TABLE 5.
Application of linear regression modeling to analyze the threshold effects of total sugar and total fat intake on sleep disorders in hypertensive patients.
Exposure | Adjusted OR (95% CI) p-value | ||
Total sugars/100 | Total (N = 15871) |
Inflection point/100 | 0.59 |
Total sugars/100<0.59 | 0.91 (0.67, 1.22) | ||
Total sugars/100 ≥ 0.59 | 1.23 (1.15, 1.32) | ||
Log likelihood ratio | 0.069 | ||
Male (N = 7694) |
Inflection point/100 | 1.65 | |
Total sugars/100<1.65 | 1.34 (1.19, 1.50) | ||
Total sugars/100 ≥ 1.65 | 1.23 (1.06, 1.44) | ||
Log likelihood ratio | 0.485 | ||
Female (N = 8177) |
Inflection point/100 | 1.4 | |
Total sugars/100<1.65 | 0.97 (0.85, 1.10) | ||
Total sugars/100 ≥ 1.65 | 1.33 (1.07, 1.65) | ||
Log likelihood ratio | 0.034* | ||
Total fat/100 | Total (N = 15,871) |
Inflection point/100 | 1.41 |
Total sugars/100<1.41 | 1.11 (0.99, 1.24) | ||
Total sugars/100 ≥ 1.41 | 2.02 (1.40, 2.93) | ||
Log likelihood ratio | 0.004** | ||
Male (N = 7,694) |
Inflection point/100 | 1.55 | |
Total sugars/100<1.55 | 1.27 (1.10, 1.47) | ||
Total sugars/100 ≥ 1.55 | 2.04 (1.24, 3.36) | ||
Log likelihood ratio | 0.095 | ||
Female (N = 8177) |
Inflection point/100 | 0.66 | |
Total sugars/100<0.66 | 0.75 (0.55, 1.03) | ||
Total sugars/100 ≥ 0.66 | 1.27 (1.00, 1.63) | ||
Log likelihood ratio | 0.031* |
Gender; Age; Race; Education level; Marital status; PIR; BMI; Total cholesterol.; Alcohol consumption; smoking; Diabetes; Coronary heart disease and stroke were adjusted. 95%CI, 95% confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001; ap < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Significant values are in bold.