Skip to main content
The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine logoLink to The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine
. 2025 Jun 30;98(2):203–225. doi: 10.59249/BDGN2070

A Scoping Review of Epigenetic Signatures of Diet and Diet-related Metabolites: Insights from Epigenome-Wide Association Studies and Their Implications for Cardiometabolic Health and Diseases

Rameen Asif a, Ruihan Liu b, Russell J de Souza c,d, Sandi Azab c,d,e, Michael Chong f,g, Sonia S Anand c,d,g, Wei Q Deng c,h,i,*
PMCID: PMC12204033  PMID: 40589935

Abstract

Epigenome-wide association studies (EWASs) have emerged as a powerful approach to investigate how dietary exposures shape the epigenome and subsequently influence metabolic and cardiovascular health. A growing number of EWAS have examined the effects of various dietary factors, including overall dietary patterns, specific food groups, micronutrients, and food-related metabolites, on DNA methylation (DNAm) across diverse populations. In this review, we map the landscape of nutritional EWAS, identifying the types of dietary exposures studied, the genomic regions where epigenetic signals emerge, and overarching trends across studies. Across studies, consistent associations were reported at nine CpG sites in genes such as AHRR, CPT1A, and FADS2, particularly in relation to fatty acid consumption, and certain diet patterns. Biological pathways enriched included fatty acid metabolism and the PPAR signaling pathway. In conclusion, our review identified a pattern of epigenetic convergence that may underlie diet-related disease risk. While promising, key knowledge gaps were also noted, including limited longitudinal follow-up, unclear causal pathways, and underrepresentation of ethnic diversity. Moving forward, we highlighted several complementary approaches for translating nutritional EWAS findings into actionable public health and precision nutrition strategies, including integrating multi-omics, mediation analyses, and population-wide epigenetic risk profiling.

Keywords: Epigenetics, DNA Methylation, Diet, Metabolomics, Nutritional Biomarkers, Cardiometabolic Disease, Dietary Patterns, Chronic Disease, Precision Nutrition, Epigenome-Wide Association Study

Introduction

Diet is a key determinant of health, influencing metabolism, immune function, cognitive performance, and disease risk. Once ingested, certain dietary components are absorbed and metabolized into circulating bioactive compounds [1], which can be detected as metabolic signatures of dietary intake [2]. Growing research supports the hypothesis that foods, including macronutrients, micronutrients, and bioactive food compounds, contribute to the development of metabolic disorders [3,4], cardiovascular disease [5], and other non-communicable chronic diseases [6]. Diet can affect long-term health through multiple mechanisms, such as cumulative dose-dependent exposure and epigenetic modifications [7], which “reprogram” gene expression to regulate metabolism [2], immune responses, disease susceptibility, and healthy aging [7].

Epigenome-wide association studies (EWASs) [8] have emerged as a powerful approach to understanding how environmental exposures, particularly diet, influence epigenetic changes. DNA methylation (DNAm) is one of the most studied epigenetic variations as it can be profiled at scale in large population studies. This scoping review synthesizes EWASs of dietary measures, with a focus on dietary patterns, micronutrients, macronutrients, and diet-related metabolites. The objectives are to: 1) characterize the dietary outcomes studied in EWASs; 2) identify overlapping epigenetic signals from dietary and related metabolite EWASs; and 3) evaluate whether epigenetic signals of dietary exposures influence long-term health outcomes.

Dietary Patterns and Measures

Diet is a complex and dynamic phenotype influenced by multiple biological, behavioral, and environmental factors, making it challenging to accurately capture in research. It can be classified qualitatively into patterns—eg, Mediterranean, or plant-based diets—and quantitatively by estimating intake of nutrients and food processing levels [9,10]. Accurate measurement of diet enables precision nutrition through tailored dietary recommendations based on genetics, metabolism, epigenetics, and microbiota [11]. Additionally, accurate measurements are crucial for understanding lifelong dietary exposures that shape metabolism and disease risk. Traditional dietary assessment methods have well-described limitations, such as misreporting, social desirability bias, and recall bias. While digital tools offer potential improvement, their validity across diverse populations remains a concern.

Metabolomic Signature of Diet

Advances in high-resolution mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy [12] have significantly improved metabolite profiling, a more detailed characterization of the metabolome—the complete set of small molecules present within a biological sample [13]. This includes the entirety of low-molecular-weight compounds (<1000 Da) such as amino acids, peptides, lipids, nucleotides, and secondary metabolites that are end products of cellular processes. Metabolites can be measured in serum, plasma, and urine. Blood metabolites reflect hemodynamic regulation, while urinary metabolites reflect renal filtration and excretion; thus, together, they offer complementary health indicators [14].

Diet modulates the metabolome. For instance, a diet high in processed foods influences the fecal metabolome, altering concentrations of specific metabolites such as dipeptides and long-chain saturated fatty acids. These changes reflect altered protein digestibility and nutrient bioavailability resulting from food processing methods [15]. The metabolome also reflects the interactions between ingested foods, their processing, the gut microbiota, and host biology. Early-life dietary patterns, such as breastfeeding versus formula feeding, impact the infant serum metabolome [16,17]. Notable dietary biomarkers include nutrients and metabolite associations, such as dietary fructose, glucose, vitamin C, and proline betaine, a known metabolomic biomarker of citrus fruit intake [18]. Despite clear diet and metabolome connections, it is important to note that metabolomic profiles only partially capture dietary intake. Current studies suggest that the correlation between self-reported diets and metabolomic data tends to be modest, with a correlation coefficient r = 0.3 to 0.4 at best [19], depending on dietary assessment methods and individual metabolic variability.

DNA Methylation

Epigenetic regulation includes mechanisms such as DNAm, histone modifications, and non-coding RNAs, all of which influence gene expression without altering the DNA sequence. DNAm is currently the most extensively studied in large population studies. It typically refers to the covalent addition of a methyl group (-CH₃) to the 5-carbon position of the cytosine ring, forming 5-methylcytosine (5mC), predominantly within cytosine-phosphate-guanine (CpG) dinucleotides. This modification can influence gene expression by altering transcription factor binding or recruiting methyl-binding proteins that remodel chromatin. Newer, long-read sequencing technologies now allow for the detection of methylation beyond the 5mC context. However, this review focuses on 5mC, given its established relevance and widespread use in current research. In contrast to genetic alterations, DNAm changes are reversible and sensitive to environmental factors and lifestyle choices [15,16]. Indeed, the growing number of EWASs in relation to environmental exposures and health outcomes represents the early stages of a systematic effort to identify epigenetic signatures linked to disease and biological processes.

Modern array-based technologies, such as the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChip (450K) and its successor, the MethylationEPIC BeadChip (Illumina Inc, San Diego, CA), are commonly used. These platforms interrogate between 450 000 to over 850 000 CpG sites, providing extensive coverage of the methylation landscape. The generated beta-values, which range from 0 (completely unmethylated) to 1 (fully methylated), quantify the fraction of methylation at each CpG site.

Why Diet-Metabolome-Epigenome

Diet can induce reversible epigenetic changes [17,18], prompting interest in capturing dietary signatures relevant to chronic disease prevention and management. A conceptual overview of these interactions is illustrated in Figure 1, highlighting proposed pathways by which dietary exposures influence metabolite profiles and DNAm. Given the aforementioned complexities in nutrition research [19], reliable dietary biomarkers present a promising complement. A dietary biomarker is a measurable biological indicator that reflects dietary intake, metabolism, or nutritional status [20], and could offer more objective and precise measurements of dietary intake [21]. Examples include urinary proline betaine (a marker of citrus fruit intake) and chlorophyll-derived metabolites like pheophorbide A and pheophytin A (marker for leafy green vegetables), which provide objective measures of metabolic effects [22,23]. These insights support the development of dietary biomarkers and targeted interventions, such as folate supplementation, to reverse adverse epigenetic changes and promote health [24,25].

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Conceptual framework linking dietary patterns, dietary metabolites, and DNA methylation to chronic disease outcomes. This diagram illustrates the hypothesized relationships between subjective measures of diet (dietary patterns) and more objective biomarkers of intake and exposure (dietary metabolites and DNA methylation) in relation to health consequences such as coronary artery disease (CAD), type 2 diabetes (T2D), aging, and other chronic conditions. We hypothesize that dietary patterns may show weaker and less robust associations with outcomes due to recall bias and imprecision. In contrast, dietary metabolites, as more objective indicators of recent intake, may be more strongly and immediately associated with health outcomes. Finally, DNA methylation captures the long-term biological responses to exposure, potentially reflecting the cumulative effects of diet and other environmental factors. Arrows indicate hypothesized directions of influence, with DNA methylation and dietary metabolites acting as intermediates or biomarkers linking diet to disease.

DNAm and metabolomics provide complementary insights into the molecular mechanisms by which diet influences health. Metabolites, as dietary intermediates or regulators have been linked to epigenetic changes that influence gene expression and disease risk [26]. Dysregulation of these pathways is associated with metabolic disorders, cancer, and immune dysfunction [27]. Integrating the two thus allows for an wholesome assessment of dietary intake and its biological effects (Figure 1), capturing both short-term metabolic responses and long-term epigenetic adaptations [28]. This approach strengthens the evidence for diet-disease links and informs personalized nutritional interventions.

Dietary and Metabolite Influences on the Epigenome

EWAS Curation

We conducted a PubMed search to identify EWASs on dietary patterns, specific foods, and diet-related metabolites using the following terms: (EWAS OR “epigenome-wide association study” OR “epigenomic”) AND (diet OR dietary OR intake OR food OR nutrition OR “dietary patterns”) AND (metabolite OR metabolomics OR “DNA methylation” OR epigenetic OR epi genomics).

The search identified 700 manuscripts in PubMed, covering human studies published between 2006 and 2025 (as of February 24, 2025). To ensure methodological consistency, we excluded studies published before 2011, prior to the launch of the Illumina HumanMethylation450K BeadChip [29], leaving 427 eligible studies. We focused on 30 of these studies that met the following criteria (Table 1): 1) Investigated associations between dietary patterns or specific foods and DNAm in human subjects; or 2) Investigated associations between diet-related metabolites and DNAm in human subjects; and 3) Utilized current-generation DNAm arrays (HumanMethylation450K or HumanMethylation EPIC); and 4) Provided sufficient detail on study population, tissue source (eg, maternal whole blood, infant cord blood), and dietary exposures or diet-related metabolite.

Table 1. A List of Studies with Significant EWAS Findings.

Category Study Author – Year Cohorts Sample Size Epigenetic tissue type Exposure Statistical Model # of Significant CpGs
CpG as Dependent vs. Independent Covariates Adjusted For

Dietary Intake Karabegović et al. (Nat. Commun. 2021) Rotterdam Study (Netherlands), FHS (United States), ALSPAC (UK), Atheroscleorosis Risk in Communities Study (United States), Cardiovascular Health Study (United States), KORA (Germany), TwinsUK (UK), European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (Italy), AIRWAVE (Great Britain), ESTHER Study (Germany) 15 789 Whole blood Coffee and tea consumption Dependent Age, sex, smoking status (never, former, and current), white blood cells (either measured or imputed based on the Houseman algorithm) as fixed effects, and technical covariates as random effects to control for batch effects, additionally adjusted for body mass index (BMI, kg/m2) and alcohol consumption (g/day) 11*
Dietary Intake Ma et al. (Circ Genom Precis Med. 2021) Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study, the Framingham Heart Study, the Genetics of Lipid Lowering Drugs and Diet Network, the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis, the Normative Aging Study, and the Lothian Birth Cohort 6662 (European subset) Whole blood Mediterranean-style diet score (MDS) and the Alternative Healthy Eating Index score (AHEI) Dependent Age, sex, total energy intake, smoking status, physical activity, and BMI. 30*
Dietary Intake Schellhas et al., (Epigenetics, 2023) Six European studies (ALSPAC, BiB, Generation R Study, MoBa Norway, INMA, EDEN Mother-Child Cohort) 3725 mother-child pairs Cord Blood Maternal caffeine intake Dependent Maternal age, maternal BMI (kg/m²), maternal education (ordinal measure), maternal smoking during pregnancy (binary), parity (binary), estimated cord blood cell proportions (Houseman method), 20 surrogate variables for technical variation, and ethnicity (if applicable).Sensitivity models also adjusted for gestational age at birth. 1*
Dietary Intake Ek et al. (Hum. Mol. Genet. 2017) Four European cohorts (NSPHS, PIVUS, HWFS, EGM) 3096 Whole Blood Coffee and tea consumption Dependent Age, sex, smoking status, estimated white blood cell proportions (CD8T, CD4T, NK cells, B cells, monocytes, and granulocytes). 2*
Dietary Intake Keshawarz et al. (Epigenetics. 2023) FHS Offspring, FHS Third-Generation, UK TWINS UK, KORA, YFS, Generation 2 of the Austrailia-based Raine Study, Rotterdam Study, ARIC Study 11 866 Whole blood Vitamin C and E intake Dependent Age, sex, body mass index (BMI), daily caloric intake, estimated blood cell type proportions (CD4+, CD8+, NK cells, monocytes, eosinophils), smoking status (never, former, current), alcohol consumption, and technical covariates. A secondary model adjusted for physical activity and diet quality. 19
Dietary Intake Mandaviya et al., (Am J Clin Nutr, 2019) 10 European studies (Rotterdam Study, LLS, CODAM, InCHIANTI, YFS, TwinsUK, RHS, GOLDN, ARIC, CHS) 5841 Whole Blood Dietart folate and vitamin B-12 Dependent Age, sex, BMI, differential white blood cell counts (measured or imputed), smoking status, physical activity, B-vitamin supplement use, alcohol intake, coffee intake, and technical covariates (e.g., array number, position). 6
Dietary Intake Domínguez-Barragán et al., (Eur J Prev Cardiol, 2023) 4 European Studies (REGICOR, FOS USA, Womens Health Initiative, AIRWAVE) 5274 Whole Blood 3 diet quality scores Dependent Age, sex, total energy intake (kcal/day), smoking status (never, former, current), estimated blood cell counts (CD8T, CD4T, NK cells, B cells, monocytes, granulocytes), cohort-specific surrogate variables for technical and biological variation, ethnicity (in WHI only), and batch/chip effects (in AIRWAVE). A second model additionally adjusted for BMI (kg/m²). 18*
Dietary Intake Do et al. (Int J Epidemiol. 2021) WHI, TwinksUK 4926 Whole blood Diet quality Dependent Cell composition, chip number, chip location, study characteristics, principal components of genetic relatedness, age, smoking status, race/ethnicity, and body mass index (BMI). 24
Dietary Intake Lecorguillé et al., (J Nutr, 2023) Lifeways Cross-Generation Cohort Study (Ireland) 244 mother-child pairs & 130 father-child pairs Cord blood Parental diet quality Dependent Child sex, parental smoking status, batch effect (sample plate), estimated cell-type proportions (buccal epithelial cells, B cells, granulocytes, natural killer cells), maternal age, education level, parity, birthweight, maternal BMI, gestational age at birth, and energy intake (for DASH models only). 2*
Dietary Intake Laurado-Pont et al., (Clin Epigenetics, 2025) Four European studies (HELIX, Generation XXI, ALSPAC, and Generation R) 3152 children Whole Blood Ultra-processed food consumption Dependent Child age, sex, ethnicity (or HELIX sub-cohort), maternal age, maternal early-pregnancy BMI, maternal smoking status, maternal education level, child BMI, child sedentary behavior (physical inactivity), and fruit and vegetable intake. 0
Dietary Intake Hellbach et al., (Eur J Nutr 2022) KORA FF4, TwinsUK, and Leiden Longevity Study 2293 Whole blood 37 dietary exposures Dependent Sex, age, age², BMI, BMI², total energy intake, alcohol intake (where applicable), smoking status, estimated white-blood-cell proportions, and methylation batch/plate (plus surrogate variables in KORA). 49
Dietary Intake Küpers et al. (Diabetes Care 2022) ALSPAC (UK), Generation R Study (Netherlands, INMA (Spain) 2003 mother-child pairs Cord blood Maternal dietary glycemic index and load Dependent Age, sex, BMI, smoking status, white-blood-cell proportions, technical batch effects, physical activity, total energy intake, estrogen-therapy use, and PUFA supplement intake. 3*
Dietary Intake Lange de la Luna et al., (Clin Epigenetics, 2024) KORA FF4 study (N = 1354) and LLS (N = 448) 1802 Whole blood up to 8 dietary fatty acid intake Dependent Age, sex, body mass index (BMI), smoking status (current/former/never), white blood cell proportions (monocytes, basophils, eosinophils, neutrophils, lymphocytes), sample plate number (batch), physical activity, total energy intake, estrogen-therapy use, and PUFA supplement intake. 3*
Dietary Intake Ott et al., (Diabetes Care, 2023) Five European studies (INMA, Leipzig Atherobesity Chidldhood Cohort, The LIFE Child Study, TEENDIAB, Northern Finland Birth Cohort), Raine Study Gen2 (Austrailia) 1187 children/adolescents Whole blood Dietary Glycemic Index and Glycemic Load Dependent Age, sex, parental education level, smoking, total energy intake, blood cell–type proportions, technical batch variables (e.g. plate or array), and any cohort-specific covariates (e.g. study centre). 1
Dietary Intake El Sharkawy et al. (Epigenetics 2024) CHOP Trail (Germany, Beligum, Italy, Poland, and Spain), Generation R Study (Netherlands) 1183 children Whole Blood Animal and plant protein intake during infancy Dependent Child sex, study centre (Nancy vs Poitiers), maternal age at delivery, smoking during pregnancy (never, 1–9 cigarettes/day, ≥ 10 cigarettes/day), gestational age, batch/plate effects, estimated placental cell-type proportions, surrogate variables (SVA), and vitamin supplementation before and during pregnancy. 4
Dietary Intake Küpers et al (Epigenetics. 2022) ALSPAC, Generation R Study, INMA, Healthy Start, Project Viva 2802 mother-child pairs Cord blood Adherence to the Mediterranean diet Dependent Child sex, maternal educational level, maternal age, maternal smoking, maternal body mass index, maternal total energy intake, batch (technical), estimated cell-type proportions 1*
Dietary Intake Lecorguillé et al. (Epigenetics 2021) EDEN mother-child (France) 573 mother-child pairs Placental tissue Dietary patterns (‘varied and balanced diet,’ ‘vegetarian tendency,’ and ‘bread and starchy food’) Dependent Child sex, maternal age at delivery, study centre (Poitiers vs Nancy), smoking during pregnancy (none / 1–9 cigarettes / ≥ 10 cigarettes per day), gestational age at birth, batch (array plate), estimated placental cell-type composition (ReFACTor PCs), surrogate variables (SVA), vitamin supplementation before/during pregnancy 0*
Dietary Intake Ramaker et al. (J Gerontol A. 2022) CALERIETM Trial (United States) 197 Whole blood Calorie restriction (CR) over 12 and 24 months Dependent Age, sex, body-mass-index stratum (22.0–24.9 vs. 25.0–27.9 kg/m²), study site, genetic-ancestry principal components 1–3, estimated blood-cell proportions (monocytes, neutrophils, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, natural-killer cells, B cells), EPIC-array control-probe principal components 1–7 0
Metabolites Costeira et al. (Clin Epigenetics 2023) Two European studies (TwinsUK, KORA) 3358 Whole blood 18 metabolites were associated with B vitamin intakes Dependent Age, smoking status during pregnancy, estimated blood-cell proportions, ancestry (as a random intercept) 16*
Metabolites Joubert et al., (Nat Commun, 2016) Two European studies (MoBa, Generation R Study) 1988 Cord blood Maternal plasma folate Dependent Maternal age, maternal education level, smoking during pregnancy, parity, methylation-array batch, array position. 48*
Metabolites Battram et al., (bioRxiv, 2020) Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (UK) 940 mother-child pairs Cord blood Maternal plasma metabolites Dependent Age, top 10 ancestry principal components, and estimated cell-type proportions (CD8+ and CD4+ T cells, B cells, monocytes, natural killer cells, and granulocytes). 0
Metabolites Bargas et al., (Epigenomics, 2023) EPIPREG (Oslo, Norway) 823 Whole blood Maternal serum folate Dependent Age, smoking status, estimated blood cell proportions (CD8+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, NK cells, B cells, monocytes, granulocytes), ancestry (random intercept in cross-ancestry EWAS). 3
Metabolites Sayols-Baixeras et al. (Hum. Mol. Genet. 2016) REGICOR (Spain), Framingham Offspring Study (US) 3187 Whole blood Serum lipid levels (total cholesterol, LDL-C, HDL-C, triglycerides) Independent Age, sex, smoking status (current/former/never), estimated white-blood-cell proportions (CD8+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, NK cells, B cells, monocytes, granulocytes), array number, array positon 13*
Metabolites Irvin et al., (Circ, 2014) GOLDN Study, FHS Offpsring Cohort 2252 Whole blood Fasting very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides Dependent Age, sex, study site, methylation PC1, PC2, PC3, PC4 (to adjust for cell-purity), family kinship (random effect) 4*
Metabolites Braun et al., (Clin Epigenetics, 2017) Rotterdam Study (Netherlands) 1485 Whole blood Blood lipid levels (total cholesterol, LDL-C, HDL-C, triglycerides) Dependent Sex, age, smoking status (current/former/never), estimated white blood cell proportions (CD8+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, NK cells, B cells, monocytes, granulocytes), array number, array position. 5*
Metabolites Lai et al. (J. Lipid Res. 2016) GOLDN Study 979 Whole blood Triglyceride response to a high-fat meal Dependent Sex, age, study site, the first four methylation-based principal components (to adjust for CD4+ T-cell heterogeneity), and family kinship (modelled as a random effect). 4*
Metabolites Tindula et al., (Environ Epigenet. 2019) Center for the Health Assessment of Mothers and Children of Salinas cohort (US) 81 mother-child pairs Cord blood 92 maternal lipid plasma metabolites Dependent Child sex, batch (450K BeadChip batch), estimated proportions of cord-blood white blood cell types (granulocytes, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, B cells, monocytes, NK cells, nucleated red blood cells) 4*
Metabolites Petersen et al., (Hum Mol Genet, 2014) KORA cohort (Germany) 1814 Whole blood 649 blood metabolites Independent Age, sex, body mass index (BMI), white blood cell count (WBC), three SNPs within ±5 Mb of each CpG site (in secondary models) 20*
Metabolites Gomez-Alonso et al., (Clin Epigenetics. 2021) KORA F4 study (N = 1662) and replicated the results in the LOLIPOP, NFBC1966, and YFS cohorts (N = 3752) 1662 Whole blood 147 serum metabolites Independent Age, sex, smoking status, oral contraceptive use, first 22 principal components of DNA methylation data (non-genetic), cis-meQTLs, metaboQTLs, erythrocytes, granulocytes, basophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, and thrombocytes. 16
Metabolites Wu et al., (Clin Epigenetics. 2024) LifeLines-DEEP cohort (Netherland) 693 Whole blood 1183 plasma metabolites Independent Age, sex, smoking status, oral contraceptive use, first 22 principal components of methylation data (non-genetic), cis-meQTLs, metaboQTLs, erythrocytes, granulocytes, basophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, thrombocytes. 5

* Significance threshold using Bonferroni correction p < 0.05, otherwise FDR correction p < 0.05

Data Extraction and Synthesis

For each study included, we extracted the dietary outcomes, the number of significant CpG signals, characteristics of the study population (eg, mothers, offspring), sample size, the source of DNAm data (eg, whole blood, cord blood, and array used), and details on the statistical models (Table 1). Due to the uneven sample sizes across studies, significant CpG associations were identified using each study’s multiple testing correction: either a false discovery rate (FDR) or Bonferroni, based on the primary analysis at α = 0.05. When both were reported, we retained CpGs based on the more stringent Bonferroni correction. Whenever replication was performed, we extracted only replicated signals. For each identified signal, we extracted the CpG site, chromosome, genomic position, mapped gene, and associated outcomes (Tables S1 and S2).

Among the 18 studies focused on diet, 15 reported significant findings. Sample sizes varied widely (n=197 to n=15 789), ranging from small cohort studies (hundreds) to large population-based meta-analyses (tens of thousands). Many studies (n=5) examined maternal diet and its relationship with newborn cord blood DNAm, while others (n=13) explored diet associations in the general population. The primary dietary features studied included essential vitamins (eg, folate and vitamins C, E, and B12), animal and plant protein, maternal dietary glycemic index and load, dietary fatty acids, overall diet quality, tea and coffee consumption, and specific dietary patterns (eg, calorie-restricted high-fat, plant-based, omnivorous, Western, and Mediterranean diet). Emerging trends, including the impact of ultra-processed foods on DNAm, were also noted.

Among 12 diet-related metabolite EWAS studies, 11 reported significant associations. Sample sizes varied (n=81 to n=3358), though comparatively smaller than diet EWASs. Five studies reported DNAm impacted lipid-related metabolites, while one study found significant associations of DNAm with phospholipids [30-34]. Three investigations focused on the effects of maternal plasma metabolites on fetal DNAm in cord blood, all reporting significant results [35,36]. The remaining six studies focused on either specific metabolites, such as folate and metabolites associated with vitamin B intake, or a comprehensive scan of all metabolites on a panel [35-40].

In the four studies that did not report significant findings, we identified several recurring themes. First, two diet EWASs with the smallest sample sizes [41,42] were unable to detect specific CpGs associated with the targeted dietary exposures; however, they did observe relevant functional enrichment among the top signals. Second, some dietary phenotypes may require further refinement—for example, ultra-processed food intake [43], which may not be adequately captured by current assessment methods. Third, the one metabolomic EWAS [44] applied stringent corrections for all pairwise comparisons between metabolites and CpGs, which reduced statistical power.

Dietary Exposures and Epigenetic Changes

Our analysis reveals several CpG sites with overlapping associations across diverse dietary exposures (Figure 2 and Table S1). Identifying multiple exposures that map to CpGs in the same gene provides strong evidence supporting an association with dietary signals. In dietary EWASs, we found nine such signals (Table S1), the majority of which are specific to whole blood DNAm. The most robust signal is at cg03084350 (PLCD1), independently identified in three separate studies, on the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet, Vitamin C and E intake, and poor diet quality [45-47]. In the DASH diet and Vitamin C/E intake studies, lower methylation or hypomethylation at CpG sites mapped to PLCD1 was observed with increasing intake, whereas the poor diet quality study reported higher methylation or hypermethylation. The convergence of these findings highlights common nutritional features captured across dietary exposures, particularly the nutrient-dense composition of the DASH diet, which reflects overall higher diet quality and greater intake of antioxidants such as vitamins C and E. Altogether, these findings suggest DNAm may serve as a molecular signature of antioxidant-rich, high-quality diets.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Common CpG Sites Associated with Multiple Dietary Exposures. This figure summarizes the significant CpG–diet associations identified in studies from Table 1. Each row corresponds to a specific dietary exposure (eg, AHEI, cream, butter), while blue dots mark individual CpG sites that show evidence of association with that exposure. Only CpGs that are associated with more than one exposure are shown to highlight shared epigenetic signals. To the right of each row, a horizontal bar represents the total number of shared CpG associations for that exposure. The bars help summarize the relative density of shared epigenetic signals across different exposures.

Meanwhile, cg18181703 in SOCS3 showed associations with both the Alternative Healthy Eating Index (AHEI) and a Mediterranean diet pattern in two large independent studies with no sample overlap [48,49]. Similarly, multiple CpGs in the AHRR gene was observed in two independent contexts (Table S1): Mediterranean diet and habitual coffee/tea consumption [49,50]. Finally, the COL24A1 gene (cg05781609) was identified in two independent studies, one related to butter intake [51] and another associated with poor diet quality [52].

In contrast, several signals were confined to a single study. For example, cg27344289 (FLJ41603) appears solely in a study on nuts‑seeds intake; notably, it was replicated twice within that study [51]. Similarly, cg15928106 and cg20228731 (FLJ43663) are detected only within one study on habitual coffee and tea consumption, despite multiple occurrences within the same cohort [50].

Diet-related Metabolites and Epigenetic Changes

Ten robust signals were identified in the studies, which included CpGs mapped to the following genes: PHGDH, TXNIP, DHCR24, SCD, CPT1A, SREBF1, SLC1A5, SLC7A11, LOC100132354, and ABCG1 (Table S2). We did not observe overlapping signals across whole blood and cord blood EWASs.

The most abundant epigenetic signal identified in the review was mapped to the ATP-binding cassette transporter G1 gene (ABCG1), which was found in six of the EWAS studies. The most robust CpG site was the cg06500161 in ABCG1, present in four EWAS studies using whole blood studies, and was associated with triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and C16 Sphingomyelin (SM C16:0; Table S2) [30,34,38,40]. Two of the studies reported hypermethylation at cg06500161 to increase TG levels and decrease HDL-C levels, a well-known metabolic pattern (Table S2) [30,34]. Additionally, hypermethylation at cg06500161 was reported to decrease SM C16:0, a sphingolipid that is largely present in HDL, though this was only identified in one study (Table S2) [40]. Another study found associations between TG and cg06500161 in ABCG1; interestingly, they found that TG may drive methylation, suggesting the possible usage of ABCG1 as a biomarker for lipid profiling [38]. This is also supported by previous studies, which have also illustrated the role of ABCG1 in mediating lipid homeostasis [53]. Moreover, cg27243685 in ABCG1 was represented in two studies (Table S2) [30,38]. In one study, hypermethylation at this site was similarly associated with increased TG and decreased HDL-C levels, while the other study further linked it to increased risk of obesity.

Two additional robust CpG signals were mapped to the carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1A gene (CPT1A), at cg00574958 and cg17058475, identified in three separate whole blood EWASs (Table S2) [32-34]. Hypermethylation at both CpG sites was associated with decreased TG and very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C). This is consistent with the role of CPT1A in regulating lipid transport and serves as a potential biomarker for lipid-related diseases [33,38,54]. There were several other signals in the CPT1A gene associated with lipid-related metabolites, but they were only identified in one study, which requires further validation (Table S2) [33].

TG was also associated with methylation at cg11024682, mapped to the sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1 gene (SREBF1) in four whole blood EWASs (Table S2) [30,32,34,38]. Hypermethylation at cg11024682 was shown to decrease SREBF1 gene expression and is associated with increasing TG metabolite levels and obesity, consistent with the role of SREBF1 as a key regulator of lipogenesis [55]. Hypomethylation at cg11024682 and increased expression of SREBF1 was associated with higher levels of HDL-C [30], resulting in a metabolic profile similar to that observed with CpG sites at the ABCG1 gene.

We also observed the same epigenetic signals mapping to multiple metabolites. For example, cg06690548 in the solute carrier family 7-member 11 gene (SLC7A11) was identified in four whole blood studies. Upon hypermethylation, studies reported decreased TG levels, obesity, sulfated steroid, and pyridoxate (Table S2) [30,37,38,40]. A similar effect has been observed at two CpG sites at the SLC1A5 gene, a member of the same transporter family, which may strengthen the reliability of these associations [37,40]. Another example was cg17901584 at the 24-dehydrocholesterol reductase gene (DHCR24), as reported in three separate studies [56-58]. Hypermethylation at cg17901584 was associated with increased HDL-C, decreased myocardial infarction (MI), and increased PC ae C36:5, a glycerophospholipid found in cell membranes (Table S2) [34,38,40]. Similarly, three studies identified hypermethylation at cg19693031 (TXNIP) was associated with a decrease in TG, diabetes risk, and Chylo-A (Table S2) [30,38,40].

Many epigenetic signals linked to diet-related metabolites were also driven by serum folate (vitamin B9) and vitamin B6, which have a key role in methylation processes [36]. Serum folate is correlated with dietary folate [59], which is found in green leafy vegetables or folic acid supplementation [60]. There were 51 CpG sites strongly associated with maternal folate in two EWAS studies, one based on infant cord blood and the other one maternal whole blood. but no signal overlap (Table S2) [36,61]. Another whole blood study reported 16 CpG sites linked to pipecolate, a metabolomic biomarker for vitamin B6 and folate intake, pyridoxate, a direct catabolic product of vitamin B6, and docosahexaenoate (DHA), an omega-3 fatty acid high in cold-water fish [37]. Two studies reported a signal at cg03440556 with stearoyl-CoA desaturase (SCD), where one study found hypomethylation to be associated with decreased DHA and another study found it associated with increased SCD (Table S2) [37,38].

Finally, three whole blood studies identified two signals at the phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase gene (PHGDH); however, they reported different outcomes. Hypermethylation at cg16246545 was reported to be associated with increased glycine and L-serine in one study while it was observed to be associated with decreased risk of obesity in another (Table S2) [38,39]. Hypermethylation at cg14476101 (PHGDH) was found to be associated with decreased 17beta-diol disulfate, a cholesterol molecule, and increased glycine and L-serine [39,40].

Identifying Overlapping Epigenetic Signals in Diet and Metabolite EWAS

We summarized significant CpG-diet related associations in Figure 2, showing the 28 CpGs that were associated with more than one exposure across 11 dietary exposures and 18 metabolites. Of these 28 CpGs, only nine were shared between diet and diet-related metabolites, while the remaining 19 were shared within diet exposures or within metabolites only. Across all exposures, habitual coffee/tea consumption and triglycerides showed significant associations with the largest number of unique CpGs.

CpG Sites Shared Between Diet and Metabolites

Nine CpG sites mapping to eight genes overlapped between diet- and metabolite-associated whole blood EWASs (Table 2). For example, cg00574958 in the CPT1A gene was associated with both high-fat diet intake and lipid-related metabolites in whole blood samples, including VLDL-C and TG. A similar pattern was observed for cg11024682 (SREBF1) and cg06500161 (ABCG1), which were associated with both high-fat diet and lipid-related metabolites, including HDL-C and TG. HDL-C is found in foods containing omega-3 fatty acid such as salmon and flaxseeds [62]. In contrast, cg02650017 (PHOSPHO1) showed an overlap between plant-based diets and HDL-C levels. Epigenetic modifications at PHOSPHO1 might be a key link between plant-based diets and improved lipid profiles. Similarly, there was an overlap between Mediterranean diet and lowered TG and Chylo-A levels at CpG site, cg19693031 (TXNIP), also associated with decreased risk for type 2 diabetes (T2D) and cardiovascular disease (CVD). This further reinforces the idea that Mediterranean diet promotes a healthier lipid profile, potentially mediated by epigenetic mechanisms.

Table 2. Overlapping Epigenetic Signals Across Diet and Diet-related Metabolites.

Associated CpG Mapped Gene Association with
Diet Metabolite Diseases or markers of disease

cg14476101 PHGDH Habitual coffee and tea consumption A-diol, Glycine, L-Serine Obesity, Type 2 Diabetes, Blood pressure
cg00574958 CPT1A High-fat diet VLDL-C, VLDL-A, TG, ApoB Lipoproteins Lipid-related disorder, BMI, obesity, type 2 diabetes, MI
cg02650017 PHOSPHO1 Healthy plant-based diet HDL-C Type 2 Diabetes, Crohn’s disease
cg05575921 AHRR Mediterranean diet, habitual coffee and tea consumption 4-vinylphenol sulphate CHD, PTSD
cg03636183 F2RL3 Habitual coffee and tea consumption 4-vinylphenol sulphate Lung cancer, mortality
cg06126421 Habitual coffee and tea consumption 4-vinylphenol sulphate Lung cancer
cg09935388 GFI1 Habitual coffee and tea consumption 4-vinylphenol sulphate Lung cancer
cg11250194 FADS2 Alternative Helathy Eating Index Poly-unsaturated fatty acid TG concentration
cg19693031 TXNIP Mediterranean diet Triglyceride and Chylo-A Type 2 Diabetes, CVD

Another unexpected overlap emerged in CpG sites linked to both habitual coffee and tea consumption and 4-vinylphenol sulphate, a metabolite associated with smoking exposure. cg05575921 (AHRR), cg03636183 (F2RL3, GFI1), cg06126421 (HDAC4), and cg09935388 (GFI1) all exhibited methylation changes in response to both dietary intake and smoking-related metabolites. These CpGs have been well-documented in smoking exposure studies, yet their presence in relation to coffee and tea consumption suggests either a potentially shared pathway or confounding [63]. While one possible explanation is that polyphenols or other bioactive compounds in coffee and tea influence detoxification pathways similarly to tobacco exposure, the more likely explanation is confounding as previous studies have found a positive association between smoking and caffeine consumption [64].

Collectively, these overlapping CpG sites illustrate that dietary patterns and metabolite levels do not operate independently but instead influence DNAm in ways that reflect broader metabolic processes. Indeed, we found moderate enrichment of KEGG pathways [65,66], in fatty acid metabolism and PPAR signaling pathways (Figure 3A; Table S3; adjusted p-value < 0.1). Additional pathways include alpha-linolenic acid metabolism, biosynthesis of unsaturated fatty acids, glycine/serine/threonine metabolism, and fatty acid degradation, though each represented by single genes. This suggests that CpGs responding to both dietary exposures and metabolite levels are concentrated in core lipid metabolic processes. These converging findings also strengthen the biological plausibility of diet–epigenome interactions and highlight candidate pathways for further mechanistic and experimental investigation.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

KEGG pathway enrichment analysis for genes identified from nutritional EWASs. Dot plots show the top enriched KEGG pathways based on gene ratio identified in (A) both dietary and metabolite EWASs, or Table 2 and (B) metabolite EWASs, or Table S2. The x-axis represents the Gene Ratio (the proportion of input genes associated with each pathway). Dot color indicates the adjusted p-value (p.adjust), with red denoting higher significance. Dot size reflects the number of genes mapped to each pathway. Pathways such as Fatty acid metabolism and PPAR signaling pathway were enriched in both groups, whereas unique enrichment patterns (eg, Insulin resistance) highlight additional biological processes linked to epigenetic signals of metabolites.

Distinct Epigenetic Signatures and Plausibility

Many CpG sites appear in only one study, making it unclear whether they reflect true biological effects or spurious signals. The full list of CpGs identified is available in Tables S1 and S2. While mapped genes from diet-specific CpGs were not enriched in any pathways, the metabolite-unique signals show a broader metabolic profile, retaining the fatty acid metabolism and PPAR signaling pathways but adding energy regulation (AMPK signaling) and disease-related pathways (alcoholic liver disease, insulin resistance; Figure 3B). The AMPK pathway enrichment is particularly notable as it represents cellular energy sensing. The inclusion of pathological pathways like alcoholic liver disease and insulin resistance suggests these metabolite-unique CpGs may be more directly linked to metabolic dysfunction.

While some methylation changes align with expected biological pathways, while others suggest confounding or methodological limitations. Inconsistencies, such as disease-associated methylation changes appearing in protective dietary patterns, indicate lifestyle factors like smoking, medication use, or socioeconomic status may be influencing associations rather than diet itself. Further, recent studies highlight the role of dietary fats, particularly saturated and trans fats, suggesting that their health effects depend on dietary context rather than absolute intake [67].

Notably, some expected overlaps were absent. For instance, since nuts and vegetable oils are key components of plant-based and Mediterranean diets, one might anticipate convergence between signals from these specific exposures and those from broader plant-based dietary patterns. However, CpG sites associated with nuts‑seeds do not overlap with signal for healthy plant-based diets or with the plant-oils signal. This lack of convergence suggests that the methylation profiles for individual dietary components remain distinct from those reflecting overall dietary patterns, potentially reflecting the complexity of diet, methodological differences across studies, or confounding from related lifestyle factors. Additionally, the lack of concordance may be due in part to false-positive findings in the literature, arising from limited sample sizes or imprecise dietary recall in some studies [68].

Several associations likely reflect residual confounding rather than direct effects of diet. For example, CpG sites such as cg05575921 (AHRR) and cg03636183 (F2RL3) are robustly associated with tobacco exposure [69,70], yet they appear in studies of coffee and tea intake, behaviors often correlated with smoking [71,72]. While smoking status was adjusted for in both instances, DNAm changes due to light or past smoking can still be detected at these CpGs [73]. In this case, residual confounding may persist due to unmeasured variation in smoking intensity, duration, or recency, without quantitative metrics (eg, pack-years, cotinine levels) or methylation-derived smoking scores.

While many studies attempt rigorous adjustment (Table 1), there is considerable heterogeneity in covariate selection, statistical modeling, and tissue sources, limiting comparability and interpretability across findings. Moreover, only a handful of studies conduct sensitivity analyses to explore potential mediation or bi-directional relationships. We highlight the evolution in confounder adjustment practices across the literature, noting greater thoroughness of covariates included in recent dietary-related EWASs. Covariate adjustment consistently included age, sex, smoking status, and tissue-specific estimated cell proportions, with many also adjusting for body mass index (BMI) and total energy intake. However, there was notable heterogeneity in the inclusion of lifestyle, dietary, and socioeconomic factors, as well as in the handling of technical variation. Recent studies have improved in incorporating ancestry principal components and batch correction methods, but gaps remain in adjusting for metabolic traits and comprehensive lifestyle exposures.

Health Implications of Diet-Metabolite Epigenome Interactions

Evaluation of Association with Diseases

To evaluate the broader relevance of CpG sites associated with dietary exposures, we mapped the identified diet-related CpGs to the EWAS catalog [44] and EWAS Atlas [74] by systematically searching for putative associations with metabolic, cardiovascular, and other disease-related traits. EWAS Catalog and EWAS Atlas are publicly available databases of published and unpublished EWASs. To capture potential signals that may not meet the strict epigenome-wide significance threshold (α = 3.6 × 10⁻⁸) [75], we applied a lenient yet more stringent threshold than the suggested threshold for the 450K array (α = 2.4 × 10⁻⁷), setting our cutoff at p < 1 × 10⁻⁷. This reflects the exploratory nature of our study, allowing for the identification of biologically plausible overlaps between diet-related CpGs and disease traits that may otherwise be missed.

Metabolic and Cardiovascular Disease Risk

The majority of the CpGs identified in metabolite EWASs show cardiovascular associations due to the large number of signals from lipid-related metabolites, see Table S2. For example, CpGs at the ABCG1 gene are associated with elevated triglyceride levels and reduced HDL-C, is a hallmark of insulin resistance and is commonly observed in individuals with metabolic syndrome (MetS), T2D, and diets high in refined carbohydrates. Indeed, we found CpGs at the ABCG1 gene are associated with MetS, BMI, and waist circumference, reinforcing its regulatory role in controlling TG and HDL-C. In fact, it has been demonstrated recently that individuals with lower methylation at the ABCG1 gene experienced greater reductions in body fat distribution after an average-protein diet intervention [76]. Hypermethylation at CpGs in the following genes: PHGDH, DHCR24, CPT1A, and SLC7A11, were linked to decreased BMI and waist circumference. These are consistent with the observation that hypermethylation at these sites decreases harmful lipids and increases HDL-C, suggesting a protective metabolic effect. In contrast, hypermethylation at SREBF1 is likely positively associated with BMI and waist circumference, consistent with its potential role in lipid accumulation and the risk of cardiovascular-related diseases. DNAm at TXNIP may be associated with a reduced risk of MetS, as multiple studies have reported it to be associated with decreased lipid levels. Interestingly, SLC1A5 was linked to BMI, although there is limited evidence supporting a role for DNAm at this site in lipid regulation. Given the close link between lipid metabolism and adiposity, epigenetic markers that influence lipid levels are often expected to correlate with BMI, making this association noteworthy but not yet mechanistically clear.

Further, CpGs in the PHGDH gene that are associated with habitual coffee/tea consumption and multiple metabolites were also reported to have associations with blood pressure and hypertensive diseases. Circulating amino acids and DNAm levels at PHGDH were also found in previous studies to be negatively correlated with BMI [77], further supporting the role of PHGDH in regulating both protein-based and fat-based metabolites. It also highlights PHGDH’s protective role against metabolic disorders such as obesity and T2D. It has also been recently interrogated as a potential epigenetic marker to explore gene–diet interaction, and there is evidence that baseline DNAm at the PHGDH gene may modify how individuals respond to dietary interventions for blood pressure control [78].

Several epigenetic markers identified in our study were consistently associated with metabolic traits, irrespective of the specific dietary exposure (Table S1). For example, PLCD1 (cg03084350) was linked to metabolic outcomes such as altered cholesterol parameters and indicators of cardiovascular risk. cg20761853 (TIMP2) is another example; it appears in association with Vitamin C/E intake and the DASH diet, and in both cases, the associated traits point to improved metabolic homeostasis). We found healthier diets tend to produce a hypomethylated profile at TIMP2, which is associated with better lipid and glucose regulation. Conversely, markers like SLC16A3 (cg01944226 and cg08429256) consistently show hypermethylation in settings linked to poor metabolic outcomes, such as MetS and T2D. Likewise, AHRR (cg05575921) and COL24A1—although originally noted for overlapping dietary exposures—are associated with adverse metabolic traits, such as elevated triglyceride levels, impaired glucose regulation, and increased inflammatory markings [79].

Diet-induced epigenetic changes have been implicated in several other metabolic diseases. In NAFLD, high-fat and high-sugar diets may alter methylation in genes regulating lipid storage and liver inflammation [80,81]. Together, these relationships suggest that diet may shape disease risk through epigenetic regulation across multiple metabolic pathways. Together, these relationships suggest that diet may shape disease risk through epigenetic regulation across multiple metabolic pathways.

Chronic Diseases and Others

Cord blood DNAm for cg23291200, cg19870717, cg16613938, within adenomatous polyposis coli 2 (APC2), were found associated with maternal plasma folate [82]. APC2 is known to be involved in brain development and cancer etiology as a tumor suppressor gene [83]. Additionally, the same study observed various CpGs mapping to metabotropic glutamate receptor 8 (GRM8), which is linked with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder. This further reinforces folate’s role as an epigenetic marker for congenital disorders and possibly early indicators for developmental abnormalities.

Several epigenetic signals are reported to be associated with inflammatory and immune-related outcomes. ASPRV1 (cg01894508) is particularly notable as it is detected in studies of poor diet quality and lower Vitamin C/E intake [52,84]. Hypermethylation at ASPRV1 correlates with elevated C-reactive protein levels, systemic lupus erythematosus, and mild cognitive impairment. Similarly, while AHRR (cg05575921) is classically recognized as a smoking biomarker, it has also been detected in several diet-related EWASs [49,50]. Its repeated association with traits such as impaired lung function and cognitive decline (Table S1), both of which can be influenced by dietary inflammatory load, suggests that methylation at the AHRR gene may reflect broader environmental exposures related to inflammation. In addition, PRDX1 (cg19937480) is observed in relation to both docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) intake and high-polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) consumption [85]. Although DHA is a subclass of PUFA, the observation that PRDX1 appears consistently across studies assessing both specific (ie, DHA) and broader (ie, PUFA) intake patterns supports this CpG as a nutrient-responsive epigenetic site linked to myopia risk. Together, these overlapping signals, where multiple, distinct dietary assessments yield similar health outcomes reinforce the biological plausibility that these epigenetic modifications are integral to the diet–disease relationship.

Knowledge Gaps and Future Directions

Despite advances in diet-metabolome-epigenome research, key gaps remain in study designs, data sources, and translational impact. Below, we highlight some limitations and suggest directions for future research.

Need for Longitudinal Studies to Capture Temporal Dynamics

Longitudinal studies are necessary to capture the dynamic and temporal effects of diet on epigenetic modifications and metabolic processes [86]. Longer exposure periods are often needed to detect consistent and biologically meaningful patterns in observational studies, whereas metabolites and epigenetics are dynamic. For example, birth weight epigenetic signatures diminish by age 5, no longer associated with later life body weight [87,88]. With the increasing number of CpGs linked to specific dietary exposures, methylation profile scores [89] may prove useful for monitoring the cumulative epigenetic impact of dietary exposure over time, as opposed to epigenetic aging [90], which reflects global patterns and is more susceptible to lifestyle factors beyond diet. Longitudinal studies will help distinguish transient metabolic changes from epigenetic alterations that contribute to chronic disease risk, metabolic health, and aging-related processes.

Expanding Multi-Omics Approaches for Causal Insights

While diet-related metabolites have been suggested to be biomarkers of dietary intake, their reliability can be inconsistent due to multiple biological and environmental factors [91]. While some metabolites strongly reflect dietary consumption [92], others can be influenced by individual metabolism, gut microbiota composition, genetic variation, and lifestyle factors, leading to variability in their association with actual dietary intake [93]. To fully understand the role of metabolites in the diet-epigenome relationship, studies that simultaneously assess dietary intake, circulating metabolites, and DNAm are needed, allowing for robust mediation analyses that distinguish direct dietary effects from metabolite-driven epigenetic modifications. Further, as evidenced by the epigenetic signals associated with tea and coffee consumption, we observed overlap with previously reported signals for smoking. This highlights the need for caution when interpreting dietary EWAS findings, as such analyses remain susceptible to confounding factors, much like traditional epidemiological studies of diet.

A persistent limitation across nutritional EWASs is the inconsistent adjustment for key confounders, including smoking, BMI, physical activity, and socioeconomic status, and also DNAm specific confounds, such as cell compositions and batch effects. These variables can be correlated with dietary exposure and DNAm, complicating interpretation. For instance, our review found smoking-related CpGs such as cg05575921 (AHRR) appearing in studies of coffee and tea consumption, potentially reflecting behavioral confounding rather than dietary effects. Similarly, epigenetic changes at genes like ABCG1 and SREBF1, frequently linked to lipid metabolism and obesity, may reflect adiposity-driven changes if BMI were not adequately controlled. Standardized covariate adjustment procedures are needed to clarify whether diet plays a direct role in these methylation signatures.

Finally, there is growing evidence suggesting that certain metabolites can regulate epigenetic modifications [94], but much of it remains based on associations rather than definitive causal relationships. Emerging statistical approaches such as epigenome-wide Mendelian randomization [95] and causal inference models could help establish the causal role of epigenetic modifications in disease development. Multiple data layers, including diet, metabolomics, epigenomics, and perhaps transcriptomics and proteomics, will provide the foundation to identify biologically relevant pathways and explore causal mechanisms.

Addressing Tissue-Specificity in Diet-Epigenome Research

Another key gap in current research is the lack of tissue-specific investigations in nutritional EWAS. For instance, the role of maternal circulating metabolites in shaping DNAm in newborn (eg, cord blood) remains largely unexplored, yet it may serve as a key mediating mechanism in early-life health programming, aligning with the core principles of the Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DoHaD) framework [96-98]. Further, DNAm patterns in blood may not reflect changes occurring in metabolically active tissues [99], such as the liver, skeletal muscle, or adipose tissues. Future research should incorporate multi-tissue epigenetic profiling to determine whether diet-induced DNAm changes are systemic or tissue-specific – as was done for epigenetic clocks [88,100-105]. Finally, advances in liquid biopsy techniques [106] and single-cell resolution epigenetic analysis [107] may provide more targeted insights into diet-related epigenetic modifications in specific cell types.

Improving Ethnic Diversity in Nutritional EWAS

Another pressing need is to improve ethnic diversity in diet-metabolome-epigenome research. While some studies and meta-analyses have made efforts to include non-European populations, the majority of nutritional EWASs still come from White European cohorts. For example, dietary patterns rich in refined sugars, starches, or fiber may have distinct epigenetic effects across populations due to differences in insulin sensitivity, gut microbiota composition, and lipid metabolism. Expanding research to include ethnically diverse populations is needed to identify population-specific epigenetic and metabolic responses to diet and ensuring that dietary guidelines are inclusive and relevant across different genetic and cultural backgrounds.

Translating Diet-Epigenome Findings into Public Health and Precision Nutrition

Research triangulating diet-metabolome-epigenome is rapidly expanding; however, its clinical and public health translation remains limited. Key challenges include determining whether epigenetic biomarkers are reversible through diet and whether they can inform risk prediction or personalized nutrition. The majority of current studies focused on identifying CpG sites are strongly associated with both diet and metabolic outcomes, but few uses causal inference or randomized control trials [16,108,109]. Thus, the effectiveness of interventions (eg, dietary changes, supplements, lifestyle modifications) in altering disease trajectories remains to be established. Dietary intervention trials [110,111], incorporating epigenetic and metabolomic assessments, will be essential for determining whether modifying dietary intake can reverse adverse epigenetic changes and improve health outcomes.

Concluding Remarks

In this review, we identified nine diet-metabolome-epigenome associations and summarized the current state of EWASs literature on diet-related exposures. The shared diet-metabolite CpGs appear focused on fundamental fatty acid processing, while metabolite-unique signals extend into broader metabolic regulation and pathological states. Understanding how dietary exposures relate to epigenetic changes through metabolic pathways may inform future nutritional guidelines, though causal pathways remain to be validated. This area of research is also in synergy with the development of personalized nutrition, emphasizing the need to move beyond one-size-fits-all recommendations. Further progress would benefit from multi-omics data, ethnic, and genetic diversity to develop more inclusive, globally relevant nutritional guidelines.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Table 1

CpGs significantly associated with dietary intake.

yjbm_98_2_203_s01.xls (63KB, xls)
Supplementary Table 2

CpGs significantly associated with diet-related metabolites.

yjbm_98_2_203_s02.xls (57.5KB, xls)
Supplementary Table 3

Enriched KEGG Pathways for Diet and Metabolite-Associated CpG-Mapped Genes.

yjbm_98_2_203_s03.xls (39.5KB, xls)

Glossary

EWASs

Epigenome-wide association studies

DNAm

DNA methylation

5mC

5-methylcytosine

CVD

cardiovascular disease

BMI

body mass index

HDL-C

High-density lipoprotein cholesterol

VLDL-C

very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol

TG

triglycerides

T2D

type 2 diabetes

MetS

metabolic syndrome

DHA

high-dose docosahexaenoic acid

PUFA

polyunsaturated fatty acid

SCD

stearoyl-CoA desaturase

CpG

cytosine-phosphate-guanine

AHEI

Alternative Healthy Eating Index

References

  1. Scalbert A, Brennan L, Manach C, Andres-Lacueva C, Dragsted LO, Draper J, et al. The food metabolome: a window over dietary exposure [Internet]. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014. Jun;99(6):1286–308. [cited 2025 Apr 16] Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24760973/ 10.3945/ajcn.113.076133 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Norheim F, Gjelstad IM, Hjorth M, Vinknes KJ, Langleite TM, Holen T, et al. Molecular nutrition research: the modern way of performing nutritional science [Internet]. Nutrients. 2012. Dec;4(12):1898–944. [cited 2025 Apr 16] Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3546614/ 10.3390/nu4121898 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fraga CG, Croft KD, Kennedy DO, Tomás-Barberán FA. The effects of polyphenols and other bioactives on human health [Internet]. Food Funct. 2019. Feb;10(2):514–28. [cited 2025 Apr 16] Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30746536/ 10.1039/C8FO01997E [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Tian Y, Su L, Wang J, Duan X, Jiang X. Fruit and vegetable consumption and risk of the metabolic syndrome: a meta-analysis [Internet]. Public Health Nutr. 2018. Mar;21(4):756–65. [cited 2025 Apr 16] Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29151369/ 10.1017/S136898001700310X [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Koene RJ, Prizment AE, Blaes A, Konety SH. Shared risk factors in cardiovascular disease and cancer [Internet]. Circulation. 2016. Mar;133(11):1104–14. [cited 2025 Apr 16] Available from: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.020406 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.020406 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Shang X, Liu J, Zhu Z, Zhang X, Huang Y, Liu S, et al. Metabolomic age and risk of 50 chronic diseases in community-dwelling adults: A prospective cohort study [Internet]. Aging Cell. 2024. May;23(5):e14125. [cited 2025 Apr 16] Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38380547/ 10.1111/acel.14125 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lorenzo PM, Izquierdo AG, Rodriguez-Carnero G, Fernández-Pombo A, Iglesias A, Carreira MC, et al. Epigenetic Effects of Healthy Foods and Lifestyle Habits from the Southern European Atlantic Diet Pattern: A Narrative Review [Internet]. Adv Nutr. 2022. Oct;13(5):1725–47. [cited 2025 Apr 16] Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35421213/ 10.1093/advances/nmac038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Rakyan VK, Down TA, Balding DJ, Beck S. Epigenome-wide association studies for common human diseases [Internet]. Nat Rev Genet. 2011. Jul;12(8):529–41. [cited 2025 Apr 16] Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21747404/ 10.1038/nrg3000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Romero-Gómez M, Zelber-Sagi S, Trenell M. Treatment of NAFLD with diet, physical activity and exercise [Internet]. J Hepatol. 2017. Oct;67(4):829–46. [cited 2025 Apr 16] Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28545937/ 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.05.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mondal DD, Chakraborty U, Bera M, Ghosh S, Kar D. An overview of nutritional profiling in foods: bioanalytical techniques and useful protocols [Internet]. Front Nutr. 2023. Mar;10:1124409. [cited 2025 Mar 12] Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10070841/ 10.3389/fnut.2023.1124409 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Tiffon C. The Impact of Nutrition and Environmental Epigenetics on Human Health and Disease [Internet]. Int J Mol Sci. 2018. Nov;19(11):3425. [cited 2025 Apr 16] Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30388784/ 10.3390/ijms19113425 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Qiu S, Cai Y, Yao H, Lin C, Xie Y, Tang S, et al. Small molecule metabolites: discovery of biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy. 2023. Mar 20 [cited 2025 Apr 16];8(1):1–37. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41392-023-01399-3 10.1038/s41392-023-01399-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  13. Clish CB. Metabolomics: an emerging but powerful tool for precision medicine [Internet]. Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud. 2015. Oct;1(1):a000588. [cited 2025 Apr 16] Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4850886/ 10.1101/mcs.a000588 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Saoi M, Britz-McKibbin P. New Advances in Tissue Metabolomics: A Review [Internet]. Metabolites. 2021. Sep;11(10):672. [cited 2025 Apr 16] Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8541552/ 10.3390/metabo11100672 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Alegría-Torres JA, Baccarelli A, Bollati V. Epigenetics and lifestyle [Internet]. Epigenomics. 2011. Jun;3(3):267–77. [cited 2025 Jun 13] Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3752894/ 10.2217/epi.11.22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fitzgerald KN, Hodges R, Hanes D, Stack E, Cheishvili D, Szyf M, et al. Potential reversal of epigenetic age using a diet and lifestyle intervention: a pilot randomized clinical trial [Internet]. Aging (Albany NY). 2021. Apr;13(7):9419–32. [cited 2025 Mar 12] Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8064200/ 10.18632/aging.202913 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. McKay JA, Mathers JC. Diet induced epigenetic changes and their implications for health [Internet]. Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2011. Jun;202(2):103–18. [cited 2025 Mar 12] Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1748-1716.2011.02278.x 10.1111/j.1748-1716.2011.02278.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Choi SW, Friso S. Epigenetics: A New Bridge between Nutrition and Health. Adv Nutr. 2010. Nov;1(1):8–16. 10.3945/an.110.1004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Bailey RL. Overview of dietary assessment methods for measuring intakes of foods, beverages, and dietary supplements in research studies [Internet]. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2021. Aug;70:91–6. [cited 2025 Apr 16] Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8338737/ 10.1016/j.copbio.2021.02.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Liang S, Nasir RF, Bell-Anderson KS, Toniutti CA, O’Leary FM, Skilton MR. Biomarkers of dietary patterns: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials [Internet]. Nutr Rev. 2022. Jul;80(8):1856–95. [cited 2025 Mar 13] Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9263887/ 10.1093/nutrit/nuac009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Picó C, Serra F, Rodríguez AM, Keijer J, Palou A. Biomarkers of Nutrition and Health: New Tools for New Approaches [Internet]. Nutrients. 2019. May;11(5):1092. [cited 2025 Apr 16] Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6567133/ 10.3390/nu11051092 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ramzan F, Vickers MH, Mithen RF. Epigenetics, microRNA and Metabolic Syndrome: A Comprehensive Review. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:5047 [Internet]. 2021 May 10 [cited 2025 Apr 16];22(9):5047. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/22/9/5047/htm 10.3390/ijms22095047 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Brouwer-Brolsma EM, Brandl B, Buso ME, Skurk T, Manach C. Food intake biomarkers for green leafy vegetables, bulb vegetables, and stem vegetables: a review. Genes & Nutrition. 2020;15:1 [Internet]. 2020. Apr 9 [cited 2025 Apr 12];15(1):1–12. Available from: https://genesandnutrition.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12263-020-00667-z 10.1186/s12263-020-00667-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Wang Z, Long H, Chang C, Zhao M, Lu Q. Crosstalk between metabolism and epigenetic modifications in autoimmune diseases: a comprehensive overview. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2018;75:18 [Internet]. 2018. Jul 4 [cited 2025 Apr 16];75(18):3353–69. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00018-018-2864-2 10.1007/s00018-018-2864-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Suhre K, Zaghlool S. Connecting the epigenome, metabolome and proteome for a deeper understanding of disease. J Intern Med. 2021. [cited 2025 Apr 16];527. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joim.13306 10.1111/joim.13306 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wang P, Chen LL, Xiong Y, Ye D. Metabolite regulation of epigenetics in cancer. Cell Rep. 2024. Oct;43(10):114815. 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114815 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Li X, Egervari G, Wang Y, Berger SL, Lu Z. Regulation of chromatin and gene expression by metabolic enzymes and metabolites [Internet]. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2018. Sep;19(9):563–78. [cited 2025 Apr 16] Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6907087/ 10.1038/s41580-018-0029-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lyon P, Strippoli V, Fang B, Cimmino L. B Vitamins and One-Carbon Metabolism: Implications in Human Health and Disease [Internet]. Nutrients. 2020. Sep;12(9):2867. [cited 2025 Apr 16] Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7551072/ 10.3390/nu12092867 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Bibikova M, Barnes B, Tsan C, Ho V, Klotzle B, Le JM, et al. High density DNA methylation array with single CpG site resolution. Genomics. 2011. Oct;98(4):288–95. 10.1016/j.ygeno.2011.07.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Sayols-Baixeras S, Subirana I, Lluis-Ganella C, Civeira F, Roquer J, Do AN, et al. Identification and validation of seven new loci showing differential DNA methylation related to serum lipid profile: an epigenome-wide approach. The REGICOR study [Internet]. Hum Mol Genet. 2016. Oct;25(20):4556–65. [cited 2025 Mar 11] 10.1093/hmg/ddw285 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Tindula G, Lee D, Huen K, Bradman A, Eskenazi B, Holland N. Pregnancy lipidomic profiles and DNA methylation in newborns from the CHAMACOS cohort [Internet]. Environ Epigenet. 2019. Apr;5(1):dvz004. [cited 2025 Apr 16] Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30956810/ 10.1093/eep/dvz004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lai CQ, Wojczynski MK, Parnell LD, Hidalgo BA, Irvin MR, Aslibekyan S, et al. Epigenome-wide association study of triglyceride postprandial responses to a high-fat dietary challenge [Internet]. J Lipid Res. 2016. Dec;57(12):2200–7. [cited 2025 Apr 16] Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27777315/ 10.1194/jlr.M069948 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Irvin MR, Zhi D, Joehanes R, Mendelson M, Aslibekyan S, Claas SA, et al. Epigenome-wide association study of fasting blood lipids in the Genetics of Lipid-lowering Drugs and Diet Network study [Internet]. Circulation. 2014. Aug;130(7):565–72. [cited 2025 Mar 8] Available from: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.009158 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.009158 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Braun KV, Dhana K, de Vries PS, Voortman T, van Meurs JB, Uitterlinden AG, et al. BIOS consortium . Epigenome-wide association study (EWAS) on lipids: the Rotterdam Study [Internet]. Clin Epigenetics. 2017. Feb;9(1):15. [cited 2025 Mar 11] Available from: https://clinicalepigeneticsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13148-016-0304-4 10.1186/s13148-016-0304-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Fragoso-Bargas N, Page CM, Joubert BR, London SJ, Lee-Ødegård S, Opsahl JO, et al. Epigenome-wide association study of serum folate in maternal peripheral blood leukocytes [Internet]. Epigenomics. 2023. Jan;15(1):39–52. [cited 2025 Apr 16] Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10072132/ 10.2217/epi-2022-0427 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Joubert BR, den Dekker HT, Felix JF, Bohlin J, Ligthart S, Beckett E, et al. Maternal plasma folate impacts differential DNA methylation in an epigenome-wide meta-analysis of newborns [Internet]. Nat Commun. 2016. Feb;7(1):10577. [cited 2025 Mar 11] Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26861414/ 10.1038/ncomms10577 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Costeira R, Evangelista L, Wilson R, Yan X, Hellbach F, Sinke L, et al. Metabolomic biomarkers of habitual B vitamin intakes unveil novel differentially methylated positions in the human epigenome [Internet]. Clin Epigenetics. 2023. Oct;15(1):166. [cited 2025 Apr 16] Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37858220/ 10.1186/s13148-023-01578-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Gomez-Alonso MD, Kretschmer A, Wilson R, Pfeiffer L, Karhunen V, Seppälä I, et al. DNA methylation and lipid metabolism: an EWAS of 226 metabolic measures [Internet]. Clin Epigenetics. 2021. Jan;13(1):7. [cited 2025 Mar 11] Available from: https://clinicalepigeneticsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13148-020-00957-8 10.1186/s13148-020-00957-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wu J, Palasantzas V, Andreu-Sánchez S, Plösch T, Leonard S, Li S, et al. Epigenome-wide association study on the plasma metabolome suggests self-regulation of the glycine and serine pathway through DNA methylation [Internet]. Clin Epigenetics. 2024. Aug;16(1):104. [cited 2025 Apr 16] Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39138531/ 10.1186/s13148-024-01718-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Petersen AK, Zeilinger S, Kastenmüller G, Römisch-Margl W, Brugger M, Peters A, et al. Epigenetics meets metabolomics: an epigenome-wide association study with blood serum metabolic traits [Internet]. Hum Mol Genet. 2014. Jan;23(2):534–45. [cited 2025 Apr 16] Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24014485/ 10.1093/hmg/ddt430 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Lecorguillé M, Charles MA, Lepeule J, Lioret S, de Lauzon-Guillain B, Forhan A, et al. Association between dietary patterns reflecting one-carbon metabolism nutrients intake before pregnancy and placental DNA methylation [Internet]. Epigenetics. 2022;17(7):715–30. [cited 2025 Jun 9] Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9336486/ 10.1080/15592294.2021.1957575 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Ramaker ME, Corcoran DL, Apsley AT, Kobor MS, Kraus VB, Kraus WE, et al. Epigenome-wide Association Study Analysis of Calorie Restriction in Humans, CALERIETM Trial Analysis. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2022. Dec 29 [cited 2025 Jun 9];77(12):2395–401. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/gerona/glac168 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Llauradó-Pont J, Stratakis N, Fiorito G, Handakas E, Neumann A, Barros H, et al. A meta-analysis of epigenome-wide association studies of ultra-processed food consumption with DNA methylation in European children [Internet]. Clin Epigenetics. 2025. Jan;17(1):3. [cited 2025 Jun 9] Available from: https://clinicalepigeneticsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13148-024-01782-z 10.1186/s13148-024-01782-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Battram T, Yousefi P, Crawford G, Prince C, Sheikhali Babaei M, Sharp G, et al. The EWAS Catalog: a database of epigenome-wide association studies. Wellcome Open Res. 2022. May;7:41. 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17598.2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Do WL, Whitsel EA, Costeira R, Masachs OM, Le Roy CI, Bell JT, et al. Epigenome-wide association study of diet quality in the Women’s Health Initiative and TwinsUK cohort [Internet]. Int J Epidemiol. 2021. May;50(2):675–84. [cited 2025 Apr 16] Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33354722/ 10.1093/ije/dyaa215 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Domínguez-Barragán J, Fernández-Sanlés A, Hernáez Á, Llauradó-Pont J, Marrugat J, Robinson O, et al. Blood DNA methylation signature of diet quality and association with cardiometabolic traits [Internet]. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2024. Jan;31(2):191–202. [cited 2025 Apr 16] Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37793095/ 10.1093/eurjpc/zwad317 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Keshawarz A, Joehanes R, Ma J, Lee GY, Costeira R, Tsai PC, et al. Dietary and supplemental intake of vitamins C and E is associated with altered DNA methylation in an epigenome-wide association study meta-analysis [Internet]. Epigenetics. 2023. Dec;18(1):2211361. [cited 2025 Apr 16] Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37233989/ 10.1080/15592294.2023.2211361 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Ma J, Rebholz CM, Braun KV, Reynolds LM, Aslibekyan S, Xia R, et al. Whole Blood DNA Methylation Signatures of Diet Are Associated With Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors and All-Cause Mortality [Internet]. Circ Genom Precis Med. 2020. Aug;13(4):e002766. [cited 2025 Apr 17] Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7442697/ 10.1161/CIRCGEN.119.002766 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Domínguez-Barragán J, Fernández-Sanlés A, Hernáez Á, Llauradó-Pont J, Marrugat J, Robinson O, et al. Blood DNA methylation signature of diet quality and association with cardiometabolic traits [Internet]. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2024. Jan;31(2):191–202. [cited 2025 Apr 17] 10.1093/eurjpc/zwad317 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Karabegović I, Portilla-Fernandez E, Li Y, Ma J, Maas SC, Sun D, et al. Epigenome-wide association meta-analysis of DNA methylation with coffee and tea consumption. Nat Commun. 2021. May;12(1):2830. 10.1038/s41467-021-22752-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Hellbach F, Sinke L, Costeira R, Baumeister SE, Beekman M, Louca P, et al. Pooled analysis of epigenome-wide association studies of food consumption in KORA, TwinsUK and LLS [Internet]. Eur J Nutr. 2023. Apr;62(3):1357–75. [cited 2025 Apr 17] Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36571600/ 10.1007/s00394-022-03074-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Do WL, Whitsel EA, Costeira R, Masachs OM, Le Roy CI, Bell JT, et al. Epigenome-wide association study of diet quality in the Women’s Health Initiative and TwinsUK cohort [Internet]. Int J Epidemiol. 2021. May;50(2):675–84. [cited 2025 Apr 17] Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33354722/ 10.1093/ije/dyaa215 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Kennedy MA, Barrera GC, Nakamura K, Baldán A, Tarr P, Fishbein MC, et al. ABCG1 has a critical role in mediating cholesterol efflux to HDL and preventing cellular lipid accumulation [Internet]. Cell Metab. 2005. Feb;1(2):121–31. [cited 2025 Mar 18] Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16054053/ 10.1016/j.cmet.2005.01.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Rauber F, Campagnolo PD, Hoffman DJ, Vitolo MR. Consumption of ultra-processed food products and its effects on children’s lipid profiles: a longitudinal study [Internet]. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2015. Jan;25(1):116–22. [cited 2025 Mar 10] Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25240690/ 10.1016/j.numecd.2014.08.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. SREBF1 sterol regulatory element binding transcription factor 1 [Homo sapiens (human)] - Gene - NCBI [Internet]. [cited 2025 Mar 10]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/6720
  56. Gomez-Alonso MD, Kretschmer A, Wilson R, Pfeiffer L, Karhunen V, Seppälä I, et al. DNA methylation and lipid metabolism: an EWAS of 226 metabolic measures [Internet]. Clin Epigenetics. 2021. Jan;13(1):7. [cited 2024 Nov 5] Available from: https://clinicalepigeneticsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13148-020-00957-8 10.1186/s13148-020-00957-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Petersen AK, Zeilinger S, Kastenmüller G, Römisch-Margl W, Brugger M, Peters A, et al. Epigenetics meets metabolomics: an epigenome-wide association study with blood serum metabolic traits. Hum Mol Genet. 2014. Jan;23(2):534–45. 10.1093/hmg/ddt430 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Braun KV, Dhana K, de Vries PS, Voortman T, van Meurs JB, Uitterlinden AG, et al. BIOS consortium . Epigenome-wide association study (EWAS) on lipids: the Rotterdam Study [Internet]. Clin Epigenetics. 2017. Feb;9(1):15. [cited 2025 Jun 14] Available from: https://link.springer.com/articles/10.1186/s13148-016-0304-4 10.1186/s13148-016-0304-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Park JY, Vollset SE, Melse-Boonstra A, Chajès V, Ueland PM, Slimani N. Dietary intake and biological measurement of folate: a qualitative review of validation studies [Internet]. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2013. Apr;57(4):562–81. [cited 2025 Apr 16] Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23065735/ 10.1002/mnfr.201200105 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Vitamin B and your health - foods high in vitamin B | healthdirect [Internet]. [cited 2025 Mar 9]. Available from: https://www.healthdirect.gov.au/vitamin-b-and-your-health
  61. Fragoso-Bargas N, Page CM, Joubert BR, London SJ, Lee-Ødegård S, Opsahl JO, et al. Epigenome-wide association study of serum folate in maternal peripheral blood leukocytes [Internet]. Epigenomics. 2023. Jan;15(1):39–52. [cited 2025 Apr 16] Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36974632/ 10.2217/epi-2022-0427 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Cholesterol: Top foods to improve your numbers - Mayo Clinic [Internet]. [cited 2025 Apr 17]. Available from: https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/high-blood-cholesterol/in-depth/cholesterol/art-20045192
  63. Treur JL, Taylor AE, Ware JJ, McMahon G, Hottenga JJ, Baselmans BM, et al. Associations between smoking and caffeine consumption in two European cohorts [Internet]. Addiction. 2016. Jun;111(6):1059–68. [cited 2025 Apr 16] Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4879503/ 10.1111/add.13298 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Treur JL, Taylor AE, Ware JJ, McMahon G, Hottenga JJ, Baselmans BM, et al. Associations between smoking and caffeine consumption in two European cohorts [Internet]. Addiction. 2016. Jun;111(6):1059–68. [cited 2025 Apr 12] Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4879503/ 10.1111/add.13298 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Kanehisa M, Furumichi M, Sato Y, Ishiguro-Watanabe M, Tanabe M. KEGG: integrating viruses and cellular organisms. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021. Jan;49 D1:D545–51. 10.1093/nar/gkaa970 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Kanehisa M, Sato Y, Kawashima M. KEGG mapping tools for uncovering hidden features in biological data. Protein Sci. 2022. Jan;31(1):47–53. 10.1002/pro.4172 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. de Souza RJ, Mente A, Maroleanu A, Cozma AI, Ha V, Kishibe T, et al. Intake of saturated and trans unsaturated fatty acids and risk of all cause mortality, cardiovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies [Internet]. BMJ. 2015. Aug;351:h3978. [cited 2025 Apr 16] Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26268692/ 10.1136/bmj.h3978 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Lorenzo PM, Izquierdo AG, Rodriguez-Carnero G, Fernández-Pombo A, Iglesias A, Carreira MC, et al. Epigenetic Effects of Healthy Foods and Lifestyle Habits from the Southern European Atlantic Diet Pattern: A Narrative Review. Adv Nutr. 2022. Oct;13(5):1725–47. 10.1093/advances/nmac038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Dugué PA, Jung CH, Joo JE, Wang X, Wong EM, Makalic E, et al. Smoking and blood DNA methylation: an epigenome-wide association study and assessment of reversibility. Epigenetics. 2020. Apr;15(4):358–68. 10.1080/15592294.2019.1668739 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Joehanes R, Just AC, Marioni RE, Pilling LC, Reynolds LM, Mandaviya PR, et al. Epigenetic Signatures of Cigarette Smoking. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2016. Oct;9(5):436–47. 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.116.001506 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Klesges RC, Ray JW, Klesges LM. Caffeinated coffee and tea intake and its relationship to cigarette smoking: an analysis of the Second National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES II) [Internet]. J Subst Abuse. 1994;6(4):407–18. [cited 2025 Jun 19] Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7780298/ 10.1016/S0899-3289(94)90334-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Treur JL, Taylor AE, Ware JJ, McMahon G, Hottenga JJ, Baselmans BM, et al. Associations between smoking and caffeine consumption in two European cohorts [Internet]. Addiction. 2016. Jun;111(6):1059–68. [cited 2025 Jun 19] Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4879503/ 10.1111/add.13298 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Keshawarz A, Joehanes R, Guan W, Huan T, DeMeo DL, Grove ML, et al. Longitudinal change in blood DNA epigenetic signature after smoking cessation. Epigenetics. 2022. Oct;17(10):1098–109. 10.1080/15592294.2021.1985301 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Li M, Zou D, Li Z, Gao R, Sang J, Zhang Y, et al. EWAS Atlas: a curated knowledgebase of epigenome-wide association studies [Internet]. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019. Jan;47 D1:D983–8. [cited 2025 Apr 17] Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30364969/ 10.1093/nar/gky1027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Saffari A, Silver MJ, Zavattari P, Moi L, Columbano A, Meaburn EL, et al. Estimation of a significance threshold for epigenome-wide association studies. Genet Epidemiol. 2018. Feb;42(1):20–33. 10.1002/gepi.22086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Li X, Shao X, Kou M, Wang X, Ma H, Grundberg E, et al. DNA Methylation at ABCG1 and Long-term Changes in Adiposity and Fat Distribution in Response to Dietary Interventions: The POUNDS Lost Trial [Internet]. Diabetes Care. 2023. Dec;46(12):2201–7. [cited 2025 Apr 16] Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37770056/ 10.2337/dc23-0748 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Wahl S, Drong A, Lehne B, Loh M, Scott WR, Kunze S, et al. Epigenome-wide association study of body mass index, and the adverse outcomes of adiposity [Internet]. Nature. 2017. Jan;541(7635):81–6. [cited 2025 Apr 17] Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28002404/ 10.1038/nature20784 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Li X, Shao X, Champagne CM, Xue Q, Grundberg E, Bazzano LA, et al. Abstract 11963: Blood Level of Coffee-Eelated DNA Methylation and Long-Term Changes in Blood Pressure in Response to Weight-Loss Diet Interventions: The Pounds Lost Trial. Circulation [Internet]. 2022. Nov 8 [cited 2025 Apr 16];146(Suppl_1). Available from: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circ.146.suppl_1.11963 [Google Scholar]
  79. Karabegović I, Portilla-Fernandez E, Li Y, Ma J, Maas SC, Sun D, et al. Epigenome-wide association meta-analysis of DNA methylation with coffee and tea consumption. Nature Communications. 2021;May 14 [cited 2025 Apr 16];12(1):1–13. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-22752-6 10.1038/s41467-021-22752-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  80. Hyun J, Jung Y. DNA Methylation in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2020, Vol 21, Page 8138 [Internet]. 2020 Oct 30 [cited 2025 Jun 13];21(21):8138. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/21/21/8138/htm 10.3390/ijms21218138 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Rodríguez-Sanabria JS, Escutia-Gutiérrez R, Rosas-Campos R, Armendáriz-Borunda JS, Sandoval-Rodríguez A. An Update in Epigenetics in Metabolic-Associated Fatty Liver Disease [Internet]. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022. Jan;8:770504. [cited 2025 Jun 13] Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8787199/ 10.3389/fmed.2021.770504 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Joubert BR, den Dekker HT, Felix JF, Bohlin J, Ligthart S, Beckett E, et al. Maternal plasma folate impacts differential DNA methylation in an epigenome-wide meta-analysis of newborns [Internet]. Nat Commun. 2016. Feb;7(1):10577. [cited 2024 Dec 10] Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26861414/ 10.1038/ncomms10577 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Zhang L, Shay JW. Multiple Roles of APC and its Therapeutic Implications in Colorectal Cancer [Internet]. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017. Aug;109(8):djw332. [cited 2025 Apr 17] Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28423402/ 10.1093/jnci/djw332 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Keshawarz A, Joehanes R, Ma J, Lee GY, Costeira R, Tsai PC, et al. Dietary and supplemental intake of vitamins C and E is associated with altered DNA methylation in an epigenome-wide association study meta-analysis [Internet]. Epigenetics. 2023. Dec;18(1):2211361. [cited 2025 Apr 17] Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37233989/ 10.1080/15592294.2023.2211361 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Lange de Luna J, Nounu A, Neumeyer S, Sinke L, Wilson R, Hellbach F, et al. Epigenome-wide association study of dietary fatty acid intake [Internet]. Clin Epigenetics. 2024. Feb;16(1):29. [cited 2024 Nov 5] Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10874013/ 10.1186/s13148-024-01643-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Asif S, Morrow NM, Mulvihill EE, Kim KH. Understanding Dietary Intervention-Mediated Epigenetic Modifications in Metabolic Diseases [Internet]. Front Genet. 2020. Oct;11:590369. [cited 2025 Mar 11] Available from: www.frontiersin.org 10.3389/fgene.2020.590369 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Simpkin AJ, Suderman M, Gaunt TR, Lyttleton O, McArdle WL, Ring SM, et al. Longitudinal analysis of DNA methylation associated with birth weight and gestational age. Hum Mol Genet. 2015. Jul;24(13):3752–63. 10.1093/hmg/ddv119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Deng WQ, Pigeyre M, Azab SM, Wilson SL, Campbell N, Cawte N, et al. Consistent cord blood DNA methylation signatures of gestational age between South Asian and white European cohorts [Internet]. Clin Epigenetics. 2024. Jun;16(1):74. [cited 2024 Sep 12] Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38840168/ 10.1186/s13148-024-01684-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Nabais MF, Gadd DA, Hannon E, Mill J, McRae AF, Wray NR. An overview of DNA methylation-derived trait score methods and applications. Genome Biology. 2023; Feb 16 [cited 2025 Apr 16];24(1):1–23. Available from: https://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13059-023-02855-7 10.1186/s13059-023-02855-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Kim Y, Huan T, Joehanes R, McKeown NM, Horvath S, Levy D, et al. Higher diet quality relates to decelerated epigenetic aging [Internet]. Am J Clin Nutr. 2022. Jan;115(1):163–70. [cited 2025 Apr 16] Available from: https://ajcn.nutrition.org/action/showFullText?pii=S0002916522001204 10.1093/ajcn/nqab201 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Dragsted LO, Gao Q, Scalbert A, Vergères G, Kolehmainen M, Manach C, et al. Validation of biomarkers of food intake-critical assessment of candidate biomarkers [Internet]. Genes Nutr. 2018. May;13(1):14. [cited 2025 Apr 16] Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5975465/ 10.1186/s12263-018-0603-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Rafiq T, Azab SM, Teo KK, Thabane L, Anand SS, Morrison KM, et al. Nutritional Metabolomics and the Classification of Dietary Biomarker Candidates: A Critical Review. Adv Nutr. 2021. Dec;12(6):2333–57. 10.1093/advances/nmab054 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Rafiq T, Azab SM, Anand SS, Thabane L, Shanmuganathan M, Morrison KM, et al. Sources of Variation in Food-Related Metabolites during Pregnancy [Internet]. Nutrients. 2022. Jun;14(12):2503. [cited 2025 Apr 16] Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/14/12/2503/htm 10.3390/nu14122503 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Wu J, Palasantzas V, Andreu-Sánchez S, Plösch T, Leonard S, Li S, et al. Epigenome-wide association study on the plasma metabolome suggests self-regulation of the glycine and serine pathway through DNA methylation [Internet]. Clin Epigenetics. 2024. Aug;16(1):104. [cited 2025 Apr 16] Available from: https://clinicalepigeneticsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13148-024-01718-7 10.1186/s13148-024-01718-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Liu Z, Shen J, Barfield R, Schwartz J, Baccarelli AA, Lin X. Large-Scale Hypothesis Testing for Causal Mediation Effects with Applications in Genome-wide Epigenetic Studies [Internet]. J Am Stat Assoc. 2022;117(537):67–81. [cited 2025 Apr 16] Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35989709/ 10.1080/01621459.2021.1914634 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Akhabir L, Stringer R, Desai D, Mandhane PJ, Azad MB, Moraes TJ, et al. NutriGen Alliance . DNA methylation changes in cord blood and the developmental origins of health and disease - a systematic review and replication study. BMC Genomics. 2022. Mar;23(1):221. 10.1186/s12864-022-08451-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Bianco-Miotto T, Craig JM, Gasser YP, Van Dijk SJ, Ozanne SE. Epigenetics and DOHaD: From basics to birth and beyond. Journal of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease. 2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Barker DJ. The origins of the developmental origins theory. Journal of Internal Medicine. 2007. 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2007.01809.x [DOI] [PubMed]
  99. Ling C, Rönn T. Epigenetics in Human Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes [Internet]. Cell Metab. 2019. May;29(5):1028–44. [cited 2025 Mar 12] Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6509280/ 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.03.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Shireby GL, Davies JP, Francis PT, Burrage J, Walker EM, Neilson GW, et al. Recalibrating the epigenetic clock: implications for assessing biological age in the human cortex. Brain. 2020. Dec;143(12):3763–75. 10.1093/brain/awaa334 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Lee Y, Choufani S, Weksberg R, Wilson SL, Yuan V, Burt A, et al. Placental epigenetic clocks: estimating gestational age using placental DNA methylation levels. Aging (Albany NY). 2019. Jun;11(12):4238–53. 10.18632/aging.102049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Mulder RH, Neumann A, Felix JF, Suderman M, Cecil CA. Characterising developmental dynamics of adult epigenetic clock sites [Internet]. EBioMedicine. 2024. Nov;109:105425. [cited 2024 Dec 10] Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39471750 10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105425 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Bozack AK, Rifas-Shiman SL, Gold DR, Laubach ZM, Perng W, Hivert MF, et al. DNA methylation age at birth and childhood: performance of epigenetic clocks and characteristics associated with epigenetic age acceleration in the Project Viva cohort. Clin Epigenetics. 2023. Apr;15(1):62. 10.1186/s13148-023-01480-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Horvath S, Gurven M, Levine ME, Trumble BC, Kaplan H, Allayee H, et al. An epigenetic clock analysis of race/ethnicity, sex, and coronary heart disease. Genome Biol. 2016. Aug;17(1):171. 10.1186/s13059-016-1030-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Knight AK, Craig JM, Theda C, Bækvad-Hansen M, Bybjerg-Grauholm J, Hansen CS, et al. An epigenetic clock for gestational age at birth based on blood methylation data. Genome Biol. 2016. Oct;17(1):206. 10.1186/s13059-016-1068-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Lo YM, Han DS, Jiang P, Chiu RW. Epigenetics, fragmentomics, and topology of cell-free DNA in liquid biopsies. Science. (1979) [Internet]. 2021. Apr 9 [cited 2025 Mar 12];372(6538). Available from: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aaw3616 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Clark SJ, Lee HJ, Smallwood SA, Kelsey G, Reik W. Single-cell epigenomics: powerful new methods for understanding gene regulation and cell identity [Internet]. Genome Biol. 2016. Apr;17(1):72. [cited 2025 Mar 12] Available from: https://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13059-016-0944-x 10.1186/s13059-016-0944-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Dwaraka VB, Aronica L, Carreras-Gallo N, Robinson JL, Hennings T, Carter MM, et al. Unveiling the epigenetic impact of vegan vs. omnivorous diets on aging: insights from the Twins Nutrition Study (TwiNS) [Internet]. BMC Med. 2024. Jul;22(1):301. [cited 2025 Mar 12] Available from: https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12916-024-03513-w 10.1186/s12916-024-03513-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Hoffmann A, Meir AY, Hagemann T, Czechowski P, Müller L, Engelmann B, et al. A polyphenol-rich green Mediterranean diet enhances epigenetic regulatory potential: the DIRECT PLUS randomized controlled trial. Metabolism. 2023. Aug;145:155594. 10.1016/j.metabol.2023.155594 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Fitzgerald KN, Hodges R, Hanes D, Stack E, Cheishvili D, Szyf M, et al. Potential reversal of epigenetic age using a diet and lifestyle intervention: a pilot randomized clinical trial [Internet]. Aging (Albany NY). 2021. Apr;13(7):9419–32. [cited 2025 Apr 16] Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8064200/ 10.18632/aging.202913 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Dwaraka VB, Aronica L, Carreras-Gallo N, Robinson JL, Hennings T, Carter MM, et al. Unveiling the epigenetic impact of vegan vs. omnivorous diets on aging: insights from the Twins Nutrition Study (TwiNS) [Internet]. BMC Med. 2024. Jul;22(1):301. [cited 2025 Apr 16] Available from: https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12916-024-03513-w 10.1186/s12916-024-03513-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Table 1

CpGs significantly associated with dietary intake.

yjbm_98_2_203_s01.xls (63KB, xls)
Supplementary Table 2

CpGs significantly associated with diet-related metabolites.

yjbm_98_2_203_s02.xls (57.5KB, xls)
Supplementary Table 3

Enriched KEGG Pathways for Diet and Metabolite-Associated CpG-Mapped Genes.

yjbm_98_2_203_s03.xls (39.5KB, xls)

Articles from The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine are provided here courtesy of Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine

RESOURCES