TABLE 3.
Comparison of powers of the regression-based test and the Hotelling T2 test under the second setting (runs:1000).
| n | Test | Variance | The number of levels of Z |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
K = 2 |
K = 3 |
K = 4 |
K = 5 |
|||||||
| 30 | Regression | Approximate | 0.114 | 0.114 | 0.288 | 0.256 | 0.510 | 0.511 | 0.765 | 0.773 |
| Bootstrapping | 0.074 | 0.075 | 0.199 | 0.188 | 0.402 | 0.415 | 0.679 | 0.687 | ||
| Hotelling | Approximate | 0.112 | 0.109 | 0.231 | 0.240 | 0.390 | 0.415 | 0.608 | 0.636 | |
| Bootstrapping | 0.069 | 0.072 | 0.146 | 0.144 | 0.228 | 0.240 | 0.401 | 0.428 | ||
| 60 | Regression | Approximate | 0.151 | 0.144 | 0.383 | 0.415 | 0.761 | 0.796 | 0.959 | 0.956 |
| Bootstrapping | 0.119 | 0.120 | 0.330 | 0.363 | 0.721 | 0.743 | 0.948 | 0.938 | ||
| Hotelling | Approximate | 0.149 | 0.141 | 0.325 | 0.336 | 0.620 | 0.639 | 0.886 | 0.859 | |
| Bootstrapping | 0.120 | 0.117 | 0.257 | 0.274 | 0.538 | 0.559 | 0.821 | 0.784 | ||
| 100 | Regression | Approximate | 0.210 | 0.224 | 0.598 | 0.614 | 0.955 | 0.950 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
| Bootstrapping | 0.183 | 0.191 | 0.565 | 0.569 | 0.935 | 0.940 | 1.000 | 1.000 | ||
| Hotelling | Approximate | 0.208 | 0.221 | 0.534 | 0.518 | 0.850 | 0.880 | 1.000 | 1.000 | |
| Bootstrapping | 0.176 | 0.186 | 0.463 | 0.452 | 0.790 | 0.810 | 0.985 | 1.000 | ||
| 150 | Regression | Approximate | 0.225 | 0.235 | 0.770 | 0.782 | 0.980 | 0.982 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
| Bootstrapping | 0.190 | 0.200 | 0.760 | 0.768 | 0.980 | 0.983 | 1.000 | 1.000 | ||
| Hotelling | Approximate | 0.225 | 0.230 | 0.705 | 0.712 | 0.965 | 0.965 | 1.000 | 1.000 | |
| Bootstrapping | 0.190 | 0.200 | 0.650 | 0.635 | 0.950 | 0.960 | 1.000 | 1.000 | ||
Note: The data were generated under the assumptions of regression analysis with a logit link function, in which increases by the same amount as the level of Z is increased by one unit.