Abstract
Background:
This study aimed to assess the mid-term effects of focused extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) on clinical symptoms and tendon structure in patellar tendinopathy. Ultrasound (US) evaluation and an innovative in vivo analysis of intra-tendinous morphology using validated spatial frequency analysis (SFA) software were employed to quantify the organization and density of collagen fascicles.
Methods:
This prospective cohort study included 21 recreational athletes (mean age 29.9 ± 9.3 years) with chronic unilateral symptomatic patellar tendinopathy. ESWT was applied as monotherapy over four weekly sessions. Pain was assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and disease severity with the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment – Patella (VISA-P) questionnaire. Morphological parameters, such as tendon diameter (TD), were assessed with US and analyzed using SFA software. The asymptomatic tendons served as controls. Follow-up assessments were conducted at the end of the treatment period and 3 months posttreatment.
Results:
Baseline evaluations revealed increased TD in proximal part of the tendon (P = 0.001) and decreased organization of collagen fascicles (P = 0.013) in symptomatic tendons compared to asymptomatic controls. At the 3-month follow-up, symptomatic tendons showed significant reductions in TD (P < 0.001) and improvements in both organization and density of collagen fascicles throughout various parameters – peak spatial frequency radius (PSFR) (P = 0.024), P6 (P = 0.05), Q6 (P = 0.016), PPP (P = 0.003). No significant morphological changes were observed in asymptomatic tendons. Clinical evaluations demonstrated significant reductions in NRS (P < 0.001) and increases in Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment – Patella (VISA-P) scores (P < 0.001) at all time points.
Conclusion:
The study suggests that ESWT may have the potential to induce positive structural changes in patellar tendinopathy, including improved organization and density of collagen fascicles. These findings indicate that ESWT could be a promising noninvasive approach to managing patellar tendinopathy, with observed improvements in clinical symptoms and tendon structure. However, further high-quality research is needed to confirm these results and establish their long-term efficacy.
Keywords: extracorporeal shockwave therapy, jumper’s knee, patellar tendinopathy, spatial frequency analysis, ultrasound
Introduction
Patellar tendinopathy (PT) is a commonly used term for the clinical manifestation of patellar tendon pain and functional limitation with multifactorial etiology. It occurs in both athletes and general population in all age groups[1,2]. It is often characterized as an overuse injury resulting from chronic failure of the healing response that is not strictly linked to inflammatory or degenerative processes[1,3]. Structural changes, such as enlargement of the tendon, can be present. Disorganization of the collagen fascicles is described as one of the main pathological processes at the intra-tendinous level[1,3]. Understanding these changes is essential for identifying appropriate treatment strategies for PT.
HIGHLIGHTS
To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study evaluating the structural changes in patellar tendinopathy at the intra-tendinous level after extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) in vivo.
ESWT showed to be able to induce positive intra-tendinous changes in patellar tendinopathy.
The improved organization and density of collagen fascicles three months after the last session may indicate a remodeling process associated with the biological effects of ESWT.
Although resistance training is the gold standard in PT management[2], extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) is a noninvasive, safe, and promising additive treatment[4,5], albeit with inconsistent results in pain reduction and functional improvement among literature[6–8]. On the other hand, ESWT is known to activate an intracellular signaling pathway that results in a variety of biological responses[4]. In particular, ESWT stimulates tendon cell activity, modulates inflammation, upregulates the expression of angiogenic and osteogenic factors, and induces various protein synthesis, including collagen[4,9]. These mechanisms support the potential of ESWT’s role in enhancing the structural integrity of tendons.
Considering the conflicting evidence related to ESWT in PT and its biological effects, further investigation is warranted to determine whether these effects can lead to structural improvements in the tendon. Few studies using ESWT in PT have focused on structural changes or biomechanical properties (e.g. tendon diameter [TD] or stiffness), and none have focused on intra-tendinous changes in the organization of collagen fascicles[8]. Understanding these changes is essential because improved tendon structure could potentially contribute to enhanced biomechanical properties, offering significant benefits for the comprehensive management of PT.
This prospective cohort study is the first to evaluate the impact of ESWT on micromorphological changes in PT, alongside clinical manifestations, and macro-morphology (e.g. TD). This includes the organization, spacing, and density of intra-tendinous collagen fascicles. It is quantified in vivo using valid spatial frequency analysis (SFA) software for ultrasound (US) picture analysis[10,11]. It aims to demonstrate whether ESWT can effectively induce intra-tendinous changes and thereby contribute to improving the treatment of PT at a structural level.
We stated two hypotheses: (1) the organization and density of collagen fascicles within symptomatic tendons will significantly improve three months after the last session of ESWT, as measured by SFA; (2) asymptomatic tendons in the same patients are expected to exhibit no significant change in the organization of collagen fascicles over the same period.
Methods
Study description
This prospective, single-center, longitudinal cohort study monitors the effect of a low-energy focused ESWT on the tendon structure in patients with PT. The structure was evaluated both on the symptomatic and on the contralateral asymptomatic lower limb. The article is written in accordance with the STROCSS checklist[12].
All participants signed an informed consent. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University Hospital Motol with number EK-980/23 and was registered in the Clinical Trials database with number NCT06102421.
Patient recruitment
Potential research participants were contacted by a rehabilitation physician’s office. Their suitability for the study was assessed during an initial examination, and those deemed eligible were subsequently enrolled.
The sample size was calculated using G*Power software (version 3.1.9.7., Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Germany) previous to participants recruitment[13]. The power analysis calculated with one-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Mann–Whitney U test (two groups) to deduce a sample size of no less than 21 participants (21 samples of symptomatic and asymptomatic tendon), based on calculated effect size 0.8, an α level of 0.05, a power of 80%, and an allocation ratio of 1.
Patient selection – inclusion and exclusion criteria
The patient was included in the study if they met the following criteria:
is a recreational athlete performing intensive sport activity loading the patellar tendon (running, jumping, strength training, etc.) at least 3 days a week for a minimum of 1 hour per session;
is aged between 18 and 40 years;
has patellar tendon pain, which limits (at least in part) the quality of normal daily or sports activities;
has clinical manifestation of PT (pain and impaired function) confirmed by a clinician; and
has symptoms only in one leg, the other one is asymptomatic.
Patients were not included if:
Any contraindication for ESWT is present (according to the International Society for Medical Shockwave Treatment [ISMST] consensus at https://shockwavetherapy.org).
They were aware of any symptomatic mechanical tendon damage in the past (e.g. partial or complete rupture in relation to the injury), neurological, oncological, or systemic disease (e.g. neuropathy, lupus or rheumatic arthritis) coexists.
They were already treated for PT elsewhere up to 3 months prior to the study (e.g. platelet-rich plasma therapy, physiotherapy incl. resistance training or ESWT).
They are using blood thinning medications or statins.
Study timeline and procedures
Once enrolled, participants were examined by an experienced clinician and physiotherapist including US evaluation, and received the first application of ESWT (week 0). At weekly intervals, they received three more applications and on the day of the last application (week 3), a control clinical examination was performed. In the 12th-week follow-up after the last application (week 15), a final examination including US evaluation was performed.
Patients were not restricted in their usual daily or sports activities if pain was not limiting during or after activity. However, any therapeutic intervention was prohibited for the entire duration of the study (incl. injection therapy, resistance training, physical therapy, etc.). Thus, participants followed their normal regimen supplemented with ESWT as part of the study protocol. In addition, usually taken analgetic medication was not denied if necessary. However, this situation was monitored and if this type of medication was used, the results of this patient were excluded.
Examinations and variables
During the initial examination, basic anamnestic data were collected, and US evaluation was performed on both lower limbs.
All examinations included completion of a validated Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment – Patella (VISA-P) questionnaire. VISA-P is a commonly used questionnaire for assessing subjective perceptions of PT severity[14]. It reaches values of 0–100 points. The more points the patient achieves, the better their condition is. A minimal change of 13 points indicates a significant clinical improvement. However, it is highly recommended to rely not only on VISA-P in the evaluation of PT improvement as its reliability is not very good[15].
The examination also included an evaluation of patient-reported pain on NRS in the morning (NRSm), maximum pain during daily activities (NRSday), and in sport activity (NRSsport).
US evaluation with objective measurements and subsequent analysis was performed in the initial and final examination and is described below.
US examination
The examination was performed by the same experienced US examiner (4 years of experience on a daily basis in musculoskeletal US diagnostics) in all cases and periods, with a linear probe type L12-3E with a frequency of 12 MHz using a Mindray DC-70 device in the preset mode MSK[16,17]. The participant was placed in the supine position, and a knee flexion of 30° was achieved by using a custom-made knee pillow[18,19]. The whole area of the patellar tendon was evaluated, from the apex patellae to the insertion on the tibia in long-axis imaging. The probe was placed as parallel to the tendon as possible. Findings were consulted and evaluated with experts in US diagnostics for greater relevance and reduced error rates. Only proximal or mid-portion tendinopathies were included.
The anteroposterior TD in mm was recorded in three areas: (1) just below the apex patellae in the anteroposterior widest area (TDapex); (2) in the middle of the tendon (TDmid); (3) just above the insertion (see Fig. 1a, b).
Figure 1.
Demonstration of measured areas within the patellar tendon (outlined with dashed lines). Tendon diameter (TD) measurements are shown for the region below the apex (TDapex) and mid-tendon (TDmid) in part (a), and for the region above the insertion (TDins) in part (b). Part (c) presents an ultrasound image acquired in a special setting for spatial frequency analysis (SFA), highlighting the selected ROI with a green polygonal outline.
After that, the preset was changed to the specific setting for SFA, and the picture of each leg was saved in the long axis. Those pictures covered the proximal and mid-portion part of the tendon in the most pathological area defined by the US examination. This was repeated three times in a row. The output values were subsequently averaged to reduce the error rate, as each probe application may show a different intra-tendinous condition.
The US setting was adjusted in collaboration with experts in musculoskeletal US and SFA to increase the contrast between the hyperechoic structures within the tendon, representing collagen fascicles, and the hypoechoic parts of the tendon. These pictures were subsequently analyzed using SFA software. All picture settings in both presets (gain, TCG, dynamic range, depth, and focus) were maintained the same for all examinations. In addition, the asymptomatic limb was evaluated for reference values.
Spatial frequency analysis
SFA is a valid and reliable specialized noninvasive method which analyzes the US picture[10,20]. In particular, it analyzes the anisotropic B-mode speckle pattern arising from within a tissue type in the spatial frequency domain and is capable of detecting and comparing the organization, spacing, and density of collagen fascicles across various parameters[10]. A list of parameters with their physiological correlates for tendon is shown in Table 1. Mathematical descriptions of parameters are well explained by Lesinski et al[21].
Table 1.
List of parameters from spatial frequency analysis (SFA) with its physiological correlates
| Parameter | Full name | Physiological correlate |
|---|---|---|
| PSFR (mm−1) | Peak spatial frequency radius |
|
| P6 (mm−1) | Peak −6 dB width |
|
| Q6 (unitless) | PSFR/P6 |
|
| Amax (B/sample) | Normalized peak value of amplitude spectrum |
|
| PWP (B2) | Power within peak |
|
| PPP (%) | Peak power percent |
|
The analysis procedure was as follows. Static pictures in B-mode with specific settings in the long axis were saved on a local computer and subsequently processed using custom MATLAB (Mathworks, USA R2021b) algorithms described by Bashford et al[10,20]. Once the US picture was loaded into the software, a region of interest (ROI) was selected. The ROI was set as a polygon around the most pathological area, taking in as much of the tendon as possible with the upper and lower borders copying the anterior and posterior parts of the tendon without the epitenon (see Fig. 1c). Parts of the tendon where curvature appears were excluded. After ROI selection, the software automatically calculates the spatial frequency parameters of all 32 × 32 pixel kernels which fit within the polygonal ROI. The mean and standard deviation of these parameters were calculated and subsequently used for statistical analysis.
For asymptomatic tendons, the same area was chosen for the ROI as the contralateral symptomatic twin leg.
ESWT setting
The low-energy focused ESWT was applied using the BTL-6000 FSWT device with piezoelectric generator and a coupling pad which modulates penetration depth to 0–35 mm. The setting was chosen based on ISMST guidelines (https://shockwavetherapy.org). Energy flux density varied between 0.14 and 0.18 mJ/mm2 due to patient tolerance, frequency was set at 5 Hz. A total of 2000 shocks were applied semi-statically to the most US defined pathological area in the patellar tendon followed by 2000 shocks dynamically to the quadriceps muscle by an experienced specialist in ESWT (4 years of clinical experience with ESWT on a daily basis). The application was performed in the same patient position as was used for the US examination. The set parameters did not change during the study and were the same for each patient.
Statistical analysis
Jamovi statistical software was used for data analysis. The normality of the data distribution was determined by calculating the Shapiro–Wilk P value. Subsequently, independent t-tests (or Mann Whitney U tests for nonparametric) were performed for each parameter to compare baseline values between the symptomatic and asymptomatic limb for the US and SFA parameters. In addition, paired t-tests (or Wilcoxon tests) were performed for each parameter, evaluated in each group separately (symptomatic, asymptomatic) between baseline and final values. To reach effect size, Cohen’s d was calculated for paired t-tests and biserial rank correlation for nonparametric Wilcoxon test.
Intergroup statistical significance between baseline and follow-up values of the morphological parameters was evaluated using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis test. The statistical significance between time periods in VISA-P and NRS parameters was evaluated using repeated measures ANOVA or nonparametric Friedman test with repeated measures.
Results
Patient recruitment and data collection were performed between May 2023 and February 2024 in the Czech Republic. The course of the study is illustrated in Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Flowchart illustrating the study course.
A total of 26 patients were assessed for eligibility, and 21 (80%) were included in the study based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. From the study population, 16 were males and 5 were females (mean age 29.8 ± 9.1), so in total 42 tendon samples (21 symptomatic, 21 asymptomatic) were evaluated. Other five (20%) patients were not included for following reasons – two reported previous tendon injury and three reported other interventions targeting PT less than 3 months prior to the baseline examination. During the study, no patient withdrew.
The demographic data with baseline values are shown in Table 2. Baseline values include patient-reported clinical parameters (VISA-P, NRSm, NRSday, NRSsport), macro-morphological parameters (TDapex, TDmid, TDins), and micromorphological parameters (PSFR, P6, Q6, Amax, PWP, PPP). The baseline measurements of morphological parameters showed statistically significant difference between the symptomatic and asymptomatic legs in TDapex (P = 0.001), P6 (P = 0.009), Q6 (P = 0.018), and PPP (P = 0.013).
Table 2.
Demographic characteristics of the groups
| Variable | Symptomatic | Asymptomatic | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| N (male/female) | 21 (16/5) | 21 (16/5) | Not applicable (1.000) |
| Age | 29.8 ± 9.1 | ||
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.2 ± 3.2 | ||
| Symptom duration (months) | 19.6 ± 16.1 | ||
| Training frequency (h/w) | 5.6 ± 3.2 | ||
| NRSm (pts) | 3.6 ± 2.3 | Not applicable | |
| NRSday (pts) | 4.7 ± 2.2 | ||
| NRSsport (pts) | 4.8 ± 2.1 | ||
| VISA-P (pts) | 68.4 ± 8.2 | ||
| TDapex (mm) | 4.87 ± 0.74 | 3.92 ± 0.83 | 0.001 |
| TDmid (mm) | 4.12 ± 0.86 | 3.64 ± 0.82 | 0.070 |
| TDins (mm) | 4.26 ± 0.90 | 3.70 ± 0.90 | 0.050 |
| PSFR (mm–1) | 2.119 ± 0.148 | 2.215 ± 0.192 | 0.080 |
| P6 (mm–1) | 1.119 ± 0.022 | 1.102 ± 0.016 | 0.009 |
| Q6 (unitless) | 1.926 ± 0.136 | 2.046 ± 0.183 | 0.018a |
| GOF (unitless) | 0.948 ± 0.008 | 0.954 ± 0.007 | 0.024a |
| Amax (B/sample) | 2.522 ± 0.494 | 2.789 ± 0.358 | 0.057 |
| PWP (B2) | 18 201 ± 5990 | 21 343 ± 4838 | 0.076 |
| PPP (%) | 48.91 ± 3.40 | 51.67 ± 3.30 | 0.013 |
BMI, body mass index; NRSm, numeric rating scale of pain in the morning; NRSday, numeric rating scale of maximal pain during basic daily activities; NRSsport, numeric rating scale of maximal pain during sport activities; TD, tendon diameter; VISA-P, Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment – Patella.
Mann-Whithey U test was used.
There were a statistically significant positive changes in VISA-P, NRSm, NRSday, and NRSsport between all the time periods (P < 0.001). All subtests reached an effect size higher than 0.8 between exact time periods. The exact values of the intra-group changes are included in Table 3.
Table 3.
Comparison of the clinical manifestation parameters values in all time periods for symptomatic tendons
| Variable | W0 | W4 | W15 | F/χ2 | P-value | Post hoc |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NRSm (pts) | 3.6 ± 2.3 (3) | 1.7 ± 1.6 (1) | 0.8 ± 1.3 (0) | 34.2a | <0.001b | a!!,b!!,c! |
| NRSday (pts) | 4.7 ± 2.2 (5) | 3.0 ± 1.6 (2) | 2.0 ± 1.5 (2) | 34.1a | <0.001b | a!!,b!!,c! |
| NRSsport (pts) | 4.8 ± 2.1 (5) | 2.4 ± 1.7 (2) | 1.1 ± 1.1 (1) | 39.0a | <0.001b | a!!,b!!,c!! |
| VISA-P (pts) | 68.4 ± 8.2 (71) | 79.8 ± 7.2 (82) | 83.3 ± 7.1 (85) | 95.1 | <0.001b | a!!,b!!,c! |
Mean ± SD (median) is shown. In post hoc tests, “a” shows statistical significance (P < 0.01) between W0 and W4, “b” between W0 and W15, and “c” between W4 and W15; “!” shows effect size (rank biserial correlation or Cohen’s d) >0.8, and “!!” >0.99.
NRSday, maximal pain during daily activities; NRSm, numeric rating scale of pain in the morning; NRSsport, maximal pain during sport activity; SD, standard deviation.
Nonparametric Friedman test with repeated measures was used, and therefore χ2 is given.
P-value is <0.001.
Morphological parameters were evaluated in both symptomatic and asymptomatic legs. In symptomatic legs, there were significant changes in TDapex (P < 0.001), TDmid (P = 0.005), TDins (P = 0.025), PSFR (P = 0.024), P6 (P = 0.05), Q6 (P = 0.016), Amax (P = 0.008), PWP (P = 0.016), and PPP (P = 0.003). These values show improvement at the structural level – decreasing TD and greater organization after ESWT. This can also be seen in Figure 3. No significant changes were observed in any morphological parameter in asymptomatic legs (P > 0.05), suggesting no natural changes in structure over time. Exact values of the intra-group changes in morphological parameters are shown in Table 4. Results of effect size and inter-group analysis are also included.
Figure 3.
Ultrasound demonstration of the symptomatic patellar tendon (outlined with dashed lines) at baseline (a) and follow-up (b), performed using settings optimized for subsequent spatial frequency analysis (SFA). In part (a), a hypoechoic area is visible in the proximal region (arrows), with notable collagen disorganization extending distally into the central portion of the tendon (asterisks). In part (b), the hypoechoic area in the proximal region has decreased, and improved collagen organization is observed in both the proximal and central tendon regions (arrows and asterisks).
Table 4.
Comparison of the baseline and follow-up (W15) values of macromorphological (TDapex, mid, and ins) and micromorphological (other) parameters for both groups – symptomatic and asymptomatic patellar tendon
| Variable | Group | W0 mean ± SD (median) | W15 mean ± SD (median) | Intra-group P-value | Effect size | Inter-group P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TDapex | Symp.a | 4.87 ± 0.74 (4.9) | 4.40 ± 0.73 (4.3) | <0.001b | 1.000 | 0.147 |
| Asymp.a | 3.92 ± 0.83 (3.9) | 3.91 ± 0.86 (3.9) | 0.944 | 0.056 | ||
| TDmid | Symp. a | 4.12 ± 0.86 (4.1) | 3.92 ± 0.82 (3.9) | 0.005c | 0.809 | 0.628 |
| Asymp.a | 3.64 ± 0.82 (3.6) | 3.67 ± 0.84 (3.6) | 0.174 | 0.470 | ||
| TDins | Symp. a | 4.26 ± 0.90 (4.1) | 4.11 ± 0.94 (3.9) | 0.025d | 0.590 | 0.537 |
| Asymp. | 3.70 ± 0.90 (3.8) | 3.75 ± 0.92 (3.9) | 0.162 | 0.317 | ||
| PSFR | Symp. | 2.119 ± 0.148 (2.121) | 2.234 ± 0.133 (2.259) | 0.024d | 0.550 | 0.125 |
| Asymp. | 2.215 ± 0.192 (2.236) | 2.215 ± 0.184 (2.228) | 0.995 | 0.001 | ||
| P6 | Symp.a | 1.119 ± 0.022 (1.112) | 1.099 ± 0.022 (1.104) | 0.050d | 0.505 | 0.027d |
| Asymp. | 1.102 ± 0.016 (1.103) | 1.101 ± 0.016 (1.101) | 0.881 | 0.034 | ||
| Q6 | Symp.a | 1.926 ± 0.136 (1.927) | 2.066 ± 0.131 (2.071) | 0.016d | 0.619 | 0.051 |
| Asymp.a | 2.046 ± 0.183 (2.066) | 2.046 ± 0.175 (2.052) | 0.897 | 0.044 | ||
| GOF | Symp.a | 0.948 ± 0.008 (0.949) | 0.957 ± 0.006 (0.956) | 0.001c | 0.819 | 0.006c |
| Asymp.a | 0.954 ± 0.007 (0.955) | 0.954 ± 0.006 (0.953) | 0.856 | 0.059 | ||
| Amax | Symp. | 2.522 ± 0.494 (2.598) | 2.851 ± 0.379 (2.783) | 0.008c | 0.663 | 0.028d |
| Asymp. | 2.789 ± 0.358 (2.780) | 2.712 ± 0.378 (2.675) | 0.338 | 0.220 | ||
| PWP | Symp. | 18 201 ± 5990 (18 466) | 22 174 ± 5400 (20 888) | 0.016d | 0.591 | 0.043d |
| Asymp. | 21 343 ± 4838 (20 986) | 20 336 ± 5299 (19 650) | 0.349 | 0.215 | ||
| PPP | Symp. | 48.91 ± 3.40 (49.51) | 52.25 ± 3.79 (52.06) | 0.003c | 0.753 | 0.031d |
| Asymp.a | 51.67 ± 3.30 (51.38) | 51.52 ± 3.75 (50.80) | 0.938 | 0.029 |
SD, standard deviation; TDapex, tendon diameter – apex region; TDins, tendon diameter – insertional region; TDmid, tendon diameter – middle of the tendon.
Wilcoxon test and rank biserial correlation for effect size were used.
P-value is <0.001.
P-value is <0.01.
P-value is <0.05.
No patient needed to take painkiller medication during the study, and no adverse effects were reported.
Discussion
To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study evaluating the structural changes in PT at the intra-tendinous level after ESWT in vivo. SFA software was used for quantitative evaluation of collagen fascicles organization, spacing, and density. Focusing on these alterations is crucial, as they represent one of the main pathological findings in tendinopathy. Results of this study can enhance our understanding of ESWT in PT treatment, particularly its impact on the tendon structure over a 3-month follow-up.
Notable improvements were observed in symptomatic legs across both clinical (VISA-P and pain score) and morphological parameters (TD, PSFR, P6, Q6, Amax, PWP, PPP), highlighting the potential of ESWT to induce positive structural changes within the pathologically altered patellar tendon.
Current literature favors resistance training as the primary treatment for PT and does not support ESWT as monotherapy[2,6]. However, this study evaluated ESWT alone to clarify its effects without the influence of other interventions. ESWT is considered a valuable adjuvant treatment but with conflicting evidence in management of PT symptoms[7,8]. On the other hand, previous literature has often focused primarily on clinical outcomes, while only a limited number of studies have evaluated macro-morphological changes or biomechanical properties such as TD or stiffness[8,22]. None of these studies have examined intra-tendinous changes.
Long-standing tendinopathy is characterized by a series of structural changes at the intra-tendinous level, notably the synthesis of collagen III and disorganization of collagen fascicles[3]. Prior studies have shown that tendinopathic tendons have worse values in micromorphological parameters using SFA, indicating greater disorganization compared to healthy tendons[10,11,23,24]. For example, Kulig et al[23] demonstrated that a reduced PSFR in US pictures of degenerated tendons is indicative of reduced collagen organization, a hallmark of tendinopathy. In another study, volleyball athletes with PT exhibited significantly greater collagen fascicles disorganization at the proximal patellar tendon compared to both asymptomatic athletes and nonathletes, indicating that this change might be the factor associated with pain[11]. The same method was also used for muscle tissue characterization due to its good reliability[21,25]. An increase in TD is one of the next negative alterations in tendinopathies[19,26]. The result of this study acknowledges these findings, showing that PT exhibits increased TD and collagen fascicles disorganization compared to asymptomatic, likely healthy tendons.
However, there is no study that has evaluated the therapeutic effect on micro-morphology in tendinopathies. Addressing this gap is crucial for understanding how different treatments influence intra-tendinous structure and how this correlates with clinical outcomes. This knowledge could lead to more effective therapeutic strategies. Our study builds on existing literature that has provided insights for exploring biomechanical changes and intra-tendinous changes analyzed by SFA[27–32]. We extend this knowledge by being the first to explore the effects of ESWT on intra-tendinous structure in vivo, aiming to bridge the gap between structural understanding and therapeutic impact.
The biological effects of ESWT are known to initiate several intracellular processes leading to tendon healing and remodeling, including collagen I neosynthesis and induction of collagen III transformation to collagen I[4,9]. In this study, significant positive changes in both the macromorphological and micromorphological parameters occurred in symptomatic tendons. As chronic tendinopathies are mostly characterized by increased disorganization of the collagen fascicles due to the failure of the healing function of tenocytes[3], it is unlikely that these processes would naturally recover. Therefore, it is more likely that positive changes resulted from increased collagen synthesis and remodeling processes initiated by ESWT[7,9].
These findings suggest that ESWT can contribute to both symptomatic relief and structural remodeling in chronic tendinopathies, providing a mechanism for targeted biological intervention.
Limitations
Small sample size may limit the statistical power of the study, the short duration of the follow-up restricts the ability to observe long-term effects, and the lack of a placebo/sham control group introduces potential biases, limiting the generalizability of these results.
It should also be noted that different US devices, while maintaining the same settings, may have different spatial resolutions and other picture quality factors that affect the detailed echogenicity and speckle pattern used for SFA. Therefore, absolute values cannot be compared between devices, however, mean differences, percent change, or effect size have been shown to be relevant.
Suggestions
Based on the positive structural changes observed, along with ESWT’s safety, noninvasive nature, and its role in pain reduction, ESWT shows promise not only for future research but also for clinical practice. Specifically, ESWT may be recommended as an adjunct treatment to improve tissue quality in chronic tendinopathy cases, particularly in patients not fully responding to conventional therapies.
Future investigations should include randomized clinical trials with longer follow-up periods, larger sample sizes including general population, and control groups (placebo or other treatment modalities). Additionally, assessing intra-tendinous morphology in vivo using SFA should be used as it may help determine how these changes relate to improved clinical outcomes. This will be crucial for validating our findings and determining ESWT’s long-term benefits for tendon healing and recovery.
Conclusion
This study suggests that low-energy focused ESWT is an effective therapy for PT, improving both pain and tendon structure. The findings indicate significant improvements in pain, function, and morphology, particularly in the organization of intra-tendinous collagen fascicles. These results support the use of ESWT as adjunctive treatment for PT. While promising, further research with larger and more diverse cohorts is needed to confirm these findings and establish the effect of ESWT on intra-tendinous structure and its correlation with clinical outcomes.
Footnotes
Sponsorships or competing interests that may be relevant to content are disclosed at the end of this article.
Published online 28 March 2025
Contributor Information
Jakub Katolický, Email: jakubkatolicky@gmail.com.
Petra Poklopová, Email: petra.snajberkova@gmail.com.
Gregory Bashford, Email: gbashford2@unl.edu.
Tereza Katolická, Email: teri.stepankova@gmail.com.
Kryštof Voleský, Email: k.volesk@gmail.com.
Stanislav Machač, Email: machac.s@seznam.cz.
Tomáš Nedělka, Email: tnedelka@post.cz.
Ethical approval
The study was approved by Ethics Committee of the University Hospital Motol with number EK-980/23.
Consent
Consent for publication was obtained from all authors. A written informed consent was obtained from all the patients for their willingness to participate in this study and for their data to be used for research purposes.
Sources of funding
This study was supported by the Grant Agency of Charles University (grant number: 193523).
Author contributions
Concept/idea/research design: J.K., P.P., T.N.; Writing: J.K.; Data collection: J.K., P.P.; Data analysis: J.K., T.K.; Project management: J.K., P.P.; Fund procurement: J.K.; Providing participants: T.N., J.K., P.P.; Providing facilities/equipment: T.N., G.B.; Consultation (including review of manuscript before submitting): G. Bashford, S. Machac, K. Volesky, T.K.
Conflicts of interest disclosure
The authors declare they have no competing interests or other interests that might be perceived to have influenced the results and discussion reported in this paper.
Research registration unique identifying number (UIN)
Clinical Trials database with number NCT06102421.
Guarantor
Jakub Katolický.
Provenance and peer review
Not commissioned, externally peer-reviewed.
Data availability statement
The data from this study are not publicly available due to privacy and/or technical reasons.
References
- [1].Scott A, Squier K, Alfredson H, et al. ICON 2019: International Scientific Tendinopathy Symposium Consensus: clinical terminology. Br J Sports Med. 2020;54:260–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Rosen AB, Wellsandt E, Nicola M, Tao MA. Clinical management of patellar tendinopathy. J Athl Train 2022;57:621–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Millar NL, Silbernagel KG, Thorborg K, et al. Tendinopathy. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2021;7:1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Chen Y, Lyu K, Lu J, et al. Biological response of extracorporeal shock wave therapy to tendinopathy in vivo. Front Vet Sci 2022;9:851894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Schroeder AN, Tenforde AS, Jelsing EJ. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy in the management of sports medicine injuries. Curr Sports Med Rep 2021;20:298–305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Challoumas D, Pedret C, Biddle M, et al. Management of patellar tendinopathy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised studies. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med 2021;7:e001110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Liao CD, Xie GM, Tsauo JY, et al. Efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for knee tendinopathies and other soft tissue disorders: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2018;19:1–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Charles R, Fang L, Zhu R, et al. The effectiveness of shockwave therapy on patellar tendinopathy, Achilles tendinopathy, and plantar fasciitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Immunol 2023;14:1193835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Poenaru D, Sandulescu M, Cinteza D. Biological effects of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in tendons: a systematic review. Biomed Rep 2022;18:15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Bashford GR, Tomsen N, Arya S, et al. Tendinopathy discrimination by use of spatial frequency parameters in ultrasound B-mode images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2008;27:608–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Kulig K, Landel R, Chang YJ, et al. Patellar tendon morphology in volleyball athletes with and without patellar tendinopathy. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2013;23:e81–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Rashid R, Sohrabi C, Kerwan A, et al. The STROCSS 2024 guideline: strengthening the reporting of cohort, cross-sectional and case-control studies in surgery. Int J Surg 2024;110:3151–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, et al. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 2007;39:175–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Visentini PJ, Khan KM, Cook JL, et al. The VISA score: an index of severity of symptoms in patients with jumper’s knee (patellar tendinosis). J Sci Med Sport 1998;1:22–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Palazón-Bru A, Tomás Rodríguez MI, Mares-García E, et al. The Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment Scale for Patellar Tendinopathy (VISA-P): a reliability generalization meta-analysis. Clin J Sport Med 2021;31:455–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Cardovac A, Smajlovic F, Junuzovic D. Application of ultrasound in medicine. Acta Inform Med 2011;19:168–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Ozsoy U, Ogut E, Sekerci R, et al. Effect of pulsed and continuous ultrasound therapy on the degree of collateral axonal branching at the lesion site, polyinnervation of motor end plates, and recovery of motor function after facial nerve reconstruction. Anat Rec 2019;302:1314–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Beggs I, Bianchi S, Bueno A, et al. Musculoskeletal ultrasound technical guidelines: v. Knee. In [Internet]. p. 8. https://essr.org/content-essr/uploads/2016/10/knee.pdf
- [19].Zhang ZJ, GYfat N, Lee WC, et al. Changes in morphological and elastic properties of patellar tendon in athletes with unilateral patellar tendinopathy and their relationships with pain and functional disability. PLoS ONE 2014;9:e108337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Crawford SK, Lee KS, Bashford GR, et al. Intra-session and inter-rater reliability of spatial frequency analysis methods in skeletal muscle. PLOS ONE 2020;15:e0235924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Lesinski M, Bashford G, Markov A, et al. Reliability of assessing skeletal muscle architecture and tissue organization of the gastrocnemius medialis and vastus lateralis muscle using ultrasound and spatial frequency analysis. Front Sport Active Liv 2024;6:1282031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Stania M, Król T, Marszałek W, et al. Treatment of jumper’s knee with extracorporeal shockwave therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hum Kinet 2022;84:124–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Kulig K, Chang Y-J, Winiarski S, et al. Ultrasound-based tendon micromorphology predicts mechanical characteristics of degenerated tendons. Ultrasound Med Biol 2016;42:664–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Pozzi F, Seitz AL, Plummer HA, et al. Supraspinatus tendon micro-morphology in individuals with subacromial pain syndrome. J Hand Ther 2017;30:214–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Crawford SK, Lee KS, Bashford GR, et al. Spatial-frequency analysis of the anatomical differences in hamstring muscles. Ultrasonic Imaging 2021;43:100–08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Nishida Y, Nishino T, Tanaka K, et al. An objective measure of patellar tendon thickness based on ultrasonography and MRI in university athletes. J Clin Med 2021;10:4092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Crawford SK, Rudolph A, Engel AJ, et al. Longitudinal quantitative ultrasonic analysis of patellar tendon in a collegiate athlete after bilateral debridement: a case report. J Athl Train 2021;56:1349–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].McCrum C, Leow P, Epro G, et al. Alterations in leg extensor muscle-tendon unit biomechanical properties with ageing and mechanical loading. Front Physiol 2018;9:150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].de Cassia Marqueti R, Vieira de Sousa Neto I, Reichert Barin F, et al. Exercise and tendon remodeling mechanism. Tendons. IntechOpen; 2019. 10.5772/intechopen.79729 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Pearson SJ, Engel AJ, Bashford GR. Changes in tendon spatial frequency parameters with loading. J Biomech 2017;57:136–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Freedman BR, Rodriguez AB, Leiphart RJ, et al. Dynamic loading and tendon healing affect multiscale tendon properties and ECM stress transmission. Sci Rep 2018;8:10854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Williamson PM, Freedman BR, Kwok N, et al. Tendinopathy and tendon material response to load: what we can learn from small animal studies. Acta Biomater 2021;134:43–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data from this study are not publicly available due to privacy and/or technical reasons.


