Skip to main content
. 2025 Jun 4;12:1592654. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1592654

Table 5.

The relationship between fruit intake, sagittal abdominal diameter, and waist circumference within key subgroups.

Exposure variable: fruit intake Sagittal abdominal diameter (cm)
Regression Coefficient SE F p
Gender
Boys only −0.23 0.10 5.3 0.0253
Girls only −0.16 0.14 1.3 0.2616
Race and ethnicity
Non-Hispanic White only −0.23 0.13 3.2 0.0804
Non-Hispanic Black only −0.06 0.16 0.1 0.7129
Mexican American only −0.34 0.22 2.3 0.1342
Non-White only −0.18 0.08 4.8 0.0342
Non-Black only −0.21 0.09 5.3 0.0259
Non-Mexican American only −0.19 0.08 5.6 0.0226
Computer use
0–2 h per day only −0.22 0.08 7.1 0.0106
≥ 3 h per day only −0.10 0.22 0.2 0.6612
Physical activity
0–3 days per week only −0.09 0.33 0.1 0.7934
4–7 days per week only −0.21 0.09 5.6 0.0219
Waist circumference (cm)
Gender
Boys only −0.84 0.48 3.1 0.0845
Girls only −0.93 0.55 2.9 0.0967
Race and ethnicity
Non-Hispanic White only −1.02 0.55 3.5 0.0681
Non-Hispanic Black only −0.25 0.72 0.1 0.7335
Mexican American only −1.16 0.92 1.6 0.2165
Non-White only −0.77 0.34 5.0 0.0303
Non-Black only −0.94 0.41 5.2 0.0269
Non-Mexican American only −0.89 0.36 6.0 0.0179
Computer use
0–2 h per day only −1.03 0.37 7.6 0.0085
≥ 3 h per day only −0.21 1.06 0.0 0.8453
Physical activity
0–3 days per week only −0.66 1.47 0.2 0.6544
4–7 days per week only −0.88 0.38 5.3 0.0256

Because the distribution of fruit intake was skewed, the log10 of fruit intake was used. Non-Mexican Am., Non-Mexican American. Table values included person-level weighted adjustments based on the sampling methods of NHANES, so values represented those of the U.S. population of children, 8–11 years old.