Skip to main content
. 2025 Jun 24;20:8101–8118. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S516233

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Characterization of CMCNPs. (A-E) TEM images of PAM-SiO2, Gl261-PAM-SiO2, B16-PAM-SiO2, 4T1-PAM-SiO2, and RAW-PAM-SiO2, with a scale bar of 200 nm. (F) Particle sizes of the five nanoparticles under an electron microscope: the PAM-SiO2 diameter was 75.23±7.47 nm (n=10, the same as below); the Gl261-PAM-SiO2 diameter was 98.45±7.37 nm; the B16-PAM-SiO2 diameter was 90.31±5.53 nm; the 4T1-PAM-SiO2 diameter was 96.02±5.91 nm; and the RAW-PAM-SiO2 diameter was 92.35±6.94 nm. (G) Zeta potential of PAM-SiO2, Gl261-PAM-SiO2, B16-PAM-SiO2, 4T1-PAM-SiO2, and RAW-PAM-SiO2 (n=6). (H) The encapsulation efficiency of the CMCNPs in each group. (I) In vitro release profiles of CMCNPs and NPs in PBS (n=3).