Skip to main content
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology logoLink to Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
. 1996 Feb;122(2):78–94. doi: 10.1007/BF01226265

Preferential inhibition of DNA polymerasesα,δ, andε from Novikoff hepatoma cells by inhibitors of cell proliferation

Gabriele Fox 1, Odilia Popanda 1, Lutz Edler 2, Heinz Walter Thielmann 1,
PMCID: PMC12201295  PMID: 8576284

Abstract

DNA polymerases α, δ and ε from normal regenerating rat liver and Novikoff hepatoma cells were purified about 300-fold, characterized, and checked for sensitivity towards drugs known to inhibit cell proliferation. Characterization included (a) identification of associated proteins, (b) measurement of physicochemical constants (including sedimentation coefficients, diffusion coefficients, calculation of relative molecular masses), (c) quantification of catalytic activities using specific DNA primer templates (K m values) and specific inhibitors (K i values), and (d) discrimination between DNA polymerases from normal cells and those from malignant cells using inhibitors of cell proliferation. (a) DNA primase associated with DNA polymerase α, and 3′–5′ exonuclease accompanying DNA polymerases δ and ε had similar activities. (b) Comparison of physicochemical and catalytic properties of DNA polymerases from both sources revealed similarities but also some important differences. Sedimentation and diffusion coefficients of DNA polymerases α and ε from malignant cells differed significantly. (c) The DNA-binding domain of DNA polymerases α and ε from hepatoma cells was altered sinceK m values, determined with several specific DNA primer-templates, were higher. Furthermore, dNTP-binding sites of DNA polymerases from malignant cells; when probed with specific inhibitors (aphidicolin, butylphenyl-dGTP, carbonyldiphosphonate, and dideoxy-TTP) showed significantly lowerK i values, indicating lower affinity to deoxyribonucleoside 5′-triphosphates. (d) Sixteen drugs representative of various modes of interaction with DNA and protein were chosen. Dose/response experiments were performed and the concentration at which the polymerizing activity was reduced to 50% was calculated (K 50 values). Preferential inhibition of DNA polymerases α,δ, and ε from Novikoff hepatoma cells was found for: the intercalating drugs doxorubicin, daunorubicin, amsacrine, mitoxantrone, quinacrine and ethidium bromide, the minor-groove binders distamycin and netropsin, the ATPase-blocking agents novobiocin and coumamycin, and the topoisomerase I inhibitors camptothecin and topotecan. When the sensitivity of polymerases δ and ε was measured using poly(dA·dT) as a primer-template, the preferential inhibition of the enzymes from malignant cells was even more pronounced. Drugs known to trap the DNA-topoisomerase-II complex, etoposide, nalidixic acid, teniposide, and merbarone did not affect DNA polymerases irrespective of the source. Since the majority of the inhibitors used, particularly intercalators and minor-groove binders, act by modification of the primer-template, inhibition of DNA synthesis must have occurred through weakening of non-covalent bonds between DNA and catalytic polypeptides. Consequently, preferential inhibition of DNA polymerases from malignant cells seems to be indicative of abnormally diminished binding of the enzymes to their primer-templates. This effect may be caused by conformational alterations in polymerases from malignant cells which affect the DNA binding domains. Similarly, changes in physicochemical and kinetic constants are indicative of alterations of dNTP-binding domains.

Key Words: Mutant DNA polymerases, Mutator properties, Catalytic domains of DNA polymerases, Physico-chemical constants of DNA polymerases, Rat liver

Abbreviations

butylphenyl-dGTP

N 2-(p-n-butylphenyl)-2′-deoxyguanosine 5′-triphosphate

dideoxy-TTP

2′,3′-dideoxyribosylthymine 5′-triphosphate

HEPES

4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid

etoposide

4′-demethylepipodophyllotoxin-9-(4,6-O-ethylidene-β-D-glucopyranoside)

amsacrine

4′-(9-acridinylamino)methanesulfon-m-ansidide

mitoxantrone

1,4-dihydroxy-5,8-bis{2-[(2-hydroxyethyl)amino]ethyl} amino)-9,10-anthracenedione

merbarone

5-(N-phenylcarboxamido)-2-thiobarbituric acid

PCNA

proliferating-cell nuclear antigen

teniposide

4′-demethylepipodophyllotoxin-9-(4,6-O-thionylidine-β-d-glucopyranoside)

topotecan

(S)-10-[(dimethylamino) methyl]-4-ethyl-4,9-dihydroxy-1H-pyrano[3′, 4′∶6, 7] indolizino[1, 2-b]quinoline-3,14(4H, 12H)-dione hydrochloride

References

  1. Basra J, Wolf CR, Brown JR, Patterson LH (1985) Evidence for human liver mediated free-radical formation by doxorubicin and mitozantrone. Anticancer Drug Des 1:45–52 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bosch K (1986) Angewandte Statistik: Einführung in Problemlösungen mit dem Mikrocomputer. Vieweg, Braunschweig [Google Scholar]
  3. Boyer JC, Thomas DC, Maher VM, McCormick JJ, Kunkel TA (1993) Fidelity of DNA replication by extracts of normal and malignantly transformed human cells. Cancer Res 53:3270–3275 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Byrnes JJ, Downey KM, Esserman L, So AG (1975) Mechanism of hemin inhibition of erythroid cytoplasmic DNA polymerase. Biochemistry 14:796–799 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Byrnes JJ, Downey KM, Black VL, So AG (1976) A new mammalian DNA polymerase with 3′ to 5′ exonuclease activity: DNA polymerase δ. Biochemistry 15:2817–2823 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Byrnes JJ, Downey KM, Que BG, Lee MYW, Black VL, So AG (1977) Selective inhibition of the 3′ to 5′ exonuclease activity associated with DNA polymerases: a mechanism of mutagenesis. Biochemistry 16:3740–3746 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chan JYH, Becker FF (1979) Decreased fidelity of DNA polymerase activity duringN-2-fluorenylacetamide hepatocarcinogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76:814–818 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen GL, Yang L, Rowe TC, Halligan BD, Tewey KM, Liu LF (1984) Nonintercalative antitumor drugs interfere with the breakage-reunion reaction of mammalian DNA topoisomerase II. J Biol Chem 259:13560–13566 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chuang LF, Chuang RY, Acton EM, Israel M, Yu M (1987) Effect of morpholinyladriamycin analogs and adriamycin on the activities of DNA polymerase α and RNA polymerase II of chicken leukemia cells. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 242:372–377 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chung DW, Zhang J, Tan C-K, Davie EW, So AG, Downey KM (1991) Primary structure of the catalytic subunit of human DNA polymerase δ and chromosomal location of the gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:11197–11201 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Copeland WC, Lam NK, Wang TS-F (1993) Fidelity studies of the human DNA polymerase α. J Biol Chem 268:11041–11049 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. DePhilipp RM, Lynch WE, Lieberman I (1977) Nuclear DNA polymerases of human carcinomas. Cancer Res 37:702–704 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dobashi Y, Shuin T, Tsuruga H, Uemura H, Torigoe S, Kubota Y (1994) DNA polymerase β gene mutation in human prostate cancer. Cancer Res 54:2827–2829 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Durchschlag H (1986) Specific volumes of biological macromolecules and some other molecules of biological interest. In: Hinz H-J (ed) Thermodynamic data for biochemistry and biotechnology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 45–128 [Google Scholar]
  16. Evarts RP, Nagy P, Nakatsukasa H, Marsden E, Thorgeirsson SS (1989) In vivo differentiation of rat liver oval cells into hepatocytes. Cancer Res 49:1541–1547 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Farber E (1992) On cells of origin of liver cell cancer. In: Sirica AE (ed) The role of cell types in hepatocarcinogenesis. CRC, Boca Raton, Fla, pp 1–28 [Google Scholar]
  18. Fry M, Loeb LA (eds) (1986) Animal cell DNA polymerases. CRC, Boca Raton, Fla [Google Scholar]
  19. Goulian M, Herrmann SM, Sackett JW, Grimm SL (1990) Two forms of DNA polymerase δ from mouse cells. J Biol Chem 265:16402–16411 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hsiang Y-H, Hertzberg R, Hecht S, Liu LF (1985) Camptothecin induces protein-linked DNA breaks via mammalian DNA topoisomerase I. J Biol Chem 260:14873–14878 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hübscher U, Thömmes P (1992) DNA polymerase ε: in search of a function. Trends Biochem Sci 17:55–58 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hussy P, Maass B, Tümmler B, Grosse F, Schomburg U (1986) Effect of 4-quinolones and novobiocin on calf thymus DNA polymerase α primase complex, topoisomerase I and II, and growth of mammalian lymphoblasts. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 29:1073–1078 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Jaxel C, Kohn KW, Wani MC, Wall ME, Pommier Y (1989) Structure-activity study of the actions of camptothecin derivatives on mammalian topoisomerase I: evidence for a specific receptor site and a relation to antitumor activity. Cancer Res 49:1465–1469 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kapscinski J, Darzynkiewicz Z, Traganos F, Melamed MR (1981) Interactions of a new antitumor agent, 1,4-dihydroxy-5,8-bis[[2-[(2-hydroxy-ethyl)amino]ethyl]amino]-9,10- anthracenedione, with nucleic acids. Biochem Pharmacol 30:231–240 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Karnasuta C, Dunsford HA, Schmidt WN, Sell S (1987) Monoclonal antibodies identify oval cells as possible precursor of hepatocellular carcinoma during azo dye carcinogenesis. Fed Proc 46:746 [Google Scholar]
  26. Kesti T, Frantti H, Syväoja JE (1993) Molecular cloning of the cDNA for the catalytic subunit of human DNA polymerase ε. J Biol Chem 268:10238–10245 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kopka ML, Yoon C, Goodsell D, Pjura P, Dickerson RE (1985) The molecular origin of DNA-drug specificity in netropsin and distamycin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82:1376–1380 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lerman LS (1963) The structure of the DNA-acridine complex. Biochemistry 49:94–102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Levy A, Weisman-Shomer P, Fry M (1989) Distamycin paradoxically stimulates the copying of oligo(dA)·poly(dT) by DNA polymerases. Biochemistry 28:7262–7267 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lineweaver H, Burk D (1934) The determination of enzyme dissociation constants. J Am Chem Soc 56:658–666 [Google Scholar]
  31. Liu LF, Miller, KG (1981) Eukaryotic DNA topoisomerases: two forms of type I DNA topoisomerases from HeLa cell nuclei. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:3487–3491 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Liu PK, Chang C-C, Trosko JE, Dube DK, Martin GM, Loeb LA (1983) Mammalian mutator mutant with an aphidicolin-resistant DNA polymerase α. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80:797–801 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Liu PK, Trujillo JM, Monnat RJ (1993) Spectrum, of spontaneous mutation in animal cells containing an aphidicolin-resistant DNA polymerase α. Mutat Res 288:229–236 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Loeb LA (1991) Mutator phenotype may be required for multistage carcinogenesis. Cancer Res 51:3075–3079 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Momparler RL, Karon M, Siegel SE, Avila F (1976) Effect of adriamycin on DNA, RNA, and protein synthesis in cell-free systems and intact cells. Cancer Res 36:2891–2895 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Montecucco A, Fontana M, Focher F, Lestingi M, Spadari S, Ciarrocchi G (1991) Specific inhibition of human DNA ligase adenylation by a distamycin derivative possessing antitumor activity. Nucleic Acids Res 19:1067–1072 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Müller H, Klingert A (1993) Surface interpolation from cross sections. In: Hagen H, Müller G, Nielson GM (eds) Focus on scientific visualization. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 145–196 [Google Scholar]
  38. Nasheuer H-P, Moore A, Wahl AF, Wang TS-F (1991) Cell cycledependent phosphorylation of human DNA polymerase α. J Biol Chem 266:7893–7903 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Neidle S, Pearl LH, Skelly JV (1987) DNA structure and perturbation by drug binding. Biochem J 243:1–13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Novikoff AB (1957) A transplantable rat liver tumor induced by 4-dimethylaminoazobenzene. Cancer Res 17:1010–1027 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Nowell PC (1986) Mechanisms of tumor progression. Cancer Res 46:2203–2207 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Pahlich E (1984) Bestimmungsmethoden fürVmax undKm. In: Pahlich E (ed) Geschwindigkeitskontrolle von Stoffwechselabläufen. Vieweg, Braunschweig, pp 70–72 [Google Scholar]
  43. Podust V, Bialek G, Sternbach H, Grosse F (1990) Casein kinase II phosphorylates DNA-polymerase-α-DNA-primase without affecting its basic enzymic properties. Eur J Biochem 193:189–193 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Popanda O, Thielmann HW (1989) DNA polymerase α from normal rat liver is different than DNA polymerases α from Morris hepatoma strains. Eur J Biochem 183:5–13 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Popanda O, Thielmann HW (1992) The function of DNA topoisomerases in UV-induced DNA excision repair studies with specific inhibitors in permeabilized human fibroblasts. Carcinogenesis 13:2321–2328 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Popanda O, Fox G, Thielmann HW (1995) DNA polymerases α, δ, and ε of Novikoff hepatoma cells differ from those of normal rat liver in physicochemical and catalytic properties. J Mol Med 73:259–268 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Schmidt WN, Page DL, Schmidt CA, McKusick KB, Ward WS, Hnilica LS (1984) Characterization of monoclonal antibodies to Novikoff hepatoma cytokeratin antigen p39. Cancer Res 44:5867–5879 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Schmidt WN, Page DL, McKusick K, Hnilica LS (1985) Cell specificity of rat cytokeratin p39 during azo dye-induced hepatocarcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis 6:1147–1153 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Sell S (1990) Is there a liver stem cell? Cancer Res 50:3811–3815 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Siegel LM, Monty KJ (1966) Determination of molecular weights and frictional ratios of proteins in impure systems by use of gel filtration and density gradient centrifugation. Application to crude preparations of sulfite and hydroxylamine reductases. Biochim Biophys Acta 112:346–362 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Springgate CF, Loeb LA (1973) Mutagenic DNA polymerase in human leukemic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 70:245–249 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Sugino A, Higgins NP, Brown PO, Peebles CL, Cozzarelli NR (1978) Energy coupling in DNA gyrase and the mechanism of action of novobiocin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 75:4838–4842 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Syväoja J, Suomensaari S, Nishida C, Goldsmith JS, Chui GSJ Jain S, Linn S (1990) DNA polymerases α, δ and ε: three distinct enzyms from HeLa cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:6664–6668 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Talanian RV, Brown NC, McKenna CE, Ye T-G, Levy JN, Wright GE (1989) Carbonyldiphosphonate, a selective inhibitor of mammalian DNA polymerase δ. Biochemistry 28:8270–8274 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Tan C-K, Castillo C, So AS, Downey KM (1986) An auxiliary protein for DNA polymerases-δ from fetal calf thymus. J Biol Chem 261:12310–12316 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Tanaka M, Yoshida S (1980) Mechanism of the inhibition of calf thymus DNA polymerases α and β by daunomycin and adriamycin. J Biochem (Tokyo) 87:911–918 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Tsurimoto T, Melendy T, Stillman B (1990) Sequential initiation of lagging and leading strand synthesis by two different polymerase complexes at the SV40 DNA replication origin. Nature 346:534–539 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Wang L, Patel U, Lagnajita G, Banerjee S (1992) DNA polymerase β mutations in human colorectal cancer. Cancer Res 52:4824–4827 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Wang TS-F (1991) Eukaryotic DNA polymerases. Annu Rev Biochem 60:513–552 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Wang TS-F, Hu S-Z, Korn D (1984) DNA primase from KB cells: characterization of a primare activity tightly associated with immunoaffinity purified DNA polymerase α. J Biol Chem 259: 1854–1865 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Wang TS-F, Wong SW, Korn D (1989) Human DNA polymerase α: predicted functional domains and relationships with viral DNA polymerases. FASEB J 3:14–21 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Weiser T, Gassmann M, Thömmes P, Ferrari E, Hafkemeyer P, Hübscher U (1991) Biochemical and functional comparison of DNA polymerases α, δ, and ε from calf thymus. J Biol Chem 266:10420–10428 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Wong SW, Wahl AF, Yuan P-M, Arai N, Pearson BE, Arai K, Korn D, Hunkapiller MW, Wang TSF (1988) Human DNA polymerase α gene expression is cell proliferation dependent and its primary structure is similar to both prokaryotic and eukaryotic replicative DNA polymerases. EMBO J 7:37–47 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Yang C-L, Zhang S-J, Toomey NL, Palmer TN, Lee MYWT (1991) Induction of DNA polymerase activities in the regenerating rat liver. Biochemistry 30:7534–7541 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Zimmer C, Wähnert U (1986) Nonintercalating DNA-binding ligands: specificity of the interaction and their use as tools in biophysical, biochemical and biological investigations of the genetic material. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 47:31–112 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Zunino F, Di Marco A, Zaccara A, Gambetta RA (1980) The interaction of daunorubicin and doxirubicin with DNA and chromatin. Biochim Biophys Acta 607:206–214 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES