Table 4.
Conflicting findings in human versus animals in the context of circadian studies.
| Conflicting Finding | Human Studies | Animal Studies | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex-specific CVD risk from circadian disruption | Daylight saving time shifts increase MI risk, with higher risk in women in spring and men in fall; confounding factors like sleep and chronotype not controlled. | Rodent studies show greater circadian-dependent MI mortality in males; controlled genetic/environmental manipulations reveal direct sex-specific effects. | (Young, 2023; Rabinovich-Nikitin et al., 2019) |
| Mechanisms of circadian influence | Mechanisms linking circadian disruption to CVD remain cryptic, with multiple confounders (sleep deprivation, hormonal changes, inflammation). | Genetic ablation of clock genes (e.g., CLOCK/BMAL1) in mice leads to cardiomyopathy, arrhythmias, and altered metabolism, directly linking clock disruption to pathology. | (Young, 2023), (Eckle et al., 2024), (Rabinovich-Nikitin et al., 2019) |
| Role of central vs. peripheral clocks | Human studies often cannot distinguish effects of central (brain) vs. peripheral (heart) clocks due to complexity of environmental cues. | Animal models can isolate central and peripheral clock contributions; disruption in specific tissues (e.g., cardiomyocytes) demonstrates distinct roles in cardiac rhythms and disease. | (Young, 2023; Rabinovich-Nikitin et al., 2019; Hayter et al., 2021) |
| Impact of environmental circadian misalignment | Shift work, daylight saving, and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) environments linked to increased CVD risk, but with variable and sometimes contradictory findings due to uncontrolled variables. | Controlled circadian misalignment (e.g., jet lag simulation) in animals consistently increases CVD risk and inflammatory responses, independent of sleep loss. | (Rabinovich-Nikitin et al., 2019), (Morris et al., 2016) |
| Chronotherapy and biomarker rhythms | Human biomarker studies show circadian variation, but clinical translation for optimized therapy timing remains inconsistent. | Animal studies demonstrate robust circadian regulation of cardiac gene/protein expression and response to therapy, supporting chronotherapy strategies. | (Young, 2023; Rabinovich-Nikitin et al., 2019; Scheer et al., 2010) |