Abstract
Bisphenol A (BPA) is a synthetic organic compound commonly utilized in the manufacturing of polycarbonate plastics and epoxy resins. Its widespread presence in everyday items, including water bottles, food containers, and thermal paper, has raised considerable health concerns due to its potential as an endocrine disruptor. BPA has the ability to mimic estrogen and bind to estrogen receptors, which can lead to disruptions in hormonal signaling pathways. This interference poses risks to reproductive health, especially among younger individuals, as it may result in irregular menstrual cycles, ovulation issues, and compromised spermatogenesis. Research indicates that BPA exposure can adversely affect ovarian function, diminish sperm quality, and induce oxidative stress and inflammation, further compromising fertility. The potential for BPA to cause long-term health effects through epigenetic modifications, alongside its prevalence in food contact materials, underscores the urgent need for strategies to minimize exposure. Recommended approaches include the use of BPA-free products, choosing fresh foods over canned items, and advocating for stricter regulations. A deeper understanding of the mechanisms underlying BPA’s reproductive toxicity is essential for developing effective interventions. Additionally, research is needed to address critical gaps in knowledge regarding the cumulative effects of low-dose exposure, transgenerational impacts, and the specific effects on male fertility. Investigating epigenetic mechanisms, variability in susceptibility, and the safety of BPA alternatives is paramount. Furthermore, exploring effective interventions, increasing public awareness, and implementing regulatory measures are crucial steps in mitigating BPA’s adverse effects on reproductive health.
Keywords: bisphenol A, endocrine disruptor, reproductive health, fertility, steroidogenesis, spermatotoxicity
Bisphenol A and Its Prevalence in Everyday Products
Bisphenol A (BPA) is a synthetic organic compound utilized extensively in the manufacturing of polycarbonate plastics and epoxy resins. Since its development in the early 20th century, BPA has become a fundamental component in a variety of consumer products due to its durability, clarity, and resilience. 1 The widespread use of BPA is attributed to its cost-effectiveness and the advantageous properties it imparts to materials, such as high-impact resistance and stability under high temperatures. 2 However, its ubiquitous presence in everyday items has raised significant concerns regarding its potential health implications. 3
Polycarbonate plastics containing BPA are prevalent in numerous household items, including water bottles, food storage containers, and optical lenses. These plastics are chosen for their lightweight, shatterproof nature, and their ability to maintain their integrity under varying environmental conditions. 4 Moreover, BPA-derived epoxy resins are extensively applied in the lining of food and beverage cans, as well as in dental sealants and composites, due to their effective barrier properties that prevent corrosion and contamination. 5 This widespread application has led to BPA being one of the highest-volume chemicals produced worldwide. 6
The prevalence of BPA in food contact materials is particularly concerning due to the potential for leaching into food and beverages, especially under conditions of high temperature or acidity. 7 Studies have shown that BPA can migrate from containers into the contents, leading to human exposure through ingestion. 8 This is a critical exposure route, as BPA has been detected in a significant percentage of the population’s urine, indicating widespread exposure. 9 The presence of BPA in everyday items and its subsequent migration into consumables underscores the importance of understanding the implications of chronic low-dose exposure. 10
In addition to food-related applications, BPA is also found in a variety of other products, including thermal paper used for receipts, medical devices, and electronics. 11 Thermal paper is particularly noteworthy because BPA can be transferred to human skin upon handling, providing another potential exposure pathway. 4 The pervasive use of BPA in such diverse products demonstrates its integral role in modern manufacturing, while also highlighting the challenges associated with limiting human exposure. 12
The potential health risks associated with BPA exposure have been the subject of extensive research and debate. BPA is known to mimic estrogen, a hormone critical to human development and health, by binding to estrogen receptors and disrupting endocrine functions. 13 Animal studies have linked BPA exposure to a range of adverse effects, including reproductive disorders, metabolic disease, and behavioral changes. 14 Although the levels of exposure in humans are typically lower than those used in animal studies, the potential for subtle yet significant health effects has prompted regulatory scrutiny and efforts to find safer alternatives. 1
The widespread use of BPA in a multitude of consumer products, particularly those related to food and beverage storage, has resulted in widespread human exposure. This has led to growing concerns over its potential health effects and a push for increased research and regulation. The ongoing evaluation of BPA’s safety and the development of BPA-free materials are crucial steps in mitigating the risks associated with this prevalent chemical.3,15
Mechanistic Insights Into Endocrine Disruption and Reproductive Health
Bisphenol A (BPA) has been implicated in adversely affecting fertility, particularly in young individuals, through various mechanisms. One primary route through which BPA may impact fertility is its ability to disrupt endocrine function, particularly by mimicking estrogen, a hormone crucial for reproductive development and function. 13 BPA can bind to estrogen receptors, altering hormonal signaling pathways and potentially disrupting the delicate balance necessary for proper reproductive health. 16 Such interference can lead to irregularities in menstrual cycles, ovulation, and ultimately fertility.
Furthermore, BPA exposure has been associated with alterations in ovarian function and development. Studies have shown that BPA can affect follicle growth and maturation, leading to impaired ovarian function and reduced fertility. 17 Additionally, BPA exposure during critical periods of reproductive development, such as prenatal and early postnatal stages, may have long-lasting effects on ovarian reserve and follicular development, impacting fertility later in life. 18 Another mechanism through which BPA may impact fertility in young individuals is by disrupting spermatogenesis in males. BPA exposure has been linked to abnormalities in sperm production, motility, and morphology, potentially leading to decreased sperm quality and fertility ( 19 ). Moreover, BPA-induced alterations in testicular function and hormone production can disrupt the delicate hormonal balance necessary for normal spermatogenesis. 20
Additionally, BPA exposure has been associated with oxidative stress and inflammation, both of which can negatively impact reproductive health. Oxidative stress induced by BPA can lead to damage to reproductive tissues, including the ovaries and testes, impairing their function and fertility. 21 Furthermore, BPA-induced inflammation in the reproductive organs can disrupt normal physiological processes, contributing to infertility. 22 Moreover, emerging evidence suggests that BPA exposure may also epigenetically modify gene expression patterns related to fertility. Epigenetic changes induced by BPA can alter the expression of genes involved in reproductive development and function, potentially leading to long-term impacts on fertility. 23 Such alterations in gene expression patterns may persist across generations, further exacerbating the impact of BPA on fertility.
BPA exposure has been associated with various mechanisms that can adversely affect fertility, particularly in young individuals. These mechanisms include disruption of endocrine function, alterations in ovarian and testicular function, oxidative stress, inflammation, and epigenetic modifications. Understanding the complex interplay of these mechanisms is crucial for elucidating the reproductive toxicity of BPA and developing strategies to mitigate its impact on fertility.
Recent Research Findings Linking BPA Exposure to Infertility in Young Ages
Recent research has elucidated compelling links between Bisphenol A (BPA) exposure and infertility, particularly in young individuals. One significant area of investigation involves the impact of BPA on gene expression related to reproductive health. Studies have identified alterations in gene expression patterns associated with BPA exposure, particularly in genes involved in steroid hormone synthesis and signaling pathways crucial for reproductive function. 24 For example, BPA exposure has been shown to downregulate genes involved in ovarian steroidogenesis, leading to disruptions in hormone production and ovarian function. 18 Additionally, BPA-induced changes in gene expression have been implicated in the pathogenesis of reproductive disorders such as polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and endometriosis. 25 These findings underscore the molecular mechanisms by which BPA exposure may contribute to infertility in young individuals.
Furthermore, recent research has highlighted the role of epigenetic modifications in mediating the effects of BPA exposure on fertility. Epigenetic changes induced by BPA exposure can alter gene expression patterns in reproductive tissues, leading to long-lasting impacts on reproductive health. 23 For example, BPA exposure has been shown to induce DNA methylation changes in genes critical for ovarian function and follicular development, potentially contributing to infertility. 24 Moreover, BPA-induced alterations in histone modifications have been implicated in the dysregulation of genes involved in reproductive processes, further elucidating the epigenetic mechanisms underlying BPA-related infertility. 21
In addition to gene expression and epigenetic changes, recent research has focused on the role of oxidative stress and inflammation in BPA-induced infertility. BPA exposure has been shown to increase oxidative stress levels in reproductive tissues, leading to damage to ovarian and testicular cells and impaired reproductive function. 21 Moreover, BPA-induced inflammation in the reproductive organs can disrupt normal physiological processes, contributing to infertility. 22 These findings highlight the multifaceted nature of BPA’s impact on fertility and underscore the importance of considering oxidative stress and inflammation in understanding its reproductive toxicity. Recent research findings have provided compelling evidence linking BPA exposure to infertility in young individuals. These findings elucidate the molecular mechanisms by which BPA may disrupt reproductive function, including alterations in gene expression, epigenetic modifications, oxidative stress, and inflammation. Understanding these mechanisms is crucial for developing targeted interventions to mitigate the reproductive toxicity of BPA and protect fertility in vulnerable populations.
Potential Impacts of BPA on Hormonal Balance and Reproductive Development in Adolescents
Bisphenol A (BPA) exposure during adolescence has raised concerns due to its potential impacts on hormonal balance and reproductive development. Adolescence is a critical period of growth and maturation, characterized by dynamic hormonal changes that orchestrate reproductive development. BPA, as an endocrine-disrupting chemical, can interfere with these hormonal processes, leading to disruptions in reproductive development. 13 BPA can mimic estrogen, a key hormone involved in the regulation of reproductive function, by binding to estrogen receptors and activating estrogenic signaling pathways. 16 This estrogenic activity of BPA can disrupt the delicate hormonal balance necessary for normal reproductive development during adolescence.
Moreover, BPA exposure during adolescence has been associated with alterations in the timing and progression of puberty. Animal studies have shown that BPA exposure can advance puberty onset in females, leading to early reproductive maturation. 18 Similarly, BPA exposure has been linked to accelerated pubertal development and earlier menarche in human studies, raising concerns about its potential impact on long-term reproductive health. 26 Furthermore, BPA-induced disruptions in hormonal balance during adolescence may have implications for fertility later in life, as alterations in pubertal timing and progression can affect reproductive function and fecundity.
Additionally, BPA exposure during adolescence has been implicated in the pathogenesis of reproductive disorders such as polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and endometriosis. PCOS is characterized by hormonal imbalances, ovarian dysfunction, and menstrual irregularities, all of which can be influenced by BPA exposure. 25 Animal studies have shown that BPA exposure during adolescence can exacerbate PCOS-like symptoms, suggesting a potential role for BPA in the development and progression of this disorder. 24 Similarly, BPA exposure has been associated with an increased risk of endometriosis, a condition characterized by the presence of endometrial tissue outside the uterus, potentially due to its estrogenic effects and inflammatory properties. 27
Furthermore, emerging evidence suggests that BPA exposure during adolescence may have transgenerational effects on reproductive health. Epigenetic modifications induced by BPA exposure can alter gene expression patterns in germ cells, potentially leading to heritable changes in reproductive function across generations. 23 Such transgenerational effects may perpetuate the impact of BPA on reproductive health, even in the absence of direct exposure.
BPA exposure during adolescence has the potential to disrupt hormonal balance and reproductive development, with implications for fertility and reproductive health later in life. Understanding the mechanisms underlying these effects is crucial for developing strategies to mitigate the reproductive toxicity of BPA and protect adolescent health.
Effects of BPA Exposure on Adult Male and Female Reproductive Systems
Bisphenol A (BPA) exposure has been extensively studied for its effects on both male and female reproductive systems. In males, BPA exposure has been linked to various adverse outcomes, including impaired spermatogenesis, reduced sperm quality, and altered hormone levels. Animal studies have demonstrated that BPA exposure can disrupt testicular development and function, leading to decreased sperm count, motility, and morphology. 19 Additionally, BPA has been shown to interfere with hormone signaling pathways involved in male reproductive health, such as the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis, leading to hormonal imbalances and reproductive dysfunction. 20 Furthermore, BPA-induced oxidative stress and inflammation in the testes have been implicated in the pathogenesis of male infertility. 21
Our previous studies provide significant insights into the detrimental effects of bisphenol A (BPA) on the male reproductive system and potential interventions to mitigate these effects. Samova et al 28 demonstrated that BPA administration for 45 days led to a reduction in steroid hormone synthesis and caused a significant, dose-dependent decrease in serum steroid hormone levels in Swiss albino mice. Moreover, supplementation with quercetin was found to ameliorate the toxicity induced by high doses of BPA. This finding was supported by molecular docking and dynamics simulation studies, which revealed plausible mechanisms underlying the protective effects of quercetin. Similarly, Samova et al 29 investigated the spermatotoxic effects of BPA and the potential protective role of quercetin on spermatotoxicity. Their study concluded that BPA indeed has toxic effects on spermatotoxicity and quercetin supplementation showed promise in mitigating these effects. Furthermore, Samova et al 30 analyzed BPA-induced dose-dependent adverse effects in the cauda epididymis of mice. They found that BPA caused toxicity in the epididymis by generating free radicals, which could explain the observed reduction in sperm parameters. In other Samova et al 31 in vivo analysis of bisphenol A-induced sub-chronic toxicity on reproductive accessory glands of male mice they have found that BPA causes toxicity in prostate gland and seminal vesicle of mice. Together, these studies underscore the urgent need to understand and address the reproductive toxicity of BPA, while also highlighting the potential of quercetin as a protective agent against BPA-induced damage.
Similarly, in females, BPA exposure has been associated with various reproductive disorders, including irregular menstrual cycles, impaired ovarian function, and reduced fertility. Animal studies have revealed that BPA exposure during critical periods of ovarian development can disrupt follicle growth and maturation, leading to diminished ovarian reserve and compromised fertility later in life. 18 Moreover, BPA has been shown to exert estrogenic effects on the female reproductive system, disrupting hormonal balance and ovarian function. 13 BPA-induced alterations in estrogen signaling pathways can interfere with follicular development, ovulation, and implantation, contributing to infertility. 16 Additionally, BPA exposure has been associated with increased risk of reproductive disorders such as polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and endometriosis, further highlighting its impact on female reproductive health. 25 Furthermore, emerging evidence suggests that BPA exposure may have transgenerational effects on reproductive health, potentially impacting offspring of exposed individuals. Epigenetic modifications induced by BPA exposure can alter gene expression patterns in germ cells, leading to heritable changes in reproductive function across generations. 23 Such transgenerational effects may perpetuate the impact of BPA on reproductive health, even in the absence of direct exposure.
BPA exposure has significant effects on both male and female reproductive systems, disrupting normal physiological processes and contributing to reproductive disorders and infertility. Understanding the mechanisms underlying these effects is crucial for developing strategies to mitigate the reproductive toxicity of BPA and protect human health.
Strategies to Minimize BPA Exposure in Order to Preserve Fertility
Minimizing Bisphenol A (BPA) exposure is crucial for preserving fertility and reproductive health. Several strategies have been proposed to reduce BPA exposure, ranging from lifestyle changes to regulatory measures. One effective approach is to limit the consumption of canned foods and beverages, as BPA is commonly used in the lining of cans to prevent corrosion. Instead, opting for fresh or minimally processed foods can significantly reduce BPA exposure. 32 Additionally, avoiding plastic containers labeled with recycling codes 3 (polyvinyl chloride or PVC) and 7 (other plastics, including polycarbonate) can help minimize BPA exposure, as these plastics may contain BPA.32,33
Another strategy to reduce BPA exposure is to choose BPA-free alternatives for everyday products. Many manufacturers now offer BPA-free alternatives for items such as water bottles, food storage containers, and baby bottles. These products are typically made from materials such as glass, stainless steel, or BPA-free plastics, reducing the risk of BPA leaching into food or beverages.32,34 Moreover, using glass or ceramic containers for food storage and heating instead of plastic containers can further minimize BPA exposure, as BPA leaching is more likely to occur when plastics are heated. 32
Furthermore, advocating for stricter regulations on BPA use in consumer products can help reduce overall exposure levels. Many countries have implemented bans or restrictions on the use of BPA in certain products, such as baby bottles and infant formula packaging. Supporting such regulatory measures and advocating for the use of safer alternatives can contribute to reducing BPA exposure on a larger scale.27,33 Additionally, encouraging manufacturers to label products as “BPA-free” can help consumers make informed choices and avoid products containing BPA. 32
Moreover, adopting healthy lifestyle habits can also help minimize BPA exposure and promote overall reproductive health. Maintaining a balanced diet rich in fruits, vegetables, and whole grains can help reduce reliance on processed and packaged foods that may contain BPA.27,32 Regular exercise and avoiding exposure to other environmental contaminants, such as phthalates and parabens, can also support reproductive health and minimize potential reproductive risks associated with BPA exposure.32,35 Minimizing BPA exposure is essential for preserving fertility and reproductive health. Strategies such as avoiding canned foods, choosing BPA-free alternatives, advocating for regulatory measures, and adopting healthy lifestyle habits can all contribute to reducing BPA exposure and promoting reproductive well-being.
Introduction to the Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to consolidate evidence on the relationship between Bisphenol A (BPA) and its analogs with various health outcomes across different populations and contexts (Table 1). BPA, an endocrine-disrupting chemical widely used in consumer products, has been implicated in numerous health concerns, including metabolic dysfunction, reproductive health issues, and chronic diseases. Given the widespread exposure to BPA and its alternatives, understanding their potential health effects is critical for public health and regulatory policies. The table below provides a detailed summary of key studies included in this review, highlighting the authors, populations studied, exposure measurements, outcomes assessed, and principal findings. This comprehensive overview serves as a foundation for synthesizing evidence and identifying research gaps in the field.
Table 1.
Systematic review and meta-analysis summary.
| Author | Location | Population | Exposure type & measurement | Outcomes assessed | Duration | Conclusion | Key results (OR, CI, etc.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McKinney et al 36 | Seattle, USA | 211 children aged 4-12 y | Bisphenol A (BPA) exposure from dental treatments; urinary BPA concentrations measured | Changes in urinary BPA levels post-treatment | 16 wk post-treatment monitoring | BPA levels increase temporarily after dental treatments but return to baseline within weeks. | uBPA increased 86% (CI: 42%-143%) at 2 d post-treatment. BPA levels returned to baseline within weeks. |
| Rancière et al 37 | France | 755 adults aged 30-65 y | Bisphenol A (BPA) and Bisphenol S (BPS) from environmental and dietary sources; urinary BPA and BPS concentrations | Incidence of type 2 diabetes | 9 y follow-up | Higher BPA and BPS levels associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes. | HR for diabetes: BPA 2.56 (CI: 1.16-5.65), BPS 2.81 (CI: 1.74-4.53). Associations strongest among middle-aged adults. |
| Townsend et al 38 | USA | 80 women, Nurses’ Health Study | Bisphenol A (BPA) and phthalate metabolites; urinary concentrations measured over 1 to 3 y | Within-person reproducibility of BPA and phthalate metabolites over time | 1 to 3 y between measurements | Single BPA measurements show high variability; multiple measurements improve accuracy. | ICC for BPA: 0.14; Spearman correlation: 0.19. Single measurements have high variability, suggesting reduced statistical power. |
| Ashley-Martin et al 39 | Canada | 2001 pregnant women and their newborns | Phthalates and BPA measured in maternal urine | Fetal metabolic dysfunction (adiponectin and leptin levels) | Pregnancy to birth | Prenatal phthalate and BPA exposure linked to sex-specific metabolic changes. | MCPP associated with high leptin (OR = 3.5, CI: 1.1-11.6). BPA showed sex-specific associations with adiponectin levels. |
| Braun et al 40 | USA | 297 mother-child pairs (HOME Study) | BPA in prenatal and early childhood urine samples | BMI and waist circumference at ages 2 to 5 | 2-5 y | Early-life BPA exposure showed mixed associations with BMI. | Higher early BPA exposure linked to BMI slope increase (β = .12, CI: 0.07-0.18). Top tercile exposure showed faster BMI growth. |
| Jacobson et al 41 | USA and Canada | 618 children with chronic kidney disease | BPA and phthalate metabolites measured in urine | Kidney function, tubular injury, oxidative stress | 5 y follow-up | BPA and phthalates linked to increased tubular injury and oxidative stress. | BPA associated with increased KIM-1 (β = .30, CI: 0.21-0.40), NGAL (β = .13, CI: 0.05-0.21), and oxidative stress markers (8-OHdG). |
| Lee et al 42 | South Korea | 164 children aged 3-13 y | Urinary BPA concentrations measured at ages 3-5 and 7-9 | Liver enzyme levels (ALT, AST, GGT) | 10 y follow-up | Higher BPA exposure at 7-9 y linked to increased liver enzyme levels. | Top tertile of BPA linked to ALT (β = 1.45, CI: 0.86-2.04) and GGT (β = 1.22, CI: 0.74-1.71). Dose-response stronger in boys. |
| Liu et al 43 | Canada | 467 pregnant women | BPA and alternatives (BPS, BPF) measured in maternal urine | Dietary sources of BPA and BPA alternatives | Pregnancy and postpartum | Canned food consumption associated with BPA; high BPS and BPF exposure in minorities. | BPA: 8.2 ng/mL; BPS: 0.16 ng/mL; BPF: 7.3 ng/mL (95th percentile). Canned food linked to BPA, mustard linked to BPF. |
| Wang et al 44 | China | 700 women attempting pregnancy | Urinary BPA concentrations measured preconception | Fecundability and infertility | 12 mo or until pregnancy | Higher BPA levels associated with reduced fecundability, especially in older women. | BPA linked to 13% reduced fecundability (FOR = 0.87, CI: 0.78-0.98); infertility odds increased by 23% (OR = 1.23, CI: 1.00-1.50). |
| Xie et al 45 | Global (Systematic Review) | Systematic review of studies on children | Prenatal and postnatal BPA exposure assessed | Childhood asthma and wheeze | Varies across reviewed studies | Evidence for prenatal BPA exposure contributing to childhood asthma risk. | Mixed results; prenatal exposure often linked to wheeze/asthma risk. Second trimester exposure showed strongest effects. |
Abbreviations: BPA, Bisphenol A; BPS, Bisphenol S; BPF, Bisphenol F; ICC, intraclass correlation coefficient; uBPA, Urinary Bisphenol A; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; GGT, gamma-glutamyl transferase; FOR, fecundability odds ratio; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; KIM-1, kidney injury molecule-1; NGAL, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin; 8-OHdG, 8-Hydroxy-2′-Deoxyguanosine; BMI, Body Mass Index.
Gaps in Current Research and Areas for Further Investigation
While significant progress has been made in understanding the reproductive toxicity of Bisphenol A (BPA), several gaps in current research warrant further investigation to fully elucidate its effects on fertility and reproductive health. One area of interest is the long-term effects of low-dose BPA exposure on reproductive outcomes. Although numerous studies have demonstrated adverse effects of BPA at high doses, there is growing evidence suggesting that even low levels of BPA exposure may impact fertility and reproductive development. 16 Further research is needed to understand the cumulative effects of chronic low-dose BPA exposure on reproductive health over time.
Moreover, the mechanisms underlying the reproductive effects of BPA remain incompletely understood. While BPA is known to exert estrogenic effects by binding to estrogen receptors, its interactions with other hormonal pathways and signaling molecules warrant investigation. 13 Additionally, the role of genetic susceptibility in modulating individual responses to BPA exposure remains unclear. Identifying genetic variants associated with increased susceptibility to BPA-induced reproductive toxicity could help identify at-risk populations and inform personalized prevention strategies. 35
Furthermore, the transgenerational effects of BPA exposure on fertility and reproductive health are an area of emerging interest. Animal studies have shown that BPA exposure during critical periods of development can lead to transgenerational changes in reproductive function, potentially through epigenetic mechanisms. 23 Investigating the transgenerational effects of BPA exposure in humans and elucidating the underlying mechanisms could have profound implications for public health and reproductive medicine.
Additionally, the impact of BPA exposure on male fertility and reproductive outcomes deserves further attention. While much of the research on BPA has focused on its effects on female reproductive health, emerging evidence suggests that BPA exposure may also adversely affect male fertility through mechanisms such as impaired spermatogenesis and altered hormone levels ( 19 ). Understanding the mechanisms underlying BPA-induced male infertility and its implications for reproductive health is crucial for addressing this overlooked aspect of BPA toxicity.
Furthermore, there is a need for more comprehensive epidemiological studies to assess the relationship between BPA exposure and reproductive outcomes in human populations. While animal studies have provided valuable insights into the reproductive toxicity of BPA, translating these findings to humans requires robust epidemiological evidence. 27 Large-scale longitudinal studies assessing BPA exposure levels and reproductive outcomes across diverse populations are essential for elucidating the associations between BPA exposure and fertility-related endpoints. While significant strides have been made in understanding the reproductive toxicity of BPA, several gaps in current research warrant further investigation. These include elucidating the long-term effects of low-dose BPA exposure, uncovering the underlying mechanisms of BPA-induced reproductive toxicity, exploring transgenerational effects, investigating male fertility outcomes, and conducting comprehensive epidemiological studies in human populations. Addressing these research gaps is essential for informing public health policies and interventions aimed at mitigating the reproductive risks associated with BPA exposure.
Conclusion
This review highlights the significant reproductive health risks associated with Bisphenol A (BPA), a prevalent endocrine disruptor in various consumer products. BPA’s ability to mimic estrogen disrupts normal hormonal signaling, leading to detrimental effects on fertility, particularly in adolescents and young adults. Evidence indicates that BPA exposure can alter gene expression and induce epigenetic modifications, which may have long-lasting and transgenerational implications. Additionally, the induction of oxidative stress and inflammation further complicates its impact on reproductive development, impairing both ovarian and testicular functions. The multifaceted nature of BPA’s reproductive toxicity underscores the urgency of addressing its widespread use and potential effects on human health.
To mitigate the risks posed by BPA, it is imperative to implement effective strategies such as avoiding canned foods, opting for BPA-free alternatives, and advocating for stricter regulations on its use in consumer products. While these measures can significantly reduce exposure, there remain critical gaps in our understanding of the long-term effects of low-dose BPA exposure and its specific impacts on male fertility. Future research must focus on these areas to inform public health policies and interventions aimed at safeguarding reproductive health. Collaborative efforts among researchers, healthcare practitioners, policymakers, and the public are essential to protect fertility and promote the well-being of future generations, ultimately fostering a healthier population.
Overall, concerted efforts from researchers, policymakers, healthcare professionals, and individuals are needed to tackle the challenges posed by BPA and safeguard fertility and reproductive health for current and future generations. By advancing our understanding of BPA’s impact on fertility and implementing effective prevention strategies, we can work toward a healthier and more resilient population.
Footnotes
ORCID iDs: Sanman Samova
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0086-6854
Hetal Doctor
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9453-6348
Author Contributions: SS: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – Original Draft, Writing – Review & Editing, Supervision. HD: Data Curation, Investigation, Writing – Supporting Draft.
Funding: The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
References
- 1. Vogel SA. The politics of plastics: the making and unmaking of bisphenol a “safety.” Am J Public Health. 2009;99(S3):S559-S566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Rubin BS. Bisphenol A: an endocrine disruptor with widespread exposure and multiple effects. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2011;127(1-2):27-34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Flint S, Markle T, Thompson S, Wallace E. Bisphenol A exposure, effects, and policy: a wildlife perspective. J Environ Manag. 2012;104:19-34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Biedermann S, Tschudin P, Grob K. Transfer of bisphenol A from thermal printer paper to the skin. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2010;398(1):571-576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Geens T, Aerts D, Berthot C, et al. A review of dietary and non-dietary exposure to bisphenol-A. Food Chem Toxicol. 2012;50(10):3725-3740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Burridge E. Bisphenol A: product profile. Eur Chem News. 2003;17:14-20. [Google Scholar]
- 7. Cao XL, Perez-Locas C, Dufresne G, et al. Concentrations of bisphenol A in the composite food samples from the 2008 Canadian total diet study in Quebec City and dietary intake estimates. Food Addit Contam. 2011;28(6):791-798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Liao C, Kannan K. Concentrations and profiles of bisphenol A and other bisphenol analogues in foodstuffs from the United States and their implications for human exposure. J Agric Food Chem. 2013;61(19):4655-4662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Calafat AM, Ye X, Wong LY, Reidy JA, Needham LL. Exposure of the US population to bisphenol A and 4-tertiary-octylphenol: 2003–2004. Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116(1):39-44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Vandenberg LN, Chahoud I, Heindel JJ, Padmanabhan V, Paumgartten FJ, Schoenfelder G. Urinary, circulating, and tissue biomonitoring studies indicate widespread exposure to bisphenol A. Cien Saude Colet. 2012;17:407-434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Mendum T, Stoler E, VanBenschoten H, Warner JC. Concentration of bisphenol A in thermal paper. Green Chem Lett Rev. 2011;4(1):81-86. [Google Scholar]
- 12. Rudel RA, Perovich LJ. Endocrine disrupting chemicals in indoor and outdoor air. Atmos Environ. 2009;43(1):170-181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Richter CA, Birnbaum LS, Farabollini F, et al. In vivo effects of bisphenol A in laboratory rodent studies. Reprod Toxicol. 2007;24(2):199-224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. vom Saal FS, Hughes C. An extensive new literature concerning low-dose effects of bisphenol A shows the need for a new risk assessment. Environ Health Perspect. 2005;113(8):926-933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Vandenberg LN, Maffini MV, Sonnenschein C, Rubin BS, Soto AM. Bisphenol-A and the great divide: a review of controversies in the field of endocrine disruption. Endocr Rev. 2009;30(1):75-95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Vandenberg LN, Hauser R, Marcus M, Olea N, Welshons WV. Human exposure to bisphenol A (BPA). Reprod Toxicol. 2007;24(2):139-177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Hunt PA, Koehler KE, Susiarjo M, et al. Bisphenol a exposure causes meiotic aneuploidy in the female mouse. Curr Biol. 2003;13(7):546-553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Hunt PA, Lawson C, Gieske M, et al. Bisphenol A alters early oogenesis and follicle formation in the fetal ovary of the rhesus monkey. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2012;109(43):17525-17530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Li DK, Zhou Z, Miao M, et al. Urine bisphenol-A (BPA) level in relation to semen quality. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(2):625-630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Jin P, Wang X, Chang F, et al. Low dose bisphenol A impairs spermatogenesis by suppressing reproductive hormone production and promoting germ cell apoptosis in adult rats. J Biomed Res. 2013;27(2):135-144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Alonso-Magdalena P, Morimoto S, Ripoll C, Fuentes E, Nadal A. The estrogenic effect of bisphenol A disrupts pancreatic β-cell function in vivo and induces insulin resistance. Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114(1):106-112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Salian S, Doshi T, Vanage G. Perinatal exposure of rats to bisphenol A affects the fertility of male offspring. Life Sci. 2009;85(21-22):742-752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Susiarjo M, Sasson I, Mesaros C, Bartolomei MS. Bisphenol a exposure disrupts genomic imprinting in the mouse. PLoS Genet. 2013;9(4):e1003401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Veiga-Lopez A, Luense LJ, Christenson LK, Padmanabhan V. Developmental programming: gestational bisphenol-A treatment alters trajectory of fetal ovarian gene expression. Endocrinology. 2013;154(5):1873-1884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Fernandez MF, Arrebola JP, Taoufiki J, et al. Bisphenol-A and chlorinated derivatives in adipose tissue of women. Reprod Toxicol. 2007;24(2):259-264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Wolff MS, Teitelbaum SL, Windham G, et al. Pilot study of urinary biomarkers of phytoestrogens, phthalates, and phenols in girls. Environ Health Perspect. 2007;115(1):116-121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Rochester JR, Bolden AL. Bisphenol S and F: a systematic review and comparison of the hormonal activity of bisphenol A substitutes. Environ Health Perspect. 2015;123(7):643-650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Samova S, Patel CN, Doctor H, Pandya HA, Verma RJ. The effect of bisphenol A on testicular steroidogenesis and its amelioration by quercetin: an in vivo and in silico approach. Toxicol Res. 2018;7(1):22-31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Samova S, Doctor H, Verma RJ. Spermatotoxic effect of bisphenol A and its amelioration using quercetin. J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2016;5(5):1161-1175. [Google Scholar]
- 30. Samova S, Doctor H, Verma R. Analysis of bisphenol A induced dose-dependent adverse effects in cauda epididymis of mice. Interdiscip Toxicol. 2018;11(3):209-216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Samova S, Doctor H, Damore D, Verma R. In vivo analysis of bisphenol A-induced sub-chronic toxicity on reproductive accessory glands of male mice and its amelioration by quercetin. Indian J Pharm Pharmacol. 2019;5(S1):28-36. [Google Scholar]
- 32. Carwile JL, Ye X, Zhou X, Calafat AM, Michels KB. Canned soup consumption and urinary bisphenol A: a randomized crossover trial. JAMA. 2011;306(20):2218-2220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Geens T, Aerts D, Berthot C, et al. A review of dietary and non-dietary exposure to bisphenol-A. Food Chem Toxicol. 2012;50(10):3725-3740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Yang CZ, Yaniger SI, Jordan VC, Klein DJ, Bittner GD. Most plastic products release estrogenic chemicals: a potential health problem that can be solved. Environ Health Perspect. 2011;119(7):989-996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Caserta D, Mantovani A, Marci R, et al. Environment and women’s reproductive health. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17(3):418-433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. McKinney CM, Leroux BG, Seminario AL, et al. A prospective cohort study of bisphenol a exposure from dental treatment. J Dent Res. 2020;99(11):1262-1269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Rancière F, Botton J, Slama R, et al. Exposure to bisphenol A and bisphenol S and incident type 2 diabetes: a case–cohort study in the French cohort DESIR. Environ Health Perspect. 2019;127(10):107013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Townsend MK, Franke AA, Li X, Hu FB, Eliassen AH. Within-person reproducibility of urinary bisphenol A and phthalate metabolites over a 1 to 3 year period among women in the Nurses’ Health Studies: a prospective cohort study. Environ Health. 2013;12(1):9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Ashley-Martin J, Dodds L, Arbuckle TE, et al. A birth cohort study to investigate the association between prenatal phthalate and bisphenol A exposures and fetal markers of metabolic dysfunction. Environ Health. 2014;13(1):4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Braun JM, Lanphear BP, Calafat AM, et al. Early-life bisphenol a exposure and child body mass index: a prospective cohort study. Environ Health Perspect. 2014;122(11):1239-1245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Jacobson MH, Wu Y, Liu M, et al. Serially assessed bisphenol A and phthalate exposure and association with kidney function in children with chronic kidney disease in the US and Canada: A longitudinal cohort study. PLoS Med. 2020;17(10):e1003384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Lee S, Lee HA, Park B, et al. A prospective cohort study of the association between bisphenol A exposure and the serum levels of liver enzymes in children. Environ Res. 2018;161:195-201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Liu J, Wattar N, Field CJ, et al. APrON Study Team. Exposure and dietary sources of bisphenol A (BPA) and BPA-alternatives among mothers in the APrON cohort study. Environ Int. 2018;119:319-326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Wang B, Zhou W, Zhu W, et al. Associations of female exposure to bisphenol A with fecundability: evidence from a preconception cohort study. Environ Int. 2018;117:139-145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Xie MY, Ni H, Zhao DS, et al. Exposure to bisphenol A and the development of asthma: A systematic review of cohort studies. Reprod Toxicol. 2016;65:224-229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
