technology. 2021;155 doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112939. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Wang J.J., Ouyang W., Zhu X.Z., Jiang Y.W., Yu Y.Y., Chen M.…Hua J.J. Effect of shaking on the improvement of aroma quality and transformation of volatile metabolites in black tea. Food Chemistry: X. 2023;20 doi: 10.1016/j.fochx.2023.101007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wang K., Xiao Y., Xie N., Xu H., Li S., Liu C., Huang J., Zhang S., Liu Z., Yin X. Effect of leaf grade on taste and aroma of shaken Hunan black tea. Foods. 2023;13(1) doi: 10.3390/foods13010042. Article 42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Wang Y., Zheng P., Liu P. Novel insight into the role of the withering process in characteristic flavor formation of teas using transcriptome analysis and metabolite profiling. Food Chemistry. 2019;272:313–322. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Wang Y.J., Huang L.F., Deng G.J., Ning J.M. The shaking and standing processing improve the aroma quality of summer black tea. Food Chemistry. 2024;454 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.139772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Wei, Y., Zhang, J., Li, T., Zhao, M., Song, Z., Wang, Y., & Ning, J. (2023). GC-MS, GC-O, and sensomics analysis reveals the key odorants underlying the improvement of yellow tea aroma after optimized yellowing. Food Chemistry, 431,Article 137139. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.137139. [DOI] [PubMed]
  34. Xue, J., Liu, P., Yin, J., Wang, W., Zhang, J., Wang, W., Le, T., Ni, D., & Jiang, H. (2022). Dynamic changes in volatile compounds of shaken black tea during its manufacture by GC × GC-TOFMS and multivariate data analysis. Foods. 11(9), article 1228. doi: 10.3390/foods11091228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  35. Yan T.Y., Lin J.X., Zhu J.X., Ye N.X., Huang J.F., Wang P.J., Jin S., Zheng D.Y., Yang J.F. Aroma analysis of Fuyun 6 and Jinguanyin black tea in the Fu'an area based on E-nose and GC–MS. European Food Research and Technology. 2022;248:947–961. doi: 10.1007/s00217-021-03930-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Yang Z.Y., Baldermann S., Watanabe N. Recent studies of the volatile compounds in tea. Food Research International. 2013;53(2):585–599. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2013.02.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Yao H.B., Su H., Ma J.Y., Zheng J., He W., Wu C.L., Hou Z.Y. Widely targeted volatileomics analysis reveals the typical aroma formation of Xinyang black tea during fermentation. Food Research International. 2023;164 doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.112387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Ye, J., Wang, Y., & Lin, S. (2023). Effect of processing on aroma intensity and odor characteristic of Shuixian (Camellia sinensis) tea. Food Chemistry: X, 17,Article 100616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  39. Yin X., Xiao Y., Wang K. Effect of shaking manners on floral aroma quality and identification of key floral-aroma-active compounds in Hunan black tea. Food Research International. 2023;174 doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2023.113515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Zeng L., Fu Y., Huang J. Comparative analysis of volatile compounds in Tieguanyin with different types based on HS-SPME-GC-MS. Foods. 2022;11(11):1530. doi: 10.3390/foods11111530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Zeng L., Zhou Y., Fu X. Does oolong tea (Camellia sinensis) made from a combination of leaf and stem smell more aromatic than leaf-only tea? Contribution of the stem to oolong tea aroma. Food Chemistry. 2017;237:488–498. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.05.137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Zhai X.T., Zhang L., Granvogl M., Ho C.T., Wan X.C. Flavor of tea (Camellia sinensis): A review on odorants and analytical techniques. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety. 2022;21:3867–3909. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material.

mmc1.docx (77KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.


Articles from Food Chemistry: X are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES