Skip to main content
. 2025 Jun 9;54:100992. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2025.100992

Table 2.

Target volume and OAR dosimetry for treatment plans using 7 mm vs 5 mm PTV margins.





Mean
Mean of Difference

OAR Priority n 7 mm 5 mm p-value
Bladder
V40.8 (%) 3 10 13.57 11.1 −2.47 0.0005 ***
V48.6 (%) 2 10 9.84 7.85 −1.99 0.0007 ***
V60 (%) 2 10 0.89 1.46 0.57 0.3434
D0.03 (Gy) 1 10 61.11 61.34 0.237 0.3267
Rectum
V24.6 (%) R 10 33.68 28.98 −4.7 <0.0001 ****
V32.4 (%) R 10 24.97 20.48 −4.49 <0.0001 ****
V40.8 (%) 3 10 19.12 14.64 −4.48 <0.0001 ****
V43.5 (%) 3 10 17.59 13.32 −4.27 <0.0001 ****
V52.8 (%) 3 10 12.09 8.56 −3.53 0.0002 ***
V57 (%) 2 10 8.1 5.2 −2.9 0.001 ***
V60 (%) 1 10 0.43 0.39 −0.04 0.7509
D0.03 (Gy) 2 10 60.38 60.26 −0.116 0.4549
Penile Bulb
Dmean (Gy) 4 10 18.03 19.81 1.779 0.5692
Right Femoral Head
D0.03 (Gy) R 10 30.17 28.39 −1.775 0.0576
Left Femoral Head
D0.03 (Gy) R 10 30.73 29.67 −1.052 0.0727
Bowel Bag
V43.5 (%) 3 10 1.284 0.968 −0.316 0.3127
V46.2 (%) 3 10 1.05 0.722 −0.328 0.3372



Mean Mean of Difference
Target Volume Priority n 7 mm 5 mm p-value
CTV
V99 (%) 1 10 99.98 99.92 −0.06 0.1679
PTV
V95 (%) 1 10 99.39 99.54 0.15 0.2126
V99.9 (%) 4 10 85.58 89.58 4 0.0298 *
D0.03 (%) 2 10 106.7 105.9 −0.74 0.0046 **