Skip to main content
. 2025 May 29;104(9):105344. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2025.105344

Table 8.

Subgroup analyses of the effect of covariates of grape pomace on feed conversion ratio of broiler chickens.

Subgroup
Random Effects
Heterogeneity
Nc SMD 95 % CI p-value I2 (%) p-value
Strain
Ross 21 0.05 −0.08, 0.18 0.463 54.6 0.001
Cobb 26 −0.04 −0.30, 0.22 0.786 89.8 < 0.001
Inclusion (g/kg)
1-10 9 −0.14 −0.29, −0.001 0.049 37.8 0.116
11-20 11 −0.01 −0.14, 0.12 0.894 0 0.891
21-30 10 0.16 −0.06, 0.38 0.160 63.3 0.004
41-50 3 −0.29 −0.51, −0.06 0.012 0 0.539
51-60 6 0.09 −0.70, 0.90 0.821 93.9 <0.001
>60 8 0.03 −0.73, 0.80 0.932 95.7 <0.001
Age (days)
1-21 14 0.32 −0.01, 0.64 0.056 81.6 <0.001
1-28 3 −0.001 −.0.23, 0.23 0.991 52.7 0.121
1-42 28 −0.14 −0.34, 0.05 0.156 86.0 <0.001
22-42 2 0.03 −0.30, 0.36 0.871 0 0.347
Sex
Male 23 0.32 0.03, 0.43 0.023 77.5 <0.001
Mixed 24 −0.21 −0.41, −0.01 0.044 85.7 <0.001

Nc = number of comparisons; SMD = standardized mean differences; CI = confident interval; I2 = Inconsistency index; p = probability difference.