Table 3.
Postoperative changes in the severity grading of AS and AR.
| Surgical indication | AS | AR | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Improved | Maintained | Worsened | Missing | Improved | Maintained | Worsened | Missing | |
| Predominantly severe MS (n = 71) | 3 | 49 | 16 | 3 | 14 | 39 | 15 | 3 |
| Predominantly severe MR | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 |
| Severe MS + severe MR (n = 1) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Note: Severity assessments using echocardiography, at least one year after mitral valve surgery, compared to preoperative evaluations are shown. Among the three patients with paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis despite normal left ventricular ejection fraction, only one patient was classified as having true-severe aortic stenosis according to our assessment. The remaining two patients were classified as having moderate aortic stenosis. Parenthesis presents the number of patients.
Abbreviations: AR, aortic regurgitation; AS, aortic stenosis; MR, mitral regurgitation; MS, mitral stenosis.