Table 2.
Impact of women’s educational attainment on dietary quality.
| Explanatory variables | Dietary quality | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Diet quality distance | High bound score | Low bound score | |
| Wo_edu | −0.181*** | −0.114** | −0.067** |
| (−4.82) | (−3.07) | (−2.64) | |
| Wo_career | 0.074 | 0.008 | 0.082 |
| (0.25) | (0.03) | (0.42) | |
| Man_career | −0.601* | −0.551* | −0.050 |
| (−2.24) | (−2.08) | (−0.27) | |
| lnIncome | −0.496*** | 0.239 | −0.735*** |
| (−3.94) | (1.93) | (−8.63) | |
| Hhsize | −0.280** | −0.652*** | −0.373*** |
| (−3.17) | (−7.50) | (−6.24) | |
| Old_ratio | 1.039* | 2.176*** | 1.137*** |
| (2.47) | (5.24) | (3.99) | |
| Child_ratio | −0.739 | −0.233 | −0.972 |
| (−0.95) | (−0.30) | (−1.85) | |
| Distribution | −0.018 | −0.256 | 0.238 |
| (−0.05) | (−0.73) | (0.99) | |
| Distance | 0.030*** | 0.025*** | 0.005 |
| (3.93) | (3.34) | (0.93) | |
| Terrain | −0.237 | −0.208 | −0.445* |
| (−0.86) | (−0.76) | (−2.37) | |
| Constant | 24.260*** | 6.273*** | 17.980*** |
| (18.10) | (4.75) | (19.81) | |
| N | 2,069 | 2,069 | 2,069 |
| Adjusted R-squared | 0.058 | 0.078 | 0.086 |
(1) *, **, and *** indicate significance at 10, 5, and 1% levels, respectively.
(2) Models estimated using multiple linear regression, and value in brackets is t statistics.
(3) DQD, Diet Quality Distance; HBS, High Bound Score; LBS, Low Bound Score.