Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Jun 30.
Published in final edited form as: Stat Med. 2022 May 16;41(18):3466–3478. doi: 10.1002/sim.9428

Table 3.

The estimated effects of efficacy (y1) and safety (y2) outcomes in the meta-analysis of antidepressant drugs using unadjusted, univariate and proposed bivariate T&F approaches. Larger effects favor treatment over control. Presented are the OR estimates of the two outcomes and 95% CI, or the numbers of trim and filled studies and their standard errors. The T&F method is conducted on the arcsine-difference scale and the OR is then calculated based on the filled studies.

Method Published Published + grey literature
y1 (95% CI) y2 (95% CI) k0 (SE) y1 (95% CI) y2 (95% CI) k0 (SE)
Unadjusted 1.737 (1.663, 1.813) 0.979 (0.934, 1.026) NA 1.631 (1.571, 1.693) 1.003 (0.964, 1.043) NA
Univariate T&F, R0 1.718 (1.645, 1.793) 1.008 (0.960, 1.059) y1: 3 (2.8)
y2: 7 (4.0)
1.602 (1.540, 1.666) 0.978 (0.933, 1.025) y1: 4 (3.2)
y2: 8 (4.2)
Bivariate T&F, R0 1.718 (1.645, 1.793) 1.008 (0.960, 1.059) 7 (4.0) 1.614 (1.552, 1.679) 0.984 (0.944, 1.025) 8 (4.2)
Univariate T&F, L0 1.557 (1.486, 1.632) 0.959 (0.915, 1.005) y1: 49 (11.1)
y2: 27 (10.8)
1.539 (1.485, 1.594) 0.909 (0.871, 0.949) y1: 52 (12.6)
y2: 53 (12.6)
Bivariate T&F, L0 1.565 (1.493, 1.641) 0.959 (0.915, 1.005) 49 (11.1) 1.576 (1.519, 1.636) 0.912 (0.874, 0.952) 54 (12.6)