Skip to main content
. 2025 Jun 19;18:17562864251342855. doi: 10.1177/17562864251342855

Table 2.

Main efficacy outcomes from real-world experience summarized according to the years of follow-up (up to 2 years, between the 3rd and 4th year, and beyond year 4).

Follow-up period Reference Study type Population Main efficacy outcomes
Up to 2 years Petracca et al. 68 Multicentre, observational, retrospective post-marketing study 243 patients (100% RRMS; 29.3% DMT-naïve) - 64% NEDA-3: Higher number of prior treatments reduced NEDA-3 retention; clinical relapses were more likely. Median time to NEDA-3 loss: 2.6 years.
- 89% relapse-free
- 77% MRI activity-free
- 87% disability progression-free
Sorensen et al. 57 Prospective registry-based observational cohort study 268 patients (97.8% RRMS; 12.7% DMT-naïve) - 84.8% ARR reduction compared to the year before CLAD initiation.
- NEDA-3 achieved: 71.7% at 1 year; 49.0% at 2 years.
- Risk factors for relapse: Switching from HeDMT or high baseline disease activity.
Zanetta et al. 66 Retrospective and prospective monocentric, observational study 114 patients (100% RRMS; 50% DMT-naïve) - 74.9% NEDA-3 at 24 months: Higher gadolinium-enhancing lesions at baseline predicted NEDA-3 loss
- 90.9% relapse-free
- 76.7% MRI activity-free
- 96.2% disability progression-free
Arena et al. 144 (REWIND) Prospective multicentre study 217 patients (100% RRMS; 23% DMT-naïve) - 80% EDSS progression-free
- 88% relapse-free at 24 months
- 48% MRI activity-free
- NEDA-3 outcomes: Higher in the MAT group, with greater freedom from disease progression, clinical relapses and radiological worsening
- ARR analysis: Lowest in MAT patients compared to naïve and HAT groups
Adamec et al. 58 Retrospective observational multi-centre, multi-national study 320 patients (100% RRMS; 26.6% DMT-naïve) - 54.2% NEDA-3
- 72.5% MRI activity-free
- 86.5% relapse-free
- 90.2% disability progression-free
Al-Hashel et al. 65 Observational, longitudinal prospective study 72 patients (100% RRMS; 44.4% DMT-naïve) - 75% NEDA-3
- 90% MRI activity-free
- 85% relapse-free
- 90% disability progression-free
Conway et al. 184 Prospective multicentre study 117 (64.2% RRMS; 9.4% SPMS; 1.9% PPMS; 13.2% PRMS; 11.3% CIS) - Walking speed improvement over time (p < 0.001) with better scores compared to other DMTs
- Stable patient determined disease steps and walking aid use
- Stable MRI activity
- 11% started a post-CladT DMT
Years 3–4 Rauma et al. 69 Non-interventional cohort study based on the Finnish MS registry 179 (98.9% RRMS; 29.6% DMT-naïve) - 86% relapse-free at last follow-up
- 92.5% of DMT-naïve patients remained relapse-free until the end of follow-up
- Mean ARR 0.1 during follow-up
- 66.7% of patients with early relapse have switched from fingolimod
Magalashvili et al. 70 Retrospective exploratory analysis from the Sheba MS
Computerized Data Registry
128 patients (80.5% RRMS; 14.8% SPMS; 4.7%CIS; 15.6% DMT-naïve) - 59.0% NEDA-2 at Year 3 and 74.3% at Year 4
- 68.9% relapse-free patients at Year 3 and 82.9% at Year 4
- 83.6% EDSS stability or improvement at Year 3 and 85.7% at Year 4
Aerts et al. 67 Retrospective single centre study 84 patients (100% RMS; 9.5% DMT-naïve) - 72.5% NEDA-3 during observation period
- 37 months median event-free survival
- 72.6% remaining disease activity-free at the mean follow-up time (22.6 months)
- 16.7% reported relapses
- 93.3% MRI activity-free at 22.6 months
- 83.3% and 66.7% relapse-free, 96.7% and 88.9% MRI activity-free, 82.8% and 77.8% CDW-free,72.4% and 55.6% disease activity-free at year 2 and 3, respectively
- 88.3% SC lesion-free at 22.6 months
Schiavetti et al. 152 (CladSTOP) Retrospective, multicentre, observational study 204 PwMS (15.1% DMT-naïve) - 91% ARR reduction at Month 36
- 28.0% EDSS improvement by ⩾0.5 points at Month 36
- 18.8% experienced disability progression at Month 36
- 70.4% no MRI activity or relapses
Manni et al. 47 Prospective and retrospective single-centre, observational analysis of the Italian MS Registry 88 patients (100% RMS; 20.5% DMT-naïve) - 55.7% NEDA-3 at last follow-up
- 75.0% NEDA-3 status retention and did not restart DMTs after >2 years post-last CladT dose
- 90.9% relapse-free
- 80.7% MRI activity-free
- 70.4% disability progression-free
Beyond year 4 Kowarik et al. 33 Multicentre retrospective study 187 patients (100% RMS; 21% DMT-naïve) - 63% Monitored without therapy at Year 5
- 14% Treatment switch at Years 1–4
- 19% Continued CladT at Year 5
- 4% Therapy switch at Year 5
Wallace et al. 153 Observational multi-centre study 116 patients (100% RRMS; 34.5% DMT-naïve) - 89% ARR reduction at Year 5
- 75% Relapse-free patients at Year 5
- 83.6% No subsequent DMT up to 5 years post-CLAD initiation
Cañibano et al. 158 Retrospective single-centre observational study 46 (100% RMS; 48% DMT-naïve) - ⩾88% ARR reduction at year 5
- Lower ARR in patients switching to cladribine from HeDMTs compared with platform therapies
- 91% were free of relapses at year 5
- 100% MRI activity-free at year 5
- 80% NEDA-3 at year 5.

ARR, annualized relapse rate; CDW, confirmed disability worsening; CIS, clinically isolated syndrome; CladT, cladribine tablets; DMT, disease-modifying therapy; EDSS, Expanded Disability Status Scale; HeDMT, high efficacy disease-modifying therapy; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; MS, multiple sclerosis; NEDA-3, no evidence of disease activity-3; PPMS, primary progressive multiple sclerosis; PRMS, progressive relapsing multiple sclerosis; PwMS, patients with multiple sclerosis; RMS, relapsing multiple sclerosis; RRMS, relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis; SC, spinal cord; SPMS, secondary progressive multiple sclerosis.