Skip to main content
. 2025 Jan 24;35(7):4233–4242. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11372-z

Table 3.

Multivariable Cox regression analysis for event-free survival

HR (EFS) (95% CI for HR) p-value HR (OS) (95% CI for HR) p-value
SULpeak 1.0 (1.0–1.1) 0.36 1.0 (0.9–1.1) 0.9
Staging (metastatic vs. localized) 2.7 (1.2–6.0) 0.02a 1.8 (0.6–5.4) 0.31
Histologic response (poor vs. good) 2.5 (1.0–6.2) 0.045a 2.5 (0.7–9.5) 0.17
TLGtotal 1.0 (1.0–1.0) 0.75 1.0 (1.0–1.0) 0.84
Staging (metastatic vs. localized) 2.6 (1.1–6.2) 0.03a 1.8 (0.6–6.0) 0.31
Histologic response (poor vs. good) 2.5 (1.0–6.3) 0.047a 2.6 (0.7–9.7) 0.17
MTVtotal 1.0 (1.0–1.0) 0.17 1.0 (1.0–1.0) 0.92
Staging (localized vs. metastatic) 2.6 (1.1–6.4) 0.04a 1.7 (0.5–5.7) 0.37
Histologic response (good vs. poor) 2.5 (1.0–6.3) 0.045a 2.5 (0.7–9.4) 0.19

CI confidence interval, EFS event-free survival, HR hazard ratio, SUL standardized uptake value lean-body mass corrected, OS overall survival

a Indicates significance