TABLE 4.
Comparison of powers of the regression-based test and the Hotelling T2 test under the third setting (runs:1000).
| n | Test | Variance | The number of levels of Z |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
K = 2 |
K = 3 |
K = 4 |
K = 5 |
|||||||
| 30 | Regression | Approximate | 0.300 | 0.272 | 0.121 | 0.103 | 0.230 | 0.197 | 0.326 | 0.342 |
| Bootstrapping | 0.186 | 0.188 | 0.059 | 0.054 | 0.140 | 0.126 | 0.205 | 0.223 | ||
| Hotelling | Approximate | 0.266 | 0.257 | 0.234 | 0.248 | 0.497 | 0.484 | 0.534 | 0.539 | |
| Bootstrapping | 0.156 | 0.155 | 0.110 | 0.104 | 0.279 | 0.279 | 0.273 | 0.302 | ||
| 60 | Regression | Approximate | 0.457 | 0.460 | 0.126 | 0.113 | 0.305 | 0.303 | 0.516 | 0.510 |
| Bootstrapping | 0.381 | 0.387 | 0.091 | 0.094 | 0.238 | 0.234 | 0.452 | 0.436 | ||
| Hotelling | Approximate | 0.443 | 0.449 | 0.386 | 0.382 | 0.741 | 0.729 | 0.780 | 0.785 | |
| Bootstrapping | 0.347 | 0.360 | 0.274 | 0.296 | 0.630 | 0.621 | 0.668 | 0.687 | ||
| 100 | Regression | Approximate | 0.688 | 0.644 | 0.162 | 0.172 | 0.458 | 0.451 | 0.737 | 0.705 |
| Bootstrapping | 0.642 | 0.601 | 0.139 | 0.148 | 0.417 | 0.410 | 0.687 | 0.673 | ||
| Hotelling | Approximate | 0.683 | 0.634 | 0.587 | 0.578 | 0.934 | 0.943 | 0.959 | 0.961 | |
| Bootstrapping | 0.626 | 0.586 | 0.516 | 0.514 | 0.902 | 0.909 | 0.934 | 0.939 | ||
| 150 | Regression | Approximate | 0.855 | 0.839 | 0.213 | 0.198 | 0.600 | 0.611 | 0.870 | 0.888 |
| Bootstrapping | 0.831 | 0.822 | 0.204 | 0.174 | 0.585 | 0.595 | 0.848 | 0.866 | ||
| Hotelling | Approximate | 0.852 | 0.836 | 0.759 | 0.745 | 0.986 | 0.993 | 0.998 | 0.996 | |
| Bootstrapping | 0.824 | 0.816 | 0.715 | 0.706 | 0.986 | 0.990 | 0.998 | 0.992 | ||
Note: The data were generated more generally, in which s are different but do not follow any functional trend as the covariate Z varies.