Skip to main content
. 2025 Apr 6;44(25):2091–2102. doi: 10.1038/s41388-025-03365-5

Fig. 4. Correlation of human CDX2 expression with APC/CTNNB1 mutation, CMS and metastasis in Sweden set.

Fig. 4

a CDX2 levels in MSS patients, n = 839. Violin plot displays median and quartiles. b Comparison of CDX2 expression in 2 groups based on APC and CTNNB1 mutational status. WT = wildtype, n = 151. mutant, n = 688. Dots represent individual patients. Data analyzed with unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test. c Comparison of APC/CTNNB1 mutational status in 2 groups based on CDX2 expression levels (25% highest vs 25% lowest expressors). N = 210 for both groups. Percentages are normalized within each group. Data analyzed with Fisher’s exact test. d Comparison of APC/CTNNB1 mutational status in 2 groups based on CMS classification. CMS1/23; n = 431, CMS4; n = 255. Percentages are normalized within each group. Data analyzed with Fisher’s exact test. e CMS distribution within 25% of patients with highest CDX2 levels versus CMS distribution within 25% of patients with lowest CDX2 levels. N = 210 for both groups. Data analyzed with Fisher’s exact test. f Confusion matrix calculated for iCMS2 or iCMS3 score within CMS4 patients. Groups are based on 25% highest CDX2 expressors within CMS4 patients, mutant for APC/CTNNB1 (n = 61, 58 iCMS classified and 3 patients undefined for iCMS classification) or on 25% lowest CDX2 expressors within CMS4 patients, WT for APC/CTNNB1 (n = 30, 26 iCMS classified and 4 patients undefined for iCMS classification). Data analyzed with Fisher’s exact test. g Kaplan-Meier curve for overall survival calculated for groups based on 25% highest CDX2 expressors within CMS4 patients, mutant for APC/CTNNB1 (n = 61) or on 25% lowest CDX2 expressors within CMS4 patients, WT for APC/CTNNB1 (n = 30). Data analyzed by Logrank test. h Pie charts comparing the percentage incidence of metastasis in all CMS4 patients (left) versus subsets of CMS4 patients; APC/CTNNB1 mutant samples within 25% highest CDX2 expressors (middle) versus APC/CTNNB1 WT samples within 25% lowest CDX2 (right). Percentages are normalized within each group. CMS4 patients, n = 255; APC/CTNNB1 mutant 25% highest CDX2 expressors CMS4, n = 61; APC/CTNNB1 WT 25% lowest CDX2 expressors CMS4, n = 30. Difference between 25% highest and lowest expressors analyzed with Fisher’s exact test. R version 4.3.2 was used for statistical analyses.