Abstract
B cells contribute effectively to antimicrobial immunity. Their subsets differ in development, tissue distribution and response regulation to infections. Yet all are positioned to rapidly differentiate into extrafollicular plasmablasts which, I argue here, are the primary humoral effectors to infections, providing highly protective antibodies of varying affinities. Germinal centers provide memory B cells that shape a largely stochastically-derived B cell repertoire to be maximally pathogen-responsive, thus to contain extrafollicular response precursors. They also provide passive protection by selecting high-affinity, long-lived plasma cells. B cell repertoire shaping occurs continuously in chronic germinal centers of mucosal lymphoid tissues, driven by the presence of the microbiome, and in de novo generated germinal centers following acute infections, expanding and further molding the existing B cell pool in defense of an invaded host. If correct, measurement of memory B cells rather than antibody titers will be critical for evaluation of humoral immunity as correlate of immune protection.
Keywords: Antibodies, B cell subsets, B cell repertoire, extrafollicular responses, germinal centers, host-pathogen interaction, immunity, immunoglobulin
B CELLS ARE INTREGRAL COMPONENTS OF THE DEFENSE AGAINST PATHOGENS
The immune system functions to limit invasion of a host by microbes. When invasion cannot be avoided, the immune system integrates various cellular and humoral components to orchestrate a complex set of responses, both innate and adaptive. Successful immune responses result in the elimination of the pathogen and the development of long-lasting immunity that prevents reinfections. B cells are critical components of this orchestrated response, acting to strengthen immune-mediated barriers to prevent infections, eliminate pathogens that have overcome these barriers, and provide immunological memory that either prevents another infection, or reduces the impact of a repeat infection on the host. B cells contribute to immunity through continued generation of antibodies, through modulation of the inflammatory response by secretion of cytokines, as antigen-transporters in lymphoid tissues, and/or by acting as antigen-presenting cells for CD4 T cells.
Germinal center (GC) responses are considered the major drivers of B cell mediated protective immunity. Their formation can result in the generation of antibodies with higher binding-affinities for their cognate antigen than the original B cell clone entering the response, considered critical for pathogen elimination. However, many infections are cleared even before GC form, and evidence linking high-affinity interactions with better resolution of infection are surprisingly scant. The review discusses the development and distribution of B cell subsets and the events leading to their activation and responses to infections. I will argue that the extrafollicular responses of B cells are the primary drivers of humoral immunity, while germinal centers (GC) function to shape the stochastically-developing peripheral B cell pool into more appropriately focused and pathogen-responsive cells (Figure 1). This occurs continuously through interaction with the microbiome in GC that persist in lymph tissues draining mucosal tissues, but also in response to acute infections. The infection signals provided to the existing B cell pool drives extrafollicular effector responses and induces germinal centers to mold further the B cell repertoire, using the invading pathogen as a blueprint.
Figure 1. B cell responses to infections.

Activation of antigen-specific B cells results in their accumulation in the T-B border zone of lymphoid tissue where they receive costimulatory signals through interaction with CD4 T cells or iNKT cells via classical and non-classical MHC interactions, respectively. Co-stimulation may also occur in a non-cognate manner through secretion of cytokines. Based on the quality of these signals, B cells will remain outside the follicle or reenter the follicles to start germinal center responses. B cells can regain quiescence as switched or non-switched MBC, or they rapidly differentiate into antibody-secreting plasmablasts forming “extrafollicular foci” (EF), major sources of antibodies early in infection. GC facilitate the shaping of the responding B cell clones through clonal expansion and introduction of high numbers of mutations in the antigen-binding sites of the BCR and subsequent selection of effective antigen-binders that interact productively with T cells. In contrast to extra-follicular MBC, GC-derived MBC provide a diversified source of responders that can feed into the EF response. Alternatively, B cells leave already programed for terminal differentiation into antibody-secreting plasma cells.
B CELL DEVELOPMENT AND DISTRIBUTION
B cells develop in multiple waves throughout ontogeny beginning from extra-hematopoietic precursors in the yolk sack as early as embryonic day E7, then the fetal AGM region (splanchno-pleura), fetal liver and eventual the postnatal bone marrow (3). The earliest populations of fetal-derived B cells belong mainly to a population of B-1 cells, which differs in repertoire and function from the later, predominantly postnatal-developing B-2 cells (4-6). Some of the fetal-derived B-1 cells are maintained into adulthood, but whether the distinct waves of prenatal development result in B-1 cells of distinct functions is currently unknown.
While transfer of the bacterial microbiota or of bacterial pathogens from mother to fetus is unlikely, given the strong maternal-fetal barriers (7), viral infections of a fetus can occur. Indeed, recent studies demonstrated a progressively more diverse repertoire of fetal B and T cells during development, with B cells preceding T cell development. B cells circulate in the fetal blood already by about week 12 of gestation in the human (8) and de novo fetal-derived IgM responses to viral infections have been measured in fetuses by week 24. Thus, the earliest developing fetal B cells can respond to external insults not prevented by the existing anatomical barriers.
The bone marrow takes over as the site of continued hematopoiesis beginning shortly after birth. Following the release of B cells that are selected against strong self-recognition, from the bone marrow into the blood, these transitional B cells enter the spleen. In the spleen, they undergo another selection process that results in the further elimination of autoreactive B cells (9). Selected B cells then mature into either spleen-resident marginal zone (MZ) B cells, a process requiring NOTCH and ADAM10 signaling, or into mature follicular B (FOB) cells (10-12). The positioning of MZ B cells adjacent to the splenic marginal sinus, where arterial blood enters the white pulp, places these cells into immediate contact with any circulating pathogens or their components (13). FOB cells instead home to the lymphoid follicles. B cell migration to and their positioning within the follicles is guided by the chemokine receptor-ligand pair CXCR5/CXCL13, and the receptor EBI2 (GPR183) and its ligand, 7α,25-dihydroxycholesterol (14). The latter organizes the follicle into inner and outer zones. FOB cells and most MZ B cells derive from the same bone marrow precursors postnatally and are thus considered the later-developing “B-2” cells, although a subset of MZ B cells appears to develop during early fetal development and to be maintained by self-renewal (15).
FOB cells recirculate via the blood between follicular regions of secondary lymphoid tissues, including the spleen, lymph nodes and Peyer’s Patches, the latter located in the small intestine and containing chronic germinal centers (16). While in circulation, they can also accumulate in the vasculature of a number of organs, where the interaction of B cells with the endothelium may contribute to the regulation of leukocyte composition of the tissue, but also imprint the transcriptional profile of the localized B cell populations (17). Alterations in the interaction of B cells with the endothelium can contribute also to the modulation of disease processes of the vasculature, such as observed in atherosclerosis (18). Remarkably little is known about the interaction of B cells with the endothelium at sites of infection-induced inflammation. However, B cells and perhaps plasmablasts and terminally-differentiated plasma cells can migrate to these tissues, where they secrete large quantities of antibodies (19). Interestingly, a subset of plasma cells with features of B-1-derived plasma cells (B-1PC) has been shown to also act as a source of IL-10 (20, 21). Depending on the organ, formation of tertiary lymphoid structures that support B cell activation and differentiation can lead to local differentiation to memory B cells (MBC) or long-lived plasma cells (LLPC), as has been reported for the lung (22, 23). Little is known about the role of IL-10 producing “regulatory B cells” in infections, which have been studied mainly in the context of inflammation and autoimmunity. We refer to recent reviews on these cells (24-26).
Plasma cells are particularly numerous in the lamina propria of mucosal tissues that are exposed to and colonized by the microbiota, regulating the microbiota, mostly through secretion of dimeric IgA that is transported by epithelial cells expressing the polymeric Ig receptor to the luminal site of the mucosa (27). Indeed, the colonization by the microbiota is a pre-requisite for their presence (28, 29). Interestingly, the skin contains predominantly IgM-secreting plasma cells, whose presence appears to be independent of microbial exposure (30) consistent with systemic natural IgM production (31). Enhanced plasma cell accumulation is seen also in instances of chronic tissue inflammation, such as in endometriosis, arthritis, myositis and granulomatous skin inflammation (30, 32), as well as in classic granulomas forming in the lungs after infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (23), to name but a few. Thus, plasmablast and plasma cell responses provide a localized effector arm of humoral immunity.
B cells are present also into the pleural and peritoneal cavities, accumulating there in a process that requires CXCL13 (33). B-1 cells are the dominant B cell subset, although conventional B cells are present also (4). B-1 cell accumulation in the cavities begins at about 2 weeks after birth following their initial expansion in the spleen. B-1 cells are highly sensitive to innate stimuli and function as sentinels. In response to infection-induced innate stimuli, such as Type I IFN or TLR stimulation, they rapidly migrate from the cavities to the regional secondary lymphoid tissues, where they differentiate into antibody or cytokine-secreting B-1 or B-1PC (34-37). The role of the body cavity B-2 cells, which are imprinted to express a BCR repertoire and transcriptional profiles distinct from that of FOB cells in secondary lymphoid tissues, has not been sufficiently explored (38).
In addition to supporting the development of B cells from hematopoietic stem cells, the bone marrow harbors terminally-differentiated LLPC that develop from activated B cells in response to infections. Their migration to and retention in the bone marrow requires their expression of the chemokine receptor CXCR4 and secretion of the ligand, CXCL12 (SDF-1) by bone marrow stromal cells. The stromal compartment of the bone marrow provides plasma cells with a “survival niche”, in which LLPC secrete antibodies for extended periods of time (39). Another site of plasma cell accumulation is the splenic red pulp. In contrast to bone marrow LLPC, splenic plasma cells appear to be mostly short-lived (SLPC). Despite intensive research, it remains unknown whether the difference between LLPC and SLPC is due to the differences in the survival niches they occupy, or due to any cell-intrinsic differences (40).
B cells are most numerous in secondary lymphoid tissues, but circulate continuously throughout the vasculature and even through tissues and are broadly distributed throughout the body. Their migration into secondary lymphoid tissues is controlled through chemokine and integrin-mediated processes, while their migration from lymph tissues into efferent lymphatics and blood is critically regulated by signaling through the sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor S1PR in processes similar between B and T cells (41-43). The presence of B cells in the afferent lymphatics, albeit at lower numbers than T cells, further suggests their continuous entry and exit also from solid tissues, even in the steady-state (44, 45). Physiological triggers, such as microbiota colonization on mucosal surfaces, as well as pathological triggers of chronic inflammation result in the local accumulation of B cells and plasma cells. Overall, these findings indicate that B cells contribute to immunity against pathogens not only through the systemic secretion of antibodies, but also as active participants of local tissue-surveillance.
CANONICAL B CELL RESPONSES TO INFECTIONS
Antigen delivery to the B cell follicles
Natural infections occur mostly via the large mucosal surfaces of the gastrointestinal and respiratory tracts, less frequently through the reproductive tract or via breaches of the skin barrier. What follows infection is a rapid orchestration of local immune responses that initially are composed of mostly innate cells, but can involve tissue-resident memory B cells (MBC) and memory T cells when present due to a prior insult. The presence of local MBC cells has been associated with increased protection (46, 47), as seen previously for tissue-resident T cells (48). In addition, and critical for the initiation of a strong immune response, dendritic cells and macrophages carry pathogen-derived antigens via the afferent lymphatics to the local “draining” lymph nodes. Pathogens, whole or in part, can also arrive in the lymph nodes as free antigens. Lymph nodes are designed to filter these antigens, preventing pathogens from spreading beyond the locally affected tissue area. When local lymph node filter functions are insufficient, antigen will enter the blood and reach the spleen. The white pulp of the spleen is structured similar to lymph nodes but filters blood-borne antigens/pathogens.
“Conventional” or FOB cells are the most numerous B cell subset in lymph nodes and in the spleen. The phenotype of FOB cells is characterized by high expression of the IgD-BCR, varied expression of the IgM-BCR, intermediate expression of the complement receptor CD21 and expression of CD23 (49). B cells are antigen-presenting cells equipped with antigen-binding receptors, the B cell receptor (BCR). The unique structure of the lymph tissue follicles strongly supports B cell antigen-encounter. Antigen-delivery can occur through afferent lymphatics that shunt small antigens into the porous conduit system that emanates from the sinus and traverses the follicles (50). In lymph nodes, afferent lymphatics drain into the subcapsular sinus (SCS), where CD169+ F4/80- SCS macrophages are located at its floor, and onto which antigens larger than those traveling through the conduit system (> 70 kDa), or antigen-antibody complexes, can adhere (51). SCS macrophages are critical for displaying non-processed antigens to B cells in the follicular outer areas, rich in 7α,25-dihydroxycholesterol, that underlie the SCS floor, and into which the SCS macrophages stretch their antigen-covered processes (41, 52). FOB cells do not have to be antigen-specific to acquire antigen. They can bind complement-tagged antigens and/or antigen-antibody complexes via their complement receptors and then transport and delivery the antigen to lymph tissue stromal cells termed follicular dendritic cells (FDC) (52). FDC in turn can then present the antigen to antigen-specific FOB cells located in the center of follicles, supporting the establishment and maintenance of germinal centers.
Similarly, arteriolar blood-derived antigens pool in the splenic marginal zone sinus adjacent to the white pulp of the spleen. Here, antigen-uptake is facilitated in part by resident MZ B cells, which can shuffle between the marginal zone and the follicle, transporting non-processed antigens to FDC, which then present unprocessed antigens to FOB cells (53-55). FDCs are critical components of antigen-specific B cell responses, as their presence in the follicle and their ability to display antigen-antibody complexes for extended periods of time are required for successful initiation and maintenance of GC responses, considered hallmark T-dependent B cell responses (56-59). FDC are part of the stromal cell network of secondary lymph tissues and are derived from perivascular endothelial cell precursors (60). Interestingly, FDC precursors are present throughout the vasculature and upon signals from inflammatory cytokines such as lymphotoxin and TNF can differentiate to FDC, explaining the establishment of tertiary lymphoid tissues at local sites of chronic inflammation/infection (60).
Some infections result in the dissolution of the normal lymphoid tissue organization and structure, disrupting the proper functioning of these organs, including the appropriate positioning of cells for antigen-capture, antigen-presentation, and antigen-specific CD4 T - B interactions. Following infection with Salmonella typhimurium, such changes were shown to depend on LPS-mediated stimulation via TLR4 which resulted in reduced production of CCL21, the chemokine responsible for the organization of the lymph tissue T cell zone (61). Similar disruption of the lymph node structures with dissolution of T- and B-cell zones was observed also in response to infection of mice with B. burgdorferi, although these alterations were independent of MyD88 and TRIF, and thus of TLR signaling (62, 63), as well as following infection with Toxoplasma gondii (64).
FOB cell activation
The frequency of antigen-specific FOB prior to a primary infection has been estimated to be in the order of 1 cell in 2 x 105 – 1 x 106 cells (65). The efficient and varied modes of antigen-delivery to secondary lymphoid B cell follicles outlined above are critical, as they enhance the likelihood that these rare antigen-specific B cells rapidly encounter and bind their “cognate” antigen. Important for the understanding of B cell response regulation, cognate antigen recognition initially occurs in the inflammatory milieu generated in response to an infection. For example, direct Type I IFN signaling was shown to affect B cells strongly early during viral infections, prior to cognate T-B interaction (66-68). This cytokine induced the upregulating of many IFN-regulated genes in B cells. It enhanced expression of CD69, which can trap B cells in the draining lymph nodes (69), caused the upregulation of the endosomal TLR 3 and 7, thereby enhancing responsiveness of B cells to internalized PAMP-containing antigens, and it enhanced surface expression of the co-stimulatory molecule CD86, driving enhanced activation and differentiation of B cells following cognate interaction with T cells (66, 67, 70). Lack of type I IFN dependent direct-signals were shown to reduce B cell activation, IgG production and plasma cell differentiation following influenza virus infection (66-68). Type I IFN, as well as other inflammatory stimuli also induce various cells, including epithelial cells, monocytes, dendritic cells, and neutrophils to secrete B cell activating factor (BAFF or Tnfsf13b) (71, 72). BAFF is a critical B cell survival factor required for the maintenance of B cells beyond the transitional 1 stage of development (73). Enhanced secretion of BAFF by innate leukocytes was shown to support the development of neutralizing antigen-specific B cell responses during infection, as recently shown for infection with West Nile Virus, (74).
These findings are significant, as they indicate that in vivo B cell activation is achieved through a diverse array of signals that include but are not limited to BCR signaling and co-stimulation by T cells. While T cell responses have long been appreciated to require polarizing signals for differentiation into appropriate effector CD4 T cell subsets (TH1, TH2 etc), much less is known about how these signals may drive distinct differentiation pathways in B cells. Yet, class-switch recombination (CSR) is determined by the cytokine milieu in which B cells are placed and polarization of B cells similar to those observed in CD4 T cells can similarly be achieved (75). This was further demonstrated by the identification of B cells expressing the TH-1 polarizing transcriptional regulator T-bet in various infections (see below).
Recognition, i.e. binding of cognate antigens to the BCR of FOB cells triggers classic adaptive B cell responses by inducing a complex BCR signaling cascade that results in a) BCR signalosome reorganization and antigen-internalization, b) endosomal reorganization causing the loading of internalized antigen into MHCII c) transcriptional changes associated with enhanced B cell survival and B cell entry into the cell cycle for clonal expansion, d) relocation of FOB cells from follicles to the T-B border region, and e) the upregulation of MHCII, costimulatory molecules and chemokines productive interaction of B cells with CD4 T cells (76). At the same time, CD4 T cells are activated by antigen-presenting dendritic cells in the T cell zones of the same secondary lymphoid tissues. Their activation results in the upregulation of CXCR5, supporting their migration towards the B cell zone and into the T-B border, and the induction of CD40L, a critical costimulatory receptor engaging with CD40 on antigen-activated B cells. The presentation of peptides in the MHCII complex of B cells initiates T-B interaction when CD4 TCR bind to their cognate antigen.
T and B cells may recognize distinct peptides derived from the same pathogen, due to the linked recognition of conjugate antigens by the B cell and then subsequently by CD4 T cells following presentation of another epitope of that protein within MHCII. Interestingly, a recent study on the glycoprotein gp120 of HIV demonstrated that CD4 T cells may not only recognize the peptide backbone of a protein, but may also engage with a MHCII-presented glycosylated peptide, where the nature of the glycosylation determined antigen-recognition (77). The data thus expand the universe of potential pathogen-derived antigens that can generate T-dependent B cell responses to include glycoproteins. Small viruses may engage and be internalized in toto by B cells through their BCR, which could lead to antigen-presentation of many distinct viral antigens to T cells, independent of the epitope-specificity of the B cell. Indeed, studies on the small, enveloped and negative strand RNA virus, influenza A, demonstrated that IgG responses to the surface hemagglutinin (HA)-spike protein were dependent on CD4 T cells, but that the support was similarly provided by CD4 T cells specific for the intraviral nuclear capsid or matrix protein (78). However, larger viruses as well as most bacteria and protozoa may not be taken up intact by B cells, unless they are the targets of pathogen infection. In a series of elegant studies, Sette and colleagues defined parameters of epitope recognition and antigen immune prevalence and immunodominance by CD4 and CD8 T cells by studying immunogenic peptides and antigens of vaccinia virus, a relatively large pathogen that contains over 200 open reading frames (79). They demonstrated that the generation of antibodies to a Vaccinia virus antigen correlated strongly with the presence of CD4 T cells of that same specificity (80). Furthermore, enhanced presence of antigen-specific CD4 T cells did not boost a specific B cell response, unless the CD4 T cells were specific for the same viral proteins than the B cells (80). The strong correlation between the specificity of B cells and CD4 T cells is further underscored by findings that B cells importantly expands the CD4 T cell compartment of cells with the same specificity ((81) and references therein).
Following antigen-uptake, FOB cells upregulate CCR7 and migrate to the T-B border zone, where they secrete CCL4, a chemoattractant for CD4 T cells (82). CD4 T cells migrate to the same region following their upregulation of CXCR5 in response to priming by dendritic cells in the T cell zone (83). The initial CD4 T-B interactions in the border region are critical. They induce the further expansion of B cells through cell-cell interaction via MHCII-TCR, CD86-CD28, ICOSL-ICOS and CD40-CD40L. The latter supports B cell survival and proliferation and induces expression of the enzyme activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID), encoded by the gene aicda, and critical for CSR (84). Induction of AID further supported by secretion of cytokines such as IL-4 or IFN-γ provide early signals directing the isotype profile of the antibody response (85, 86). Similarly, the interaction of CD4 T cells with B cells drives the polarization of the T cells towards a T follicular helper cell (TFH) fate (87). Through continued engagement of CD4 TFH with B cells, a process that requires expression of “signaling lymphocyte activation molecule-associated protein” (SAP) (88), the further fate of the B cells is determined.
In addition to harboring activated CD4 T cells and B cells, the T-B border zone also contains innate-like lymphocytes such as ILCs and invariant natural killer T cells (iNKT) that can interact with B cells. iNKT express an invariant α/β TCR that recognizes the canonical glycolipid α-galactosylceramide presented within the non-classical MHCI molecule CD1d expressed by B cells and other antigen-presenting cells (89). While mice only express one CD1 allotype (CD1d), humans harbor additional allotypes (a-e) that can present various glycolipids to a more diverse repertoire of NKT cells (90). Many bacterial pathogens express glycolipids. Studies on Streptococcus pneumoniae and B. burgdorferi have demonstrated the importance of iNKT cells in supporting B cell responses to these pathogens through antigen-specific FOB cells interacting with iNKT cells via antigen-presentation through the CD1d complex (91, 92). These interactions appear very similar to interactions between classical peptide-restricted CD4 T cells, in that Bcl6+ iNKT cells required expression of CD40L for upregulation of AID and SAP, and supported B cell expansion and differentiation via secretion of IL-21, although the induced B cell responses appeared more short-lived (91-94). iNKT cells can also provide critical non-cognate support for B cell responses through secretion of cytokines, as has been shown following influenza virus infection, a virus that does not express glycolipids (95). Thus, although the original view of T-B interaction was restricted to that involving protein antigens, there is now support for T-dependent B cell responses for pathogen-derived glycan, lipids and protein antigens, greatly expanding the number of pathogen-antigens against which humoral immunity can be induced by natural infection or vaccination.
Taken together, the initial clonal expansion of antigen-activated FOB cells occurs at the time of antigen encounter and is enhanced through costimulatory and cytokine signals provided at the T-B border zone (83, 96). This process supplies an increased number of antigen-specific and often, but not always, class-switched B cells (97-99). The further fate of the B cell is determined by these signals and involves either their return to the follicles, where they initiate GC responses that give rise to MBC and LLPC (56), or they remain in the extrafollicular space, as antigen-experienced B cells/MBC or differentiate into plasmablasts. The latter congregate in so-called extrafollicular foci (EF) in the T-B border and the medullary cord area of lymph nodes or red pulp of the spleen (97). As outlined below, extrafollicular responses amplify the existing humoral effector B cells to eliminate acute infections and, I would argue are the main effector response to infections. GC responses, on the other hand, use the infections to alter the existing B cell repertoire through expansions of a more diverse and adapted set of B cell clones that can participate in EF responses following their differentiation into MBC, or provide protective antibodies directly following their terminal differentiation to LLPC (Figure 1).
Outcomes of FOB cell activation
Extrafollicular B cell responses
Extrafollicular effector and memory B cells
Despite earlier work suggesting that MBC development depends on GC, more recent work, enabled by the use of fluorescent antigen-baits for identification of antigen-specific B cells, suggested GC-independent formation of non-switched IgM+ as well as class-switched IgG+ effectors/MBC (65, 100, 101). Although their specific developmental paths remain to be more firmly established, it appears likely that they derive following (T-dependent and T-independent) B cell activation at the T-B border. They may form from FOB cell clones that do not receive sufficiently strong BCR-signals, or qualitatively different signals than required for EF plasmablast formation. IgM+ “non-switched” MBC, which seem to separate into B cells that are IgM+ IgD− and those that have a naïve, IgD+ IgM+ phenotype (102), can respond to reinfection with rapid seeding of either EF or GC responses, thus in this regard behave similar to naïve B cells and thus are not a priori precluded from EF responses (103). The data are significant as they suggest that quiescent, antigen-experienced, and clonally-expanded non-switched B cell populations, including populations that by phenotype resemble naïve B cells, shape the repertoire of the circulating B cell pool, skewing it towards expanded numbers of B cells that have the capacity to be stimulated by pathogens. MBC’s apparent potential for self-renewal (103), further suggests that these cells remain in the peripheral circulating B cell pool long-term. By virtue of their increased frequencies alone, they can support more rapid responses to recall infections.
The data may also explain how MBC responses can be found to pathogens an individual has no history of having encountered previously. By retaining a naïve-like (IgM+ IgD+, or IgM+ IgD−) state, infections with distinct pathogens that share epitopes, perhaps conformational in nature, can provide an initial wave of pathogen-specific antibodies of an appropriate quality, i.e. their isotype and glycan profile. The humoral response quality is then shaped by the inflammatory milieu of the newly encountered pathogen, rather than dependent the legacy of the previous infection that let to their initial induction and may support the development of cross-reactive humoral immune responses to broader classes of pathogens, as recently shown for cross-reactive B cell responses to LPS O-antigen in humans (104).
Recent studies have shown that engagement of TLR9 following BCR-mediated antigen-stimulation in the presence of T cell help result in the development of a population of CD11c+ B cell subset that expresses the transcription factor T-bet (105, 106). The first description of B cells with this phenotype was by Winslow and colleagues, who noted that a population of IgM-secreting extrafollicular CD11c+ plasmablasts emerged rapidly and independent of T cell-help following infection with the intracellular bacterium Ehrlichia muris (107), as well a population of CD11c+ CD19+ MBC that developed somewhat later in the response (108). Collectively, additional studies have revealed that this CD11c+ B cell subset harbors a transcriptional profile dominated by expression of the transcription factor T-bet (109-111), a well-known transcriptional regulator of CD4 TH1-differentiation (112). Plasmablasts and MBC with this phenotype emerge in situations of IFN-γ-driven infections of both humans and mice, such as following chronic infection with HIV (113, 114) and repeat infections with Malaria (115), but also after acute influenza virus infection (86). While initial reports of MBC cells with this phenotype in chronic HIV-infected patients (114) as well as in the aging and in autoimmune diseases (116) suggested that these cells were “atypical” MBC that are showing signs of exhaustion and dysfunction, subsequent studies have demonstrated that these cells represent a population of B cells poised to develop into plasmablasts and that their emergence is related to the inflammatory milieu in which they develop. Elegant studies by Lund and colleagues recently defined the transcriptional control of these cells, demonstrating that B cell-intrinsic signaling via IFN-γ induces the induction of T-bet during influenza infection. T-bet expression then orchestrates transcriptional changes that suppresses the initial IFN-γ-driven inflammatory signaling profile towards one that enables these cells to respond to BCR-signaling with rapid upregulation of Blimp1+ and IRF4 and thus to initiate differentiation to plasma cells (86).
Extrafollicular foci
(EF) are generated by antigen-specific B cells that undergo rapid rounds of proliferation followed by their differentiation into CD138+ Blimp-1-expressing plasmablasts that secrete either IgM or class-switched Ig. This response type is induced by all mature peripheral B cell populations: B-1 cells, MZ B cells and FOB cells, underscoring its significance for the survival of the host. While many EF responses require initial interaction of B cells with CD4 T cells, EF responses can form in response to T-independent antigens. Here, in addition to strong antigen-BCR interaction, TLR signals, and sufficient availability of BAFF and other cytokines supplied by innate immune cells, such as ILC, NK cells, or even neutrophils, can replace the need for T cell-derived co-stimulation of FOB cells. In addition, however, and as discussed below, splenic MZ B cells and B-1 cells respond more rapidly and more strongly to such signals compared to the FOB cells and may be responsible for an early wave of T-independent plasmablast responses.
Class-switch recombination of EF-bound FOB cells is induced likely following CD40-CD40L interaction with CD4 T cells in the T-B border zone (97-99). During primary infections, EF-derived antibodies show only limited signs of affinity maturation. This may be due to the fact that continued engagement of these cells with CD4 T cells via CD40 is not required in the EF and thus that CD40-induced AID expression, responsible for both class-switch recombination and somatic affinity hypermutation, may not be sustained (84, 97). Furthermore, recent studies showed that the transcriptional regulator Pax-5 supports AID expression, suggesting that the downregulation of Pax-5 during plasmablast differentiating further represses AID expression (85). This is in contrast to ongoing interactions of B cells with CD4 TFH in the GC, which continues to drive expression of AID, explaining the difference in the levels of affinity maturation seen between EF and GC B cell responses.
Importantly, this does not mean that all EF responses are of low affinity. Indeed, development of EF responses requires a relatively high affinity BCR for cognate antigen binding (117), presumably because high affinity interactions induce strong IRF4 expression (118), a key transcriptional regulator of plasma cell development (119). For example, Gerhard and colleagues noted high-affinity early antibody responses during primary influenza A/Puerto Rico/8/34 vaccination of BALB/c mice to the Cb-site of HA1, encoded by germline encoded antibodies of the C12 idiotype. These responses did not generate MBC and did not participate in later antibody-responses (120). We subsequently identified B cells expressing this idiotype to form EF but not GC responses following primary influenza infections (121). Thus, when available in the existing repertoire, high-affinity B cell clones are favored for EF-development. This is also the case during recall responses, or during infections with related pathogens that induce cross-reactive responses and can explain the appearance of highly mutated plasmablasts in the blood of patients within a few days of acute infection during recall responses (122, 123).
Taken together, EF responses are rapidly induced and can provide critical, early and protective antibody responses of a variety of affinities. Given the need for strong BCR-signaling to initiate B cell differentiation (118), the notion that FOB-derived EF responses generate mostly low-affinity antibodies seems inconsistent with available evidence and it wrongfully diminishes the strong impact and importance of this B cell immune effector mechanisms for host survival. Such notion might have arisen from studies with model antigens in mice, in which the pre-immune repertoire simply does not contain clones able to mount a strong EF response. Indeed, during recall responses, extrafollicular or GC-derived MBC preferentially feed into the EF pathway for enhanced immune responses (Figure 1). Based on these data, the EF response appears to be a central and critical effector response of the humoral immune system, not simply a short-lived, low-affinity response, replaced by GC.
Functions of EF-derived antibodies
The outcome of EF development is the rapid generation of antibodies that critically support host-defenses (Figure 2). Although current evidence suggests that the developing plasmablasts are relatively short-lived, with antibody-secretion usually occurring a few days prior to the establishment of GC B cell responses in the same lymph tissue (97, 121), given the half-live of IgG in the order of 3-5 weeks, these responses nonetheless will outlast typical infections. Indeed, during acute infections with influenza virus, the kinetics of the EF response strongly correlates with that of virus-clearance, while the slower-developing GC do not form until the virus is already cleared (57, 121). The early presence of antibodies can limit pathogen spread and thereby reduce the risk of overshooting cellular immune responses, which often engender higher levels of tissue destruction. The antibodies can also facilitate provision of co-stimulatory signals to FOB cells by forming complement-tagged antigen-IgG immune complexes that bind to CD21 (124). Via that same route, they can also help transport antigen to FDCs (51, 52), thereby strongly supporting GC B cell responses. Tethering the immune complexes to the surface of FOB cells may also enhance even low-affinity BCR to engage with antigen. Co-ligation of BCR and immune complexes bound to the inhibitory FcγRIIb, the only IgG-FcR expressed by B cells, would also override any FcγRIIb-mediated inhibitory effects on the B cell response and instead provide support GC development (125, 126).
Figure 2. Rapidly generated extrafollicular-derived antibodies provide immune protection and regulate pathogen-specific B cell responses.

Extrafollicular foci rapidly form after infection and secrete both IgM and class-switched antibodies. Both IgG and IgM provide rapid protection by opsonization of the pathogen for uptake by macrophages and neutrophils via binding of antibody-antigen complexes to activating FcgR or when tagged with complement to complement receptors CR1/2 (CD35/21). They may also directly bind to and neutralize pathogens. Support for B cell activation is provided through provision of costimulatory signals via binding to CD21, the deposition of antigen onto the B cell surface, which may facilitate binding to the BCR, or via transport of immune complexes on the surface of FOB cells to FDCs situated inside the follicles, thereby supporting germinal center responses. Secreted IgM and the B cell-expressed FcμR also provide B cell activation, albeit the mechanisms underlying their effects are currently unknown.
IgM-antigen complexes may fulfill similar functions as IgG-immune complexes, given that IgM strongly binds to complement (127). Indeed, the absence of secreted IgM has been associated with strong reductions in the ensuing IgG responses to infections and immunizations (127). FOB cells also express a Fc-receptor for IgM (FcμR) (128). Its absence was shown to phenocopy the reduced IgG responses to influenza virus infection seen in secreted IgM-deficient mice, suggesting that IgM-binding to the FcμR is important for IgM-enhancement of the subsequent IgG response (129). Thus, EF-derived antibody responses are critical for both, direct neutralization and opsonization of pathogens, as well as for optimal GC B cell responses.
Few studies have documented mechanisms by which pathogens may exploit the EF response as an immune evasion strategy. One example is secondary dengue virus infections in individuals living in Dengue-endemic regions. Dengue repeat-infections induce very strong MBC-driven plasmablast responses, which in cases of heterotypic infections can be directed against non-neutralizing, cross-reactive epitopes. These non-neutralizing antibodies opsonize the virus, which perversely enhances disease severity in some patients, due to enhanced virus-infection of macrophages and other FcR-bearing cells (130, 131). Host cell infection via IgG− but not IgA-mediated opsonization of plasmablast-derived antibodies was reported also for patients infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (132). Most recently, a study on infections with Plasmodium yoelii in mice suggested that rapidly proliferating plasmablasts can compete with GC B cells for nutrients, starving activated B cells and abrogating the establishment of GC responses. Interestingly, the inhibitory effects of EF plasmablasts on GC responses was overcome by supplementation of the drinking water with L-glutamate (133). These are remarkable observations providing mechanistic explanations for clinical observations on malnutrition and insufficient development of pathogen-specific immunity (134). Driving EF responses, while diminishing GC responses that provide MBC that can feed into future EF responses, as well as strong antibody-mediated protection via formation of LLPC makes evolutionary “sense” in that Plasmodium requires frequent reinfections of a host in Malaria-endemic areas. But it also suggests that strong EF responses may have a “cost” associated, that is usually balanced through their rapid involution.
Intrafollicular GC B cell responses
In response to infections or immunization the de novo formation of GC is delayed by a few days compared to that of extrafollicular responses, taking upwards of 10 - 14 days. Multiple excellent recent reviews have discussed the regulation of GC B cell responses to both, model antigens and infectious agents and the reader is referred to these for an in-depth discussion (56, 135-137). Briefly, GC contain two histologically distinct compartments: the dark zone and the light zone. The dark zone encompasses a recently discovered subarea, “the grey zone” (138), in which rapidly proliferating B cells incorporate frequent point mutations into the hypervariable antigen-binding region of the Ig-locus. B cells with missense mutations undergo apoptosis and are eliminated by tangible body macrophages. Successfully mutated B cells will enter the major dark zone compartment, differentiate and re-express their BCR, and then move to the light zone which contains antigen-presenting FDC and CD4 TFH. Light zone B cells undergo selection, and only those that compete successfully for antigen-binding, and thus can present antigen for subsequent engagement with CD4 TFH, are selected for further rounds of proliferation. Continued competition for antigen and interaction with CD4 T cells selects for BCR with increasing binding-strengths to the selecting antigen. While much emphasis has been placed on the increasing affinity of individual GC-derived B cell clones, there is actually scant evidence that enhanced affinity is responsible for the development of protective B cell responses to pathogens (57, 139-141).
Importantly, however, and in contrast to the EF response that relies on the available B cell repertoire, the GC response actively shapes the B cell repertoire, driving diversity by selecting BCRs strongly binding to antigens from pathogens that could infect the host. While EF usually rapidly resolve within a few days after their formation, GC can persist for extended periods of time, even after the infection is cleared. Following influenza infection of mice in which the virus is cleared within 7-10 days, mediastinal lymph nodes contain GC for up to 5 months, although their total number diminishes as the lymph node involutes. This is consistent with the long retention of antigen on the surface of FDC, which act as the main antigen-presenting cell for B cells in the follicles (88). Chronic GC are also found in the mesenteric lymph nodes draining the gastrointestinal tract and in Peyer’s Patches of the small intestine, in response to microbial stimuli, suggesting that these structures are “repurposed” for differing antigens over time. Recent data show that the chronic Peyer’s Patch GC expand somatically mutated “public” clones, i.e. clones that occur in many individuals, further supporting the idea of these structures driving diversification of a repertoire of specificities to common antigenic structures (142). The long-lived GC are reminiscent of the processes of B cell diversification observed in the appendix of rabbit and sheep, among other species, that rely on gene conversion for generating a diversified repertoire upon interaction with microbiota-derived antigens (143).
I argue that these findings further support the idea (57) that the primary goal of the GC responses cannot be solely the removal of an ongoing infection, but rather the use of antigens from the infection as a means to shape the repertoire of the B cell compartment on “important” antigens. Important antigens would be those that are derived from an intruding pathogen, or in the gastrointestinal tract, antigens that provide a “blueprint” of common bacterial structures, sampled through M cell-uptake from the luminal site for presentation to GC B cells within the Peyer’s patches. Consistent with this interpretation is the recent observation that GC-derived MBC do not usually return to the GC in a recall response (144). Thus, generation of MBC supports primarily a more effective and more diverse EF response upon re-challenge. Such repertoire reshaping overcomes the inherent limitations of a stochastic process of B cell development in many mammalian species, including humans and mice; a process by which most B cells are selected initially only for functionality of their BCR and against self-recognition, but not selected for “usefulness”.
De novo GC responses establish in the follicles when B cells, activated in the T-B border return to these sites, where they are further stimulated by antigens trapped on FDC, as well as by CD4 TFH that are recruited by B cells to the GC, causing extensive further clonal expansion (88). Similar to the extrafollicular responses, GC responses result in the formation of antibody-secreting plasmablasts and plasma cells, as well as MBC. In contrast to the EF response, however, GC-derived plasmablasts migrate to the bone marrow, where they differentiate into LLPC and can remain for extended periods of time (145, 146). The output of GC switches over time from an early wave of MBC to a wave of later-developing plasma cells (100, 147). The fate-determinants of B cell development toward MBC or plasma cell fate have not been identified, but MBC fate may require lower BCR affinity compared to plasma cells, as they show lower rates of mutation, consistent with the earlier exit from the GC. Interestingly, compared to the LLPC, MBC may have an increased ability to respond to cross-reactive antigens, as demonstrated with virus escape mutants of influenza A and West Nile Virus (147, 148).
The impact of GC responses on host survival from an infection depends on the type of pathogen encountered. As discussed above, during acute infection with “hit-and-run” viruses like norovirus or influenza virus, where the virus is cleared within a few days of infection by the innate immune system as well as by the rapidly developing EF responses, GC responses develop too slowly to affect the course infection. However, GC responses become increasingly important when pathogen clearance cannot be achieved by these rapid immune responses. Already mentioned is the example of infections with P. yoelii in mice, where the abrogation of GC responses due to exuberant EF responses led to enhanced mortality (133). One of the most intriguing cases is chronic infection with HIV, where up to 50% of chronically-infected individuals will develop protective broadly neutralizing antibodies after many months to years after infection (149, 150). What distinguishes these antibodies from those generated earlier in the same patients is their ability to bind to subdominant epitopes, thus epitopes that do not provide strong triggers of B cell activation, and/or epitopes that mimic self-antigens and against which B cell tolerance might have been induced (151-153). Only the continued presence of the antigen and ongoing GC responses would lead to sufficient BCR-diversification that eventually results in the emergence of such broadly protective B cell clones. During influenza infection broadly-neutralizing antibodies are also directed against subdominant epitopes, here the stalk region epitopes of the hemagglutinin molecules (154). Influenza infections might not be sufficiently long-lived to drive selection of such subdominant B cell clones. Instead, frequent repeat infections with the yearly emerging influenza variants would ensure maximal diversification of the response to influenza. Indeed, this interpretation is supported by recent studies demonstrating that individuals with high titers anti-influenza antibodies show the greatest degree of repertoire diversification to influenza (155, 156). Given this repertoire broadening through repeat infections, however, the subdominant clones are unlikely strongly selected, as new dominant determinants are favored. Hence, strong broadly neutralizing antibody development to influenza and like viruses are unlikely to occur after natural infection. If it did, influenza infections would not likely be the continued threat to human health that they are today.
Given the importance for GC responses in diversifying a suboptimal repertoire of specificities, it is not surprising to see that some pathogens that cause persistent infections suppress functional GC. One example is the rapid collapse of GC in mice infected with B. burgdorferi, and the resulting lack of affinity maturation and MBC and LLPC development, despite strong extrafollicular-derived antibody responses (157, 158). Another is the suppression of GC responses following Salmonella infection (159). Taken together, GC responses are critical for shaping the B cell repertoire of a host, generating MBC that can induce rapid EF responses following recall infections, but also MBC that have a broadened repertoire and can engage in heterotypic immunity. The generation of LLPC provides strongly protective and neutralizing antibodies to prevent reinfections, as well as non-neutralizing antibodies that can rapidly complex antigens and thereby support de novo B cell responses as outlined above. Together extra and intra-follicular B cell immunity work together to provide both rapid responses to the infecting pathogen and better prepare the host for future pathogen encounter.
TLR SIGNALS AND THEIR SHAPING OF THE B CELL RESPONSES
B cells express surface TLR 2 and 4 and endosomal TLRs TLR3, TLR7, TLR8 and TLR9. Endosomal TLR-engagement can enhance FOB cell responses by providing additional proliferation and differentiation signals that synergistically enhance BCR signaling in FOB cells following antigen internalization (160). This enhanced B cell responsiveness supports the robustness of pathogen-specific antibody responses to both viruses and bacteria (161-164), but it may also lead to antibody-mediated autoimmunity (165, 166). Early studies showed a particular dependence of IgG2a/c generation on the expression of MyD88, which has now been linked to MyD88-dependent IFNγ-signaling, a cytokine long known to drive CSR to IgG2a/c (86, 167). B cell-intrinsic absence of MyD88 was shown to reduce B cell proliferation and germinal center responses (160, 168) and reduced terminal differentiation to antibody-producing plasmablasts and plasma cells (161-164). These are important observations that have obvious implication in the regulation of B cell responses to pathogens. Interestingly, even in the absence of BCR stimulation, TLR9 and TLR4-signaling induces phosphorylation of Syk (169, 170), and TLR7 signaling phosphorylates Btk (171), two phosphatases critical for BCR-mediated stimulation, demonstrating a remarkable but also puzzling interconnectedness of TLR and BCR signaling. While FOB cells are not particularly sensitive to TLR4-stimulation, the B-1 and MZ B cell subsets show much stronger responses to TLR engagement, as briefly summarized below.
Thus, non-cognate inflammatory signals created by the infection are critical modulators of cognate B cell responses, affecting their quality. The emerging data also underscore how features of B cell responses during infectious diseases parallel those observed in B cell-mediated autoimmunity. Rather than indicating that autoimmune diseases are triggered by infection, it suggests that PAMPS and DAMPS may initiate common signaling pathways. Understanding the regulation of pathogen-induced effective humoral responses can inform potential treatment strategies that modulate these pathways to either enhance immunity or suppress the unwanted outcomes in autoimmune diseases.
INNATE-LIKE B CELL SUBSETS IN INFECTION
B-1 cells
The first waves of B cells (B-1) emerge in early fetal development when there is limited exposure to microbial stimuli that could shape their repertoire. Instead B-1 cells, emerging from a distinct developmental path than that of B-2 cells (4, 172), undergo positive selection for recognition of self-antigens (173). It is not surprising then that the majority of B-1 cells express BCR-signaling inhibitors, including CD5, Siglec G and CD148 strongly curtailing their ability to respond to these antigens (174-176), and consistent with findings that CD5+ B-1 cells do not respond to soluble anti-IgM with clonal expansion (174, 177).
The repertoire of B-1 cells dramatically changes over the course of the first 5 month of age, even in the absence of microbiota, leading to the emergence of a heavily skewed repertoire containing some large and highly dominant public B cell clones (178, 179). The signals that drive these repertoire changes are unknown, but recent studies with TLR-deficient mice suggest that DAMPS may play a significant role (180). In the presence of microbiota, B-1 cells contribute strongly and continuously throughout life to the IgA-producing plasmablast pools in the intestinal tract (181, 182). They also generate most of the circulating “natural” serum IgM that can bind numerous pathogens (183, 184), critical for survival from infections (37, 185, 186). In addition to the direct anti-pathogen role that likely involves the activation of complement (187), the presence of IgM is required for maximal IgG responses to infections (129, 185, 188, 189). The mechanisms of that are largely unexplored but seem to involve B cell-expressed FcμR (129).
B-1 cells also respond to infections by migrating to secondary lymphoid tissues where they differentiate rapidly into IgM and cytokine-secreting cells providing a first wave of IgM (37), they may also secrete IL-10 (190) and their rapid induction of GM-CSF production has been associated with survival from experimentally-induced sepsis (36). Accumulation of body cavity B-1 cells in the lymph tissues depend on Type I IFN or MyD88-mediated integrin-activation (34, 35). B-1 cells are exquisitely sensitive to TLR-mediated stimulation (191), which causes them to lose expression of CD5 and to proliferate to levels much stronger than seen by FOB cells (192). TLR-mediated stimulation of B-1, but not FOB, cells towards plasma cell differentiation was shown to depend on CMTM7 a surface-expressed protein that supports phosphorylation of p38 following TLR stimulation (119, 193). In contrast to FOB cells, for which stimulation through TLR acts synergistically with BCR-mediated signals, BCR-engagement via anti-IgM before or immediately after TLR-stimulation inhibits TLR-induced B-1 cell proliferation (192). Thus, in vitro responses suggest that B-1 cells respond mainly through TLR not BCR stimuli, although TLR-induced loss of CD5 may alter their responsiveness to subsequent BCR stimulation (192).
This raises questions about the specificity of the early B-1 cell response. In support of antigen-specific BCR-mediated B-1 cell activation, infections with Streptococcus pneumoniae (194), Borrelia hermsii (195), Salmonella typhimurium (196) as well as Francisella tularensis (197) indicated B-1 cell clonal expansion, pathogen-binding, IgM secretion, and the formation of memory B-1 cells (37). In contrast, B-1 cell responses to influenza infection suggested a mainly innate-like response, as the number of influenza-binding IgM secreting B-1 cells was not higher after infection, than in non-infected mice (198). Furthermore, IgM responses were abrogated in mice in which B-1 cells lacked intrinsic TLR-signaling (180, 192, 199). Further work is required to determine the apparent differences between these infection models. Common to all B-1 cell responses to infections is the rapid induction of IgM-secreting B-1 plasmablasts, similar to those initiated by FOB during EF responses. Proliferating B-1 cells rapidly accumulated in the T-B border zone, where they differentiated into extrafollicular short-lived CD138+ plasmablasts (13, 21, 192, 200) and MBC that accumulated in body cavities (195, 201). Interestingly, work by Yang and colleagues suggested that B-1 plasma cell differentiation to recall responses of antigen-specific B-1-derived MBC required TLR4-mediated stimulation (202), further underscoring the importance of innate signals in quickly mobilizing this self-reactive broadly protective B cell population.
Thus, fetal-derived B-1 cells differ significantly from FOB cells in their responsiveness to infections. Their unique distribution in the pleural and peritoneal cavities allow localized and rapid responses to infections that breach mucosal barriers. Their contribution to anti-pathogen immunity is two-fold: passive, through continued secretion of broadly-binding serum natural IgM and IgG and mucosal IgA, a repertoire that is shaped by TLR stimulation, and active, through rapid migration to secondary lymphoid tissues, where B-1 cells contribute early short-lived antibody responses and regulatory cytokines, such as GM-CSF and IL-10 (203-205).
Marginal zone B cells
As discussed, splenic MZ B cells are critical for humoral immune response development, as they shuffle antigens from the marginal zone into the follicle for antigen-presentation by FDC in the spleen, while lymph nodes lack this B cell subset (51, 52). Although MZ B cell precursors can develop during fetal life, the marginal zone organization seem to require some time to develop (12). MZ B cells share many traits with B-1 cells, including enhanced responsiveness to TLR-signaling compared to FOB cells (206). They also express high levels of CD1, consistent with a repertoire responsive to glycans and lipids. These traits together with their location in the splenic marginal zone enables their rapid responses to blood-borne pathogens or TLR-agonists such as LPS (13, 206). It also explains their critical role for antibody production to glycans, including the polysaccharide capsule antigens of gram-positive pathogens, such as S. pneumoniae, explaining the sensitivity of newborns and splenectomized individuals to infections with gram-positive bacteria.
Similar to B-1 cells, MZ B cell responses to pathogen-encounter is the rapid differentiation into EF plasmablasts that can be induced in a T-dependent or T-independent manner (13, 206). Early studies already established a predilection of MZ B cells for generating non-switched IgM memory responses to model antigens, although participation in late GC responses was noted in one earlier study (207).
Thus, all peripheral mature B cell populations, FOB, B-1 and MZ B cells are poised to respond rapidly to infections with formation of EF responses. In addition, B-1 cells are providing immune surveillance in the peritoneal and pleural body cavities and MZ B cells are strategically positioned to survey the circulation. B-1 and MZ B cell’s sensitivity to innate-like signals and their exclusion from GC responses, and their self-renewal capacity suggest that their repertoires fulfill critical specificity niche gaps that exist within the FOB cell pool, that must be maintained throughout life. Their rapid antibody responses after infection reduce freely available pathogens and PAMPS, thereby reducing the potential for overshooting cellular activation and cytokine responses at a critical window during early infection.
Figure 3. Shaping of the mature B cell pool by chronic and acute germinal centers generates a pool of B cells with increased responsiveness to microbial challenges.

Transitional B cells continuously emerge from the bone marrow with a largely stochastically-derived BCR repertoire. During transition into the mature B cell pool in the spleen, the repertoire is altered through removal of strongly autoreactive B cells. The chronic germinal centers in the Peyer’s patches as well as mucosal lymph nodes further shape the B cell pool by expanding and selecting B cells that recognize microbial antigens. Rapid extrafollicular plasmablasts are selected from this diverse pool of B cells either through activation of naïve, switched or non-switched MBC. The latter are major precursor pools with a predilection for differentiation into EF responses. Further repertoire shaping occurs following infections in de novo developing germinal centers and that contribute not only MBC but also into plasma cells that will reside long-term in the bone marrow.
Summary Points.
Peripheral B cell populations are widely distributed in lymphoid and non-lymphoid tissues, functioning as antibody-secreting effectors as well as sentinels
The structure and organization of lymphoid tissues facilitates the rapid exposure of pathogen-specific B cells to antigens
Extrafollicular plasmablasts are the major humoral effectors in infection
EF are generated by all mature peripheral B cell subsets, B-1, MZB and FOB
The effectiveness of the EF response relies on tthe presence of a diverse repertoire of B cells that is shaped to respond to microbial antigens
GC function to mold the B cell repertoire by continuously expanding and altering B cell clones to microbial antigens in the chronic GC of the gastrointestinal tract, and in response to infections, generating MBC that act as precursors of the EF response
Acknowledgement
The authors most recent work on B cell responses to infections has been supported through grants from the NIH/NIAID R01AI117890, R01AI148652 and R21AI151995, and grant TB170139 from the DoD.
Terms and Definitions
- Activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID)
Enzyme required for Ig class-switch recombination and somatic hyperaffinity maturation. Encoded by the gene aicda
- B-1 cells
A subset of B cells generated most efficiently early B cell development in the fetus and around birth. Distinguished by phenotype, repertoire and function from bone-marrow derived later developing (B-2) cells. Maintained by self-renewal.
- B-1PC
B-1 cell-derived Blimp-1+ CD138+ plasma cells
- B-2 cells
Most B cells developing after birth through de novo synthesis from precursors in the bon marrow. Separated into follicular and marginal zone B cells
- Extrafollicular B cell responses
B cell responses occurring in the T-B border zone of lymphoid tissues resulting in extrafollicular foci and MBC responses.
- Extrafollicular foci (EF)
Clusters of plasmablasts in extrafollicular sites, including the T-B border zone, the medullary cords of lymph nodes, or the red pulp of the spleen. Develop following B cell activation in a T-dependent or T-independent manner. B-1 and MZB cells most rapidly respond to infections through forming EF
- Follicular B cells (FOB)
Mature B cells circulating between blood and B cell follicles in secondary lymphoid tissues. The majority of the peripheral B cell pool
- Follicular dendritic cells (FDC)
Differentiated lymph epithelial cell present in the follicles of lymph tissue, where they are critical for antigen-presentation to B cells during germinal center responses
- Germinal centers (GC)
Formation of foci of rapidly proliferating B cells in the center of B cell follicles following their activation by antigen and T cells. GC contain light and dark zones, in which B cells are selected for binding to antigens expressed by FDC and CD4 T follicular helper cells. Rapid mutations of the Ig-locus enhances repertoire diversification and selection identifies most strongly antigen-binding B cells. Results in MBC and plasma cell development.
- Invariant Natural Killer T cells (iNKT)
CD4+ α/βT cells expressing the NK surface receptor NK1.1 and expressing a highly limited TCR repertoire encoding specificity for lipids presented in the context of CD1d. Recognize the canonical glycolipid α-galactosylceramide
- Marginal Zone B cells (MZB)
B cells residing in the marginal zone of adjacent to the marinal zone sinus. Develop from transitional B cells following NOD-delta 1 signaling
- Memory B cells (MBC)
B cells that in response to antigen clonally expanded with or without undergoing class-switch recombination and returned to a quiescent state. Might be epigenetically reprogrammed to respond more strongly to repeat exposure. Can develop from extrafollicular or germinal center responses.
- Regulatory B cells (Breg)
Regulatory B cells. Identified by their production of IL-10. Developmental paths not fully resolved. Many resemble CD5+ B-1 cells
- Subcapsular sinus (SCS) macrophages
CD169+ macrophages located at the floor of the subcapsular sinus of lymph nodes where they capture antigen for presentation to B cells in the underlying outer follicular area
- T-B border zone
The area between T cell zone and B cell follicle in which activated T and B cells move following antigen activation
- Transitional B cells
B cells leaving the bone marrow to migrate to the spleen prior to their selection into the follicular or marginal zone B cell pool. Identified by surface expression of CD93 and low expression of surface IgD.
- Plasmablasts
Rapidly proliferating antibody-secreting cells expressing Blimp-1 and high levels IRF4. Can develop from extrafollicular or germinal center responses. Both IgM and class-switched
- Plasma cells (PC)
Terminal stage of B cell differentiation. Secrete large quantities of antibody. Lack expression of CD19 and CD45R, high levels intracytoplasmic class-switched or non-switched Ig. Divided into short-lived (SL) and long-lived (LL) PC. LLPC reside mostly in the bone marrow.
- Polymeric Ig receptor (pIgR)
Surface receptor of mucosal epithelial cells that facilitates transport of dimeric IgA and pentameric IgM from the subepithelial to the luminal site of mucosal surfaces.
Footnotes
Disclosure Statement
The author is not aware of any affiliations, memberships, funding, or financial holdings that could be perceived as affecting the objectivity of this review.
Literature Cited
- 1.Cedillo-Barrón L, García-Cordero J, Bustos-Arriaga J, León-Juárez M, Gutiérrez-Castañeda B. 2014. Antibody response to dengue virus. Microbes Infect 16: 711–20 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Williams KL, Sukupolvi-Petty S, Beltramello M, Johnson S, Sallusto F, Lanzavecchia A, Diamond MS, Harris E. 2013. Therapeutic efficacy of antibodies lacking Fcγ receptor binding against lethal dengue virus infection is due to neutralizing potency and blocking of enhancing antibodies [corrected]. PLoS Pathog 9: e1003157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Montecino-Rodriguez E, Dorshkind K. 2012. B-1 B cell development in the fetus and adult. Immunity 36: 13–21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Baumgarth N 2011. The double life of a B-1 cell: self-reactivity selects for protective effector functions. Nat Rev Immunol 11: 34–46 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Beaudin AE, Boyer SW, Perez-Cunningham J, Hernandez GE, Derderian SC, Jujjavarapu C, Aaserude E, MacKenzie T, Forsberg EC. 2016. A Transient Developmental Hematopoietic Stem Cell Gives Rise to Innate-like B and T Cells. Cell Stem Cell 19: 768–83 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yuan J, Nguyen CK, Liu X, Kanellopoulou C, Muljo SA. 2012. Lin28b reprograms adult bone marrow hematopoietic progenitors to mediate fetal-like lymphopoiesis. Science 335: 1195–200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ganal-Vonarburg SC, Hornef MW, Macpherson AJ. 2020. Microbial-host molecular exchange and its functional consequences in early mammalian life. Science 368: 604–7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Rechavi E, Lev A, Lee YN, Simon AJ, Yinon Y, Lipitz S, Amariglio N, Weisz B, Notarangelo LD, Somech R. 2015. Timely and spatially regulated maturation of B and T cell repertoire during human fetal development. Sci Transl Med 7: 276ra25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Loder F, Mutschler B, Ray RJ, Paige CJ, Sideras P, Torres R, Lamers MC, Carsetti R. 1999. B cell development in the spleen takes place in discrete steps and is determined by the quality of B cell receptor-derived signals. J Exp Med 190: 75–89 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hammad H, Vanderkerken M, Pouliot P, Deswarte K, Toussaint W, Vergote K, Vandersarren L, Janssens S, Ramou I, Savvides SN, Haigh JJ, Hendriks R, Kopf M, Craessaerts K, de Strooper B, Kearney JF, Conrad DH, Lambrecht BN. 2017. Transitional B cells commit to marginal zone B cell fate by Taok3-mediated surface expression of ADAM10. Nat Immunol 18: 313–20 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Monroe JG, Dorshkind K. 2007. Fate decisions regulating bone marrow and peripheral B lymphocyte development. Adv Immunol 95: 1–50 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Pillai S, Cariappa A, Moran ST. 2005. Marginal zone B cells. Annu Rev Immunol 23: 161–96 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Martin F, Oliver AM, Kearney JF. 2001. Marginal zone and B1 B cells unite in the early response against T-independent blood-borne particulate antigens. Immunity 14: 617–29 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Arnon TI, Cyster JG. 2014. Blood, sphingosine-1-phosphate and lymphocyte migration dynamics in the spleen. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 378: 107–28 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Buza-Vidas N, Cheng M, Duarte S, Nozad H, Jacobsen SE, Sitnicka E. 2007. Crucial role of FLT3 ligand in immune reconstitution after bone marrow transplantation and high-dose chemotherapy. Blood 110: 424–32 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Reboldi A, Cyster JG. 2016. Peyer's patches: organizing B-cell responses at the intestinal frontier. Immunol Rev 271: 230–45 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Adamo L, Rocha-Resende C, Lin CY, Evans S, Williams J, Dun H, Li W, Mpoy C, Andhey PS, Rogers BE, Lavine K, Kreisel D, Artyomov M, Randolph GJ, Mann DL. 2020. Myocardial B cells are a subset of circulating lymphocytes with delayed transit through the heart. JCI Insight 5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sage AP, Tsiantoulas D, Binder CJ, Mallat Z. 2019. The role of B cells in atherosclerosis. Nat Rev Cardiol 16: 180–96 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Manz RA, Hauser AE, Hiepe F, Radbruch A. 2005. Maintenance of serum antibody levels. Annu Rev Immunol 23: 367–86 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lino AC, Dang VD, Lampropoulou V, Welle A, Joedicke J, Pohar J, Simon Q, Thalmensi J, Baures A, Fluhler V, Sakwa I, Stervbo U, Ries S, Jouneau L, Boudinot P, Tsubata T, Adachi T, Hutloff A, Dorner T, Zimber-Strobl U, de Vos AF, Dahlke K, Loh G, Korniotis S, Goosmann C, Weill JC, Reynaud CA, Kaufmann SHE, Walter J, Fillatreau S. 2018. LAG-3 Inhibitory Receptor Expression Identifies Immunosuppressive Natural Regulatory Plasma Cells. Immunity 49: 120–33 e9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Savage HP, Yenson VM, Sawhney SS, Mousseau BJ, Lund FE, Baumgarth N. 2017. Blimp-1-dependent and -independent natural antibody production by B-1 and B-1-derived plasma cells. J Exp Med 214: 2777–94 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Silva-Sanchez A, Randall TD. 2020. Role of iBALT in Respiratory Immunity. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Loxton AG. 2019. Bcells and their regulatory functions during Tuberculosis: Latency and active disease. Mol Immunol 111: 145–51 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Rosser EC, Mauri C. 2015. Regulatory B cells: origin, phenotype, and function. Immunity 42: 607–12 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Mauri C, Menon M. 2017. Human regulatory B cells in health and disease: therapeutic potential. J Clin Invest 127: 772–9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tedder TF. 2015. B10 cells: a functionally defined regulatory B cell subset. J Immunol 194: 1395–401 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Brandtzaeg P 2009. Mucosal immunity: induction, dissemination, and effector functions. Scand J Immunol 70: 505–15 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Cebra JJ, Periwal SB, Lee G, Lee F, Shroff KE. 1998. Development and maintenance of the gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT): the roles of enteric bacteria and viruses. Dev Immunol 6: 13–8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Chen K, Magri G, Grasset EK, Cerutti A. 2020. Rethinking mucosal antibody responses: IgM, IgG and IgD join IgA. Nat Rev Immunol [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Wilson RP, McGettigan SE, Dang VD, Kumar A, Cancro MP, Nikbakht N, Stohl W, Debes GF. 2019. IgM Plasma Cells Reside in Healthy Skin and Accumulate with Chronic Inflammation. J Invest Dermatol 139: 2477–87 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Baumgarth N, Tung JW, Herzenberg LA. 2005. Inherent specificities in natural antibodies: a key to immune defense against pathogen invasion. Springer Semin Immunopathol 26: 347–62 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Rajendran P, Chen YF, Chen YF, Chung LC, Tamilselvi S, Shen CY, Day CH, Chen RJ, Viswanadha VP, Kuo WW, Huang CY. 2018. The multifaceted link between inflammation and human diseases. J Cell Physiol 233: 6458–71 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ansel KM, Harris RB, Cyster JG. 2002. CXCL13 is required for B1 cell homing, natural antibody production, and body cavity immunity. Immunity 16: 67–76 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ha SA, Tsuji M, Suzuki K, Meek B, Yasuda N, Kaisho T, Fagarasan S. 2006. Regulation of B1 cell migration by signals through Toll-like receptors. J Exp Med 203: 2541–50 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Waffarn EE, Hastey CJ, Dixit N, Soo Choi Y, Cherry S, Kalinke U, Simon SI, Baumgarth N. 2015. Infection-induced type I interferons activate CD11b on B-1 cells for subsequent lymph node accumulation. Nat Commun 6: 8991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Rauch PJ, Chudnovskiy A, Robbins CS, Weber GF, Etzrodt M, Hilgendorf I, Tiglao E, Figueiredo JL, Iwamoto Y, Theurl I, Gorbatov R, Waring MT, Chicoine AT, Mouded M, Pittet MJ, Nahrendorf M, Weissleder R, Swirski FK. 2012. Innate response activator B cells protect against microbial sepsis. Science 335: 597–601 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Smith FL, Baumgarth N. 2019. B-1 cell responses to infections. Curr Opin Immunol 57: 23–31 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Vale AM, Tanner JM, Schelonka RL, Zhuang Y, Zemlin M, Gartland GL, Schroeder HW Jr. 2010. The peritoneal cavity B-2 antibody repertoire appears to reflect many of the same selective pressures that shape the B-1a and B-1b repertoires. J Immunol 185: 6085–95 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Amanna IJ, Slifka MK. 2010. Mechanisms that determine plasma cell lifespan and the duration of humoral immunity. Immunol Rev 236: 125–38 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Robinson MJ, Webster RH, Tarlinton DM. 2020. How intrinsic and extrinsic regulators of plasma cell survival might intersect for durable humoral immunity. Immunol Rev [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lu E, Cyster JG. 2019. G-protein coupled receptors and ligands that organize humoral immune responses. Immunol Rev 289: 158–72 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Baeyens AAL, Schwab SR. 2020. Finding a Way Out: S1P Signaling and Immune Cell Migration. Annu Rev Immunol 38: 759–84 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Cyster JG, Schwab SR. 2012. Sphingosine-1-phosphate and lymphocyte egress from lymphoid organs. Annu Rev Immunol 30: 69–94 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Mackay CR, Kimpton WG, Brandon MR, Cahill RN. 1988. Lymphocyte subsets show marked differences in their distribution between blood and the afferent and efferent lymph of peripheral lymph nodes. J Exp Med 167: 1755–65 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Geherin SA, Fintushel SR, Lee MH, Wilson RP, Patel RT, Alt C, Young AJ, Hay JB, Debes GF. 2012. The skin, a novel niche for recirculating B cells. J Immunol 188: 6027–35 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Allie SR, Randall TD. 2020. Resident Memory B Cells. Viral Immunol 33: 282–93 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Allie SR, Bradley JE, Mudunuru U, Schultz MD, Graf BA, Lund FE, Randall TD. 2019. The establishment of resident memory B cells in the lung requires local antigen encounter. Nat Immunol 20: 97–108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Mueller SN, Mackay LK. 2016. Tissue-resident memory T cells: local specialists in immune defence. Nat Rev Immunol 16: 79–89 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Baumgarth N 2004. B-cell immunophenotyping. Methods Cell Biol 75: 643–62 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Roozendaal R, Mempel TR, Pitcher LA, Gonzalez SF, Verschoor A, Mebius RE, von Andrian UH, Carroll MC. 2009. Conduits mediate transport of low-molecular-weight antigen to lymph node follicles. Immunity 30: 264–76 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Phan TG, Grigorova I, Okada T, Cyster JG. 2007. Subcapsular encounter and complement-dependent transport of immune complexes by lymph node B cells. Nat Immunol 8: 992–1000 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Phan TG, Green JA, Gray EE, Xu Y, Cyster JG. 2009. Immune complex relay by subcapsular sinus macrophages and noncognate B cells drives antibody affinity maturation. Nat Immunol 10: 786–93 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Tedford K, Steiner M, Koshutin S, Richter K, Tech L, Eggers Y, Jansing I, Schilling K, Hauser AE, Korthals M, Fischer KD. 2017. The opposing forces of shear flow and sphingosine-1-phosphate control marginal zone B cell shuttling. Nat Commun 8: 2261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Cinamon G, Zachariah MA, Lam OM, Foss FW Jr., Cyster JG. 2008. Follicular shuttling of marginal zone B cells facilitates antigen transport. Nat Immunol 9: 54–62 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Arnon TI, Horton RM, Grigorova IL, Cyster JG. 2013. Visualization of splenic marginal zone B-cell shuttling and follicular B-cell egress. Nature 493: 684–8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Mesin L, Ersching J, Victora GD. 2016. Germinal Center B Cell Dynamics. Immunity 45: 471–82 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Baumgarth N 2013. How specific is too specific? B-cell responses to viral infections reveal the importance of breadth over depth. Immunol Rev 255: 82–94 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Abbott RK, Crotty S. 2020. Factors in B cell competition and immunodominance. Immunol Rev [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Wing JB, Lim EL, Sakaguchi S. 2020. Control of foreign Ag-specific Ab responses by Treg and Tfr. Immunol Rev [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Krautler NJ, Kana V, Kranich J, Tian Y, Perera D, Lemm D, Schwarz P, Armulik A, Browning JL, Tallquist M, Buch T, Oliveira-Martins JB, Zhu C, Hermann M, Wagner U, Brink R, Heikenwalder M, Aguzzi A. 2012. Follicular dendritic cells emerge from ubiquitous perivascular precursors. Cell 150: 194–206 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.St John AL, Abraham SN. 2009. Salmonella disrupts lymph node architecture by TLR4-mediated suppression of homeostatic chemokines. Nat Med 15: 1259–65 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Hastey CJ, Ochoa J, Olsen KJ, Barthold SW, Baumgarth N. 2014. MyD88- and TRIF-independent induction of type I interferon drives naive B cell accumulation but not loss of lymph node architecture in Lyme disease. Infect Immun 82: 1548–58 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Tunev SS, Hastey CJ, Hodzic E, Feng S, Barthold SW, Baumgarth N. 2011. Lymphoadenopathy during lyme borreliosis is caused by spirochete migration-induced specific B cell activation. PLoS Pathog 7: e1002066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Glatman Zaretsky A, Silver JS, Siwicki M, Durham A, Ware CF, Hunter CA. 2012. Infection with Toxoplasma gondii alters lymphotoxin expression associated with changes in splenic architecture. Infect Immun 80: 3602–10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Pape KA, Taylor JJ, Maul RW, Gearhart PJ, Jenkins MK. 2011. Different B cell populations mediate early and late memory during an endogenous immune response. Science 331: 1203–7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Chang WL, Coro ES, Rau FC, Xiao Y, Erle DJ, Baumgarth N. 2007. Influenza virus infection causes global respiratory tract B cell response modulation via innate immune signals. J Immunol 178: 1457–67 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Coro ES, Chang WL, Baumgarth N. 2006. Type I IFN receptor signals directly stimulate local B cells early following influenza virus infection. J Immunol 176: 4343–51 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Le Bon A, Thompson C, Kamphuis E, Durand V, Rossmann C, Kalinke U, Tough DF. 2006. Cutting edge: enhancement of antibody responses through direct stimulation of B and T cells by type I IFN. J Immunol 176: 2074–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Shiow LR, Rosen DB, Brdickova N, Xu Y, An J, Lanier LL, Cyster JG, Matloubian M. 2006. CD69 acts downstream of interferon-alpha/beta to inhibit S1P1 and lymphocyte egress from lymphoid organs. Nature 440: 540–4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Rau FC, Dieter J, Luo Z, Priest SO, Baumgarth N. 2009. B7-1/2 (CD80/CD86) direct signaling to B cells enhances IgG secretion. J Immunol 183: 7661–71 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Gomez AM, Ouellet M, Tremblay MJ. 2015. HIV-1-triggered release of type I IFN by plasmacytoid dendritic cells induces BAFF production in monocytes. J Immunol 194: 2300–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Ittah M, Miceli-Richard C, Lebon P, Pallier C, Lepajolec C, Mariette X. 2011. Induction of B cell-activating factor by viral infection is a general phenomenon, but the types of viruses and mechanisms depend on cell type. J Innate Immun 3: 200–7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Mackay F, Schneider P. 2009. Cracking the BAFF code. Nat Rev Immunol 9: 491–502 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Giordano D, Kuley R, Draves KE, Roe K, Holder U, Giltiay NV, Clark EA. 2020. BAFF Produced by Neutrophils and Dendritic Cells Is Regulated Differently and Has Distinct Roles in Antibody Responses and Protective Immunity against West Nile Virus. J Immunol 204: 1508–20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Harris DP, Haynes L, Sayles PC, Duso DK, Eaton SM, Lepak NM, Johnson LL, Swain SL, Lund FE. 2000. Reciprocal regulation of polarized cytokine production by effector B and T cells. Nat Immunol 1: 475–82 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Damdinsuren B, Zhang Y, Khalil A, Wood WH 3rd, Becker KG, Shlomchik MJ, Sen R. 2010. Single round of antigen receptor signaling programs naive B cells to receive T cell help. Immunity 32: 355–66 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Sun L, Paschall AV, Middleton DR, Ishihara M, Ozdilek A, Wantuch PL, Aceil J, Duke JA, LaBranche CC, Tiemeyer M, Avci FY. 2020. Glycopeptide epitope facilitates HIV-1 envelope specific humoral immune responses by eliciting T cell help. Nat Commun 11: 2550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Scherle PA, Gerhard W. 1986. Functional analysis of influenza-specific helper T cell clones in vivo. T cells specific for internal viral proteins provide cognate help for B cell responses to hemagglutinin. J Exp Med 164: 1114–28 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Sette A, Grey H, Oseroff C, Peters B, Moutaftsi M, Crotty S, Assarsson E, Greenbaum J, Kim Y, Kolla R, Tscharke D, Koelle D, Johnson RP, Blum J, Head S, Sidney J. 2009. Definition of epitopes and antigens recognized by vaccinia specific immune responses: their conservation in variola virus sequences, and use as a model system to study complex pathogens. Vaccine 27 Suppl 6: G21–6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Sette A, Moutaftsi M, Moyron-Quiroz J, McCausland MM, Davies DH, Johnston RJ, Peters B, Rafii-El-Idrissi Benhnia M, Hoffmann J, Su HP, Singh K, Garboczi DN, Head S, Grey H, Felgner PL, Crotty S. 2008. Selective CD4+ T cell help for antibody responses to a large viral pathogen: deterministic linkage of specificities. Immunity 28: 847–58 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Kleindienst P, Brocker T. 2005. Concerted antigen presentation by dendritic cells and B cells is necessary for optimal CD4 T-cell immunity in vivo. Immunology 115: 556–64 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Bystry RS, Aluvihare V, Welch KA, Kallikourdis M, Betz AG. 2001. B cells and professional APCs recruit regulatory T cells via CCL4. Nat Immunol 2: 1126–32 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Gulbranson-Judge A, MacLennan I. 1996. Sequential antigen-specific growth of T cells in the T zones and follicles in response to pigeon cytochrome c. Eur J Immunol 26: 1830–7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Muramatsu M, Kinoshita K, Fagarasan S, Yamada S, Shinkai Y, Honjo T. 2000. Class switch recombination and hypermutation require activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID), a potential RNA editing enzyme. Cell 102: 553–63 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Tran TH, Nakata M, Suzuki K, Begum NA, Shinkura R, Fagarasan S, Honjo T, Nagaoka H. 2010. B cell-specific and stimulation-responsive enhancers derepress Aicda by overcoming the effects of silencers. Nat Immunol 11: 148–54 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Stone SL, Peel JN, Scharer CD, Risley CA, Chisolm DA, Schultz MD, Yu B, Ballesteros-Tato A, Wojciechowski W, Mousseau B, Misra RS, Hanidu A, Jiang H, Qi Z, Boss JM, Randall TD, Brodeur SR, Goldrath AW, Weinmann AS, Rosenberg AF, Lund FE. 2019. T-bet Transcription Factor Promotes Antibody-Secreting Cell Differentiation by Limiting the Inflammatory Effects of IFN-gamma on B Cells. Immunity 50: 1172–87 e7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Choi YS, Kageyama R, Eto D, Escobar TC, Johnston RJ, Monticelli L, Lao C, Crotty S. 2011. ICOS receptor instructs T follicular helper cell versus effector cell differentiation via induction of the transcriptional repressor Bcl6. Immunity 34: 932–46 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Qi H, Cannons JL, Klauschen F, Schwartzberg PL, Germain RN. 2008. SAP-controlled T-B cell interactions underlie germinal centre formation. Nature 455: 764–9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Kinjo Y, Tupin E, Wu D, Fujio M, Garcia-Navarro R, Benhnia MR, Zajonc DM, Ben-Menachem G, Ainge GD, Painter GF, Khurana A, Hoebe K, Behar SM, Beutler B, Wilson IA, Tsuji M, Sellati TJ, Wong CH, Kronenberg M. 2006. Natural killer T cells recognize diacylglycerol antigens from pathogenic bacteria. Nat Immunol 7: 978–86 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Ogg G, Cerundolo V, McMichael AJ. 2019. Capturing the antigen landscape: HLA-E, CD1 and MR1. Curr Opin Immunol 59: 121–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.King IL, Fortier A, Tighe M, Dibble J, Watts GF, Veerapen N, Haberman AM, Besra GS, Mohrs M, Brenner MB, Leadbetter EA. 2011. Invariant natural killer T cells direct B cell responses to cognate lipid antigen in an IL-21-dependent manner. Nat Immunol 13: 44–50 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Leadbetter EA, Brigl M, Illarionov P, Cohen N, Luteran MC, Pillai S, Besra GS, Brenner MB. 2008. NK T cells provide lipid antigen-specific cognate help for B cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 8339–44 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Detre C, Keszei M, Garrido-Mesa N, Kis-Toth K, Castro W, Agyemang AF, Veerapen N, Besra GS, Carroll MC, Tsokos GC, Wang N, Leadbetter EA, Terhorst C. 2012. SAP expression in invariant NKT cells is required for cognate help to support B-cell responses. Blood 120: 122–9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Chang PP, Barral P, Fitch J, Pratama A, Ma CS, Kallies A, Hogan JJ, Cerundolo V, Tangye SG, Bittman R, Nutt SL, Brink R, Godfrey DI, Batista FD, Vinuesa CG. 2011. Identification of Bcl-6-dependent follicular helper NKT cells that provide cognate help for B cell responses. Nat Immunol 13: 35–43 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Gaya M, Barral P, Burbage M, Aggarwal S, Montaner B, Warren Navia A, Aid M, Tsui C, Maldonado P, Nair U, Ghneim K, Fallon PG, Sekaly RP, Barouch DH, Shalek AK, Bruckbauer A, Strid J, Batista FD. 2018. Initiation of Antiviral B Cell Immunity Relies on Innate Signals from Spatially Positioned NKT Cells. Cell 172: 517–33 e20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Jacob J, Kassir R, Kelsoe G. 1991. In situ studies of the primary immune response to (4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenyl)acetyl. I. The architecture and dynamics of responding cell populations. J Exp Med 173: 1165–75 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.MacLennan IC, Toellner KM, Cunningham AF, Serre K, Sze DM, Zuniga E, Cook MC, Vinuesa CG. 2003. Extrafollicular antibody responses. Immunol Rev 194: 8–18 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Marshall JL, Zhang Y, Pallan L, Hsu MC, Khan M, Cunningham AF, MacLennan IC, Toellner KM. 2011. Early B blasts acquire a capacity for Ig class switch recombination that is lost as they become plasmablasts. Eur J Immunol 41: 3506–12 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Roco JA, Mesin L, Binder SC, Nefzger C, Gonzalez-Figueroa P, Canete PF, Ellyard J, Shen Q, Robert PA, Cappello J, Vohra H, Zhang Y, Nowosad CR, Schiepers A, Corcoran LM, Toellner KM, Polo JM, Meyer-Hermann M, Victora GD, Vinuesa CG. 2019. Class-Switch Recombination Occurs Infrequently in Germinal Centers. Immunity 51: 337–50 e7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Weisel FJ, Zuccarino-Catania GV, Chikina M, Shlomchik MJ. 2016. A Temporal Switch in the Germinal Center Determines Differential Output of Memory B and Plasma Cells. Immunity 44: 116–30 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Taylor JJ, Pape KA, Jenkins MK. 2012. A germinal center-independent pathway generates unswitched memory B cells early in the primary response. J Exp Med 209: 597–606 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Pritchard GH, Krishnamurty AT, Netland J, Arroyo EN, Takehara KK, Pepper M. 2019. The development of optimally responsive Plasmodium-specific CD73+CD80+IgM+ memory B cells requires intrinsic Bcl6 expression but not CD4+ Tfh cells. BioRxiv doi: 10.1101/564351 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Kenderes KJ, Levack RC, Papillion AM, Cabrera-Martinez B, Dishaw LM, Winslow GM. 2018. T-Bet(+) IgM Memory Cells Generate Multi-lineage Effector B Cells. Cell Rep 24: 824–37 e3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Rollenske T, Szijarto V, Lukasiewicz J, Guachalla LM, Stojkovic K, Hartl K, Stulik L, Kocher S, Lasitschka F, Al-Saeedi M, Schroder-Braunstein J, von Frankenberg M, Gaebelein G, Hoffmann P, Klein S, Heeg K, Nagy E, Nagy G, Wardemann H. 2018. Cross-specificity of protective human antibodies against Klebsiella pneumoniae LPS O-antigen. Nat Immunol 19: 617–24 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Sindhava VJ, Oropallo MA, Moody K, Naradikian M, Higdon LE, Zhou L, Myles A, Green N, Nundel K, Stohl W, Schmidt AM, Cao W, Dorta-Estremera S, Kambayashi T, Marshak-Rothstein A, Cancro MP. 2017. A TLR9-dependent checkpoint governs B cell responses to DNA-containing antigens. J Clin Invest 127: 1651–63 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Kallies A, Good-Jacobson KL. 2017. Transcription Factor T-bet Orchestrates Lineage Development and Function in the Immune System. Trends Immunol 38: 287–97 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Racine R, Chatterjee M, Winslow GM. 2008. CD11c expression identifies a population of extrafollicular antigen-specific splenic plasmablasts responsible for CD4 T-independent antibody responses during intracellular bacterial infection. J Immunol 181: 1375–85 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Yates JL, Racine R, McBride KM, Winslow GM. 2013. T cell-dependent IgM memory B cells generated during bacterial infection are required for IgG responses to antigen challenge. J Immunol 191: 1240–9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Myles A, Sanz I, Cancro MP. 2019. T-bet(+) B cells: A common denominator in protective and autoreactive antibody responses? Curr Opin Immunol 57: 40–5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Portugal S, Obeng-Adjei N, Moir S, Crompton PD, Pierce SK. 2017. Atypical memory B cells in human chronic infectious diseases: An interim report. Cell Immunol 321: 18–25 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Winslow GM, Papillion AM, Kenderes KJ, Levack RC. 2017. CD11c+ T-bet+ memory B cells: Immune maintenance during chronic infection and inflammation? Cell Immunol 321: 8–17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Zhu J, Jankovic D, Oler AJ, Wei G, Sharma S, Hu G, Guo L, Yagi R, Yamane H, Punkosdy G, Feigenbaum L, Zhao K, Paul WE. 2012. The transcription factor T-bet is induced by multiple pathways and prevents an endogenous Th2 cell program during Th1 cell responses. Immunity 37: 660–73 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Kardava L, Moir S, Shah N, Wang W, Wilson R, Buckner CM, Santich BH, Kim LJ, Spurlin EE, Nelson AK, Wheatley AK, Harvey CJ, McDermott AB, Wucherpfennig KW, Chun TW, Tsang JS, Li Y, Fauci AS. 2014. Abnormal B cell memory subsets dominate HIV-specific responses in infected individuals. J Clin Invest 124: 3252–62 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Moir S, Ho J, Malaspina A, Wang W, DiPoto AC, O'Shea MA, Roby G, Kottilil S, Arthos J, Proschan MA, Chun TW, Fauci AS. 2008. Evidence for HIV-associated B cell exhaustion in a dysfunctional memory B cell compartment in HIV-infected viremic individuals. J Exp Med 205: 1797–805 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Weiss GE, Crompton PD, Li S, Walsh LA, Moir S, Traore B, Kayentao K, Ongoiba A, Doumbo OK, Pierce SK. 2009. Atypical memory B cells are greatly expanded in individuals living in a malaria-endemic area. J Immunol 183: 2176–82 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Rubtsova K, Rubtsov AV, Cancro MP, Marrack P. 2015. Age-Associated B Cells: A T-bet-Dependent Effector with Roles in Protective and Pathogenic Immunity. J Immunol 195: 1933–7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Paus D, Phan TG, Chan TD, Gardam S, Basten A, Brink R. 2006. Antigen recognition strength regulates the choice between extrafollicular plasma cell and germinal center B cell differentiation. J Exp Med 203: 1081–91 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Ochiai K, Maienschein-Cline M, Simonetti G, Chen J, Rosenthal R, Brink R, Chong AS, Klein U, Dinner AR, Singh H, Sciammas R. 2013. Transcriptional regulation of germinal center B and plasma cell fates by dynamical control of IRF4. Immunity 38: 918–29 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Cook SL, Franke MC, Sievert EP, Sciammas R. 2020. A Synchronous IRF4-Dependent Gene Regulatory Network in B and Helper T Cells Orchestrating the Antibody Response. Trends Immunol 41: 614–28 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Kavaler J, Caton AJ, Staudt LM, Gerhard W. 1991. A B cell population that dominates the primary response to influenza virus hemagglutinin does not participate in the memory response. Eur J Immunol 21: 2687–95 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Rothaeusler K, Baumgarth N. 2010. B-cell fate decisions following influenza virus infection. Eur J Immunol 40: 366–77 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Kauffman RC, Bhuiyan TR, Nakajima R, Mayo-Smith LM, Rashu R, Hoq MR, Chowdhury F, Khan AI, Rahman A, Bhaumik SK, Harris L, O'Neal JT, Trost JF, Alam NH, Jasinskas A, Dotsey E, Kelly M, Charles RC, Xu P, Kovac P, Calderwood SB, Ryan ET, Felgner PL, Qadri F, Wrammert J, Harris JB. 2016. Single-Cell Analysis of the Plasmablast Response to Vibrio cholerae Demonstrates Expansion of Cross-Reactive Memory B Cells. mBio 7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Garcia-Bates TM, Cordeiro MT, Nascimento EJ, Smith AP, Soares de Melo KM, McBurney SP, Evans JD, Marques ET Jr., Barratt-Boyes SM. 2013. Association between magnitude of the virus-specific plasmablast response and disease severity in dengue patients. J Immunol 190: 80–7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Erdei A, Isaak A, Torok K, Sandor N, Kremlitzka M, Prechl J, Bajtay Z. 2009. Expression and role of CR1 and CR2 on B and T lymphocytes under physiological and autoimmune conditions. Mol Immunol 46: 2767–73 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Bournazos S, Ravetch JV. 2017. Fcgamma Receptor Function and the Design of Vaccination Strategies. Immunity 47: 224–33 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Smith KG, Clatworthy MR. 2010. FcgammaRIIB in autoimmunity and infection: evolutionary and therapeutic implications. Nat Rev Immunol 10: 328–43 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Blandino R, Baumgarth N. 2019. Secreted IgM: New tricks for an old molecule. J Leukoc Biol 106: 1021–34 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Kubagawa H, Oka S, Kubagawa Y, Torii I, Takayama E, Kang DW, Gartland GL, Bertoli LF, Mori H, Takatsu H, Kitamura T, Ohno H, Wang JY. 2009. Identity of the elusive IgM Fc receptor (FcmuR) in humans. J Exp Med 206: 2779–93 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Nguyen TTT, Graf BA, Randall TD, Baumgarth N. 2017. sIgM-FcmuR Interactions Regulate Early B Cell Activation and Plasma Cell Development after Influenza Virus Infection. J Immunol 199: 1635–46 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Priyamvada L, Cho A, Onlamoon N, Zheng NY, Huang M, Kovalenkov Y, Chokephaibulkit K, Angkasekwinai N, Pattanapanyasat K, Ahmed R, Wilson PC, Wrammert J. 2016. B Cell Responses during Secondary Dengue Virus Infection Are Dominated by Highly Cross-Reactive, Memory-Derived Plasmablasts. J Virol 90: 5574–85 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Guzman MG, Alvarez M, Halstead SB. 2013. Secondary infection as a risk factor for dengue hemorrhagic fever/dengue shock syndrome: an historical perspective and role of antibody-dependent enhancement of infection. Arch Virol 158: 1445–59 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Zimmermann N, Thormann V, Hu B, Kohler AB, Imai-Matsushima A, Locht C, Arnett E, Schlesinger LS, Zoller T, Schurmann M, Kaufmann SH, Wardemann H. 2016. Human isotype-dependent inhibitory antibody responses against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. EMBO Mol Med 8: 1325–39 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Vijay R, Guthmiller JJ, Sturtz AJ, Surette FA, Rogers KJ, Sompallae RR, Li F, Pope RL, Chan JA, de Labastida Rivera F, Andrew D, Webb L, Maury WJ, Xue HH, Engwerda CR, McCarthy JS, Boyle MJ, Butler NS. 2020. Infection-induced plasmablasts are a nutrient sink that impairs humoral immunity to malaria. Nat Immunol 21: 790–801 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Muller O, Krawinkel M. 2005. Malnutrition and health in developing countries. CMAJ 173: 279–86 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Victora GD, Wilson PC. 2015. Germinal center selection and the antibody response to influenza. Cell 163: 545–8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Suan D, Sundling C, Brink R. 2017. Plasma cell and memory B cell differentiation from the germinal center. Curr Opin Immunol 45: 97–102 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Cyster JG, Allen CDC. 2019. B Cell Responses: Cell Interaction Dynamics and Decisions. Cell 177: 524–40 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Kennedy DE, Okoreeh MK, Maienschein-Cline M, Ai J, Veselits M, McLean KC, Dhungana Y, Wang H, Peng J, Chi H, Mandal M, Clark MR. 2020. Novel specialized cell state and spatial compartments within the germinal center. Nat Immunol 21: 660–70 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Kalinke U, Bucher EM, Ernst B, Oxenius A, Roost HP, Geley S, Kofler R, Zinkernagel RM, Hengartner H. 1996. The role of somatic mutation in the generation of the protective humoral immune response against vesicular stomatitis virus. Immunity 5: 639–52 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Roost HP, Bachmann MF, Haag A, Kalinke U, Pliska V, Hengartner H, Zinkernagel RM. 1995. Early high-affinity neutralizing anti-viral IgG responses without further overall improvements of affinity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92: 1257–61 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Bachmann MF, Kalinke U, Althage A, Freer G, Burkhart C, Roost H, Aguet M, Hengartner H, Zinkernagel RM. 1997. The role of antibody concentration and avidity in antiviral protection. Science 276: 2024–7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Chen H, Zhang Y, Ye AY, Du Z, Xu M, Lee CS, Hwang JK, Kyritsis N, Ba Z, Neuberg D, Littman DR, Alt FW. 2020. BCR selection and affinity maturation in Peyer's patch germinal centres. Nature 582: 421–5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Lanning DK, Knight KL. 2005. Intestinal bacteria and development of the antibody repertoire. Discov Med 5: 393–8 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Mesin L, Schiepers A, Ersching J, Barbulescu A, Cavazzoni CB, Angelini A, Okada T, Kurosaki T, Victora GD. 2020. Restricted Clonality and Limited Germinal Center Reentry Characterize Memory B Cell Reactivation by Boosting. Cell 180: 92–106.e11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Slifka MK, Antia R, Whitmire JK, Ahmed R. 1998. Humoral immunity due to long-lived plasma cells. Immunity 8: 363–72 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Wrammert J, Ahmed R. 2008. Maintenance of serological memory. Biol Chem 389: 537–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Purtha WE, Tedder TF, Johnson S, Bhattacharya D, Diamond MS. 2011. Memory B cells, but not long-lived plasma cells, possess antigen specificities for viral escape mutants. J Exp Med 208: 2599–606 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Leach S, Shinnakasu R, Adachi Y, Momota M, Makino-Okamura C, Yamamoto T, Ishii KJ, Fukuyama H, Takahashi Y, Kurosaki T. 2019. Requirement for memory B-cell activation in protection from heterologous influenza virus reinfection. Int Immunol 31: 771–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Burton DR, Hangartner L. 2016. Broadly Neutralizing Antibodies to HIV and Their Role in Vaccine Design. Annu Rev Immunol 34: 635–59 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Hraber P, Seaman MS, Bailer RT, Mascola JR, Montefiori DC, Korber BT. 2014. Prevalence of broadly neutralizing antibody responses during chronic HIV-1 infection. AIDS 28: 163–9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Doyle-Cooper C, Hudson KE, Cooper AB, Ota T, Skog P, Dawson PE, Zwick MB, Schief WR, Burton DR, Nemazee D. 2013. Immune tolerance negatively regulates B cells in knock-in mice expressing broadly neutralizing HIV antibody 4E10. J Immunol 191: 3186–91 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Yang G, Holl TM, Liu Y, Li Y, Lu X, Nicely NI, Kepler TB, Alam SM, Liao HX, Cain DW, Spicer L, VandeBerg JL, Haynes BF, Kelsoe G. 2013. Identification of autoantigens recognized by the 2F5 and 4E10 broadly neutralizing HIV-1 antibodies. J Exp Med 210: 241–56 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Haynes BF, Verkoczy L. 2014. AIDS/HIV. Host controls of HIV neutralizing antibodies. Science 344: 588–9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Cho A, Wrammert J. 2016. Implications of broadly neutralizing antibodies in the development of a universal influenza vaccine. Curr Opin Virol 17: 110–5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Andrews SF, Kaur K, Pauli NT, Huang M, Huang Y, Wilson PC. 2015. High preexisting serological antibody levels correlate with diversification of the influenza vaccine response. J Virol 89: 3308–17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Andrews SF, Huang Y, Kaur K, Popova LI, Ho IY, Pauli NT, Henry Dunand CJ, Taylor WM, Lim S, Huang M, Qu X, Lee JH, Salgado-Ferrer M, Krammer F, Palese P, Wrammert J, Ahmed R, Wilson PC. 2015. Immune history profoundly affects broadly protective B cell responses to influenza. Sci Transl Med 7: 316ra192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Elsner RA, Hastey CJ, Olsen KJ, Baumgarth N. 2015. Suppression of Long-Lived Humoral Immunity Following Borrelia burgdorferi Infection. PLoS Pathog 11: e1004976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Hastey CJ, Elsner RA, Barthold SW, Baumgarth N. 2012. Delays and diversions mark the development of B cell responses to Borrelia burgdorferi infection. J Immunol 188: 5612–22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Elsner RA, Shlomchik MJ. 2019. IL-12 Blocks Tfh Cell Differentiation during Salmonella Infection, thereby Contributing to Germinal Center Suppression. Cell Rep 29: 2796–809 e5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Meyer-Bahlburg A, Khim S, Rawlings DJ. 2007. B cell intrinsic TLR signals amplify but are not required for humoral immunity. J Exp Med 204: 3095–101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Park SM, Ko HJ, Shim DH, Yang JY, Park YH, Curtiss R 3rd, Kweon MN. 2008. MyD88 signaling is not essential for induction of antigen-specific B cell responses but is indispensable for protection against Streptococcus pneumoniae infection following oral vaccination with attenuated Salmonella expressing PspA antigen. J Immunol 181: 6447–55 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Browne EP, Littman DR. 2009. Myd88 is required for an antibody response to retroviral infection. PLoS Pathog 5: e1000298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Sin JI. 2011. MyD88 signal is required for more efficient induction of Ag-specific adaptive immune responses and antitumor resistance in a human papillomavirus E7 DNA vaccine model. Vaccine 29: 4125–31 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Guay HM, Andreyeva TA, Garcea RL, Welsh RM, Szomolanyi-Tsuda E. 2007. MyD88 is required for the formation of long-term humoral immunity to virus infection. J Immunol 178: 5124–31 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Leadbetter EA, Rifkin IR, Hohlbaum AM, Beaudette BC, Shlomchik MJ, Marshak-Rothstein A. 2002. Chromatin-IgG complexes activate B cells by dual engagement of IgM and Toll-like receptors. Nature 416: 603–7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Nundel K, Marshak-Rothstein A. 2019. The role of nucleic acid sensors and type I IFNs in patient populations and animal models of autoinflammation. Curr Opin Immunol 61: 74–9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Lee MSJ, Natsume-Kitatani Y, Temizoz B, Fujita Y, Konishi A, Matsuda K, Igari Y, Tsukui T, Kobiyama K, Kuroda E, Onishi M, Marichal T, Ise W, Inoue T, Kurosaki T, Mizuguchi K, Akira S, Ishii KJ, Coban C. 2019. B cell-intrinsic MyD88 signaling controls IFN-gamma-mediated early IgG2c class switching in mice in response to a particulate adjuvant. Eur J Immunol 49: 1433–40 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Hou B, Saudan P, Ott G, Wheeler ML, Ji M, Kuzmich L, Lee LM, Coffman RL, Bachmann MF, DeFranco AL. 2011. Selective utilization of Toll-like receptor and MyD88 signaling in B cells for enhancement of the antiviral germinal center response. Immunity 34: 375–84 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Kremlitzka M, Macsik-Valent B, Erdei A. 2015. Syk is indispensable for CpG-induced activation and differentiation of human B cells. Cell Mol Life Sci 72: 2223–36 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Schweighoffer E, Nys J, Vanes L, Smithers N, Tybulewicz VLJ. 2017. TLR4 signals in B lymphocytes are transduced via the B cell antigen receptor and SYK. J Exp Med 214: 1269–80 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Corzo CA, Varfolomeev E, Setiadi AF, Francis R, Klabunde S, Senger K, Sujatha-Bhaskar S, Drobnick J, Do S, Suto E, Huang Z, Eastham-Anderson J, Katewa A, Pang J, Domeyer M, Dela Cruz C, Paler-Martinez A, Lau VWC, Hadadianpour A, Ramirez-Carrozi V, Sun Y, Bao K, Xu D, Hunley E, Brightbill HD, Warming S, Roose-Girma M, Wong A, Tam L, Emson CL, Crawford JJ, Young WB, Pappu R, McKenzie BS, Asghari V, Vucic D, Hackney JA, Austin CD, Lee WP, Lekkerkerker A, Ghilardi N, Bryan MC, Kiefer JR, Townsend MJ, Zarrin AA. 2020. The kinase IRAK4 promotes endosomal TLR and immune complex signaling in B cells and plasmacytoid dendritic cells. Sci Signal 13 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Wong JB, Hewitt SL, Heltemes-Harris LM, Mandal M, Johnson K, Rajewsky K, Koralov SB, Clark MR, Farrar MA, Skok JA. 2019. B-1a cells acquire their unique characteristics by bypassing the pre-BCR selection stage. Nat Commun 10: 4768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Hayakawa K, Asano M, Shinton SA, Gui M, Allman D, Stewart CL, Silver J, Hardy RR. 1999. Positive selection of natural autoreactive B cells. Science 285: 113–6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Bikah G, Carey J, Ciallella JR, Tarakhovsky A, Bondada S. 1996. CD5-mediated negative regulation of antigen receptor-induced growth signals in B-1 B cells. Science 274: 1906–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Meyer SJ, Linder AT, Brandl C, Nitschke L. 2018. B Cell Siglecs-News on Signaling and Its Interplay With Ligand Binding. Front Immunol 9: 2820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Skrzypczynska KM, Zhu JW, Weiss A. 2016. Positive Regulation of Lyn Kinase by CD148 Is Required for B Cell Receptor Signaling in B1 but Not B2 B Cells. Immunity 45: 1232–44 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Bondada S, Bikah G, Robertson DA, Sen G. 2000. Role of CD5 in growth regulation of B-1 cells. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 252: 141–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Yang Y, Wang C, Yang Q, Kantor AB, Chu H, Ghosn EE, Qin G, Mazmanian SK, Han J, Herzenberg LA. 2015. Distinct mechanisms define murine B cell lineage immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) repertoires. Elife 4: e09083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Prohaska TA, Que X, Diehl CJ, Hendrikx S, Chang MW, Jepsen K, Glass CK, Benner C, Witztum JL. 2018. Massively Parallel Sequencing of Peritoneal and Splenic B Cell Repertoires Highlights Unique Properties of B-1 Cell Antibodies. J Immunol 200: 1702–17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Kreuk LS, Koch MA, Slayden LC, Lind NA, Chu S, Savage HP, Kantor AB, Baumgarth N, Barton GM. 2019. B cell receptor and Toll-like receptor signaling coordinate to control distinct B-1 responses to both self and the microbiota. Elife 8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Kroese FG, Butcher EC, Stall AM, Herzenberg LA. 1989. A major peritoneal reservoir of precursors for intestinal IgA plasma cells. Immunol Invest 18: 47–58 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Kroese FG, Butcher EC, Stall AM, Lalor PA, Adams S, Herzenberg LA. 1989. Many of the IgA producing plasma cells in murine gut are derived from self-replenishing precursors in the peritoneal cavity. Int Immunol 1: 75–84 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Baumgarth N, Herman OC, Jager GC, Brown L, Herzenberg LA, Herzenberg LA. 1999. Innate and acquired humoral immunities to influenza virus are mediated by distinct arms of the immune system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96: 2250–5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Zhou ZH, Zhang Y, Hu YF, Wahl LM, Cisar JO, Notkins AL. 2007. The broad antibacterial activity of the natural antibody repertoire is due to polyreactive antibodies. Cell Host Microbe 1: 51–61 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Baumgarth N, Herman OC, Jager GC, Brown LE, Herzenberg LA, Chen J. 2000. B-1 and B-2 cell-derived immunoglobulin M antibodies are nonredundant components of the protective response to influenza virus infection. J Exp Med 192: 271–80 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Ochsenbein AF, Fehr T, Lutz C, Suter M, Brombacher F, Hengartner H, Zinkernagel RM. 1999. Control of early viral and bacterial distribution and disease by natural antibodies. Science 286: 2156–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Jayasekera JP, Moseman EA, Carroll MC. 2007. Natural antibody and complement mediate neutralization of influenza virus in the absence of prior immunity. J Virol 81: 3487–94 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Boes M, Esau C, Fischer MB, Schmidt T, Carroll M, Chen J. 1998. Enhanced B-1 cell development, but impaired IgG antibody responses in mice deficient in secreted IgM. J Immunol 160: 4776–87 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Nguyen TT, Elsner RA, Baumgarth N. 2015. Natural IgM prevents autoimmunity by enforcing B cell central tolerance induction. J Immunol 194: 1489–502 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190.O'Garra A, Chang R, Go N, Hastings R, Haughton G, Howard M. 1992. Ly-1 B (B-1) cells are the main source of B cell-derived interleukin 10. Eur J Immunol 22: 711–7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191.Genestier L, Taillardet M, Mondiere P, Gheit H, Bella C, Defrance T. 2007. TLR agonists selectively promote terminal plasma cell differentiation of B cell subsets specialized in thymus-independent responses. J Immunol 178: 7779–86 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192.Savage HP, Klasener K, Smith FL, Luo Z, Reth M, Baumgarth N. 2019. TLR induces reorganization of the IgM-BCR complex regulating murine B-1 cell responses to infections. Elife 8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193.Liu Z, Liu Y, Li T, Wang P, Mo X, Lv P, Ma D, Han W. 2020. CMTM7 plays key roles in TLR-induced plasma cell differentiation and p38 activation in murine B-1 B cells. Eur J Immunol 50: 809–21 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194.Haas KM, Poe JC, Steeber DA, Tedder TF. 2005. B-1a and B-1b cells exhibit distinct developmental requirements and have unique functional roles in innate and adaptive immunity to S. pneumoniae. Immunity 23: 7–18 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195.Alugupalli KR, Leong JM, Woodland RT, Muramatsu M, Honjo T, Gerstein RM. 2004. B1b lymphocytes confer T cell-independent long-lasting immunity. Immunity 21: 379–90 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196.Cunningham AF, Flores-Langarica A, Bobat S, Dominguez Medina CC, Cook CN, Ross EA, Lopez-Macias C, Henderson IR. 2014. B1b cells recognize protective antigens after natural infection and vaccination. Front Immunol 5: 535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197.Cole LE, Yang Y, Elkins KL, Fernandez ET, Qureshi N, Shlomchik MJ, Herzenberg LA, Herzenberg LA, Vogel SN. 2009. Antigen-specific B-1a antibodies induced by Francisella tularensis LPS provide long-term protection against F. tularensis LVS challenge. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 4343–8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198.Choi YS, Baumgarth N. 2008. Dual role for B-1a cells in immunity to influenza virus infection. J Exp Med 205: 3053–64 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199.Gunti S, Messer RJ, Xu C, Yan M, Coleman WG Jr., Peterson KE, Hasenkrug KJ, Notkins AL. 2015. Stimulation of Toll-Like Receptors profoundly influences the titer of polyreactive antibodies in the circulation. Sci Rep 5: 15066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200.Yang Y, Tung JW, Ghosn EE, Herzenberg LA, Herzenberg LA. 2007. Division and differentiation of natural antibody-producing cells in mouse spleen. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 4542–6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201.Yang Y, Ghosn EE, Cole LE, Obukhanych TV, Sadate-Ngatchou P, Vogel SN, Herzenberg LA, Herzenberg LA. 2012. Antigen-specific memory in B-1a and its relationship to natural immunity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 5388–93 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 202.Yang Y, Ghosn EE, Cole LE, Obukhanych TV, Sadate-Ngatchou P, Vogel SN, Herzenberg LA, Herzenberg LA. 2012. Antigen-specific antibody responses in B-1a and their relationship to natural immunity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 5382–7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 203.Chin SS, Chorro L, Chan J, Lauvau G. 2019. Splenic Innate B1 B Cell Plasmablasts Produce Sustained Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor and Interleukin-3 Cytokines during Murine Malaria Infections. Infect Immun 87 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 204.Chousterman BG, Swirski FK. 2015. Innate response activator B cells: origins and functions. Int Immunol 27: 537–41 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 205.Aziz M, Holodick NE, Rothstein TL, Wang P. 2017. B-1a Cells Protect Mice from Sepsis: Critical Role of CREB. J Immunol 199: 750–60 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 206.Martin F, Kearney JF. 2002. Marginal-zone B cells. Nat Rev Immunol 2: 323–35 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 207.Song H, Cerny J. 2003. Functional heterogeneity of marginal zone B cells revealed by their ability to generate both early antibody-forming cells and germinal centers with hypermutation and memory in response to a T-dependent antigen. J Exp Med 198: 1923–35 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
