Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Aug 19.
Published in final edited form as: J Urban Ecol. 2024 Aug 19;10(1):juae016. doi: 10.1093/jue/juae016

Table 3.

Gā€™ST matrix of all collection site comparisons (below diagonal) and associated P-values (above diagonal).

Jer Wan Mid Hor Slo Apo Hak Bch NBH Win Mat
Jer 0.009 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001
Wan 0.009 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001
Mid 0.035 0.039 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001
Hor 0.086 0.085 0.066 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001
Slo 0.122 0.109 0.091 0.017 0.261 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.005
Apo 0.131 0.114 0.098 0.040 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.096 0.071
Hak 0.135 0.119 0.110 0.048 0.032 0.015 0.005 0.001 0.065 0.001
Bch 0.155 0.133 0.129 0.062 0.045 0.031 0.011 0.240 0.001 0.001
NBH 0.156 0.137 0.142 0.078 0.066 0.049 0.029 0.002 0.001 0.001
Win 0.145 0.134 0.113 0.053 0.017 0.005 0.006 0.024 0.047 0.719
Mat 0.146 0.136 0.108 0.041 0.010 0.005 0.013 0.033 0.057 āˆ’0.002

Most comparisons are statistically significant at P < .05. Exceptions are highlighted in yellow. The P-values shown here are not adjusted for multiple comparisons.