Skip to main content
. 2025 Jun 18;170(1):e250044. doi: 10.1530/REP-25-0044

Table 1.

Taxa with significantly (P < 0.05) and trending toward significantly (0.05 < P < 0.1) different relative abundance between HRP and INF sow vaginal microbiota communities. Bold P values indicate significantly different relative abundance between HRP and INF vaginal microbiota communities.

Taxonomic level/name Corrected P value Group it is increased Mean relative abundance %
HRP INF
Genus
Lachnospiraceae XPB1014 group 0.005 INF 0.19 ± 0.51 1.01 ± 1.62
Aerococcus 0.024 HRP 1.86 ± 2.83 0.18 ± 0.25
Staphylococcus 0.026 HRP 1.02 ± 1.68 0.10 ± 0.15
Anaeroplasma 0.084 INF 0.00 ± 0.00 0.07 ± 0.16
Species
Campylobacter ureolyticus 0.009 HRP 13.39 ± 24.73 0.00 ± 0.00
Staphylococcus simulans 0.009 HRP 1.67 ± 3.20 0.04 ± 0.16
Corynebacterium urealyticum 0.014 INF 0.01 ± 0.08 0.28 ± 0.80
Ruminococcus flavefaciens 0.014 INF 2.01 ± 8.14 8.32 ± 18.97
Streptococcus alactolyticus 0.014 INF 0.65 ± 1.28 10.84 ± 18.05
Streptococcus thoraltensis 0.017 HRP 1.19 ± 2.79 0.00 ± 0.00
Streptococcus suis 0.018 HRP 5.95 ± 11.88 0.54 ± 1.39
Facklamia tabacinasalis 0.026 HRP 7.16 ± 12.70 0.77 ± 1.75
Peptoniphilus harei 0.026 HRP 0.55 ± 1.08 0.01 ± 0.04