Skip to main content
Biochemical Journal logoLink to Biochemical Journal
. 1997 May 15;324(Pt 1):103–111. doi: 10.1042/bj3240103

Network organization of cell metabolism: monosaccharide interconversion.

J C Nuño 1, I Sánchez-Valdenebro 1, C Pérez-Iratxeta 1, E Meléndez-Hevia 1, F Montero 1
PMCID: PMC1218437  PMID: 9190785

Abstract

The structural properties of carbohydrate metabolism are being studied. The present contribution focuses mainly on those processes involving the transfer of carbon fragments among sugars. It is shown how enzymatic activities fix the way the system self-organizes stoichiometrically at the steady state. It is proven that there exists a specific correspondence between the set of all possible enzymic activities, the activity set, and the set of stoichiometrically compatible flux distributions through the pathway. On the one hand, there are enzymic activities that do not allow a stoichiometrically feasible coupling at the steady state of the reactions involved in the conversion. On the other hand, there are enzymic activities that are related to one or more flux distributions at the steady state (i.e. with one or several rate vectors respectively). For this latter group, it can be demonstrated that the structure of the system depends on other non-structural factors, such as boundary constraints and the kinetic parameters. As a consequence, it is suggested that this kind of metabolic process must be viewed as a complex reaction network instead of a sequential number of steps. Some implications of these derivations are illustrated for the particular conversion of CO2 --> C3. General remarks are also discussed within the framework of network models of cell metabolism.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (512.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Fell D. A., Small J. R. Fat synthesis in adipose tissue. An examination of stoichiometric constraints. Biochem J. 1986 Sep 15;238(3):781–786. doi: 10.1042/bj2380781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Maden B. E. No soup for starters? Autotrophy and the origins of metabolism. Trends Biochem Sci. 1995 Sep;20(9):337–341. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(00)89069-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Meléndez-Hevia E. The game of the pentose phosphate cycle: a mathematical approach to study the optimization in design of metabolic pathways during evolution. Biomed Biochim Acta. 1990;49(8-9):903–916. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Meléndez-Hevia E., Waddell T. G., Cascante M. The puzzle of the Krebs citric acid cycle: assembling the pieces of chemically feasible reactions, and opportunism in the design of metabolic pathways during evolution. J Mol Evol. 1996 Sep;43(3):293–303. doi: 10.1007/BF02338838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Reder C. Metabolic control theory: a structural approach. J Theor Biol. 1988 Nov 21;135(2):175–201. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(88)80073-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Williams J. F., Arora K. K., Longenecker J. P. The pentose pathway: a random harvest. Impediments which oppose acceptance of the classical (F-type) pentose cycle for liver, some neoplasms and photosynthetic tissue. The case for the L-type pentose pathway. Int J Biochem. 1987;19(9):749–817. doi: 10.1016/0020-711x(87)90239-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biochemical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biochemical Society

RESOURCES