Table 6.

Correlational analyses between aggression (self-reported, informant-reported), SDE and IM original BIDR and BIDR-D20 (N = 100).

Variables		ω [95%CI]	Self-reported aggression	Informant-reported aggression
	Informant reported aggression		.54**
SDE	BIDR original dichotomous	.77 [.71, .83]	−.03	.06
	Denial	.76 [.70, .83]	−.17	−.04
	Enhancement	.63 [.52, .73]	.13	.16
	BIDR original polytomous	.66 [.56, .75]	−.14	−.02
	Denial	.63 [.52, .73]	−.24*	−.10
	Enhancement	.44 [.27, .61]	.04	.09
	BIDR-D20	.76 [.69, .83]	−.09	.03
	Denial	.76 [.69, .83]	−.23*	−.06
	Enhancement	.61 [.49, .73]	.08	.11*
IM	BIDR original dichotomous	.87 [.83, .91]	−.33**	−.20*
	Denial	.76 [.69, .83]	−.44**	−.25*
	Enhancement	.83 [.79, .88]	−.14	−.09*
	BIDR original polytomous	.79 [.73, .85]	−.39**	−.21*
	Denial	.64 [.54, .75]	−.50**	−.26*
	Enhancement	.67 [.57, .77]	−.18	−.10*
	BIDR-D20	.83 [.79, .88]	−.30**	−.14
	Denial	.73 [.65, .81]	−.40**	−.22*
	Enhancement	.76 [.68, .83]	−.12	−.02

SDE, Self-Deceptive Enhancement; IM, Impression Management; BIDR-D20, 20 item short version that can only be used Dichotomous. Omega of BIDR-D20 was calculated with n = 99. *p ≤ .05, **p ≤ .001.