Skip to main content
Current Neuropharmacology logoLink to Current Neuropharmacology
. 2024 Nov 5;23(6):686–704. doi: 10.2174/011570159X343115241030094848

Neuropsychiatric Manifestations of COVID-19 Disease and Post COVID Syndrome: The Role of N-acetylcysteine and Acetyl-L-carnitine

Tommaso Barlattani 1, Giuseppe Celenza 1,*, Alessandro Cavatassi 1, Franco Minutillo 1, Valentina Socci 1, Carolina Pinci 2, Riccardo Santini 2, Francesca Pacitti 1
PMCID: PMC12163478  PMID: 39506442

Abstract

COVID-19 is associated with neuropsychiatric symptoms, such as anosmia, anxiety, depression, stress-related reactions, and psychoses. The illness can cause persistent cognitive impairment and “brain fog”, suggesting chronic brain involvement. Clinical entities of ongoing symptomatic COVID-19 and Post COVID Syndrome (PCS) mainly present neuropsychiatric symptoms such as dysgeusia, headache, fatigue, anxiety, depression, sleep disturbances, and post-traumatic stress disorder. The pathophysiology of COVID-19-related brain damage is unclear, but it is linked to various mechanisms such as inflammation, oxidative stress, immune dysregulation, impaired glutamate homeostasis, glial and glymphatic damage, and hippocampal degeneration. Noteworthy is that the metabotropic receptor mGluR2 was discovered as a mechanism of internalisation of SARS-CoV-2 in Central Nervous System (CNS) cells. N-acetylcysteine (NAC) and acetyl-L-carnitine (ALC) are two supplements that have already been found effective in treating psychiatric conditions. Furthermore, NAC showed evidence in relieving cognitive symptomatology in PCS, and ALC was found effective in treating depressive symptomatology of PCS. The overlapping effects on the glutamatergic system of ALC and NAC could help treat COVID-19 psychiatric symptoms and PCS, acting through different mechanisms on the xc-mGluR2 network, with potentially synergistic effects on chronic pain and neuro-astrocyte protection. This paper aims to summarise the current evidence on the potential therapeutic role of NAC and ALC, providing an overview of the underlying molecular mechanisms and pathophysiology. It proposes a pathophysiological model explaining the effectiveness of NAC and ALC in treating COVID-19-related neuropsychiatric symptoms.

Keywords: COVID-19; SARS CoV-2, post-acute COVID-19 syndrome, long COVID brain fog, acetylcysteine, acetylcarnitine, SLC7A11 protein, metabotropic glutamate receptor 2, metabotropic glutamate receptor 3

1. INTRODUCTION

The global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, including its repercussions in terms of infections and casualties within the population, has garnered significant worldwide interest [1].

SARS-CoV-2 infection primarily targets the pulmonary system, usually initiating pneumonia and potentially life-threatening respiratory damage [1]. SARS-CoV-2 infection induces damage and detrimental effects on endothelial cells, instigating a cascade of events, including inflammation, thrombosis, and cerebral damage [2].

Therefore, it is noteworthy that neuropsychiatric manifestations of COVID-19 are prevalent [3]. Although the variants have changed [4], there is still potential for neuropsychiatric sequelae, and a large cohort study identified an equal potential of neuropsychiatric consequences comparing omicron versus delta variants [5]. When delving into the neuropsychiatric sequelae of COVID-19 disease, it is imperative to encompass both the ongoing symptomatic COVID-19 and the PCS [6]. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) defines these clinical entities as signs and symptoms during or after COVID-19 infection [7]. These symptoms persist for a period ranging from 4 to 12 weeks in the case of ongoing symptomatic COVID-19 and extend beyond 12 weeks in the context of PCS, provided that a clear alternative diagnostic explanation is not present [7]. In the context of ongoing symptomatic COVID-19 and PCS, a spectrum of neurological and neuropsychological symptoms have been documented [8, 9]. In particular, among the array of psychiatric and cognitive symptoms, the most commonly represented are depression, anxiety, fatigue, “brain fog”, sleep disturbances, and PTSD [8, 10, 11]. Moreover, an elevated propensity for suicidal behaviour was outlined [12].

The underlying mechanisms responsible for the pathophysiology of acute and persistent neuropsychiatric symptoms in COVID-19 and PCS remain not completely elucidated [8,13]. Previous investigations into systemic viral infections have proposed a pathogenic hypothesis centered on a sustained neuroinflammatory response to viral antigens and the mobilisation of proinflammatory mediators and immune cells from the peripheral circulation [14]. Despite the etiopathological uncertainties, several mechanisms have been postulated [15]. Aberrant inflammation is among these [16], associated with other factors, including oxidative stress induced by Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS), glial and astrocyte injury, compromised monoamine secretion, dysregulation of glutamatergic pathways, neuro excitotoxicity, damage to cerebral blood vessels [15, 17], dysfunction in glymphatic processes [18], and disruption of hippocampal function and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) [19]. The role of the mGluR2 brain receptor is crucial, as it plays a pivotal role in the internalisation process of SARS-CoV-2 within cells [20], given its association with various psychiatric disorders [21, 22].

Considering the nature of the neuropsychiatric manifestations, compounds able to modulate the underlying molecular mechanisms and biochemical pathways can be considered. For these purposes, N-acetylcysteine (NAC) and acetyl-L-carnitine (ALC), even in consideration of their molecular target and pleiotropic effect, are valuable therapeutic options.

For instance, the overlapping effects of ALC and NAC on the glutamatergic system could act through different mechanisms on the xc-mGluR2 network, which may synergistically affect chronic pain and neuro-astrocyte protection.

Noteworthy, these compounds stand out as effective in treating various psychiatric conditions.

It is not by chance that NAC has been shown to alleviate cognitive symptoms in PCS [23], while ALC has been effective in treating depressive symptoms of PCS [24].

Thus, within this pathological framework and considering their multifaceted pharmacological profile, NAC and ALC look promising for mitigating COVID-19-associated neuropsychiatric symptoms and PCS [24-28]. Considering the absence of specific guidelines on effective treatment for the management of neuropsychiatric symptoms of acute COVID-19 and PCS, there is considerable interest in identifying possible candidate drugs.

In attempting to describe and hypothesis the mechanisms underlying the success of NAC and ALC in mitigating the neuropsychiatric symptoms associated with COVID-19 and PCS, the authors present a comprehensive and detailed overview of both molecular and pathophysiological pivotal mechanisms, proposing a potential pathophysiological model accounting for NAC and ALC effectiveness in treating COVID-19-related neuropsychiatric symptoms. To define and speculate on the molecular mechanism, this article will first summarise the mechanisms of entry of SARS-CoV-2 and its consequences in the CNS and related symptoms at the molecular level. Finally, the known mechanisms of action of NAC and ALC will be outlined in order to hypothesise a rationale for the use of NAC and ALC as a treatment in the outlined conditions.

2. LITERATURE REVIEW

This narrative review was conducted using the following search terms: “COVID-19”; “Sars CoV-2”; Post-COVID Syndrome”; “PCS”; “Post-acute COVID syndrome”; “PACS”; “neuropsychiatric symptoms” “N-Acetyl Cysteine”; “NAC”; “Acetyl-L-Carnitine”; “ALC”; “Metabotropic Glutamate receptor”; “mGlu”; “mGluR2”; “mGluR3”; “Metabotropic receptors”; Cystine-glutamate antiporter”; “Xct”; “Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor”; “Nrf2”; “Nuclear factor Kb”; “Nf-kB”; “Blood-Brain Barrier”; “BBB”; “Central Nervous System”; “CNS”; “Blood-Cerebrospinal Fluid Barrier”; “BCB”; “Interleukin”; “IL; “Tumoral Necrosis Factor”; “TNF”; “angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptor”; “ACE2”; “Transferrin receptor”; “TfR1”; “interferon”; “IFN”, “monocyte chemoattractant protein”; “MCP”; reactive oxigen species; ROS “reactive nitrogen species”; “RNS”, “glial fibrillary acidic protein”; “GFAP”; “Excitatory amino-acid Transporter 2”; “EAAT2”; “N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor”; “NMDA”; “Chronic Fatigue Syndrome”; “CFS”; “Dorso-Lateral prefrontal cortex”; “DLPFC”; “kynurenic acid”; “KYNA”; “Nf-kB essential modulator”; “NEMO”; were entered in ERIC, MEDLINE, PsycARTICLES, PsycINFO, Scopus and PubMed.

Terms and databases were combined using the Boolean search technique to make search more restrictive and detailed. Only studies published in English have been included. The main results were then discussed narratively divided by paragraphs, respectively: SARS-CoV-2 Neuroinvasion in COVID-19: overview of Entry Mechanisms; COVID-19-induced Brain Damage and Neuropsychiatric Consequences; Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Acute COVID-19, Ongoing COVID-19, and PCS; NAC and ALC: overview and mechanism of action; Hypothesis and Rationale of NAC and ALC in neuropsychiatric manifestations of acute COVID-19 disease, ongoing symptomatic COVID-19, PCS”.

3. SARS-CoV-2 NEUROINVASION IN COVID-19: OVERVIEW OF ENTRY MECHANISMS

SARS-CoV-2 directly affects the nervous system [29]. Many theories tried to explain how the virus enters the brain and its impact on it [2]. One is that the olfactory tract represents the preferential way through the axons from the cribriform plate, explaining the loss of smell associated with COVID-19 [30]. Another theory is that the virus enters the brain via the vagal and trigeminal nerves [31]. It is also suggested that the virus may enter the brain through the paranasal lymph vessels and circumventricular organs (CVOs) [32] (Fig. 1).

Fig. (1).

Fig. (1)

Potential mechanism of SARS-CoV-2 internalisation. Abbreviations: TfR1: Transferrin Receptor type 1; mGluR2: metabotropic Glutamate 2 receptor; ACE2: angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptor; TMPRSS2: type II Transmembrane Serine Proteases; RNA: Sars-Cov-2 virus RNA.

One of the most extensively studied pathways for SARS-CoV-2 infection involves host entry through the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor [33]. This receptor is expressed in endothelial cells within the central nervous system (CNS) [34], in neurons and glial cells [35], as well as in the choroid plexus [36]. A study by Wang et al. in 2021 underlined the role of mGluR2 participation in the mechanism of COVID-19 infection and cellular internalisation [23]. The mGluR2 itself plays an inhibitory role by depleting cyclic Adenosine Mono Phosphate (cAMP) and consequently facilitating the opening of K+ channels, thus preventing neuro-excitotoxicity [37]. It works as a co-receptor through a clathrin-mediated mechanism, thereby favouring the process of virus internalisation [38]. mGluR2 is widely expressed in the CNS, both in neurons and glia [39], and it is involved in the pathophysiology of epilepsy, dementia, autism, and various psychiatric illnesses [21, 22, 40]. Specifically, it has been observed that Transferrin receptor 1 (TfR1) interacts with mGluR2, leading to their co-internalization within the same clathrin-coated pit, ultimately facilitating the entry of Coronaviruses [38]. Furthermore, it is noteworthy that TfR1 directly binds to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein [38].

Cortical astrocytes appear particularly susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection [41], impairing protein folding, translation initiation, and metabolic functions. Together with astrocytes, pericytes also tend to be infected, resulting in impaired functioning due to receptor blockade and capillary constriction [42]. Even brain epithelial cells are infected through the cleavage of the S2 subunit of the TMPRSS-2, a transmembrane protease expressed in these cellular types, thus allowing the entry of SARS-CoV-2 [43] (Fig. 1).

Moreover, SARS-CoV-2 infection may damage the choroid plexus epithelium, leading to leakage of immune cells and cytokines into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) [36, 44]. The discovery of the glymphatic system, the brain-wide network of perivascular channels with a role in CSF recirculation [45], opens up new possibilities for understanding how COVID-19 damages the brain [18]. Notably, a glymphatic dysfunction was found in subjects recovered from mild COVID-19 [46]. The engagement of this network aligns with the CSF profile observations in COVID-19 patients exhibiting neurological symptoms and experiencing long COVID. These individuals typically demonstrate cerebrospinal epitheliopathy, blood-CSF barrier (BCB) dysfunction, and elevated cytokine levels [44]. Astrocytic endfeet contribute to the regulation of microvessel dilation and constriction, thereby exerting control over blood flow [47, 48], underscoring the dependence of the glymphatic system functioning on the optimal functioning of astrocytes [49, 50].

The receptors involved in SARS-CoV-2 infection are numerous and still under investigation [43], but ACE2 appears to be the primary receptor facilitating viral entry. Astrocytes express ACE2 [35], CD147, and DPP4 receptors, all of which supposedly serve as co-receptors for viral internalisation [41]. Consequently, alterations in the astrocytic and glymphatic system’s function are intricately linked to the neuropathological manifestations observed in COVID-19 cases. Furthermore, it is noteworthy that astrocytes, in concert with the choroid plexus, nasal lymphatic vessels, and CSF, are recognised as integral constituents of the glymphatic system thereby, the glymphatic system may provide a conduit for viral infiltration into the brain [18].

In conclusion, SARS-CoV-2 invades the brain through multiple pathways, including the olfactory tract, vagal and trigeminal nerves, and paranasal lymph vessels, with ACE2 being the primary receptor facilitating viral entry. Other receptors, such as mGluR2 and TfR1, also contribute to the virus's internalization, particularly affecting astrocytes and pericytes, leading to significant neurological dysfunction. The virus's impact on the glymphatic system and choroid plexus further exacerbates neurological symptoms, highlighting the intricate relationship between SARS-CoV-2 infection and CNS pathology. These findings underscore the complexity of COVID-19's effects on the nervous system and its long-term consequences.

4. COVID-19-INDUCED BRAIN DAMAGE AND NEUROPSYCHIATRIC CONSEQUENCES

The hallmark feature of COVID-19 disease is the severe cytokine storm, primarily responsible for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and possible subsequent Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome (MODS) [51, 52].

Patients with COVID-19 infection often exhibit elevated serum concentrations of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including interleukin (IL) IL-1, IL-6, IL-10, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α [53]. Inflammatory markers such as IL-2, IL-6, IL-7, IL-10, IL-18, interferon (IFN)-γ, monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1, MCP-3, and macrophage-inflammatory protein-1α have been associated with symptom severity [54-56]. TNF-α can directly breach the BBB, leading to microglia and astrocyte activation [57, 58]. IL-6 and TNF-α levels are predictive of symptom severity and survival rates due to increased production of ROS and Reactive Nitrogen Species (RNS), with consequent oxidative stress-induced apoptosis [20, 54, 59]. Excessive ROS production also leads to mitochondrial dysfunction, DNA damage, and potential alterations in neurotransmitter signaling [60-62].

An epidemiological and clinical characteristics study revealed that 52% of COVID-affected patients exhibited increased IL-6 levels; among this cohort, 86% displayed markedly elevated C-reactive protein levels, indicating a substantial inflammatory response [2]. IL‐6 negatively modulates neural stem cell proliferation and cell fate in the hippocampus [63, 64]. Moreover, the Choroid Plexus can release the proinflammatory cytokines IL-6 and IL-8 into the CSF, thus augmenting the host's immune response [65].

In the CNS, microglia and astrocytes are the primary sources of IL-6 synthesis [66]. In physiological conditions, astrocytes play a crucial role in synthesising essential neurotransmitters like glutamate [67]. The responsible enzyme, glutamine synthetase, is primarily located within astroglial cells and converts glutamate into glutamine [68]. Astrocytes also regulate neuronal glutamate release using the xc- system, which facilitates the uptake of extracellular cysteine while releasing intracellular glutamate at a 1:1 ratio [69-71]. The significance of xCT is also linked to its role in GSH production, providing defense against oxidative stress-induced damage and its modulation of mGluRs [39, 72].

During inflammatory states, astrocytes can switch to an activated phenotype, characterised by heightened levels of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), which is a hallmark of activated astrocytes [73]; elevated GFAP levels have been observed in COVID-19 patients [74]. Indeed, post-mortem studies of COVID-19 patients have revealed the presence of activated microglia [75]. This has generated substantial interest in the role of microglial cells, which, in conjunction with astrocytes, play a crucial role in orchestrating the modulation of neuroinflammatory processes [76, 77]. When acute inflammation persists without resolution, it can lead to prolonged microglial activation. This sustained activation amplifies cytokine production and exacerbates oxidative stress damage [15]. Microglial cells are pivotal in initiating reactive astrogliosis through the Nf-κB signalling pathway and can induce glutamate release [78]. It also triggers the formation of ROS [79], which, in turn, damages healthy tissues, ultimately contributing to brain impairment [80]. The consequences of reactive astrogliosis and microglial activation following SARS-CoV-2 infection can initiate a cascade of aberrant signalling events, potentially leading to excitotoxicity which represents a pathological process with deleterious consequences [15, 35].

A study carried out by Fernández-Castañeda et al. (2022) utilising a murine model of mild SARS-CoV-2 infection localised to the respiratory system revealed several significant findings, including elevated cytokine levels in the CNS, impairment of hippocampal neurogenesis, and specific microglial reactivity observed in white matter regions [81]. Moreover, the increased and persistent inflammatory state caused by COVID-19 switches tryptophan metabolism to the kynurenine pathway instead of serotonin production [82]. Reactive astrogliosis and subsequent Nf-κB activation downregulate Excitatory amino-acid Transporter 2 (EAAT2), increasing extracellular glutamate levels [22]. The excess glutamate impairs xc- system activity, leading to heightened neuronal excitability, excessive activation of extrasynaptic N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors, and, in severe cases, excitotoxicity [83, 84]. This process is associated with reduced GSH levels, leading to increased production of ROS [85]. Various studies have shed light on the possibility that cognitive dysfunction related to COVID-19 may be attributed to transient damage to the DLPFC, hippocampal impairment, and disruptions in glutamate levels [19, 86-89].

Glutamate plays a crucial role in memory and learning processes, including long-term potentiation, which heavily relies on the hippocampus [90]. The hippocampus is rich in mGluR2 [91], and animal studies have shown that coronaviruses can induce neurodegeneration in the hippocampal CA1 and CA3 regions, leading to reduced short-term learning abilities and spatial memory impairment [92]. COVID-19-induced damage to hippocampal neurogenesis was also observed in humans [93]. In addition, DLPFC is also rich in mGluR2 [94, 95], and several pieces of evidence have shown that it is the most damaged by COVID-19, which can explain the cognitive dysfunction also observed in long COVID [28, 86]. The expression of mGluR2 serves as a critical link connecting COVID-19-induced brain damage, astrocyte damage, excitotoxicity, DLPFC, and hippocampal impairment (Ma et al., 2023; Scholler et al., 2017; Spampinato et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2021; X. Wang et al., 2023). Moreover, increased ACE2 expression in mice has been associated with enhanced sympathetic activity [96, 97] and reduced tryptophan uptake [98], which may increase susceptibility to the effects of stressful conditions [99]. Additionally, hypothalamic ACE2 receptors are implicated in the suppression of corticotropin-releasing hormone synthesis, which is a crucial component of the physiological stress response [96-101].

In addition, recent findings have demonstrated that the SARS-CoV-2 metalloprotease cleaves Nf-κB essential modulators in brain endothelial cells [102]. This process leads to endothelial cell death, neuroinflammation, and the breakdown of BBB. Consequently, the compromised BBB allows the virus to breach the brain's protected environment while also permitting the entry of pro-inflammatory cytokines. This complex interplay fosters viral invasion and is pivotal in establishing a neuroinflammatory state [102, 103]. The convergence of evidence supports the premise that SARS-CoV-2 has a discernible impact on the CNS. This impact offers a plausible explanation for the acute neuropsychiatric symptoms observed in COVID-19 patients and long-term consequences (Fig. 2).

Fig. (2).

Fig. (2)

Potential pathophysiological mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 on the CNS. Abbreviations: EAAT: excitatory amino acid transporter; NF-κB: Nuclear Factor-kappa B; NAAG: N-Acetyl-Aspartyl-Glutamate; mGluR3: metabotropic Glutamate 3 receptor; mGluR2: metabotropic Glutamate 2 receptor; Glu: Glutamate; Gln: Glutamine; Cys: Cysteine; System xc-: cystine/glutamate antiporter system; GCPII: Glutame Carboxypeptidase II; NMDAR: N-methyl-D-aspartate Receptor; TNFα: Tumor Necrosis Factor α.

In conclusion, COVID-19-induced brain damage and neuropsychiatric consequences stem from a severe cytokine storm that breaches the blood-brain barrier, leading to neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, and excitotoxicity. Elevated cytokines like IL-6 and TNF-α activate microglia and astrocytes, causing damage to critical brain areas such as the hippocampus and DLPFC, which are essential for memory and cognition. This neuroinflammatory state, along with disrupted neurotransmitter signaling, explains the acute and long-term neurological and cognitive symptoms observed in COVID-19 patients and long COVID cases.

5. NEUROPSYCHIATRIC SYMPTOMS IN ACUTE COVID-19, ONGOING COVID-19, AND PCS

As observed within SARS and MERS, SARS-CoV-2 is associated with delirium, depression, anxiety, post-traumatic consequences, memory impairment, insomnia, encephalopathy and encephalitis during the acute phase [3, 17]. A recent study using data from two independent retrospective cohort studies found delirium, anxiety, and mood symptoms as the most commonly represented in the acute phase of infection [104]. Moreover, migraine-like headaches refractory to traditional analgesics [105] were also reported during the ongoing infection [106]. In particular, headaches, together with anosmia and ageusia, may persist beyond the resolution of other symptoms and endure for up to 6 months following recovery from both acute and ongoing infection [107, 108].

Moreover, approximately 30-40% of patients who had contracted COVID-19 reported clinically significant levels of depression and anxiety [109, 110]. In a cohort of 402 COVID-19 survivors in Italy, approximately 56% of individuals screened positive one month after hospitalisation for at least one psychiatric domain [110]. In a comprehensive analysis of a real-world dataset comprising 62,354 COVID-19 survivors from 54 healthcare institutions in the USA [111], the estimated incidence of psychiatric disorders, both initial and recurrent, occurring between 14 and 90 days after diagnosis, was determined to be 18.1%. Interestingly, a 2-year retrospective cohort analysis involving 1,487,712 individuals diagnosed with COVID-19 revealed that the heightened incidence of mood and anxiety disorders in the context of COVID-19 was temporary and did not result in an overall surplus of these diagnoses when compared to other respiratory infections [112]. Conversely, the increased susceptibility to psychotic disorders, cognitive impairment, dementia, epilepsy, or seizures endured over the observation period. Individuals recovering from COVID-19 often experience PCS, most commonly characterised by chronic malaise, diffuse myalgia, depressive symptoms, and poor sleep quality [6, 113]. Cognitive impairment, often referred to as “cognitive fog”, is a common finding that affects memory, concentration, language, and executive function [6, 92, 114]. This cognitive decline is similar to what is observed in patients after critical illness, affecting around 20-40% of those discharged from the ICU [115].

Notable findings emerged in a comprehensive analysis of Patel et al. in 2022 involving 3,304 PCS patients in which a subset of individuals showed a plethora of symptoms including headaches (27.8%), fatigue (26.7%), muscle pain (23.14%), loss of smell (22.8%), altered taste (12.1%), sleep disturbances (63.1%), confusion (32.6%), focus impairment (22%), symptoms resembling PTSD (31%), feelings of depression (20%), and even thoughts of self-harm (2%) [116].

It is interesting to note that PCS and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) have a significant overlap in their symptoms. Studies suggest that around 50% of PCS patients meet the diagnostic criteria for CFS six months after being infected with SARS-CoV2 [117, 118]. Both PCS and CFS are characterised by chronic pain and persistent fatigue that is not related to any musculoskeletal issues [119]. However, the exact cause of these symptoms remains unclear, and, like most pathophysiological mechanisms, the underlying mechanisms have yet to be confirmed.

In conclusion, SARS-CoV-2 is associated with a range of neuropsychiatric symptoms during acute infection, including delirium, depression, anxiety, memory impairment, and headaches. These symptoms can persist beyond the acute phase, with some patients experiencing ongoing cognitive issues, such as “brain fog,” and psychiatric conditions like depression and anxiety. PCS often includes chronic fatigue, myalgia, and sleep disturbances, with many symptoms overlapping with CFS. While the exact mechanisms behind these symptoms remain unclear, they highlight the significant and enduring impact of COVID-19 on mental health.

6. NAC AND ALC: OVERVIEW AND MECHANISM OF ACTION

N-Acetylcysteine (NAC), as an acetylated form of cysteine, markedly enhances bioavailability and stability, increasing its effectiveness in clinical and supplemental uses. Cysteine, a conditionally essential amino acid, is normally synthesised from methionine through a multi-step process, but its synthesis can be compromised under specific pathophysiological conditions [120].

NAC serves as a precursor to glutathione, a pivotal cellular antioxidant. NAC supports glutathione synthesis, enhancing detoxification and body antioxidant defences. Thus, its synthesis is crucial for maintaining cellular redox balance and is often limited by the availability of cysteine [121].

In clinical applications, NAC is used as a mucolytic agent for respiratory conditions, reducing mucus viscosity in the airways. Its hepatoprotective properties are notably significant in acetaminophen toxicity, where it reduces hepatic damage by replenishing intracellular glutathione levels [122].

NAC's properties are multifaceted, extending to neurodegeneration and inflammation treatment. Its precise mechanisms and clinical efficacy vary depending on the specific pathological condition and context [123-131].

NAC's substantial antioxidant properties stem from a complex array of biochemical pathways. It plays a critical role in neutralising free radicals and mitigating oxidative stress at the cellular level [132]. Additionally, NAC contributes to increasing levels of hydrogen sulfide and sulfane sulfur species, which have various signalling and regulatory roles in cells [133], and participates in reductant activities related to disulfide thiols, helping maintain protein structure and function under oxidative stress [134].

NAC also potentiates the entire glutathione enzymatic system, including glutathione-S-transferase (GST) and glutathione peroxidase (GPX), boosting the detoxification system [135]. It initiates the Nrf2 pathway, a critical regulatory pathway in cellular antioxidant defence, leading to the upregulation of various antioxidant genes [136]. Another aspect of NAC action is its modulation of nitric oxide metabolism, which is essential for vascular and neuronal functions [137].

The immunomodulatory properties of NAC are evident in its ability to reduce inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-1β, NF-κB, IL-6, and IL-10, and to enhance CD4+ T cell counts [27, 124, 125, 127, 128].

Regarding neurotransmitter systems, NAC aids in the adjustment of group II metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs), attenuating glutamatergic signalling. It enhances the endogenous activation of mGluR2 and mGluR3, promoting the expression of the EAAT2 [138]. NAC restores mGluR3 receptor activity through glutamate carboxypeptidase II (GCPII) inhibition, favouring the antioxidant response through Nrf-2 and Nf-κB pathways [139]. The enhancement of cognitive function is linked to changes in the kynurenine pathway within the DLPFC, affecting the interaction between the mGluR2 and 5-HT2A receptors and helping to prevent early stages of psychosis [27, 140]. NAC also activates the xCT transporter within astrocytes, increasing intracellular cysteine levels and facilitating glutathione synthesis, thereby modulating glutamate levels and NMDA receptor activity [129].

As a modulator of the kynurenine pathway, NAC reduces kynurenic acid levels via inhibition of the KAT/AadAT enzyme in the prefrontal cortex and influences dopamine release in the striatum, potentially through GSH-mediated modulation of glutamate receptors [23, 141]. The impact of NAC on dopamine release in animal models has been observed in the striatal nucleus and is linked to reduced dopamine transporter density in the striatum of rhesus monkeys [142]. The modulation of dopamine levels may occur through enhanced GSH production, impacting striatal dopamine levels via GSH influence on NMDA and non-NMDA glutamate receptors [143].

The cellular protective actions of NAC include activating ERK phosphorylation and MAP kinase-signaling pathways and protecting astrocytes against proteotoxic stress [144-149]. NAC extends its protective actions to glial and hippocampal cells, defending against oxidative stress-induced neuronal injury and preserving long-term potentiation [150, 151]. It also offers protection against endothelial damage via its nitric oxide (NO)-mediated vasodilatory activity [97].

NAC has therapeutic potential in treating neuropsychiatric diseases as an adjunctive treatment for disorders like obsessive-compulsive and related disorders, autism, major depression, bipolar depression, and schizophrenia [152]. It effectively treats chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and pulmonary fibrosis [153]. NAC has been suggested as a treatment for COVID-19, reducing symptoms and hindering viral replication due to its thiol-based and hydroxide-rich properties [154]. It also shows promise in treating acute brain damage caused by COVID-19, serving as a potential adjunct therapy [155].

Acetyl-L-carnitine (ALC) is the acetylated version of L-carnitine, a naturally occurring amino acid derivative essential for energy production. This acetylation enhances ALC's ability to cross the blood-brain barrier, thus increasing its bioavailability in the central nervous system. ALC boosts mitochondrial metabolism and energy production by facilitating carnitine shuttling and fatty acids beta-oxidation [156-158]. Furthermore, it contributes to mitochondrial membrane stabilisation, leading to anti-apoptotic actions mainly through attenuating mitochondrial membrane peroxidation [158]. ALC also addresses carnitine deficiency in conditions such as CFS [159, 160].

In addition to its role in metabolism, ALC exhibits antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, which help reduce excessive immune responses [158, 161]. It also influences neurotransmitter release, exerting neurotrophic, neuromodulatory, and neuroprotective effects. ALC is known for its role in hippocampal neurogenesis and in the modulation of neurotrophic factors like NGF, GDNF, and BDNF in specific brain regions [158, 162-165]. Additionally, ALC increases acetylcholine synthesis by raising acetyl-CoA levels and enhancing choline acetyltransferase activity [162, 163].

ALC acts as an acetyl group donor, acetylating the Nf-kB p65 subunit and histone-3-lysine-27 (H3K27). This process affects the expression of GRM2, encoding for mGluR2, and plays a role in modulating glutamatergic signalling in the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex [165-170]. It also promotes the expression of the xCT subunit by acetylating REST in the xCT promoter [165, 171], which is crucial in hippocampal and DLPFC regions for enhancing NGF and BDNF activity [169].

Therapeutically, ALC is used in peripheral neuropathic pain, neurodegeneration, CFS, depression, dysthymic disorder, mitochondrial decay, and cognitive impairment [172-178]. Its epigenetic modulation of glutamatergic function is linked to its antidepressant, analgesic, and neurogenic properties [158, 163, 165, 169, 179-183]. ALC modulates various neurotransmitter systems, especially the cholinergic system, by providing acetyl groups for ACh synthesis [162, 167, 184].

ALC counteracts oxidative stress and senescence by up-regulating Heat-shock proteins, Nrf2 signalling, HO-1, and SOD and promotes the transcription of the Grm2 gene [158, 166, 167, 170, 185]. It affects brain iron homeostasis by potentially reversing iron-induced oxidative stress through down-regulation of ferritin-H gene expression, reducing intracellular iron reserves [185-187].

In COVID-19, fatty acid and carnitine metabolism alterations have been observed, predictive of disease severity [188]. ALC reduces pro-inflammatory cytokines and lowers inflammatory markers [161]. COVID-19 infection increases KYNA levels and GCPII protein expression in the brain, influencing glutamatergic dysfunction and neurotransmission in the DLPFC [23, 39, 94, 189-194]. The mGluR3 receptor, predominantly located in astrocytes, is involved in glutamate uptake and synaptic modulation, thus protecting against neuro excitotoxicity [69, 195, 196].

ALC's role as a transcriptional inducer of the mGluR2 gene in various brain regions highlights its potential to modulate glutamatergic activity [95, 165, 168-170]. Elevated extracellular glutamate levels contribute to the tonic activation of mGluR2 and mGluR3 receptors, which are crucial in synaptic glutamatergic modulation [197]. ALC has shown protective potential against severe COVID-19, post-COVID-19 fatigue, and relief from PCS symptoms [24, 198, 199].

Lastly, the interplay between Nf-κB and Nrf2 pathways significantly influences the progression of long-term COVID neuropsychiatric complications [200-202], and astrocyte-neuron communication via the astroglial xc-system is crucial for synaptic glutamatergic regulation [203].

Both NAC and ALC offer significant therapeutic potential due to their roles in enhancing antioxidant defenses, modulating neurotransmitter systems, and protecting against neurodegeneration. NAC's ability to replenish glutathione and reduce oxidative stress, along with ALC's support for mitochondrial function and neurotransmitter synthesis, make them valuable in treating a wide range of conditions, including neuropsychiatric disorders and complications related to COVID-19. Their multifaceted mechanisms of action highlight their importance in maintaining cellular health and combating inflammation and oxidative damage.

7. HYPOTHESIS AND RATIONALE OF NAC AND ALC IN NEUROPSYCHIATRIC MANIFESTATIONS OF ACUTE COVID-19 DISEASE, ONGOING SYMPTOMATIC COVID-19, PCS

NAC and ALC hold promise as therapeutic agents for neuropsychiatric conditions associated with COVID-19 and PCS [23, 24, 204]. They exhibit a multifaceted mechanism of action, addressing oxidative stress, neurotransmitter imbalances, and neuroinflammation through Nf-κB inhibition, replenishing GSH reserves, and alleviating the impairment of mGluR2 and mGluR3 [136, 205], acting on inflammatory state, lowering serum inflammatory cytokines and markers (IL-6, TNF-alfa, PCR) [161].

As stated above, according to several evidence, acute COVID-19 damage to the CNS may play a central role in the pathogenesis of neuropsychiatric symptoms through several pathophysiological mechanisms: dysregulation of inflammation, astrocytic glial damage, glutamatergic impairment (shift in tryptophan metabolism towards kynurenine pathway, Nf-κB, oxidative stress, glutamatergic and excitotoxic damage) and possible glymphatic impairment [15, 46, 82]. Furthermore, Tavares-Júnior et al. (2022) suggest that memory impairment, resulting from acute phase alterations in the hippocampus, may lead to persistent neurological complications in PCS [206]. Moreover, it has been demonstrated that even mild COVID-19 inflammation or infection, not directly involving the brain, can lead to neuroinflammation and long-term cognitive impairment [81]. Wang highlighted the role of the mGluR2-TfR1 axis as a potential pathway for neurotropic viruses and their role in ferroptosis [38].

NAC and ALC's role in treating psychiatric conditions, such as mood disorders and chronic pain due to their glutamatergic modulatory activity, has been supported by multiple studies (Mohiuddin et al., 2021; Morris et al., 2019; Ooi et al., 2018; Sarzi-Puttini et al., 2021; Vermeulen and Scholte, 2004; Wang et al., 2014) [207-210]. Their potential in mitigating COVID-19-associated neuropsychiatric symptoms and PCS is promising, as evidenced by several researchers [24-28].

Preliminary studies have shown that a combination of supplements, including NAC and ALC, significantly reduces recovery time in patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 [211]. These findings align with the metabolic changes observed in COVID-19 patients [212]. Some authors recently suggested that long-term COVID-related cognitive dysfunction might improve with the intake of NAC and guanfacine [28]. Moreover, Scaturro et al., 2022 and colleagues highlighted the role of ALC in treating depressive symptoms associated with Long COVID [24].

The metabolic changes in COVID-19 highlight the suitability of NAC and ALC for their antioxidant properties and ability to compensate for metabolic alterations, such as replenishing GSH reserves or carnitine supplementation [213-216]. A negative correlation between serum carnitine levels and COVID-19 susceptibility and severity has been described [188].

NAC and ALC have a synergistic effect in modulating glutamatergic activity on the xc-/mGluR2 network through epigenetic mechanisms [165]. This synergy extends to neuron and astrocyte protection. They also mitigate Nf-κB overactivated signalling, attenuating the NLRP3 inflammasome pathway and decreasing pro-inflammatory cytokines and PCR levels, thereby showcasing their immunomodulatory activities [161, 202, 217]. Their efficacy in protecting against cytokine storms has also been noted [82, 135, 218].

NAC, as a substrate precursor of the xc- system, normalises DLPFC neurotransmission and may enhance mGluR3 signalling, improving DLPFC network connectivity and neuronal firing [141, 197, 203, 219]. Additionally, ALC has been found to ameliorate chronic fatigue and tiredness through intracellular mechanisms [199, 204, 220].

In addition, NAC thiols play a crucial role by effectively obstructing the ACE2 receptor, impeding the cellular penetration of SARS-CoV-2 [27]. An in vitro study has shown that L-carnitine treatment may mitigate SARS-CoV-2 infection [221]. Interestingly, the administration of NAC determines an augmentation in endogenous hydrogen sulfide production, which has an anti-viral host factor role [222, 223]. SARS-CoV-2 infection can induce death or damage to brain endothelial cells through SARS-CoV-2 protease, which cleaves the Nf-κB essential modulator (NEMO), leading to BBB disruption and subsequent neuroinflammation [102]. The hyperactivated Nf-kB signal in the CNS induces reactive changes in microglia and astrocytes, further amplifying the neuroinflammatory response [15, 224]. Another noteworthy aspect of NAC is its potential contribution to preventing and controlling infections caused by RNA viruses [225] by enhancing the signalling functions of TLR7 and the mitochondrial antiviral signalling protein, resulting in increased production of IFN-1 [226]. Moreover, ALC and NAC mitigate Nf-kB overactivated signal, attenuating NLRP3 inflammasome pathway (IL1β and IL18) and decreasing serum TNF-alpha, IL-1, IL-6 levels, and PCR [161, 202, 217], thereby their immunomodulatory activities [161, 227, 228], and protecting against cytokine storms [82, 135, 218].

Interestingly, ALC is a transcriptional inducer of the mGluR2 gene in the prefrontal cortex, hippocampus, and spinal circuits, thus modulating glutamatergic activity [95, 165, 168, 169]. Once neuroinflammation is established, the glutamatergic neurotransmission is impaired [15]. Nf-κB signal negatively regulates EAAT2 expression, which is crucial for astrocyte neuroprotection [229]. Astrocyte-neuron communication is essential for synaptic glutamatergic modulation, which uses the astroglial xc-system, which extrudes intracellular glutamate in exchange for extracellular cysteine [203]. This system is functionally connected to the mGluR2 of the presynaptic neuron and mediates important negative feedback, providing dynamic regulation of extracellular glutamate levels [197]. Elevated extracellular glutamate levels contribute to the tonic activation of mGluR2 and mGluR3, predominantly located presynaptically [69]. Therefore, this modulation is essential for mitigating the risk of excitotoxicity [196]. Moreover, the COVID-19 condition is associated with increased GCPII expression in astrocytes [28, 192] and a shift in tryptophan metabolism toward the kynurenine pathway (Boldrini et al., 2021), resulting in altered mGluR3 and NMDA receptor signalling [28]. Mainly, ALC and NAC have synergistic glutamatergic modulatory activity on the xc-/mGlu2 network via epigenetic mechanisms [165], exerting neuron and astrocyte protective effects. NAC is a substrate precursor of the xc- system [197, 203]. It may normalise DLPFC neurotransmission and mediate procognitive action by blocking the production of KYNA in DLPFC [141] and may enhance mGluR3 signalling [219], which ameliorates DLPFC network connectivity and DLPFC neuronal firing [28]. It also can exert modulatory effects on the kynurenine pathway [141]. ALC ameliorates chronic fatigue and tiredness through intracellular mechanisms [199, 204, 220]. Moreover, the metabolic changes described in COVID-19 make ALC and NAC particularly suitable for their well-known antioxidant properties and their ability to compensate local and systemic for metabolic established secondary to this pathological condition [213-216]. Interestingly, a negative correlation has been recently described between serum carnitine levels and COVID-19 susceptibility and severity [188].

In the context of COVID-19 pathology, neuropsychiatric manifestations, and PCS, mGluR2 could be viewed as a mediator that links the continuum between nociception, pain, negative mood, and depression [230]. Interestingly, in the context of SARS-CoV-2 infection, alterations in lipid metabolism and the xc-GSH-GPX4 axis, pivotal mechanisms of ferroptosis, are involved [231, 232], and further components of this mechanism, such as TfR1 and mGluR2, are crucial for the virus's internalisation, making it a potential therapeutic target.

Moreover, it is possible to hypothesise subsequent down-regulation of neuronal mGluR2, as already demonstrated for ACE2 [233]. In particular, xCT and mGluR2 downregulation at the hippocampal level correlates with depressive and low resilience phenotypes to stress [165], and the reduced expression of mGluR2 may provide insights into the virus-induced vulnerability to stress-related conditions [20, 168]. Thus, understanding the mechanisms of internalisation and whether this process involves heterodimeric receptors (Wang et al., 2023) would be intriguing [234].

Ferroptosis also appears to be an intersection involving iron homeostasis, lipid metabolism, and the endogenous antioxidant system xc-GSH-GPX4. In particular, viral infections, such as SARS-CoV-2 infection, seem to play a significant role in influencing the latter [231, 232]. ALC, by acting on the lipid peroxidation system, and NAC, by supplying the limiting factor in the pathway, cysteine, seem to be particularly well-suited for addressing this context [235]. ALC and NAC induce a rapid antidepressant and pro-resilience response by stimulating specific hippocampal areas [165]. NAC and ALC are also suggested to have neuroprotective functions, particularly on astrocytes, potentially reducing glymphatic impairment and improving symptoms or preventing neuropsychiatric manifestations of PCS [236] (Fig. 3).

Fig. (3).

Fig. (3)

Potential pathophysiological mechanisms and the synergistic effect of NAC and ALC. Abbreviations: NAC: N-Acetyl-Cysteine; ALC: Acetyl-L-Carnitine; ROS: Reactive oxygen species; GSH: Glutathione; EAAT: excitatory amino acid transporter; NF-kB: Nuclear Factor-kappa B; NAAG: N-Acetyl-Aspartyl-Glutamate; mGluR3: metabotropic Glutamate 3 receptor; mGluR2: metabotropic Glutamate 2 receptor; Glu: Glutamate; Gln: Glutamine; Cys: Cysteine; System xc-: cystine/glutamate antiporter system; Xct subunit (SLC7A11): light-chain subunit of cysteine/glutamate antiporter; GCPII: Glutame Carboxypeptidase II; NMDAR: N-methyl-D-aspartate Receptor; TNFα: Tumor Necrosis Factor α; KAT-II: kynurenin aminotransferase II.

The clinical efficacy of ALC and NAC has been evaluated in several trials [167, 172, 176, 199, 210, 237], the preliminary encouraging data and physiopathological frameworks support the need to study these compounds in this context and clarify their role [23, 24, 28, 199].

Most studies have demonstrated that in conditions of carnitine deficiency and inflammation, ALC dosages between 1500-2000 mg/day can be effective in treating fatigue and improving immune response [160, 204, 214, 238]. In conditions characterised by high oxidative stress and inflammation, such as psychiatric disorders, the dosages of NAC of 2000-2400 mg/day are recommended [207]. In a small study of 12 patients with long-term COVID-related cognitive dysfunction conducted by Fesharaki et al. (2022), a dosage of 600 mg NAC daily was used [28]. In a randomised study by Scaturro et al. (2022), ALC was administered with a dosage ranging from a minimum of 500 mg per os to 1000 mg per day with intramuscular injection [24].

Therefore, in the light of dosing under conditions of high oxidative stress, inflammation, and carnitine deficiency, considering recent results in PCS, it seems reasonable to recommend a dosage of ALC and NAC between 1500-2000 mg and 2000-2400 mg per day, respectively. It might be interesting to use such compounds in clinical practice as a supplement, especially as an add-on to symptom-dependent drug therapy, albeit with due caution.

CONCLUSION

This review aimed to elucidate the principal mechanisms involved in the neuropsychiatric manifestations of COVID-19, which involve glutamate dysregulation, Xct, Nf-κB, mGluR2, and mGluR3, astrocyte and glial damage and neurotoxicity highlighted as central factors [15], exploring the potential of NAC and ALC as promising therapeutic agents in neuropsychiatric conditions COVID-19-related, including those associated with PCS.

Furthermore, the elucidation of the viral entry mechanism through mGluR2, due also to its predominant expression in brain tissues, unlike the recognised internalising receptor ACE2, may provide insights into the severe impact of COVID-19 on the brain and its intricate relationship with astrocyte damage, aberrant neuroinflammation, excitotoxicity, impairment of the glymphatic system as well as DLPFC and hippocampal injury [18, 233, 239].

The provided evidence and well-conducted clinical trials could pave the way for exploiting these supplements as a treatment for COVID-19-related neuropsychiatric symptoms and PCS. This approach holds the potential for preventing both short and long-term brain damage, with a specific emphasis on vulnerable areas like the CA1 and CA3 regions, vDG of the hippocampus, as well as the DLPFC [86, 92, 93, 240-242].

In this context, we postulate that NAC and ALC could operate on several levels to manage Neuropsychiatric manifestations of COVID-19 disease and PCS.

  • They serve as a first-line defense by preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection in the nasal mucosa, countering Nf-kB activity and its over-activated signalling pathway, and counteracting virion binding.

  • Once the acute inflammatory state is established, NAC and ALC help modulate inflammatory activity in the CNS at systemic and local levels.

  • After neuroinflammation, NAC could 'restore' proper mGluR3 signalling, thereby inducing the expression of astrocytic EAAT-1 and EAAT-2. It also plays a combined action with the ALC role in 'restoring' the xc-/mGluR2 system, reinstating adequate astrocyte-neuron communication, ultimately mitigating neuro excitotoxicity.

  • Once oxidative stress is established, NAC is a substrate that restores the GSH pool and functions as an antioxidant agent. ALC counteracts oxidative stress and provides anti-apoptotic effects.

  • NAC reduces KYNA levels, potentially ameliorating COVID-related cognitive dysfunction (with a procognitive effect in Prefrontal circuitries).

  • ALC and NAC could ameliorate fatigue through different mechanisms of action, including combined action on glutamatergic neurotransmission.

In conclusion, this work emphasises the complex interplay of various factors in the neuropsychiatric manifestations associated with COVID-19, highlighting the importance of glial cells, glutamate dysregulation, glymphatic system alterations, and NAC and ALC's potential therapeutic role. It calls for further research to unveil the intricate mechanisms at play and explore novel avenues for treatment and prevention. Furthermore, the clinical interest in these compounds stems from the lack of standardised pharmacological treatment for PCS and related COVID-19 neuropsychiatric symptoms. However, despite the evidence provided in this review, it is necessary to consider the speculative nature of our inferences.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Declared none.

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

ACE2

Angiotensin-converting Enzyme 2 Receptor

ARDS

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

BBB

Blood-brain Barrier

BCB

Blood-cerebrospinal Fluid Barrier

BDNF

Brain-derived Neurotrophic Factor

cAMP

cyclic Adenosine Mono-phosphate

CFS

Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

CNS

Central Nervous System

CVOs

Circum Ventricular Organs

DLPFC

Dorso-Lateral Prefrontal Cortex

DPP4

Dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 Receptor

EAAT2

Excitatory Amino-acid Transporter 2

GCPII

Glutamate Carboxypeptidase II

GDNF

Glial Cell-derived Neurotrophic Factor

GFAP

Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein

GSH

Glutathione

IFN

Interferon

IL

Interleukin

KYNA

Kynurenic Acid

MCP

Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein

mGlu

Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor

MODS

Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome

NAC

N-Acetyl Cysteine

NEMO

Nf-kB Essential Modulator

Nf-kB

Nuclear Factor Kb

NGF

Nerve Growth Factor

NICE

National Institute for Care Excellence

NMDA

N-methyl-D-aspartate Receptor

Nrf2

Nuclear Factor Erythroid 2-related Factor

PCS

Post-Covid Syndrome

PTSD

Post-traumatic Stress Disorder

REST

Repressor Element one Silencing Transcription Factor

RNS

Reactive Nitrogen Species

ROS

Reactive Oxygen Species

TfR1

Transferrin Receptor

TLR7

Toll-like Receptor 7

TNF

Tumoral Necrosis Factor

Xct

Cystine-glutamate Antiporter

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS

T.B., F.P., and A.C. conceived and designed the project idea. T.B., F.M., and A.C. drafted the manuscript. A.C., F.M., and G.C. drew figures and tables. C.P., R.S., V.S., and G.C. contributed to designing and implementing the research and drafting the manuscript. All authors edited the draft and approved the final manuscript.

CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION

Not applicable.

FUNDING

None.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Shivalkar S., Pingali M.S., Verma A., Singh A., Singh V., Paital B., Das D., Varadwaj P.K., Samanta S.K. Outbreak of COVID-19: A detailed overview and its consequences. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2021;1353:23–45. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-85113-2_2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wan D., Du T., Hong W., Chen L., Que H., Lu S., Peng X. Neurological complications and infection mechanism of SARS-CoV-2. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2021;6(1):406. doi: 10.1038/s41392-021-00818-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rogers J.P., Chesney E., Oliver D., Pollak T.A., McGuire P., Fusar-Poli P., Zandi M.S., Lewis G., David A.S. Psychiatric and neuropsychiatric presentations associated with severe coronavirus infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis with comparison to the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7(7):611–627. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30203-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Aleem A.A., Samad A.B., Slenker A.K. Emerging variants of SARS-CoV-2 and novel therapeutics against coronavirus (COVID-19). Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls; 2021. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wee L.E., Lim J.T., Tay A.T., Pang D., Dickens B., Chiew C.J., Ong B., Lye D.C.B., Tan K.B. Long-term neuropsychiatric sequelae of Delta versus Omicron SARS-CoV-2 infection. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2024;30(4):531–539. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2023.12.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nalbandian A., Sehgal K., Gupta A., Madhavan M.V., McGroder C., Stevens J.S., Cook J.R., Nordvig A.S., Shalev D., Sehrawat T.S., Ahluwalia N., Bikdeli B., Dietz D., Der-Nigoghossian C., Liyanage-Don N., Rosner G.F., Bernstein E.J., Mohan S., Beckley A.A., Seres D.S., Choueiri T.K., Uriel N., Ausiello J.C., Accili D., Freedberg D.E., Baldwin M., Schwartz A., Brodie D., Garcia C.K., Elkind M.S.V., Connors J.M., Bilezikian J.P., Landry D.W., Wan E.Y. Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome. Nat. Med. 2021;27(4):601–615. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01283-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Venkatesan P. NICE guideline on long COVID. Lancet Respir. Med. 2021;9(2):129. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00031-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Schou T.M., Joca S., Wegener G., Bay-Richter C. Psychiatric and neuropsychiatric sequelae of COVID-19 - A systematic review. Brain Behav. Immun. 2021;97:328–348. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2021.07.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.De Berardis D. How concerned should we be about neurotropism of SARS-Cov-2? A brief clinical consideration of the possible psychiatric implications. CNS Spectr. 2022;27(3):258–259. doi: 10.1017/S1092852920002175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.De Berardis D., Di Carlo F., Di Giannantonio M., Pettorruso M. Legacy of neuropsychiatric symptoms associated with past COVID-19 infection: A cause of concern. World J. Psychiatry. 2022;12(6):773–778. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v12.i6.773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ali Awan H., Najmuddin Diwan M., Aamir A., Ali M., Di Giannantonio M., Ullah I., Shoib S., De Berardis D. SARS-CoV-2 and the brain: What do we know about the causality of ‘cognitive COVID? J. Clin. Med. 2021;10(15):3441. doi: 10.3390/jcm10153441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sher L. Post-COVID syndrome and suicide risk. QJM. 2021;114(2):95–98. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcab007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yelin D., Margalit I., Nehme M., Bordas-Martínez J., Pistelli F., Yahav D., Guessous I., Durà-Miralles X., Carrozzi L., Shapira-Lichter I., Vetter P., Peleato-Catalan D., Tiseo G., Wirtheim E., Kaiser L., Gudiol C., Falcone M., Leibovici L. Patterns of long COVID symptoms: A multi-center cross sectional study. J. Clin. Med. 2022;11(4):898. doi: 10.3390/jcm11040898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Irani S. Immune responses in SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV, and MERS-CoV infections: A comparative review. Int. J. Prev. Med. 2022;13(1):45. doi: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_429_20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mohamed M.S., Johansson A., Jonsson J., Schiöth H.B. Dissecting the molecular mechanisms surrounding Post-COVID-19 syndrome and neurological features. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022;23(8):4275. doi: 10.3390/ijms23084275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Davis H.E., McCorkell L., Vogel J.M., Topol E.J. Long COVID: Major findings, mechanisms and recommendations. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2023;21(3):133–146. doi: 10.1038/s41579-022-00846-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Han Y., Yuan K., Wang Z., Liu W.J., Lu Z.A., Liu L., Shi L., Yan W., Yuan J.L., Li J.L., Shi J., Liu Z.C., Wang G.H., Kosten T., Bao Y.P., Lu L. Neuropsychiatric manifestations of COVID-19, potential neurotropic mechanisms, and therapeutic interventions. Transl. Psychiatry. 2021;11(1):499. doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01629-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wostyn P. COVID-19 and chronic fatigue syndrome: Is the worst yet to come? Med. Hypotheses. 2021;146:110469. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2020.110469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Díez-Cirarda M., Yus-Fuertes M., Sanchez-Sanchez R., Gonzalez-Rosa J.J., Gonzalez-Escamilla G., Gil-Martínez L., Delgado-Alonso C., Gil-Moreno M.J., Valles-Salgado M., Cano-Cano F., Ojeda-Hernandez D., Gomez-Ruiz N., Oliver-Mas S., Benito-Martín M.S., Jorquera M., de la Fuente S., Polidura C., Selma-Calvo B., Arrazola J., Matias-Guiu J., Gomez-Pinedo U., Matias-Guiu J.A. Hippocampal subfield abnormalities and biomarkers of pathologic brain changes: From SARS-CoV-2 acute infection to post-COVID syndrome. EBioMedicine. 2023;94:104711. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wang J., Yang G., Wang X., Wen Z., Shuai L., Luo J., Wang C., Sun Z., Liu R., Ge J., He X., Hua R., Wang X., Yang X., Chen W., Zhong G., Bu Z. SARS-CoV-2 uses metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 2 as an internalization factor to infect cells. Cell Discov. 2021;7(1):119. doi: 10.1038/s41421-021-00357-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Nicoletti F., Bockaert J., Collingridge G.L., Conn P.J., Ferraguti F., Schoepp D.D., Wroblewski J.T., Pin J.P. Metabotropic glutamate receptors: From the workbench to the bedside. Neuropharmacology. 2011;60(7-8):1017–1041. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2010.10.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Planas-Fontánez T.M., Dreyfus C.F., Saitta K.S. Reactive astrocytes as therapeutic targets for brain degenerative diseases: Roles played by metabotropic glutamate receptors. Neurochem. Res. 2020;45(3):541–550. doi: 10.1007/s11064-020-02968-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Fesharaki-Zadeh A., Lowe N., Arnsten A.F.T. Clinical experience with the α2A-adrenoceptor agonist, guanfacine, and N-acetylcysteine for the treatment of cognitive deficits in “Long-COVID19”. Neuroimmunology Reports. 2023;3:100154. doi: 10.1016/j.nerep.2022.100154. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Scaturro D., Vitagliani F., Di Bella V.E., Falco V., Tomasello S., Lauricella L., Letizia Mauro G. The role of acetyl-carnitine and rehabilitation in the management of patients with Post-COVID syndrome: Case-control study. Appl. Sci. (Basel) 2022;12(8):4084. doi: 10.3390/app12084084. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Samsonia M., Kandelaki M., Baratashvili N., Gvaramia L. Neuroprotective and antioxidant potential of montelukast-acetylcysteine combination therapy for brain protection in patients with COVID-19 induced pneumonia. Georgian Med. News. 2023;335(335):111–118. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Stefanou M.I., Palaiodimou L., Bakola E., Smyrnis N., Papadopoulou M., Paraskevas G.P., Rizos E., Boutati E., Grigoriadis N., Krogias C., Giannopoulos S., Tsiodras S., Gaga M., Tsivgoulis G. Neurological manifestations of long-COVID syndrome: A narrative review. Ther. Adv. Chronic Dis. 2022;13:76890. doi: 10.1177/20406223221076890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.De Flora S., Balansky R., La Maestra S. Rationale for the use of N‐acetylcysteine in both prevention and adjuvant therapy of COVID‐19. FASEB J. 2020;34(10):13185–13193. doi: 10.1096/fj.202001807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Fesharaki Zadeh A., Arnsten A.F.T., Wang M. Scientific rationale for the treatment of cognitive deficits from long COVID. Neurol. Int. 2023;15(2):725–742. doi: 10.3390/neurolint15020045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Veleri S. Neurotropism of SARS-CoV-2 and neurological diseases of the central nervous system in COVID-19 patients. Exp. Brain Res. 2022;240(1):9–25. doi: 10.1007/s00221-021-06244-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Meinhardt J., Radke J., Dittmayer C., Franz J., Thomas C., Mothes R., Laue M., Schneider J., Brünink S., Greuel S., Lehmann M., Hassan O., Aschman T., Schumann E., Chua R.L., Conrad C., Eils R., Stenzel W., Windgassen M., Rößler L., Goebel H.H., Gelderblom H.R., Martin H., Nitsche A., Schulz-Schaeffer W.J., Hakroush S., Winkler M.S., Tampe B., Scheibe F., Körtvélyessy P., Reinhold D., Siegmund B., Kühl A.A., Elezkurtaj S., Horst D., Oesterhelweg L., Tsokos M., Ingold-Heppner B., Stadelmann C., Drosten C., Corman V.M., Radbruch H., Heppner F.L. Olfactory transmucosal SARS-CoV-2 invasion as a port of central nervous system entry in individuals with COVID-19. Nat. Neurosci. 2021;24(2):168–175. doi: 10.1038/s41593-020-00758-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Baysal-Kirac L., Uysal H. COVID-19 associate neurological complications. Neurol. Sci. Neurophysiol. 2020;37(1):1–3. doi: 10.4103/NSN.NSN_28_20. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bostancıklıoğlu M. SARS-CoV2 entry and spread in the lymphatic drainage system of the brain. Brain Behav. Immun. 2020;87:122–123. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.04.080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hirabara S.M., Serdan T.D.A., Gorjao R., Masi L.N., Pithon-Curi T.C., Covas D.T., Curi R., Durigon E.L. SARS-COV-2 Variants: Differences and potential of immune evasion. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022;11:781429. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.781429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zeisel A., Muñoz-Manchado A.B., Codeluppi S., Lönnerberg P., La Manno G., Juréus A., Marques S., Munguba H., He L., Betsholtz C., Rolny C., Castelo-Branco G., Hjerling-Leffler J., Linnarsson S. Cell types in the mouse cortex and hippocampus revealed by single-cell RNA-seq. Science. 2015;347(6226):1138–1142. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa1934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zhang Y., Archie S.R., Ghanwatkar Y., Sharma S., Nozohouri S., Burks E., Mdzinarishvili A., Liu Z., Abbruscato T.J. Potential role of astrocyte angiotensin converting enzyme 2 in the neural transmission of COVID-19 and a neuroinflammatory state induced by smoking and vaping. Fluids Barriers CNS. 2022;19(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12987-022-00339-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Pellegrini L., Bonfio C., Chadwick J., Begum F., Skehel M., Lancaster M.A. Human CNS barrier-forming organoids with cerebrospinal fluid production. Science. 2020;369(6500):eaaz5626. doi: 10.1126/science.aaz5626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mao L.M., Bodepudi A., Chu X.P., Wang J.Q., Group I. Group I metabotropic glutamate receptors and interacting partners: An Update. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022;23(2):840. doi: 10.3390/ijms23020840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wang X., Wen Z., Cao H., Luo J., Shuai L., Wang C., Ge J., Wang X., Bu Z., Wang J. Transferrin receptor protein 1 cooperates with mGluR2 to mediate the internalization of rabies virus and SARS-CoV-2. J. Virol. 2023;97(2):e01611–e01622. doi: 10.1128/jvi.01611-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Spampinato S.F., Copani A., Nicoletti F., Sortino M.A., Caraci F. Metabotropic glutamate receptors in glial cells: A new potential target for neuroprotection? Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2018;11:414. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2018.00414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Huang L., Xiao W., Wang Y., Li J., Gong J., Tu E., Long L., Xiao B., Yan X., Wan L. Metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) in epileptogenesis: An update on abnormal mGluRs signaling and its therapeutic implications. Neural Regen. Res. 2024;19(2):360–368. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.379018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Andrews M.G., Mukhtar T., Eze U.C., Simoneau C.R., Ross J., Parikshak N., Wang S., Zhou L., Koontz M., Velmeshev D., Siebert C.V., Gemenes K.M., Tabata T., Perez Y., Wang L., Mostajo-Radji M.A., de Majo M., Donohue K.C., Shin D., Salma J., Pollen A.A., Nowakowski T.J., Ullian E., Kumar G.R., Winkler E.A., Crouch E.E., Ott M., Kriegstein A.R. Tropism of SARS-CoV-2 for human cortical astrocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2022;119(30):e2122236119–e2122236119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2122236119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hirunpattarasilp C., James G., Kwanthongdee J., Freitas F., Huo J., Sethi H., Kittler J.T., Owens R.J., McCoy L.E., Attwell D. SARS-CoV-2 triggers pericyte-mediated cerebral capillary constriction. Brain. 2023;146(2):727–738. doi: 10.1093/brain/awac272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Jackson C.B., Farzan M., Chen B., Choe H. Mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 entry into cells. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2022;23(1):3–20. doi: 10.1038/s41580-021-00418-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Jarius S., Pache F., Körtvelyessy P., Jelčić I., Stettner M., Franciotta D., Keller E., Neumann B., Ringelstein M., Senel M., Regeniter A., Kalantzis R., Willms J.F., Berthele A., Busch M., Capobianco M., Eisele A., Reichen I., Dersch R., Rauer S., Sandner K., Ayzenberg I., Gross C.C., Hegen H., Khalil M., Kleiter I., Lenhard T., Haas J., Aktas O., Angstwurm K., Kleinschnitz C., Lewerenz J., Tumani H., Paul F., Stangel M., Ruprecht K., Wildemann B. Cerebrospinal fluid findings in COVID-19: A multicenter study of 150 lumbar punctures in 127 patients. J. Neuroinflammation. 2022;19(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12974-021-02339-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Iliff J.J., Wang M., Liao Y., Plogg B.A., Peng W., Gundersen G.A. A paravascular pathway facilitates CSF flow through the brain parenchyma and the clearance of interstitial solutes, including amyloid β. Sci. Transl. Med. 2012;4(147):147ra111. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3003748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Wu L., Zhang Z., Liang X., Wang Y., Cao Y., Li M., Zhou F. Glymphatic system dysfunction in recovered patients with mild COVID-19: A DTI-ALPS study. iScience. 2024;27(1):108647. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.108647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Koehler R.C., Roman R.J., Harder D.R. Astrocytes and the regulation of cerebral blood flow. Trends Neurosci. 2009;32(3):160–169. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2008.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Masamoto K., Unekawa M., Watanabe T., Toriumi H., Takuwa H., Kawaguchi H., Kanno I., Matsui K., Tanaka K.F., Tomita Y., Suzuki N. Unveiling astrocytic control of cerebral blood flow with optogenetics. Sci. Rep. 2015;5(1):11455. doi: 10.1038/srep11455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Jessen N.A., Munk A.S.F., Lundgaard I., Nedergaard M. The glymphatic system: A beginner’s guide. Neurochem. Res. 2015;40(12):2583–2599. doi: 10.1007/s11064-015-1581-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kubotera H., Ikeshima-Kataoka H., Hatashita Y., Allegra Mascaro A.L., Pavone F.S., Inoue T. Astrocytic endfeet re-cover blood vessels after removal by laser ablation. Sci. Rep. 2019;9(1):1263. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37419-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Hu B., Huang S., Yin L. The cytokine storm and COVID‐19. J. Med. Virol. 2021;93(1):250–256. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Selickman J., Vrettou C.S., Mentzelopoulos S.D., Marini J.J. COVID-19-Related ARDS: Key mechanistic features and treatments. J. Clin. Med. 2022;11(16):4896. doi: 10.3390/jcm11164896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Hasanvand A. COVID-19 and the role of cytokines in this disease. Inflammopharmacology. 2022;30(3):789–798. doi: 10.1007/s10787-022-00992-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Nikkhoo B., Mohammadi M., Hasani S., Sigari N., Borhani A., Ramezani C., Charajoo A., Badri S., Rostami F., Etemadi M., Rahmani K. Elevated interleukin (IL)-6 as a predictor of disease severity among COVID-19 patients: A prospective cohort study. BMC Infect. Dis. 2023;23(1):311. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08294-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Guo J., Wang S., Xia H., Shi D., Chen Y., Zheng S., Chen Y., Gao H., Guo F., Ji Z., Huang C., Luo R., Zhang Y., Zuo J., Chen Y., Xu Y., Xia J., Zhu C., Xu X., Qiu Y., Sheng J., Xu K., Li L. Cytokine signature associated with disease severity in COVID-19. Front. Immunol. 2021;12:681516. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.681516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Del Valle D.M., Kim-Schulze S., Huang H.H., Beckmann N.D., Nirenberg S., Wang B., Lavin Y., Swartz T.H., Madduri D., Stock A., Marron T.U., Xie H., Patel M., Tuballes K., Van Oekelen O., Rahman A., Kovatch P., Aberg J.A., Schadt E., Jagannath S., Mazumdar M., Charney A.W., Firpo-Betancourt A., Mendu D.R., Jhang J., Reich D., Sigel K., Cordon-Cardo C., Feldmann M., Parekh S., Merad M., Gnjatic S. An inflammatory cytokine signature predicts COVID-19 severity and survival. Nat. Med. 2020;26(10):1636–1643. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-1051-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Montazersaheb S.H., Khatibi S.M., Hejazi M.S., Tarhriz V., Farjami A.G., Sorbeni F., Farahzadi R., Ghasemnejad T. COVID-19 infection: An overview on cytokine storm and related interventions. Virol. J. 2022;19(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12985-022-01814-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Tan S., Chen W., Kong G., Wei L., Xie Y. Peripheral inflammation and neurocognitive impairment: Correlations, underlying mechanisms, and therapeutic implications. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2023;15:1305790. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1305790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Redza-Dutordoir M., Averill-Bates D.A. Activation of apoptosis signalling pathways by reactive oxygen species. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res. 2016;1863(12):2977–2992. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2016.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Maes M., Galecki P., Chang Y.S., Berk M. A review on the oxidative and nitrosative stress (O&NS) pathways in major depression and their possible contribution to the (neuro)degenerative processes in that illness. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry. 2011;35(3):676–692. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2010.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Correia A.S., Cardoso A., Vale N. Oxidative stress in depression: The link with the stress response, neuroinflammation, serotonin, neurogenesis and synaptic plasticity. Antioxidants. 2023;12(2):470. doi: 10.3390/antiox12020470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Liu X., Fang Y., Xu J., Yang T., Xu J., He J., Liu W., Yu X., Wen Y., Zhang N., Li C. Oxidative stress, dysfunctional energy metabolism, and destabilizing neurotransmitters altered the cerebral metabolic profile in a rat model of simulated heliox saturation diving to 4.0 MPa. PLoS One. 2023;18(3):e0282700–e0282700. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Kong X., Gong Z., Zhang L., Sun X., Ou Z., Xu B., Huang J., Long D., He X., Lin X., Li Q., Xu L., Xuan A. JAK2/STAT3 signaling mediates IL-6-inhibited neurogenesis of neural stem cells through DNA demethylation/methylation. Brain Behav. Immun. 2019;79:159–173. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2019.01.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Vallières L., Campbell I.L., Gage F.H., Sawchenko P.E. Reduced hippocampal neurogenesis in adult transgenic mice with chronic astrocytic production of interleukin-6. J. Neurosci. 2002;22(2):486–492. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-02-00486.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Schwerk C., Tenenbaum T., Kim K.S., Schroten H. The choroid plexus a multi-role player during infectious diseases of the CNS. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2015;9:80. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2015.00080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Yirmiya R., Goshen I. Immune modulation of learning, memory, neural plasticity and neurogenesis. Brain Behav. Immun. 2011;25(2):181–213. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2010.10.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Schousboe A., Bak L.K., Waagepetersen H.S. Astrocytic control of biosynthesis and turnover of the neurotransmitters glutamate and GABA. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 2013;4:102. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2013.00102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Schousboe A. Metabolic signaling in the brain and the role of astrocytes in control of glutamate and GABA neurotransmission. Neurosci. Lett. 2019;689:11–13. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2018.01.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Kalivas P.W. The glutamate homeostasis hypothesis of addiction. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2009;10(8):561–572. doi: 10.1038/nrn2515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Massie A., Boillée S., Hewett S., Knackstedt L., Lewerenz J. Main path and byways: Non‐vesicular glutamate release by system Xc− as an important modifier of glutamatergic neurotransmission. J. Neurochem. 2015;135(6):1062–1079. doi: 10.1111/jnc.13348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Shih A.Y., Erb H., Sun X., Toda S., Kalivas P.W., Murphy T.H. Cystine/glutamate exchange modulates glutathione supply for neuroprotection from oxidative stress and cell proliferation. J. Neurosci. 2006;26(41):10514–10523. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3178-06.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Moran M.M., McFarland K., Melendez R.I., Kalivas P.W., Seamans J.K. Cystine/glutamate exchange regulates metabotropic glutamate receptor presynaptic inhibition of excitatory transmission and vulnerability to cocaine seeking. J. Neurosci. 2005;25(27):6389–6393. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1007-05.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Hol E.M., Pekny M. Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and the astrocyte intermediate filament system in diseases of the central nervous system. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2015;32:121–130. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2015.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Kanberg N., Simrén J., Edén A., Andersson L.M., Nilsson S., Ashton N.J., Sundvall P.D., Nellgård B., Blennow K., Zetterberg H., Gisslén M. Neurochemical signs of astrocytic and neuronal injury in acute COVID-19 normalizes during long-term follow-up. EBioMedicine. 2021;70:103512. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Matschke J., Lütgehetmann M., Hagel C., Sperhake J.P., Schröder A.S., Edler C., Mushumba H., Fitzek A., Allweiss L., Dandri M., Dottermusch M., Heinemann A., Pfefferle S., Schwabenland M.S., Magruder D., Bonn S., Prinz M., Gerloff C., Püschel K., Krasemann S., Aepfelbacher M., Glatzel M. Neuropathology of patients with COVID-19 in Germany: A post-mortem case series. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19(11):919–929. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30308-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Deigendesch N., Sironi L., Kutza M., Wischnewski S., Fuchs V., Hench J., Frank A., Nienhold R., Mertz K.D., Cathomas G., Matter M.S., Siegemund M., Tolnay M., Schirmer L., Pröbstel A.K., Tzankov A., Frank S. Correlates of critical illness-related encephalopathy predominate postmortem COVID-19 neuropathology. Acta Neuropathol. 2020;140(4):583–586. doi: 10.1007/s00401-020-02213-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Cosentino G., Todisco M., Hota N., Della Porta G., Morbini P., Tassorelli C., Pisani A. Neuropathological findings from COVID‐19 patients with neurological symptoms argue against a direct brain invasion of SARS‐CoV‐2: A critical systematic review. Eur. J. Neurol. 2021;28(11):3856–3865. doi: 10.1111/ene.15045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Villarreal A., Vidos C., Monteverde Busso M., Cieri M.B., Ramos A.J. Pathological neuroinflammatory conversion of reactive astrocytes is induced by microglia and involves chromatin remodeling. Front. Pharmacol. 2021;12:689346. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.689346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Ribeiro D.E., Oliveira-Giacomelli Á., Glaser T., Arnaud-Sampaio V.F., Andrejew R., Dieckmann L., Baranova J., Lameu C., Ratajczak M.Z., Ulrich H. Hyperactivation of P2X7 receptors as a culprit of COVID-19 neuropathology. Mol. Psychiatry. 2021;26(4):1044–1059. doi: 10.1038/s41380-020-00965-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Loane D.J., Kumar A., Stoica B.A., Cabatbat R., Faden A.I. Progressive neurodegeneration after experimental brain trauma: Association with chronic microglial activation. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2014;73(1):14–29. doi: 10.1097/NEN.0000000000000021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Fernández-Castañeda A., Lu P., Geraghty A.C., Song E., Lee M.H., Wood J., O’Dea M.R., Dutton S., Shamardani K., Nwangwu K., Mancusi R., Yalçın B., Taylor K.R., Acosta-Alvarez L., Malacon K., Keough M.B., Ni L., Woo P.J., Contreras-Esquivel D., Toland A.M.S., Gehlhausen J.R., Klein J., Takahashi T., Silva J., Israelow B., Lucas C., Mao T., Peña-Hernández M.A., Tabachnikova A., Homer R.J., Tabacof L., Tosto-Mancuso J., Breyman E., Kontorovich A., McCarthy D., Quezado M., Vogel H., Hefti M.M., Perl D.P., Liddelow S., Folkerth R., Putrino D., Nath A., Iwasaki A., Monje M. Mild respiratory COVID can cause multi-lineage neural cell and myelin dysregulation. Cell. 2022;185(14):2452–2468.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.06.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Boldrini M., Canoll P.D., Klein R.S. How COVID-19 affects the brain. JAMA Psychiatry. 2021;78(6):682–683. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.0500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Buckingham S.C., Campbell S.L., Haas B.R., Montana V., Robel S., Ogunrinu T., Sontheimer H. Glutamate release by primary brain tumors induces epileptic activity. Nat. Med. 2011;17(10):1269–1274. doi: 10.1038/nm.2453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Soria F.N., Pérez-Samartín A., Martin A., Gona K.B., Llop J., Szczupak B., Chara J.C., Matute C., Domercq M. Extrasynaptic glutamate release through cystine/glutamate antiporter contributes to ischemic damage. J. Clin. Invest. 2014;124(8):3645–3655. doi: 10.1172/JCI71886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Dringen R., Brandmann M., Hohnholt M.C., Blumrich E.M. Glutathione-dependent detoxification processes in astrocytes. Neurochem. Res. 2015;40(12):2570–2582. doi: 10.1007/s11064-014-1481-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Yesilkaya U.H., Sen M., Balcioglu Y.H. COVID-19-related cognitive dysfunction may be associated with transient disruption in the DLPFC glutamatergic pathway. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2021;87:153–155. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2021.03.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.García-Sánchez C., Calabria M., Grunden N., Pons C., Arroyo J.A., Gómez-Anson B., Lleó A., Alcolea D., Belvís R., Morollón N., Mur I., Pomar V., Domingo P. Neuropsychological deficits in patients with cognitive complaints after COVID‐19. Brain Behav. 2022;12(3):e2508. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Lu Y., Li X., Geng D., Mei N., Wu P.Y., Huang C.C., Jia T., Zhao Y., Wang D., Xiao A., Yin B. Cerebral micro-structural changes in COVID-19 patients - an MRI-based 3-month follow-up study. EClinicalMedicine. 2020;25:100484. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Perica M.I., Ravindranath O., Calabro F.J., Foran W., Luna B. Hippocampal-Prefrontal connectivity prior to the COVID-19 pandemic predicts stress reactivity. Biol. Psychiatry Glob. Open Sci. 2021;1(4):283–290. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2021.06.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Bird C.M., Burgess N. The hippocampus and memory: Insights from spatial processing. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2008;9(3):182–194. doi: 10.1038/nrn2335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Scholler P., Nevoltris D., de Bundel D., Bossi S., Moreno-Delgado D., Rovira X., Møller T.C., El Moustaine D., Mathieu M., Blanc E., McLean H., Dupuis E., Mathis G., Trinquet E., Daniel H., Valjent E., Baty D., Chames P., Rondard P., Pin J.P. Allosteric nanobodies uncover a role of hippocampal mGlu2 receptor homodimers in contextual fear consolidation. Nat. Commun. 2017;8(1):1967. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01489-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Ritchie K., Chan D., Watermeyer T. The cognitive consequences of the COVID-19 epidemic: Collateral damage. Brain Commun. 2022;2(2):fcaa069. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaa069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Soung A.L., Vanderheiden A., Nordvig A.S., Sissoko C.A., Canoll P., Mariani M.B., Jiang X., Bricker T., Rosoklija G.B., Arango V., Underwood M., Mann J.J., Dwork A.J., Goldman J.E., Boon A.C.M., Boldrini M., Klein R.S. COVID-19 induces CNS cytokine expression and loss of hippocampal neurogenesis. Brain. 2022;145(12):4193–4201. doi: 10.1093/brain/awac270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Jin L.E., Wang M., Galvin V.C., Lightbourne T.C., Conn P.J., Arnsten A.F.T., Paspalas C.D. mGluR2 versus mGluR3 metabotropic glutamate receptors in primate dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: Postsynaptic mGluR3 strengthen working memory networks. Cereb. Cortex. 2018;28(3):974–987. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhx005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Ma J., Hu Z., Yue H., Luo Y., Wang C., Wu X., Gu Y., Wang L. GRM2 regulates functional integration of adult-born DGCs by paradoxically modulating MEK/ERK1/2 pathway. J. Neurosci. 2023;43(16):2822–2836. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1886-22.2023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Alenina N., Bader M. ACE2 in brain physiology and pathophysiology: Evidence from transgenic animal models. Neurochem. Res. 2019;44(6):1323–1329. doi: 10.1007/s11064-018-2679-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Xia H., Lazartigues E. Angiotensin‐converting enzyme 2 in the brain: Properties and future directions. J. Neurochem. 2008;107(6):1482–1494. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05723.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Hashimoto T., Perlot T., Rehman A., Trichereau J., Ishiguro H., Paolino M., Sigl V., Hanada T., Hanada R., Lipinski S., Wild B., Camargo S.M.R., Singer D., Richter A., Kuba K., Fukamizu A., Schreiber S., Clevers H., Verrey F., Rosenstiel P., Penninger J.M. ACE2 links amino acid malnutrition to microbial ecology and intestinal inflammation. Nature. 2012;487(7408):477–481. doi: 10.1038/nature11228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Klempin F., Mosienko V., Matthes S., Villela D.C., Todiras M., Penninger J.M., Bader M., Santos R.A.S., Alenina N. Depletion of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 reduces brain serotonin and impairs the running-induced neurogenic response. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2018;75(19):3625–3634. doi: 10.1007/s00018-018-2815-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Bartolomucci A., Carola V., Pascucci T., Puglisi-Allegra S., Cabib S., Lesch K.P., Parmigiani S., Palanza P., Gross C. Increased vulnerability to psychosocial stress in heterozygous serotonin transporter knockout mice. Dis. Model. Mech. 2010;3(7-8):459–470. doi: 10.1242/dmm.004614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Wang L.A., de Kloet A.D., Smeltzer M.D., Cahill K.M., Hiller H., Bruce E.B., Pioquinto D.J., Ludin J.A., Katovich M.J., Raizada M.K., Krause E.G. Coupling corticotropin-releasing-hormone and angiotensin converting enzyme 2 dampens stress responsiveness in male mice. Neuropharmacology. 2018;133:85–93. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2018.01.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Wenzel J., Lampe J., Müller-Fielitz H., Schuster R., Zille M., Müller K., Krohn M., Körbelin J., Zhang L., Özorhan Ü., Neve V., Wagner J.U.G., Bojkova D., Shumliakivska M., Jiang Y., Fähnrich A., Ott F., Sencio V., Robil C., Pfefferle S., Sauve F., Coêlho C.F.F., Franz J., Spiecker F., Lembrich B., Binder S., Feller N., König P., Busch H., Collin L., Villaseñor R., Jöhren O., Altmeppen H.C., Pasparakis M., Dimmeler S., Cinatl J., Püschel K., Zelic M., Ofengeim D., Stadelmann C., Trottein F., Nogueiras R., Hilgenfeld R., Glatzel M., Prevot V., Schwaninger M. The SARS-CoV-2 main protease Mpro causes microvascular brain pathology by cleaving NEMO in brain endothelial cells. Nat. Neurosci. 2021;24(11):1522–1533. doi: 10.1038/s41593-021-00926-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Johansson A., Mohamed M.S., Moulin T.C., Schiöth H.B. Neurological manifestations of COVID-19: A comprehensive literature review and discussion of mechanisms. J. Neuroimmunol. 2021;358:577658. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2021.577658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Everaerd D., Vissers P., van Helvoort M., Schellekens A., van de Maat J., Hoogerwerf J., Tendolkar I. Acute neuropsychiatric symptoms during COVID-19. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 2023;211(10):779–783. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000001700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Chhabra N., Grill M.F., Singh R.B.H. Post-COVID Headache: A Literature Review. Curr. Pain Headache Rep. 2022;26(11):835–842. doi: 10.1007/s11916-022-01086-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Belvis R. Headaches During COVID‐19: My clinical case and review of the literature. Headache. 2020;60(7):1422–1426. doi: 10.1111/head.13841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Caronna E., van den Hoek T.C., Bolay H., Garcia-Azorin D., Gago-Veiga A.B., Valeriani M., Takizawa T., Messlinger K., Shapiro R.E., Goadsby P.J., Ashina M., Tassorelli C., Diener H.C., Terwindt G.M., Pozo-Rosich P. Headache attributed to SARS-CoV-2 infection, vaccination and the impact on primary headache disorders of the COVID-19 pandemic: A comprehensive review. Cephalalgia. 2023;43(1):331024221131337. doi: 10.1177/03331024221131337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Ma Y. Deng. J.; Liu. Q.; Du. M.; Liu, M.; Liu, J. Long-term consequences of COVID-19 at 6 months and above: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2022;19(11):6865. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Mazza M.G., Palladini M., Villa G., Agnoletto E., Harrington Y., Vai B., Benedetti F. Prevalence of depression in SARS-CoV-2 infected patients: An umbrella review of meta-analyses. Gen. Hosp. Psychiatry. 2023;80:17–25. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2022.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Mazza M.G., De Lorenzo R., Conte C., Poletti S., Vai B., Bollettini I., Melloni E.M.T., Furlan R., Ciceri F., Rovere-Querini P., Benedetti F. Anxiety and depression in COVID-19 survivors: Role of inflammatory and clinical predictors. Brain Behav. Immun. 2020;89:594–600. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.07.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Taquet M., Luciano S., Geddes J.R., Harrison P.J. Bidirectional associations between COVID-19 and psychiatric disorder: Retrospective cohort studies of 62 354 COVID-19 cases in the USA. Lancet Psychiatry. 2021;8(2):130–140. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30462-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Taquet M., Sillett R., Zhu L., Mendel J., Camplisson I., Dercon Q., Harrison P.J. Neurological and psychiatric risk trajectories after SARS-CoV-2 infection: An analysis of 2-year retrospective cohort studies including 1 284 437 patients. Lancet Psychiatry. 2022;9(10):815–827. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(22)00260-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Nordvig A.S., Fong K.T., Willey J.Z., Thakur K.T., Boehme A.K., Vargas W.S., Smith C.J., Elkind M.S.V. Potential neurologic manifestations of COVID-19. Neurol. Clin. Pract. 2021;11(2):e135–e146. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Heneka M.T., Golenbock D., Latz E., Morgan D., Brown R. Immediate and long-term consequences of COVID-19 infections for the development of neurological disease. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 2020;12(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s13195-020-00640-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Sakusic A., Rabinstein A.A. Cognitive outcomes after critical illness. Curr. Opin. Crit. Care. 2018;24(5):410–414. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Patel U.K., Mehta N., Patel A., Patel N., Ortiz J.F., Khurana M., Urhoghide E., Parulekar A., Bhriguvanshi A., Patel N., Mistry A.M., Patel R., Arumaithurai K., Shah S. Long-term neurological sequelae among severe COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cureus. 2022;14(9):e29694–e29694. doi: 10.7759/cureus.29694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Kedor C., Freitag H., Meyer-Arndt L., Wittke K., Hanitsch L.G., Zoller T., Steinbeis F., Haffke M., Rudolf G., Heidecker B., Bobbert T., Spranger J., Volk H.D., Skurk C., Konietschke F., Paul F., Behrends U., Bellmann-Strobl J., Scheibenbogen C. A prospective observational study of post-COVID-19 chronic fatigue syndrome following the first pandemic wave in Germany and biomarkers associated with symptom severity. Nat. Commun. 2022;13(1):5104. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32507-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Komaroff A.L., Lipkin W.I. ME/CFS and Long COVID share similar symptoms and biological abnormalities: Road map to the literature. Front. Med. (Lausanne) 2023;10:1187163. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1187163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Comella P.H., Gonzalez-Kozlova E., Kosoy R., Charney A.W., Peradejordi I.F., Chandrasekar S. A Molecular network approach reveals shared cellular and molecular signatures between chronic fatigue syndrome and other fatiguing illnesses. MedRxiv. 2021 doi: 10.1101/2021.01.29.21250755. [DOI]
  • 120.Martinez-Banaclocha M. N-Acetyl-Cysteine: Modulating the cysteine redox proteome in neurodegenerative diseases. Antioxidants (Basel) 2022;11(2):416. doi: 10.3390/antiox11020416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Devrim-Lanpir A., Hill L., Knechtle B. How N-Acetylcysteine supplementation affects redox regulation, especially at mitohormesis and sarcohormesis level: Current perspective. Antioxidants (Basel) 2021;10(2):153. doi: 10.3390/antiox10020153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Schwalfenberg G.K. N-Acetylcysteine: A review of clinical usefulness (an Old Drug with New Tricks). J. Nutr. Metab. 2021;2021:1–13. doi: 10.1155/2021/9949453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Asanuma M., Miyazaki I. Glutathione and related molecules in parkinsonism. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22(16):8689. doi: 10.3390/ijms22168689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Ferreira F.R., Biojone C., Joca S.R.L., Guimarães F.S. Antidepressant-like effects of N-acetyl-L-cysteine in rats. Behav. Pharmacol. 2008;19(7):747–750. doi: 10.1097/FBP.0b013e3283123c98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Berk M., Dean O., Cotton S.M., Gama C.S., Kapczinski F., Fernandes B.S., Kohlmann K., Jeavons S., Hewitt K., Allwang C., Cobb H., Bush A.I., Schapkaitz I., Dodd S., Malhi G.S. The efficacy of N-acetylcysteine as an adjunctive treatment in bipolar depression: An open label trial. J. Affect. Disord. 2011;135(1-3):389–394. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Raza H., John A., Shafarin J. NAC attenuates LPS-induced toxicity in aspirin-sensitized mouse macrophages via suppression of oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction. PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e103379–e103379. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Tardiolo G., Bramanti P., Mazzon E. Overview on the effects of N-acetylcysteine in neurodegenerative diseases. Molecules. 2018;23(12):3305. doi: 10.3390/molecules23123305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Porcu M., Urbano M.R., Verri W.A., Jr, Barbosa D.S., Baracat M., Vargas H.O., Machado R.C.B.R., Pescim R.R., Nunes S.O.V. Effects of adjunctive N-acetylcysteine on depressive symptoms: Modulation by baseline high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. Psychiatry Res. 2018;263:268–274. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.02.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Dean O., Giorlando F., Berk M. N-acetylcysteine in psychiatry: Current therapeutic evidence and potential mechanisms of action. J. Psychiatry Neurosci. 2011;36(2):78–86. doi: 10.1503/jpn.100057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Rapado-Castro M., Berk M., Venugopal K., Bush A.I., Dodd S., Dean O.M. Towards stage specific treatments: Effects of duration of illness on therapeutic response to adjunctive treatment with N-acetyl cysteine in schizophrenia. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry. 2015;57:69–75. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2014.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Gleixner A.M., Hutchison D.F., Sannino S., Bhatia T.N., Leak L.C., Flaherty P.T., Wipf P., Brodsky J.L., Leak R.K. N-acetyl-L-cysteine protects astrocytes against proteotoxicity without recourse to glutathione. Mol. Pharmacol. 2017;92(5):564–575. doi: 10.1124/mol.117.109926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Halasi M., Wang M., Chavan T.S., Gaponenko V., Hay N., Gartel A.L. ROS inhibitor N-acetyl-L-cysteine antagonizes the activity of proteasome inhibitors. Biochem. J. 2013;454(2):201–208. doi: 10.1042/BJ20130282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Pedre B., Barayeu U., Ezeriņa D., Dick T.P. The mechanism of action of N-acetylcysteine (NAC): The emerging role of H2S and sulfane sulfur species. Pharmacol. Ther. 2021;228:107916. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2021.107916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Aldini G., Altomare A., Baron G., Vistoli G., Carini M., Borsani L., Sergio F. N-Acetylcysteine as an antioxidant and disulphide breaking agent: The reasons why. Free Radic. Res. 2018;52(7):751–762. doi: 10.1080/10715762.2018.1468564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Soto M.E., Manzano-Pech L., Palacios-Chavarría A., Valdez-Vázquez R.R., Guarner-Lans V., Pérez-Torres I. N-acetyl cysteine restores the diminished activity of the antioxidant enzymatic system caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection: Preliminary findings. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2023;16(4):591. doi: 10.3390/ph16040591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Zhou Y., Wang H., Zhou X., Fang J., Zhu L., Ding K. N-acetylcysteine amide provides neuroprotection via Nrf2-ARE pathway in a mouse model of traumatic brain injury. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 2018;12:4117–4127. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S179227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Xia Z., Nagareddy P.R., Guo Z., Zhang W., Mcneill J.H. Antioxidant N -acetylcysteine restores systemic nitric oxide availability and corrects depressions in arterial blood pressure and heart rate in diabetic rats. Free Radic. Res. 2006;40(2):175–184. doi: 10.1080/10715760500484336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Krzyzanowska W., Pomierny B., Budziszewska B., Filip M., Pera J. N-acetylcysteine and ceftriaxone as preconditioning strategies in focal brain ischemia: influence on glutamate transporters expression. Neurotox. Res. 2016;29(4):539–550. doi: 10.1007/s12640-016-9602-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Minarini A., Ferrari S., Galletti M., Giambalvo N., Perrone D., Rioli G., Galeazzi G.M. N-acetylcysteine in the treatment of psychiatric disorders: Current status and future prospects. Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. 2017;13(3):279–292. doi: 10.1080/17425255.2017.1251580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Ooi B.K., Chan K.G., Goh B.H., Yap W.H. The role of natural products in targeting cardiovascular diseases via Nrf2 pathway: Novel molecular mechanisms and therapeutic approaches. Front. Pharmacol. 2018;9:1308. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Blanco A.T., Ramírez O.D., Rodríguez P.O., Pineda B., Pérez de la Cruz G.G. Esquivel, D.; Schwarcz, R.; Sathyasaikumar, K.V.; Jiménez, A.A.; Pérez de la Cruz, V. Subchronic n-acetylcysteine treatment decreases brain kynurenic acid levels and improves cognitive performance in mice. Antioxidants. 2021;10(2):147. doi: 10.3390/antiox10020147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Hashimoto K., Tsukada H., Nishiyama S., Fukumoto D., Kakiuchi T., Shimizu E., Iyo M. Protective effects of N-acetyl-L-cysteine on the reduction of dopamine transporters in the striatum of monkeys treated with methamphetamine. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2004;29(11):2018–2023. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Janáky R., Dohovics R., Saransaari P., Oja S.S. Modulation of [3H]dopamine release by glutathione in mouse striatal slices. Neurochem. Res. 2007;32(8):1357–1364. doi: 10.1007/s11064-007-9315-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Yan C.Y.I., Greene L.A. Prevention of PC12 cell death by N-acetylcysteine requires activation of the Ras pathway. J. Neurosci. 1998;18(11):4042–4049. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-11-04042.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Sun L., Gu L., Wang S., Yuan J., Yang H., Zhu J., Zhang H. N-acetylcysteine protects against apoptosis through modulation of group I metabotropic glutamate receptor activity. PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e32503–e32503. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Zhang F., Lau S.S., Monks T.J. The cytoprotective effect of N-acetyl-L-cysteine against ROS-induced cytotoxicity is independent of its ability to enhance glutathione synthesis. Toxicol. Sci. 2011;120(1):87–97. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfq364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Heinemann S.D., Posimo J.M., Mason D.M., Hutchison D.F., Leak R.K. Synergistic stress exacerbation in hippocampal neurons: Evidence favoring the dual‐hit hypothesis of neurodegeneration. Hippocampus. 2016;26(8):980–994. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Posimo J.M., Titler A.M., Choi H.J.H., Unnithan A.S., Leak R.K. Neocortex and allocortex respond differentially to cellular stress in vitro and aging in vivo. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58596–e58596. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Unnithan A.S., Jiang Y., Rumble J.L., Pulugulla S.H., Posimo J.M., Gleixner A.M., Leak R.K. N-Acetyl cysteine prevents synergistic, severe toxicity from two hits of oxidative stress. Neurosci. Lett. 2014;560:71–76. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2013.12.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Fan C., Long Y., Wang L., Liu X., Liu Z., Lan T., Li Y., Yu S.Y. N-acetylcysteine rescues hippocampal oxidative stress-induced neuronal injury via suppression of p38/JNK signaling in depressed rats. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2020;14:554613. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2020.554613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Lanté F., Meunier J., Guiramand J., De Jesus Ferreira M.C., Cambonie G., Aimar R., Cohen-Solal C., Maurice T., Vignes M., Barbanel G. Late N ‐acetylcysteine treatment prevents the deficits induced in the offspring of dams exposed to an immune stress during gestation. Hippocampus. 2008;18(6):602–609. doi: 10.1002/hipo.20421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Bradlow R.C.J., Berk M., Kalivas P.W., Back S.E., Kanaan R.A. The potential of N-Acetyl-L-Cysteine (NAC) in the treatment of psychiatric disorders. CNS Drugs. 2022;36(5):451–482. doi: 10.1007/s40263-022-00907-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Fen F., Zhang J., Wang Z., Wu Q., Zhou X. Efficacy and safety of N acetylcysteine therapy for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: An updated systematic review and meta analysis. Exp. Ther. Med. 2019;18(1):802–816. doi: 10.3892/etm.2019.7579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Panahi Y., Ghanei M., Rahimi M., Samim A., Vahedian-Azimi A., Atkin S.L., Sahebkar A. Evaluation the efficacy and safety of N‐acetylcysteine inhalation spray in controlling the symptoms of patients with COVID‐19: An open‐label randomized controlled clinical trial. J. Med. Virol. 2023;95(1):e28393–e28393. doi: 10.1002/jmv.28393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Celorrio M., Rhodes J., Vadivelu S., Davies M., Friess S.H. N-acetylcysteine reduces brain injury after delayed hypoxemia following traumatic brain injury. Exp. Neurol. 2021;335:113507. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2020.113507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Izzo L.T., Trefely S., Demetriadou C., Drummond J.M., Mizukami T., Kuprasertkul N., Farria A.T., Nguyen P.T.T., Murali N., Reich L., Kantner D.S., Shaffer J., Affronti H., Carrer A., Andrews A., Capell B.C., Snyder N.W., Wellen K.E. Acetylcarnitine shuttling links mitochondrial metabolism to histone acetylation and lipogenesis. Sci. Adv. 2023;9(18):eadf0115. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adf0115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Longo N., Frigeni M., Pasquali M. Carnitine transport and fatty acid oxidation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res. 2016;1863(10):2422–2435. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2016.01.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Jones L.L., McDonald D.A., Borum P.R. Acylcarnitines: Role in brain. Prog. Lipid Res. 2010;49(1):61–75. doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2009.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Matias-Guiu J.A., Delgado-Alonso C., Díez-Cirarda M., Martínez-Petit Á., Oliver-Mas S., Delgado-Álvarez A., Cuevas C., Valles-Salgado M., Gil M.J., Yus M., Gómez-Ruiz N., Polidura C., Pagán J., Matías-Guiu J., Ayala J.L. Neuropsychological predictors of fatigue in post-COVID syndrome. J. Clin. Med. 2022;11(13):3886. doi: 10.3390/jcm11133886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Koleničová V., Vňuková M.S., Anders M., Fišerová M., Raboch J., Ptáček R. A review article on exercise intolerance in long COVID: Unmasking the causes and optimizing treatment strategies. Med. Sci. Monit. 2023;29:e941079–e941079. doi: 10.12659/MSM.941079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Fathizadeh H., Milajerdi A., Reiner Ž., Amirani E., Asemi Z., Mansournia M.A., Hallajzadeh J. The effects of L-carnitine supplementation on indicators of inflammation and oxidative stress: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J. Diabetes Metab. Disord. 2020;19(2):1879–1894. doi: 10.1007/s40200-020-00627-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Chiechio S., Canonico P., Grilli M. L-acetylcarnitine: A mechanistically distinctive and potentially rapid-acting antidepressant drug. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017;19(1):11. doi: 10.3390/ijms19010011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Ferreira G.C., McKenna M.C. l-Carnitine and acetyl-l-carnitine roles and neuroprotection in developing brain. Neurochem. Res. 2017;42(6):1661–1675. doi: 10.1007/s11064-017-2288-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Spalding K.L., Bergmann O., Alkass K., Bernard S., Salehpour M., Huttner H.B., Boström E., Westerlund I., Vial C., Buchholz B.A., Possnert G., Mash D.C., Druid H., Frisén J. Dynamics of hippocampal neurogenesis in adult humans. Cell. 2013;153(6):1219–1227. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Nasca C., Bigio B., Zelli D., de Angelis P., Lau T., Okamoto M., Soya H., Ni J., Brichta L., Greengard P., Neve R.L., Lee F.S., McEwen B.S. Role of the astroglial glutamate exchanger xct in ventral hippocampus in resilience to stress. Neuron. 2017;96(2):402–413.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.09.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Notartomaso S., Mascio G., Bernabucci M., Zappulla C., Scarselli P., Cannella M., Imbriglio T., Gradini R., Battaglia G., Bruno V., Nicoletti F. Analgesia induced by the epigenetic drug, L-acetylcarnitine, outlasts the end of treatment in mouse models of chronic inflammatory and neuropathic pain. Mol. Pain. 2017;13:1744806917697009. doi: 10.1177/1744806917697009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Sarzi-Puttini P., Giorgi V., Di Lascio S., Fornasari D. Acetyl-L-carnitine in chronic pain: A narrative review. Pharmacol. Res. 2021;173:105874. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Nasca C., Bigio B., Zelli D., Nicoletti F., McEwen B.S. Mind the gap: Glucocorticoids modulate hippocampal glutamate tone underlying individual differences in stress susceptibility. Mol. Psychiatry. 2015;20(6):755–763. doi: 10.1038/mp.2014.96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Nasca C., Xenos D., Barone Y., Caruso A., Scaccianoce S., Matrisciano F., Battaglia G., Mathé A.A., Pittaluga A., Lionetto L., Simmaco M., Nicoletti F. L -acetylcarnitine causes rapid antidepressant effects through the epigenetic induction of mGlu2 receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110(12):4804–4809. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1216100110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Onofrj M., Ciccocioppo F., Varanese S., di Muzio A., Calvani M., Chiechio S., Osio M., Thomas A. Acetyl- L -carnitine: From a biological curiosity to a drug for the peripheral nervous system and beyond. Expert Rev. Neurother. 2013;13(8):925–936. doi: 10.1586/14737175.2013.814930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Liu T., Deng K., Xue Y., Yang R., Yang R., Gong Z., Tang M. Carnitine and depression. Front. Nutr. 2022;9:853058. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.853058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Li S., Li Q., Li Y., Li L., Tian H., Sun X. Acetyl-L-carnitine in the treatment of peripheral neuropathic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0119479–e0119479. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Bigio B., Azam S., Mathé A.A., Nasca C. The neuropsychopharmacology of acetyl-L-carnitine (LAC): basic, translational and therapeutic implications. Discov. Ment. Health. 2024;4(1):2. doi: 10.1007/s44192-023-00056-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Wang S.M., Han C., Lee S.J., Patkar A.A., Masand P.S., Pae C.U. A review of current evidence for acetyl-l-carnitine in the treatment of depression. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2014;53:30–37. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Bersani G., Meco G., Denaro A., Liberati D., Colletti C., Nicolai R., Bersani F.S., Koverech A. l-Acetylcarnitine in dysthymic disorder in elderly patients: A double-blind, multicenter, controlled randomized study vs. fluoxetine. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2013;23(10):1219–1225. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2012.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Veronese N., Stubbs B., Solmi M., Ajnakina O., Carvalho A.F., Maggi S. Acetyl-l-carnitine supplementation and the treatment of depressive symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychosom. Med. 2018;80(2):154–159. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Ames B.N., Liu J. Delaying the mitochondrial decay of aging with acetylcarnitine. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2004;1033(1):108–116. doi: 10.1196/annals.1320.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Chen N., Yang M., Zhou M., Xiao J., Guo J., He L. L-carnitine for cognitive enhancement in people without cognitive impairment. Cochrane Libr. 2017;2017(3):CD009374–CD009374. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009374.pub3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Cuccurazzu B., Bortolotto V., Valente M.M., Ubezio F., Koverech A., Canonico P.L., Grilli M. Upregulation of mGlu2 receptors via NF-κB p65 acetylation is involved in the Proneurogenic and antidepressant effects of acetyl-L-carnitine. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013;38(11):2220–2230. doi: 10.1038/npp.2013.121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Foreman P.J., Perez-Polo J.R., Angelucci L., Ramacci M.T., Taglialatela G. Effects of acetyl-l-carnitine treatment and stress exposure on the nerve growth factor receptor (p75NGFR) mRNA level in the central nervous system of aged rats. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry. 1995;19(1):117–133. doi: 10.1016/0278-5846(94)00109-U. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Taglialatela G., Navarra D., Cruciani R., Ramacci M., Alemà G., Angelucci L. Acetyl-l-carnitine treatment increases nerve growth factor levels and choline acetyltransferase activity in the central nervous system of aged rats. Exp. Gerontol. 1994;29(1):55–66. doi: 10.1016/0531-5565(94)90062-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Piovesan P., Pacifici L., Taglialatela G., Ramacci M.T., Angelucci L. Acetyl-l-carnitine treatment increases choline acetyltransferase activity and NGF levels in the CNS of adult rats following total fimbria-fornix transection. Brain Res. 1994;633(1-2):77–82. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(94)91524-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Pourshahidi S., Shamshiri A.R., Derakhshan S., Mohammadi S., Ghorbani M. The effect of acetyl-L-carnitine (ALCAR) on peripheral nerve regeneration in animal models: A systematic review. Neurochem. Res. 2023;48(8):2335–2344. doi: 10.1007/s11064-023-03911-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Doležal V., Tuček S. Utilization of citrate, acetylcarnitine, acetate, pyruvate and glucose for the synthesis of acetylcholine in rat brain slices. J. Neurochem. 1981;36(4):1323–1330. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1981.tb00569.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Traina G. The neurobiology of acetyl-L-carnitine. Front. Biosci. 2016;21(7):1314–1329. doi: 10.2741/4459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Traina G., Federighi G., Brunelli M., Scuri R. Cytoprotective effect of acetyl-L-carnitine evidenced by analysis of gene expression in the rat brain. Mol. Neurobiol. 2009;39(2):101–106. doi: 10.1007/s12035-009-8056-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.He J., Li Z., Xia P., Shi A. FuChen, X.; Zhang, J.; Yu, P. Ferroptosis and ferritinophagy in diabetes complications. Mol. Metab. 2022;60:101470. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2022.101470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Li C., Ou R., Wei Q., Shang H. Carnitine and COVID-19 susceptibility and severity: A mendelian randomization study. Front. Nutr. 2021;8:780205. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.780205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Arnsten A.F.T., Datta D., Wang M. The genie in the bottle-magnified calcium signaling in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Mol. Psychiatry. 2021;26(8):3684–3700. doi: 10.1038/s41380-020-00973-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.McEwen B.S., Gray J.D., Nasca C. Recognizing resilience: Learning from the effects of stress on the brain. Neurobiol. Stress. 2015;1:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.ynstr.2014.09.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Arnsten A.F.T., Woo E., Yang S., Wang M., Datta D. Unusual molecular regulation of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex layer III synapses increases vulnerability to genetic and environmental insults in Schizophrenia. Biol. Psychiatry. 2022;92(6):480–490. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2022.02.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Arnsten A.F.T., Wang M. The evolutionary expansion of mGluR3-NAAG-GCPII signaling: Relevance to human intelligence and cognitive disorders. Am. J. Psychiatry. 2020;177(12):1103–1106. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.20101458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Knoll M.D., Wonodi C. Oxford–AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine efficacy. Lancet. 2021;397(10269):72–74. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32623-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Yang S., Datta D., Elizabeth W., Duque A., Morozov Y.M., Arellano J., Slusher B.S., Wang M., Arnsten A.F.T. Inhibition of glutamate-carboxypeptidase-II in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: Potential therapeutic target for neuroinflammatory cognitive disorders. Mol. Psychiatry. 2022;27(10):4252–4263. doi: 10.1038/s41380-022-01656-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Neale J.H., Olszewski R.T., Zuo D., Janczura K.J., Profaci C.P., Lavin K.M., Madore J.C., Bzdega T. Advances in understanding the peptide neurotransmitter NAAG and appearance of a new member of the NAAG neuropeptide family. J. Neurochem. 2011;118(4):490–498. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07338.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Holmay M.J., Terpstra M., Coles L.D., Mishra U., Ahlskog M., Öz G., Cloyd J.C., Tuite P.J. N-Acetylcysteine boosts brain and blood glutathione in Gaucher and Parkinson diseases. Clin. Neuropharmacol. 2013;36(4):103–106. doi: 10.1097/WNF.0b013e31829ae713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Scofield M.D., Heinsbroek J.A., Gipson C.D., Kupchik Y.M., Spencer S., Smith A.C.W., Roberts-Wolfe D., Kalivas P.W. The nucleus accumbens: Mechanisms of addiction across drug classes reflect the importance of glutamate homeostasis. Pharmacol. Rev. 2016;68(3):816–871. doi: 10.1124/pr.116.012484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Kazmi N.D., Smith G., Lewis S. Mendelian randomization analyses show that higher acetyl-carnitine and carnitine levels in blood protect against severe COVID19. SSRN. 2021. p. 2021-05. [DOI]
  • 199.Vaziri-harami R., Delkash P. Can l-carnitine reduce post-COVID-19 fatigue? Ann. Med. Surg. (Lond.) 2022;73:103145. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.103145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200.Cuadrado A., Martín-Moldes Z., Ye J., Lastres-Becker I. Transcription factors NRF2 and NF-κB are coordinated effectors of the Rho family, GTP-binding protein RAC1 during inflammation. J. Biol. Chem. 2014;289(22):15244–15258. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.540633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201.Wardyn J.D., Ponsford A.H., Sanderson C.M. Dissecting molecular cross-talk between Nrf2 and NF-κB response pathways. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2015;43(4):621–626. doi: 10.1042/BST20150014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202.Khodakarami A., Adibfar S., Karpisheh V., Abolhasani S., Jalali P., Mohammadi H.G., Navashenaq J., Hojjat-Farsangi M., Jadidi-Niaragh F. The molecular biology and therapeutic potential of Nrf2 in leukemia. Cancer Cell Int. 2022;22(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s12935-022-02660-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203.Cacciatore I., Cornacchia C., Pinnen F., Mollica A., Di Stefano A. Prodrug approach for increasing cellular glutathione levels. Molecules. 2010;15(3):1242–1264. doi: 10.3390/molecules15031242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204.Helbing D.L., Dommaschk E.M., Danyeli L.V., Liepinsh E., Refisch A., Sen Z.D., Zvejniece L., Rocktäschel T., Stabenow L.K., Schiöth H.B., Walter M., Dambrova M., Besteher B. Conceptual foundations of acetylcarnitine supplementation in neuropsychiatric long COVID syndrome: A narrative review. Eur. Arch. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 2024;2024:01734–3. doi: 10.1007/s00406-023-01734-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 205.Tenório M.C.S., Graciliano N.G., Moura F.A., Oliveira A.C.M., Goulart M.O.F. N-Acetylcysteine (NAC): Impacts on Human Health. Antioxidants. 2021;10(6):967. doi: 10.3390/antiox10060967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206.Tavares-Júnior J.W.L., de Souza A.C.C., Borges J.W.P., Oliveira D.N., Siqueira-Neto J.I., Sobreira-Neto M.A., Braga-Neto P. COVID-19 associated cognitive impairment: A systematic review. Cortex. 2022;152:77–97. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2022.04.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 207.Ooi S.L., Green R., Pak S.C. N-Acetylcysteine for the Treatment of Psychiatric Disorders: A Review of Current Evidence. BioMed Res. Int. 2018;2018:1–8. doi: 10.1155/2018/2469486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 208.Mohiuddin M., Pivetta B., Gilron I., Khan J.S. Efficacy and safety of N-acetylcysteine for the management of chronic pain in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain Med. 2021;22(12):2896–2907. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnab042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 209.Morris G., Puri B.K., Walker A.J., Maes M., Carvalho A.F., Walder K., Mazza C., Berk M. Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome: From pathophysiological insights to novel therapeutic opportunities. Pharmacol. Res. 2019;148:104450. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2019.104450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 210.Vermeulen R.C.W., Scholte H.R. Exploratory open label, randomized study of acetyl- and propionylcarnitine in chronic fatigue syndrome. Psychosom. Med. 2004;66(2):276–282. doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000116249.60477.e9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211.Altay O., Arif M., Li X., Yang H., Aydın M., Alkurt G., Kim W., Akyol D., Zhang C., Dinler-Doganay G., Turkez H., Shoaie S., Nielsen J., Borén J., Olmuscelik O., Doganay L., Uhlén M., Mardinoglu A. Combined metabolic activators accelerates recovery in mild‐to‐moderate COVID‐19. Adv. Sci. (Weinh.) 2021;8(17):2101222. doi: 10.1002/advs.202101222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 212.Valdés A., Moreno L.O., Rello S.R., Orduña A., Bernardo D., Cifuentes A. Metabolomics study of COVID-19 patients in four different clinical stages. Sci. Rep. 2022;12(1):1650. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05667-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 213.Micheletto C., Izquierdo J.L., Avdeev S.N.R., Escobar R.A., Pacheco Gallego M.C. N-acetylcysteine as a therapeutic approach to post-COVID-19 pulmonary fibrosis adjunctive treatment. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2022;26(13):4872–4880. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202207_29212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 214.Rastgoo S., Fateh S.T., Nikbaf-Shandiz M., Rasaei N., Aali Y., Zamani M., Shiraseb F., Asbaghi O. The effects of L-carnitine supplementation on inflammatory and anti-inflammatory markers in adults: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis. Inflammopharmacology. 2023;31(5):2173–2199. doi: 10.1007/s10787-023-01323-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 215.Alhasaniah A.H. l-carnitine: Nutrition, pathology, and health benefits. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2023;30(2):103555. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2022.103555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 216.Badawi A. Hypercytokinemia and Pathogen–Host Interaction in COVID-19. J. Inflamm. Res. 2020;13:255–261. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S259096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 217.Poe F.L., Corn J. N-Acetylcysteine: A potential therapeutic agent for SARS-CoV-2. Med. Hypotheses. 2020;143:109862. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2020.109862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 218.Zawawi A., Naser A.Y., Alwafi H., Minshawi F. Profile of circulatory cytokines and chemokines in human coronaviruses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Immunol. 2021;12:666223. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.666223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 219.Truini A., Piroso S., Pasquale E., Notartomaso S., Stefano G.D., Lattanzi R., Battaglia G., Nicoletti F., Cruccu G. N-acetyl cysteine, a drug that enhances the endogenous activation of group- II metabotropic glutamate receptors, inhibits nociceptive transmission in humans. Mol. Pain, . 2015;11:s12990-015-0009.. doi: 10.1186/s12990-015-0009-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 220.Naureen Z., Dautaj A., Nodari S., Fioretti F., Dhuli K., Anpilogov K., Lorusso L., Paolacci S., Michelini S., Guda T., Kallazi M., Bertelli M. Proposal of a food supplement for the management of post-COVID syndrome. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2021;25(1):67–73. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202112_27335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 221.Bellamine A., Pham T.N.Q., Jain J., Wilson J., Sahin K., Dallaire F., Seidah N.G., Durkee S., Radošević K., Cohen É.A. L-carnitine tartrate downregulates the ace2 receptor and limits sars-cov-2 infection. Nutrients. 2021;13(4):1297. doi: 10.3390/nu13041297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 222.Sadowska A.M. N -Acetylcysteine mucolysis in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ther. Adv. Respir. Dis. 2012;6(3):127–135. doi: 10.1177/1753465812437563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 223.Dai J., Teng X., Jin S., Wu Y. The antiviral roles of hydrogen sulfide by blocking the interaction between SARS‐CoV‐2 and its potential cell surface receptors. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2021;2021(1):7866992. doi: 10.1155/2021/7866992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 224.Guo Q., Jin Y., Chen X., Ye X., Shen X., Lin M., Zeng C., Zhou T., Zhang J. NF-κB in biology and targeted therapy: New insights and translational implications. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2024;9(1):53. doi: 10.1038/s41392-024-01757-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 225.Naushad S.M., Mandadapu G., Ramaiah M.J., Almajhdi F.N., Hussain T. The role of TLR7 agonists in modulating COVID-19 severity in subjects with loss-of-function TLR7 variants. Sci. Rep. 2023;13(1):13078. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40114-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 226.McCarty M.F., DiNicolantonio J.J. Nutraceuticals have potential for boosting the type 1 interferon response to RNA viruses including influenza and coronavirus. Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2020;63(3):383–385. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2020.02.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 227.Shibanuma M., Kuroki T., Nose K. Inhibition by N‐acetyl‐L‐cysteine of interleukin‐6 mRNA induction and activation of NFκB by tumor necrosis factor α in a mouse fibroblastic cell line, Balb/3T3. FEBS Lett. 1994;353(1):62–66. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(94)01014-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 228.Wong K.K., Lee S.W.H., Kua K.P. N-acetylcysteine as adjuvant therapy for COVID-19 - a perspective on the current state of the evidence. J. Inflamm. Res. 2021;14:2993–3013. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S306849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 229.Kim K., Lee S.G., Kegelman T.P., Su Z.Z., Das S.K., Dash R., Dasgupta S., Barral P.M., Hedvat M., Diaz P., Reed J.C., Stebbins J.L., Pellecchia M., Sarkar D., Fisher P.B. Role of Excitatory Amino Acid Transporter‐2 (EAAT2) and glutamate in neurodegeneration: Opportunities for developing novel therapeutics. J. Cell. Physiol. 2011;226(10):2484–2493. doi: 10.1002/jcp.22609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 230.Talbot K., Madden V.J., Jones S.L., Moseley G.L. The sensory and affective components of pain: Are they differentially modifiable dimensions or inseparable aspects of a unitary experience? A systematic review. Br. J. Anaesth. 2019;123(2):e263–e272. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.03.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 231.Huang R., Wu J., Ma Y., Kang K. Molecular mechanisms of ferroptosis and its role in viral pathogenesis. Viruses. 2023;15(12):2373. doi: 10.3390/v15122373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 232.Wang J., Zhu J., Ren S., Zhang Z., Niu K., Li H., Wu W., Peng C. The role of ferroptosis in virus infections. Front. Microbiol. 2023;14:1279655. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1279655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 233.Lu Y., Zhu Q., Fox D.M., Gao C., Stanley S.A., Luo K. SARS-CoV-2 down-regulates ACE2 through lysosomal degradation. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2022;33(14):ar147–ar147. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E22-02-0045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 234.Wang X., Wang M., Xu T., Feng Y., Shao Q., Han S., Chu X., Xu Y., Lin S., Zhao Q., Wu B. Structural insights into dimerization and activation of the mGlu2-mGlu3 and mGlu2-mGlu4 heterodimers. Cell Res. 2023;33(10):762–774. doi: 10.1038/s41422-023-00830-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 235.Bridges R.J., Natale N.R., Patel S.A. System xc‐ cystine/glutamate antiporter: An update on molecular pharmacology and roles within the CNS. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2012;165(1):20–34. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01480.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 236.Chiang W., Stout A., Yanchik-Slade F., Li H., Terrando N., Nilsson B.L., Gelbard H.A., Krauss T.D. Quantum dot biomimetic for SARS-CoV-2 to interrogate blood-brain barrier damage relevant to NeuroCOVID brain inflammation. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2023;6(16):15094–15107. doi: 10.1021/acsanm.3c02719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 237.Bradbury J., Wilkinson S., Schloss J. Nutritional support during long COVID: A systematic scoping review. J. Integr. Complement. Med. 2023;29(11):695–704. doi: 10.1089/jicm.2022.0821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 238.Reuter S.E., Evans A.M. Carnitine and acylcarnitines. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 2012;51(9):553–572. doi: 10.1007/BF03261931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 239.Li W., Xu Z., Niu T., Xie Y., Zhao Z., Li D., He Q., Sun W., Shi K., Guo W., Chang Z., Liu K., Fan Z., Qi J., Gao G.F. Key mechanistic features of the trade-off between antibody escape and host cell binding in the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant spike proteins. EMBO J. 2024;43(8):1484–1498. doi: 10.1038/s44318-024-00062-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 240.Stępień T., Tarka S., Chmura N., Grzegorczyk M., Acewicz A., Felczak P., Wierzba-Bobrowicz T. Influence of SARS-CoV-2 on adult human neurogenesis. Cells. 2023;12(2):244. doi: 10.3390/cells12020244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 241.Borsini A., Merrick B., Edgeworth J., Mandal G., Srivastava D.P., Vernon A.C., Nebbia G., Thuret S., Pariante C.M. Neurogenesis is disrupted in human hippocampal progenitor cells upon exposure to serum samples from hospitalized COVID-19 patients with neurological symptoms. Mol. Psychiatry. 2022;27(12):5049–5061. doi: 10.1038/s41380-022-01741-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 242.Zorzo C., Solares L., Mendez M., Mendez-Lopez M. Hippocampal alterations after SARS-CoV-2 infection: A systematic review. Behav. Brain Res. 2023;455:114662. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2023.114662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Current Neuropharmacology are provided here courtesy of Bentham Science Publishers

RESOURCES