Skip to main content
Microbiology Spectrum logoLink to Microbiology Spectrum
. 2025 May 28;13(7):e00569-25. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00569-25

Aircraft lavatory wastewater surveillance for movement of antimicrobial resistance genes: a proof-of-concept study

Yawen Liu 1,2, Wendy J M Smith 2, Metasebia Gebrewold 2, Nicholas J Ashbolt 3, Ishi Keenum 4, Stuart L Simpson 2, Xinhong Wang 1, Warish Ahmed 2,
Editor: Wenli Li5
PMCID: PMC12211000  PMID: 40434126

ABSTRACT

Long-haul flight aircraft wastewater may serve as a representative microbial footprint, often of mixed country origin, offering valuable insight into the movement of pathogens and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) on a global scale. Herein, we present a proof-of-concept for aircraft-based surveillance of AMR by investigating lavatory wastewater samples from 44 repatriation flights to Australia departing from nine countries. Profiles of pathogens including ESKAPE pathogens (Salmonella spp., Mycobacterium spp., Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) (aph(3’)-IIIa, blaNDM-1, blaCTX_M-1, blaKPC, ermB, qnrS, sul1, tetM, and vanA) were investigated along with traditional fecal indicator bacteria (Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp.) and fecal/urine marker genes (Bacteroides HF183, Carjivirus, human polyomavirus, and a cryptic plasmid pBI143) using quantitative PCR (qPCR). Two fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) and four human fecal/urine marker genes were detected in all aircraft wastewater samples. Detection rates for ESKAPE pathogens ranged from 6.8% (S. aureus) to 84.1% (K. pneumoniae). Of all ARG targets, aph(3’)-IIIa, ermB, qnrS, sul1, and tetM were detected in all wastewater samples, whereas blaKPC and vanA were not detected in any of the samples. Results reflected geographic differences in ARG abundance originating from departure countries/continents and suggested a potential risk of importing ARGs that might be rare in local wastewater systems. The loss of nucleic acid targets was less than 10% over a 24 h incubation in the presence of disinfectants, suggesting that nucleic acids are resilient enough to persist in aircraft wastewater over the maximum duration of a flight.

IMPORTANCE

In the context of international connectedness, aircraft-based wastewater surveillance should be viewed as a beyond-national tool to enhance global AMR management and foster international cooperation.

KEYWORDS: aircraft wastewater surveillance; AMR; ESKAPE pathogens; global transmission; ARGs, qPCR

INTRODUCTION

The global transmission of infectious diseases has been expedited by intercontinental flights (1). Various human pathogens, including Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis) (2), influenza A virus (3, 4), multi-drug-resistant bacteria (5), and SARS-CoV-2 (6), are all known to have been spread because of air travel, with the potential to initiate or propagate infectious diseases outbreaks worldwide (7).

To reduce infectious viral disease transmission, multi-layered control strategies have been trialed, including travel restrictions, individual passenger screening, and quarantine (8, 9). During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, analyses of aircraft lavatory wastewater from international flights proved to be useful for monitoring the importation of SARS-CoV-2 (6, 1013). Analyzing wastewater samples from aircraft could provide a non-invasive and efficient tool to support the established public health risk management efforts compared to extensive clinical testing of individual passengers (7, 14). Passengers infected with pathogens are likely to shed them in their stool and body fluids (i.e., urine, saliva, sputum, etc.) when using the onboard lavatories (12, 15). A recent study by Knight et al. (16) highlighted aircraft wastewater as a potential route for cross-border AMR transmission and a valuable tool for global AMR surveillance (16).

Antibiotic-resistant bacteria (ARB) are among the top global public health threats, responsible for an estimated 1.27 million global deaths in 2019 (17) and predicted to rise cumulatively from 2025 to 2050 to result in more than 39 million deaths that are directly attributable to antimicrobial resistance (AMR) (18). Increasing international mobility of people has significantly contributed to the global spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), as travelers to areas with high AMR prevalence are likely to be exposed to ARB and return to their countries carrying these bacteria (5). For example, a study from an international airport found that more than 90% of the Escherichia coli (E. coli) isolates from aircraft wastewater were resistant to at least one commonly used antibiotic, compared to 45%–60% for local untreated wastewater (19). Among AMR infections, E. coli, along with a group of ESKAPE pathogens (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter spp.), has been identified as critical multidrug-resistant bacteria that pose major therapeutic challenges worldwide (20, 21). Evidence from international travelers also revealed high acquisition of ARB (e.g., extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae) and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) encoding resistance to sulfonamide, trimethoprim, and beta-lactams in the gut microbiome after their return (22, 23).

Given the escalating scale of international travel, the global transmission of ARB with novel ARGs to the destination region is expected to accelerate due to high cross-border mobility, as seen previously with NDM carbapenemases (24). This extension to transmission will pose a great burden on modern medicine in the global combat against bacterial infections (17). In the effort to manage AMR, aircraft wastewater surveillance presents a complimentary approach for detecting emerging ARBs and ARGs, track their origins, monitor their global spread, and thus provide disease intelligence to support local responses and to enhance global health emergency and coverage (14).

To date, only three studies have conducted detailed AMR analysis of lavatory waste from international flights, using high-throughput quantitative PCR (qPCR) and sequencing to detect multiple human pathogens and ARGs (16, 25, 26). Herein, we demonstrate the feasibility and applicability of aircraft-based wastewater surveillance for AMR by (i) investigating and comparing the abundance of fecal indicator bacteria (FIB), several fecal/urine maker genes, ESKAPE pathogens, and clinically important ARGs in aircraft lavatory wastewater samples collected from 44 repatriation flights to Australia and (ii) evaluating the effect of disinfectants on the persistence of nucleic acids to support aircraft-based wastewater surveillance. Our preliminary findings provide data required to enhance the global surveillance network for mapping AMR transmission and potential early warning of emerging threats to public health.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Wastewater sampling from the aircraft lavatory

Aggregated wastewater samples (500 mL to 1 L) were collected from the wastewater exiting lavatories of 44 repatriation flights landing at Darwin International Airport (DRW), Northern Territory, Australia, between 8/NOV/2020 and 7/SEP/2021 (Table S1). These samples were archived at our laboratory at −20°C and previously used for SARS-CoV-2 screening (12).

Wastewater samples were collected in Darwin, Australia, from international flights that had departed from different countries, including 18 flights originating from India, 14 flights from the United Kingdom (UK), six flights from Germany, and single flights from France, UAE, Turkey, South Africa, Japan, and Indonesia. All these flights were long-haul, lasting more than 6 h, except for one flight originating from Indonesia, which had a duration of approximately 2.5 h. Each flight accommodated approximately 94–195 passengers. These flights were selected with the expectation that the repatriation passengers would consume food on one or more occasions, were more likely to use the lavatory during the flight, and were likely to defecate on board (13). Wastewater was sampled using a specifically designed sample trap capable of retaining an aliquot of bulk wastewater sample exiting the aircraft lavatory before entering a waste service truck system (https://zenodo.org/records/7834950). More details about the wastewater collection process could be found in our previous study (13).

Decay of nucleic acid targets from the lavatory disinfectant

The decay of nucleic acids in wastewater during flight in the presence of disinfectants and at a constant temperature (~15°C) was investigated by setting up laboratory microcosms designed to mimic an aircraft lavatory environment. Wastewater samples used for microcosms were composite fresh (i.e., used immediately after collection) wastewater samples collected from the influent of a WWTP. The urban wastewater samples were used instead of aircraft wastewater due to a lack of access to fresh aircraft wastewater samples. While the bacterial profiles of urban and aircraft wastewater may vary in diversity, both originate primarily from the human gut, making urban wastewater a suitable proxy for this study. In addition, the bacterial taxa selected for assessing nucleic acid decay are highly abundant and common in both wastewater sources, ensuring the reliability of the results. The composite wastewater sample was then mixed with the Novirusac Gel Bulk (Aero Defence Pty. Ltd, Southport, Queensland, Australia), a hospital grade disinfectant liquid which is commonly dosed into the Australian aircraft’s tank prior to departure, at three different ratios (0.1%, 1%, and 10% vol/vol).

The Novirusac Gel Bulk is comprised of hexylene glycol, benzalkonium chloride, didecylmethylammonium propionate ethoxylated, N-(3-aminopropyl)-N-dodecyl-1,3-propanediamine, ethanolamine, and water. The 1% dilution ratio of Novirusac Gel is recommended for routine use in recirculating aircraft lavatories (https://www.itwpf.com.au/products/applied-novirusac-gel-bulk-aircraft-lavatory-treatment-25l). The 0.1% and 10% dilution ratios were selected to account for both the dilution effects of target concentrations and the worst-case scenarios of target degradation in aircraft wastewater samples. Microcosms (5 mL capped sterile Eppendorf tubes) were then aliquoted in triplicate from three mixtures of wastewater and disinfectants, each at different dilution ratios, and incubated at 15°C in a water bath fitted with a thermostat to maintain a constant temperature. A control microcosm, aliquoted from the composite wastewater sample without the addition of any disinfectant, was incubated alongside the other microcosms.

All microcosms underwent incubation for up to 24 h, representing the maximum flight duration. The control microcosm, along with the biological triplicate microcosms for each dilution ratio group, was removed from the water bath at 0 h (the start of incubation), 3 h, 6 h, 9 h, 12 h, 15 h, and 24 h, and then stored at 4°C overnight. Nucleic acid was extracted from wastewater samples on the following day.

Aircraft lavatory sample preparation and nucleic acid extraction

Aircraft lavatory wastewater samples were thawed at 4°C overnight. Both microcosms and aircraft wastewater samples were processed following the protocol detailed in Smith et al. (27). This protocol had been demonstrated to facilitate sensitive detection and quantification of ARGs in aircraft wastewater samples (27). Briefly, the 0.2 mL aliquots of each aircraft wastewater sample were centrifuged at 21,000 × g for 3 min, and the supernatant was discarded. The resulting pellets were subjected to nucleic acid extraction using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit (Cat. No. 69506) (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Each pellet was resuspended in 180 µL of ATL buffer, then 20 µL of proteinase K was added. The mixture was thoroughly vortexed and then incubated at 56°C for 60 min. After incubation, 200 µL of AL buffer was added and incubated at 56°C for 10 min. Finally, 200 µL of ethanol was added, and the resulting solution was loaded onto the spin columns, transferred to a rotor adapter on the QIAcube Connect platform, and processed following the manufacturer’s instructions. Nucleic acid was extracted and eluted in 200 µL of RNase-free water for aircraft wastewater and microcosm samples and stored at −20°C before qPCR analysis.

qPCR assays

For aircraft wastewater nucleic acid samples, qPCR assays were used to quantify the bacteria 16S rRNA gene (28). Two FIB, E. coli 23S rRNA and Enterococcus spp. (ENT) 23S rRNA genes (29, 30), along with four human wastewater-associated marker genes, were targeted to provide evidence of onboard lavatory usage. These markers include Bacteroides HF183 (31), Carjivirus (formerly known as crAssphage) (32), human polyomavirus (HPyV) (33), and a “cryptic” plasmid named pBI143, which is reported to be abundant in urban wastewater and has been identified as having potential application for microbial source tracking (MST) (24, 25). In addition, species-specific functional genes were selected to quantify the Mycobacterium spp. 23S rRNA (34) and Salmonella spp. ttr locus (35), which had been reported as infections transmitted on commercial airlines (2).

The ESKAPE pathogens, identified as critical multidrug-resistant bacteria, were screened, encompassing Enterococcus faecium (E. faecium ddl gene) (36), Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus nuc gene) (37), Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae khe gene) (38), Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii bap gene) (39), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa gyrB gene) (40). ARGs indicative of anthropogenic and clinically relevant sources were screened, including aph(3′)-IIIa (encoding an aminoglycoside-modifying enzyme) (41), blaNDM-1 (encoding the New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase-1 enzyme) (42), blaCTX_M-1 (encoding extended-spectrum β-lactamase enzyme) (43), blaKPC (conferring resistance to carbapenems in K. pneumoniae) (44), ermB (conferring resistance to erythromycin) (45), qnrS (conferring resistance to fluoroquinolone) (46), sul1 (conferring resistance to sulfonamides by encoding dihydropteroate synthases) (47), tetM (conferring resistance to tetracyclines by encoding a ribosomal protection mechanism) (48), and vanA (conferring resistance to vancomycin) (49). The decay of nucleic acids in microcosms was analyzed using three qPCR assays targeting the 23S rRNA gene of ENT (representing the FIB), pBI143 (representing a human fecal marker), and the tetM ARG.

A series of qPCR standards (ranging from 3 to 3 × 106 gene copies (GC)/reaction) prepared from synthetic DNA in plasmid cloning vectors or gBlocks gene fragments (Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA, USA) were used to quantify target genes and as qPCR positive controls. The qPCR primers, probes, and cycling parameters for all assays were provided in Table S2. All qPCR amplifications were performed in 20 µL reaction mixtures using 2 × QuantiNova Probe PCR Master Mix (Qiagen). The qPCR mixtures contained 10 µL of Master Mix, 200 to 1,000 nM of forward primer, 200 to 1,000 nM of reverse primer, 100 to 500 nM of probe, and 3 µL of template nucleic acid. All qPCR experiments were performed in triplicate using a Bio-Rad CFX96 thermal cycler (Bio-Rad, California, USA). Triplicate negative controls were included in each qPCR run. The threshold and baseline were all adjusted to the same values, ranging from 40 to 100 RFU for each qPCR assay.

Quality assurance/controls

Quality assurance/control metrics, including amplification efficiencies (E), correlation coefficient (r2), and y-intercepts, are provided in Table S3 based on the Minimum Information of Publication of Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments (MIQE) guidelines (50). The assay limit of detection (ALOD) was defined as the minimum copy number with a 95% probability of detection for qPCR assays (51).

A Sketa22 real-time PCR assay was applied to determine PCR inhibition in extracted nucleic acid samples by seeding a known copy number (104) of Oncorhynchus keta (O. keta) (29). The reference quantification cycle (Cq) value was determined from triplicate qPCRs containing only the positive control and compared with the Cq values obtained from all aircraft wastewater nucleic acid samples. Samples were considered to have no PCR inhibition when the Cq values of aircraft wastewater nucleic acid samples were within 2 Cq values of the reference Cq value (6). Nucleic acid extraction and qPCR setup were performed in separate laboratories to minimize contamination introduced in experiments. Filter blank and reagent blank were included in the processing of all aircraft wastewater samples.

Statistical analysis

Aircraft wastewater samples were categorized as being positive for each target if amplification was observed within 40 cycles in at least one out of three qPCR replicates. Targets were categorized as non-detectable when no amplification was observed within 40 cycles in any of the qPCR replicates. Samples were categorized as quantifiable if amplifications were detected in at least two out of three qPCR replicates, and the Cq values were above the ALOD for each target. The concentrations of quantifiable aircraft wastewater samples were log10-transformed and expressed as log10 GC/L.

Data analyses were performed and visualized in R 4.3.2 (52) and GraphPad Prism Version 8.3.1 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA). Concentrations of FIB, human fecal/urine marker genes, pathogens, and relative abundances of ARGs in samples from different countries (India, UK, and Germany) were compared using the Welch ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis test, with the P values adjusted for multiple comparisons via Dunn’s test. The Mann-Whitney test was applied to assess statistical differences in the concentrations or relative abundances of targets in aggregated samples from different continents (Asia vs Europe).

The relative abundances of ARGs were calculated by dividing their concentrations by 16S rRNA GC or by GC of several fecal/urine markers (ENT 23 rRNA gene, HF183, pBI143, and Carjivirus), where each was used separately as the normalization factor. The effectiveness of these normalization factors was then assessed using principal component analysis (PCA) to compare the explained variance ratios of the first two principal components for each factor. Carjivirus was then used for normalization, allowing for the comparison of the prevalence of ARGs across flights. Density plots showing the relative abundance of three pathogens and nine ARGs were used to analyze the distributions of ARGs across flights departing from different countries or continents.

The correlations among FIB, human fecal/urine markers, bacteria 16S rRNA gene, pathogens, and ARG targets were visualized via a correlation matrix (Spearman’s rank-order correlation). In addition, correlation analysis was performed to assess whether the aggregated concentrations of each human fecal/urine marker in wastewater samples (n = 44) were associated with the number of people onboard. All data were tested for normality and homogeneity of variances before statistical analysis. P-values were marked with asterisks according to the usual convention, where * indicates P < 0.05, ** denotes P < 0.01, and *** corresponds to P < 0.001.

RESULTS

qPCR performance characteristics and PCR inhibition

For all qPCR assays, the correlation coefficients (r2) of qPCR standard curves were within the range between 0.994 and 1, and the qPCR efficiencies were within the range between 90% and 110%. The ALOD for each assay ranged from 4 GC/reaction to 10 GC/reaction. All aircraft wastewater nucleic acid samples were within the 2-Cq values of the reference Cq value, suggesting the likely absence of PCR inhibition in all nucleic acid samples.

The impact of disinfectants on the decay of nucleic acids

The nucleic acid of all endogenous targets was detected over the 24 h incubation at 15°C (Fig. 1). After the 24 h incubation, the percentage decrease in concentrations of ENT 23S rRNA gene, Carjivirus, and tetM in control microcosm sample was 6.2%, 6.1%, and 8.4%, respectively. For microcosm samples at 0.1%, 1%, and 10% dilution ratios, the mean percentages of concentration loss (%) increased from −3.5% to 4.0% for ENT 23S rRNA gene, 1.1% to 5.1% for Carjivirus, and 4.8% to 6.3% for tetM.

Fig 1.

Three line graphs compare the decrease in CrAssphage, Enterococci 23S rRNA, and tetM concentrations over 24 hours at 15°C with varying Novirusac Gel percentages (0%, 0.1%, 1%, 10%). Error bars indicate standard deviation.

Percentage of decrease in concentrations of selected targets in the presence of disinfectant during the 24 h incubation

Prevalence of human fecal/urine markers in aircraft wastewater samples

Two FIB, the E. coli 23S rRNA and ENT 23S rRNA genes and four human fecal/urine marker genes HF183, pBI143, Carjivirus, and HPyV were detected in all aircraft wastewater samples (n = 44) (Fig. 2). The concentrations of E. coli 23S rRNA gene, ENT 23S rRNA gene, HF183, pBI143, Carjivirus, and HPyV ranged from 6.72 to 9.87 log10 GC/L, 8.76 to 11.7 log10 GC/L, 6.80 to 9.89 log10 GC/L, 7.98 to 11.67 log10 GC/L, 7.54 to 11.0 log10 GC/L, and 4.06 to 8.34 log10 GC/L, respectively (Table S4). One-way ANOVA revealed significant differences in concentrations of E. coli 23S rRNA gene, ENT 23S rRNA gene, HF183, pBI143, and Carjivirus among flights from India, UK, and Germany (P < 0.05). Significantly lower concentrations of those five markers in aircraft wastewater samples were observed in flights from India compared to those from the UK (P < 0.05), except for E. coli, which was significantly higher in flights from India than in those from the UK (P < 0.05) (Fig. 3). Similar patterns were found for aircraft wastewater samples when differentiated by the continent of departure (Fig. S1). Wastewater samples in flights from Asia exhibited significantly lower concentrations of ENT 23S rRNA gene (P < 0.01), HF183 (P < 0.01), pBI143 (P < 0.05), and Carjivirus (P < 0.05) than flights from Europe. Concentrations of E. coli 23S rRNA gene were significantly higher in flights from Asia compared to those from Europe (P < 0.05). Significant correlation was observed for the concentrations of HPyV with the number of passengers (P < 0.05, r = 0.33) (Fig. S2).

Fig 2.

Passenger numbers (bar plot) & log10 GC/L concentrations (heatmap) of FIBs, human fecal/urine markers, pathogens, and ARGs across samples from Europe, Middle East, Asia, South Africa.

Prevalence of FIBs, human fecal/urine markers, pathogens, and ARGs in lavatory samples across flights.

Fig 3.

Concentrations of six human fecal/urine markers in flights differentiated by countries (* indicates P < 0.05).

Concentrations of six human fecal/urine markers in flights differentiated by countries (* indicates P < 0.05).

Profiles of ARGs and pathogens in aircraft wastewater samples differentiated by the countries/continents of departure

Concentrations of putative pathogens varied from a median of 0 to more than a million GC/L in aircraft wastewater samples. Potentially pathogenic Mycobacterium spp. (3.09 log10 GC/L) and Salmonella spp. (2.07 log10 GC/L) were only detected in one flight from the UK and India, respectively. The detection rates for five ESKAPE-grouped pathogens were 79.6% for E. faecium (0–9.82 log10 GC/L), 6.8% for S. aureus (0–3.40 log10 GC/L), 84.1% for K. pneumoniae (0–9.15 log10 GC/L), 6.8% for P. aeruginosa (0–7.98 log10 GC/L), and 25.0% for A. baumannii (0–7.88 log10 GC/L) (Table S5). No significant difference was observed for concentrations of these five ESKAPE pathogens in flights departing from different countries or continents.

Of all ARG targets, aph(3’)-IIIa, ermB, qnrS, sul1, and tetM were detected in all nucleic acid samples, whereas blaKPC and vanA were not detected in any of the samples. BlaCTX_M-1 was detected in 84.1% of the samples (n = 37) collected from all aircraft, except those from the UK (n = 4) and Germany (n = 3). BlaNDM-1 was mainly detected in aircraft wastewater samples originating from India (n = 8), UK (n = 5), Germany (n = 2), and single flights departing from Japan and South Africa. Concentrations in order of the highest to lowest, median (IQR) in log10 - transformed GC/L were 9.99 (9.02 to 12.2) for aph(3’)-IIIa, 0 (0 to 8.57) for blaNDM-1, 8.10 (0 to 10.0) for blaCTX_M-1, 11.6 (10.1 to 12.6) for ermB, 8.32 (6.70 to 10.4) for qnrS, 11.7 (10.2 to 12.8) for sul1 and 11.2 (8.54 to 12.3) for tetM. To account for the potential bias in ARG profiles introduced by defecation patterns among flights, the 16S rRNA gene, ENT 23S rRNA gene, and three human fecal markers (HF183, pBI143, and Carjivirus) were used as the independent normalization factors to calculate the relative abundances of nine ARGs, which were then subjected to PCA. The explained variance ratios by the first two principal components (PC1 and PC2) showed distinct differences depending on the normalization factor used (Table S6).

The highest explained variance for the first two components was observed for using Carjivirus as the normalization factor (PC1 and PC2 explained 72.9% of the total variance), followed by pBI143 (69.3%), ENT 23 rRNA gene (67.9%), HF183 (63.4%) and 16S rRNA gene (51.8%). Carjivirus was used as a normalization factor to enable the comparison of ARG prevalence across different flights. Significant differences were observed for relative abundances of blaCTX_M-1 (P < 0.001) and qnrS (P < 0.001) in flights departing from India, UK, and Germany (Fig. 4). Significantly higher abundances of blaCTX_M-1 in aircraft wastewater samples were observed in flights from India compared to those from the UK and Germany (P < 0.05). Meanwhile, significantly higher abundances of qnrS were found in flights from India compared to those from the UK (P < 0.001). When samples were aggregated based on continents of departure, wastewater in flights from Asia exhibited significantly higher abundances of aph(3′)-IIIa (P < 0.05), blaNDM-1 (P < 0.05), blaCTX_M-1 (P < 0.001), and qnrS (P < 0.001) than those from Europe.

Fig 4.

Box plots and density plots compare ARG to Carjivirus ratios across Asia and Europe (continents), and Germany, India, UK (countries). Each row represents a different ARG (tetM, sul1, etc.). Density plots show distribution by continent.

Normalized ARGs across flights differentiated by continents and countries (* indicates P < 0.05).

Correlations among human fecal/urine markers, pathogens, and ARGs from aggregated aircraft wastewater samples

Statistical analysis revealed an overall significant correlation pattern between the concentrations of targeted ARGs with at least one of the human fecal/urine markers screened in this study (P < 0.05) except for blaNDM-1 (Fig. S3). While the correlation among the concentrations of ARGs and five ESKAPE pathogens was only significant between E. faecium and ARGs aph(3′)-IIIa (r = 0.31), ermB (r = 0.37) and sul1 (r = 0.34) (P < 0.05), and S. aureus with aph(3’)-IIIa (P < 0.05, r = 0.34). In addition, significant correlations were found among ARG concentrations for blaNDM-1, blaCTX_M-1, and qnrS (P < 0.05) and aph(3’)-IIIa, qnrS, sul1, and tetM (P < 0.05).

DISCUSSION

International flights serve as a converging vector for the global transmission of AMR and other pathogens, resulting in the importation of AMR via humans originating from diverse geographic regions to the local environment (14, 53). The potential of aircraft-based wastewater monitoring to track the global transmission of AMR has been highlighted to enhance global AMR surveillance and management (54). However, uncertainties remain regarding the efficiency and representativeness of the surveillance data in accurately reflecting the AMR burden among flight passengers (7). In this proof-of-concept study, wastewater samples analyzed were collected directly from aircraft lavatories from individual flights. Such an approach could establish a more targeted surveillance framework, facilitating high-resolution mapping of AMR spread across international borders compared to sampling from vacuum trucks or airport sewer outlets. Wastewaters from post-flight composite sources are likely to be diluted compared to lavatory wastewater samples taken directly from individual aircraft and may not represent a specific population group arriving from a particular destination (19).

By screening lavatory wastewater samples from 44 repatriation flights to Australia, we were able to monitor and quantify FIB, several human fecal/urine markers, putative ESKAPE pathogens, and clinically relevant ARGs originating from different countries/continents of departure using qPCR. The prevalence of two FIBs and four fecal/urine marker genes confirmed the use of lavatories by the passengers and crew onboard, which varied between samples from different flight origins. The high abundance of pBI143 in flights departing from different countries also suggested the widespread presence of this plasmid in human guts (55). Significantly lower concentrations of fecal markers (ENT 23S rRNA, HF183, pBI143 and Carjivirus) were detected in flights departing from Asia (n = 20), including 18 flights from India, compared to those departing from Europe (n = 21), which comprised 14 flights from the UK and Germany. Noting the shorter flight durations from Asia (2 h & 13 min to 9 h & 38 min) compared to those from Europe (15 h & 20 min to 15 h & 49 min) (Supplemental Table ST1), the results suggested relatively higher fecal markers on longer-haul flights, which aligned with the likelihood of defecation onboard as indicated by a survey (56). However, various factors, including the timing of food service, passenger demographics, and other flight conditions such as the availability of lavatories and passenger comfort, could influence toilet usage. For HPyV, which is primarily excreted in the urine and/or feces, its significant correlation with the number of passengers, along with the lack of significant concentration differences between flights from Asia and Europe, might be attributed to the generally higher likelihood of urination compared to defecation among passengers during flights (57). The high frequency of urination was also reflected in the comparatively high abundance of common uropathogens, such as K. pneumoniae and E. faecium, among the pathogens screened in aircraft lavatory wastewater samples (21). It is important to note that while these organisms are frequently associated with infections, they can also be part of the healthy microbiome and urethra in individuals, and AMR genes may be present in both pathogenic and non-pathogenic strains in the gut microbiome. Thus, the presence of these organisms in wastewater samples does not necessarily imply pathogenicity in all cases, but rather reflects the broader diversity of bacteria in the human microbiome, including those harboring AMR genes.

The detection of ARGs, including several clinically important aph(3’)-IIIa, blaNDM-1, blaCTX_M-1, ermB, and qnrS, in aircraft wastewater samples underscores the potential dissemination of AMR across international borders. To enable comparison across flights departing from different countries or continents, individual ARG numbers were normalized using Carjivirus GC to reduce potential bias from variations in passenger defecation frequency. Specifically, significantly higher abundances of blaCTX_M-1 and qnrS were found in aircraft wastewater samples from India compared to those from the UK and Germany, suggesting a potential higher importation of these ARGs among passengers travelling to Australia. BlaCTX_M-1 and qnrS have been found to coexist on the same plasmid (58). The co-occurrence of these two ARGs in aircraft wastewater samples was further supported by correlation analysis. Previous studies on the gut microbiome of healthy travelers also showed that travel to the Indian subcontinent was associated with the highest acquisition rates of blaCTX_M-1 and qnrS (23, 59). Additionally, the acquisition rates of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E), which encode the CTX-M, SHV, and TEM enzymes, were found to be the highest in India among other Asian and European countries in a prospective cohort study (22). Among the ESBL genes detected in fecal samples by travellers, blaCTX_M-1 was one of the most frequently acquired genes (22, 59). When aircraft wastewater samples were aggregated based on the continents of departure, flights from Asia exhibited an overall higher abundance of aph(3’)-IIIa, blaNDM-1, blaCTX_M-1, and qnrS than those from Europe. This finding aligns with previous studies suggesting higher AMR levels in South Asia than in Europe, as indicated by the resistome from lavatory waste on long-distance flights (25). This difference is likely driven by the widespread dissemination of specific ARGs, dietary changes, potential food contamination, water sanitation, and hygiene practices in the departure countries (22). In addition, the comparatively higher levels of AMR genes were also reflected in urban sewage samples from Asia, where distinct geographic signatures in the resistome were identified both at the city and world region level among metagenomic sequencing data pooled from more than 100 countries (60). In the context of global traveling and migration, certain geographies may be more prone to transmission events of ARGs due to factors such as inadequate wastewater treatment, high population density, and increased antibiotic use, and thus need additional attention (60, 61). Therefore, aircraft-based wastewater surveillance could serve as a complementary tool for monitoring global transmission of ARGs and mapping AMR hotspots across the world. Such surveillance efforts are anticipated to provide critical data to inform local health authorities and international health agencies like the World Health Organization (WHO).

Previous studies comparing ARG profiles between airplane wastewater and local urban wastewater suggest that the potential risk (indicated by analysis of aircraft wastewater) lies in the dissemination of imported ARGs, which are rarely found in local environmental systems (19). The blaNDM-1 gene, which was detected in 17 aircraft lavatory samples, could not be detected in urban Australian wastewater samples collected in 2020 and 2021 (data not shown). This finding suggests the potential introduction of this ARG to the local wastewater system through international travel.

This gene could subsequently be introduced into the local aquatic environment, given that ARGs are only partially removed during wastewater treatment processes before discharge (62). It is also crucial to consider how ARGs can persist and spread within the microbiomes of travelers. Upon arrival in a new country, these genes may continue to propagate in individuals' gut microbiomes, potentially leading to the establishment of resistant strains. The introduction of these genes through international travel can contribute to the long-term persistence and spread of AMR in local populations, highlighting the need for monitoring both the initial introduction and the ongoing transmission of AMR. This highlights the true value of WBE as a surveillance tool to monitor and mitigate the risks associated with AMR importation, emphasizing the need for robust strategies to address the global movement of resistant genes and their potential integration into domestic environments. Ideally, a comparison between the abundance of ARGs in lavatory wastewater from inbound flights and their counterparts in influent wastewater from Australian WWTPs would provide a domestic baseline to assess whether inbound flights may contribute to new or elevated burdens of AMR. However, such baseline data were not available for the WWTPs where the aircraft landed.

A notable challenge for implementing aircraft wastewater surveillance is the use of disinfectants, which can potentially degrade nucleic acids and hinder the detection of microbial markers (7). While limited data exist on SARS-CoV-2 degradation in aircraft lavatory wastewater (63), no information is available on the degradation of bacteria and ARGs. Understanding the loss of nucleic acid targets is crucial to determining whether such a surveillance system can be effective in detecting clinically significant targets. Our findings suggest that the concentrations of several representative targets, such as Carjivirus, ENT 23S rRNA, and tetM, remained stable over a 24 h incubation with added disinfectants, even in the presence of the highest concentrations of disinfectants. This indicates that nucleic acids are resilient enough to persist in aircraft wastewater over the maximum duration of a flight. The minimal degradation observed in our study suggests that aircraft wastewater samples can be reliably used for AMR surveillance, even when collected several hours after passenger disembarkation.

This study underscores the potential of aircraft lavatory wastewater surveillance for assessing the prevalence of fecal indicator bacteria (FIB), human fecal/urine markers, bacterial pathogens, and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) on individual flights. By revealing the complex interplay between fecal/urine contamination, pathogen presence, and ARG dissemination, the findings highlight the feasibility of leveraging this approach to monitor public health threats.

It is important to note that the samples analyzed in this study were collected during the COVID-19 pandemic, when global travel was significantly restricted, and the flights sampled were designated repatriation flights, primarily carrying Australian citizens and residents. These unique circumstances may limit the representativeness of the findings for typical air travel conditions. The restricted passenger demographics and altered travel patterns during this period could have resulted in less cross-border exchange of ARG profiles. Consequently, the geographic differences observed in this study might be attributed to these pandemic-specific factors. Further studies under normal travel conditions will be necessary to validate these findings and evaluate the global applicability of aircraft wastewater surveillance for ARG monitoring. The presence of ARGs or pathogen genes does not necessarily indicate viable or infectious organisms, since qPCR was used. Low Cq values in aircraft wastewater samples for certain targets suggested the presence of trace amounts of genetic material. However, these traces could stem from previous flights, leading to potential carryover contamination.

While wastewater surveillance for SARS-CoV-2 on long-haul flights has demonstrated high predictive value for detecting COVID-19 infections and guiding quarantine measures, applying similar methodologies to AMR surveillance requires careful adaptation. Unlike SARS-CoV-2, which spreads rapidly and causes symptoms to develop quickly, AMR is a "silent pandemic" with less immediate public health implications, necessitating distinct strategies and follow-up actions. AMR surveillance at borders must consider long-term consequences, including the potential for colonization without symptoms and the need for coordinated responses across health sectors.

Aircraft passengers may represent a subpopulation reflective of the broader regions they originate from. Developing a global aircraft-based wastewater surveillance network could provide early warnings of emerging microbial threats across geographical boundaries, including the spread of (novel) ARGs from specific hotspots. Future studies should prioritize integrating advanced methodologies, such as metagenomic sequencing, to identify novel ARGs and pathogens. This approach would provide a comprehensive understanding of AMR transmission mechanisms, enhance global disease surveillance capabilities, and inform tailored interventions.

In conclusion, this study demonstrates the potential of aircraft lavatory wastewater as a valuable tool for monitoring global AMR circulation. By capturing high-resolution data on FIB, human fecal/urine markers, pathogens, and ARGs from specific flight populations, we highlight its feasibility for tracking the cross-border spread of AMR. Our findings underscore geographic differences in ARG prevalence, aligning with known regional disparities in AMR burden. Despite challenges like disinfectant use, the stability of nucleic acids reinforces the reliability of this approach. Aircraft wastewater surveillance could complement global health efforts, offering early warnings of emerging AMR threats and informing targeted interventions. Future studies under normal travel conditions will be critical to refining this method and enhancing global AMR surveillance. Furthermore, integrating advanced techniques such as sequencing will be essential to detect a wide range of microbial taxa and characterize novel ARGs with high sensitivity, thus improving the accuracy and depth of AMR monitoring. By leveraging these tools, we can better identify emerging pathogens and resistance genes, enabling more effective and timely interventions in AMR management.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Ian Hosegood and John Ehret from Qantas for collecting aircraft wastewater samples, and Jochen Mueller and his team from the University of Queensland for transporting samples.

Y.L., Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft | W.J.M.S., Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review and editing | M.G., Methodology, Writing – review and editing | N.J.A., Supervision, Writing – review and editing | I.K., Supervision, Writing – review and editing | S.L.S., Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review and editing | X.W., Writing – review and editing | W.A., Methodology, Supervision, Writing – original draft

AFTER EPUB

[This article was published on 28 May 2025 with errors in the Acknowledgments. The Acknowledgments were corrected in the current version, posted on 5 June 2025.]

Contributor Information

Warish Ahmed, Email: Warish.Ahmed@csiro.au.

Wenli Li, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, China.

ETHICS APPROVAL

Low-risk approval as defined by the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research was obtained from the CSIRO Ethics Committee (reference number 2020_031_LR). Passenger information was de-identified.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.00569-25.

Supplemental material. spectrum.00569-25-s0001.docx.

Tables S1 to S6; Fig. S1 to S3.

DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.00569-25.SuF1

ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Sevilla NL. 2018. Germs on a plane: the transmission and risks of airplane-borne diseases. Transp Res Rec 2672:93–102. doi: 10.1177/0361198118799709 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Mangili A, Gendreau MA. 2005. Transmission of infectious diseases during commercial air travel. Lancet 365:989–996. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71089-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Moser MR, Bender TR, Margolis HS, Noble GR, Kendal AP, Ritter DG. 1979. An outbreak of influenza aboard a commercial airliner. Am J Epidemiol 110:1–6. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112781 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Klontz KC, Hynes NA, Gunn RA, Wilder MH, Harmon MW, Kendal AP. 1989. An outbreak of influenzA A/TAIWAN/1/86 (H1N1) infections at a naval base and its association with airplane travel. Am J Epidemiol 129:341–348. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115137 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Frost I, Van Boeckel TP, Pires J, Craig J, Laxminarayan R. 2019. Global geographic trends in antimicrobial resistance: the role of international travel. J Travel Med 26:taz036. doi: 10.1093/jtm/taz036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Ahmed W, Angel N, Edson J, Bibby K, Bivins A, O’Brien JW, Choi PM, Kitajima M, Simpson SL, Li J, Tscharke B, Verhagen R, Smith WJM, Zaugg J, Dierens L, Hugenholtz P, Thomas KV, Mueller JF. 2020a. First confirmed detection of SARS-CoV-2 in untreated wastewater in Australia: a proof of concept for the wastewater surveillance of COVID-19 in the community. Sci Total Environ 728:138764. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138764 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Bivins A, Morfino R, Franklin A, Simpson S, Ahmed W. 2024. The lavatory lens: tracking the global movement of pathogens via aircraft wastewater. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 54:321–341. doi: 10.1080/10643389.2023.2239129 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Johansson MA, Wolford H, Paul P, Diaz PS, Chen T-H, Brown CM, Cetron MS, Alvarado-Ramy F. 2021. Reducing travel-related SARS-CoV-2 transmission with layered mitigation measures: symptom monitoring, quarantine, and testing. BMC Med 19:94. doi: 10.1186/s12916-021-01975-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Bart SM, Smith TC, Guagliardo SAJ, Walker AT, Rome BH, Li SL, Aichele TWS, Stein R, Ernst ET, Morfino RC, Cetron MS, Friedman CR. 2023. Effect of predeparture testing on postarrival SARS-CoV-2-positive test results among international travelers - CDC traveler-based genomic surveillance program, four U.S. Airports, March-September 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 72:206–209. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7208a2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Le Targa L, Wurtz N, Lacoste A, Penant G, Jardot P, Annessi A, Colson P, La Scola B, Aherfi S. 2022. SARS-CoV-2 testing of aircraft wastewater shows that mandatory tests and vaccination pass before boarding did not prevent massive importation of Omicron variant into Europe. Viruses 14:1511. doi: 10.3390/v14071511 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Albastaki A, Naji M, Lootah R, Almeheiri R, Almulla H, Almarri I, Alreyami A, Aden A, Alghafri R. 2021. First confirmed detection of SARS-COV-2 in untreated municipal and aircraft wastewater in Dubai, UAE: the use of wastewater based epidemiology as an early warning tool to monitor the prevalence of COVID-19. Sci Total Environ 760:143350. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143350 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Ahmed W, Bivins A, Simpson SL, Bertsch PM, Ehret J, Hosegood I, Metcalfe SS, Smith WJM, Thomas KV, Tynan J, Mueller JF. 2022. Wastewater surveillance demonstrates high predictive value for COVID-19 infection on board repatriation flights to Australia. Environ Int 158:106938. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106938 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Ahmed W, Bivins A, Smith WJM, Metcalfe S, Stephens M, Jennison AV, Moore FAJ, Bourke J, Schlebusch S, McMahon J, Hewitson G, Nguyen S, Barcelon J, Jackson G, Mueller JF, Ehret J, Hosegood I, Tian W, Wang H, Yang L, Simpson SL. 2022b. Detection of the Omicron (B.1.1.529) variant of SARS-CoV-2 in aircraft wastewater. Sci Total Environ:153171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Li J, Hosegood I, Powell D, Tscharke B, Lawler J, Thomas KV, Mueller JF. 2023. A global aircraft-based wastewater genomic surveillance network for early warning of future pandemics. Lancet Glob Health 11:e791–e795. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00129-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Jones DL, Baluja MQ, Graham DW, Corbishley A, McDonald JE, Malham SK, Hillary LS, Connor TR, Gaze WH, Moura IB, Wilcox MH, Farkas K. 2020. Shedding of SARS-CoV-2 in feces and urine and its potential role in person-to-person transmission and the environment-based spread of COVID-19. Science of The Total Environment 749:141364. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141364 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Knight ME, Farkas K, Wade M, Webster G, Pass DA, Perry W, Kille P, Singer A, Jones DL. 2025. Wastewater-based analysis of antimicrobial resistance at UK airports: evaluating the potential opportunities and challenges. Environ Int 195:109260. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2025.109260 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Collaborators AR. 2022. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. Lancet 399:629–655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Naghavi M, Vollset SE, Ikuta KS, Swetschinski LR, Gray AP, Wool EE, Robles Aguilar G, Mestrovic T, Smith G, Han C, et al. 2024. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance 1990–2021: a systematic analysis with forecasts to 2050. The Lancet 404:1199–1226. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01867-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Heß S, Kneis D, Österlund T, Li B, Kristiansson E, Berendonk TU. 2019. Sewage from airplanes exhibits high abundance and diversity of antibiotic resistance genes. Environ Sci Technol 53:13898–13905. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b03236 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Rice LB. 2008. Federal funding for the study of antimicrobial resistance in nosocomial pathogens: no ESKAPE. J Infect Dis 197:1079–1081. doi: 10.1086/533452 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Miller WR, Arias CA. 2024. ESKAPE pathogens: antimicrobial resistance, epidemiology, clinical impact and therapeutics. Nat Rev Microbiol 22:598–616. doi: 10.1038/s41579-024-01054-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Arcilla MS, van Hattem JM, Haverkate MR, Bootsma MCJ, van Genderen PJJ, Goorhuis A, Grobusch MP, Lashof AMO, Molhoek N, Schultsz C, Stobberingh EE, Verbrugh HA, de Jong MD, Melles DC, Penders J. 2017. Import and spread of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae by international travellers (COMBAT study): a prospective, multicentre cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis 17:78–85. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30319-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Bengtsson-Palme J, Angelin M, Huss M, Kjellqvist S, Kristiansson E, Palmgren H, Larsson DGJ, Johansson A. 2015. The human gut microbiome as a transporter of antibiotic resistance genes between continents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:6551–6560. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00933-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Nordmann P, Poirel L, Walsh TR, Livermore DM. 2011. The emerging NDM carbapenemases. Trends Microbiol 19:588–595. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2011.09.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Nordahl Petersen T, Rasmussen S, Hasman H, Carøe C, Bælum J, Schultz AC, Bergmark L, Svendsen CA, Lund O, Sicheritz-Pontén T, Aarestrup FM. 2015. Meta-genomic analysis of toilet waste from long distance flights; a step towards global surveillance of infectious diseases and antimicrobial resistance. Sci Rep 5:11444. doi: 10.1038/srep11444 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Hjelmsø MH, Mollerup S, Jensen RH, Pietroni C, Lukjancenko O, Schultz AC, Aarestrup FM, Hansen AJ. 2019. Metagenomic analysis of viruses in toilet waste from long distance flights-A new procedure for global infectious disease surveillance. PLoS One 14:e0210368. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210368 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Smith WJM, Liu Y, Simpson SL, Bivins A, Ahmed W. 2024. Assessment of nucleic acid extraction protocols for antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) quantification in aircraft wastewater. Hum Genomics 18:54. doi: 10.1186/s40246-024-00617-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Ritalahti KM, Amos BK, Sung Y, Wu Q, Koenigsberg SS, Löffler FE. 2006. Quantitative PCR targeting 16S rRNA and reductive dehalogenase genes simultaneously monitors multiple Dehalococcoides strains. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:2765–2774. doi: 10.1128/AEM.72.4.2765-2774.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Haugland RA, Siefring SC, Wymer LJ, Brenner KP, Dufour AP. 2005. Comparison of Enterococcus measurements in freshwater at two recreational beaches by quantitative polymerase chain reaction and membrane filter culture analysis. Water Res 39:559–568. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2004.11.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Chern EC, Siefring S, Paar J, Doolittle M, Haugland RA. 2011. Comparison of quantitative PCR assays for Escherichia coli targeting ribosomal RNA and single copy genes. Lett Appl Microbiol 52:298–306. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2010.03001.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Green HC, Haugland RA, Varma M, Millen HT, Borchardt MA, Field KG, Walters WA, Knight R, Sivaganesan M, Kelty CA, Shanks OC. 2014. Improved HF183 quantitative real-time PCR assay for characterization of human fecal pollution in ambient surface water samples. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:3086–3094. doi: 10.1128/AEM.04137-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Stachler E, Kelty C, Sivaganesan M, Li X, Bibby K, Shanks OC. 2017. Quantitative CrAssphage PCR assays for human fecal pollution measurement. Environ Sci Technol 51:9146–9154. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b02703 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. McQuaig SM, Scott TM, Lukasik JO, Paul JH, Harwood VJ. 2009. Quantification of human polyomaviruses JC virus and BK Virus by TaqMan quantitative PCR and comparison to other water quality indicators in water and fecal samples. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:3379–3388. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02302-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Bruijnesteijn Van Coppenraet ES, Lindeboom JA, Prins JM, Peeters MF, Claas ECJ, Kuijper EJ. 2004. Real-time PCR assay using fine-needle aspirates and tissue biopsy specimens for rapid diagnosis of mycobacterial lymphadenitis in children. J Clin Microbiol 42:2644–2650. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.6.2644-2650.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Malorny B, Paccassoni E, Fach P, Bunge C, Martin A, Helmuth R. 2004. Diagnostic real-time PCR for detection of Salmonella in food. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:7046–7052. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.12.7046-7052.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Maheux AF, Bissonnette L, Boissinot M, Bernier J-LT, Huppé V, Bérubé E, Boudreau DK, Picard FJ, Huletsky A, Bergeron MG. 2011. Method for rapid and sensitive detection of Enterococcus sp. and Enterococcus faecalis/faecium cells in potable water samples. Water Res 45:2342–2354. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.01.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Brakstad OG, Aasbakk K, Maeland JA. 1992. Detection of Staphylococcus aureus by polymerase chain reaction amplification of the nuc gene. J Clin Microbiol 30:1654–1660. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.7.1654-1660.1992 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Feng J, Cui X, Du B, Zhao H, Feng Y, Cui J, Yan C, Gan L, Fan Z, Fu T, Xu Z, Yu Z, Zhang R, Du S, Tian Z, Zhang Q, Xue G, Yuan J. 2023. Detection and quantification of Klebsiella pneumoniae in fecal samples using digital droplet PCR in comparison with real-time PCR. Microbiol Spectr 11:e0424922. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.04249-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. De Gregorio E, Roscetto E, Iula VD, Martinucci M, Zarrilli R, Di Nocera PP, Catania MR. 2015. Development of a real-time PCR assay for the rapid detection of Acinetobacter baumannii from whole blood samples. New Microbiol 38:251–257. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Anuj SN, Whiley DM, Kidd TJ, Bell SC, Wainwright CE, Nissen MD, Sloots TP. 2009. Identification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by a duplex real-time polymerase chain reaction assay targeting the ecfX and the gyrB genes. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 63:127–131. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2008.09.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Paulus GK, Hornstra LM, Medema G. 2020. International tempo-spatial study of antibiotic resistance genes across the Rhine river using newly developed multiplex qPCR assays. Sci Total Environ 706:135733. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135733 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Ahammad ZS, Sreekrishnan TR, Hands CL, Knapp CW, Graham DW. 2014. Increased waterborne blaNDM-1 resistance gene abundances associated with seasonal human pilgrimages to the upper ganges river. Environ Sci Technol 48:3014–3020. doi: 10.1021/es405348h [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Colomer-Lluch M, Jofre J, Muniesa M. 2011. Antibiotic resistance genes in the bacteriophage DNA fraction of environmental samples. PLoS One 6:e17549. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017549 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Hindiyeh M, Smollen G, Grossman Z, Ram D, Davidson Y, Mileguir F, Vax M, Ben David D, Tal I, Rahav G, Shamiss A, Mendelson E, Keller N. 2008. Rapid detection of blaKPC carbapenemase genes by real-time PCR. J Clin Microbiol 46:2879–2883. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00661-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Chen J, Yu Z, Michel FC, Wittum T, Morrison M. 2007. Development and application of real-time PCR assays for quantification of erm genes conferring resistance to macrolides-lincosamides-streptogramin B in livestock manure and manure management systems. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:4407–4416. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02799-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Colomer-Lluch M, Jofre J, Muniesa M. 2014. Quinolone resistance genes (qnrA and qnrS) in bacteriophage particles from wastewater samples and the effect of inducing agents on packaged antibiotic resistance genes. J Antimicrob Chemother 69:1265–1274. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkt528 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Heuer H, Schmitt H, Smalla K. 2011. Antibiotic resistance gene spread due to manure application on agricultural fields. Curr Opin Microbiol 14:236–243. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2011.04.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Ng L-K, Martin I, Alfa M, Mulvey M. 2001. Multiplex PCR for the detection of tetracycline resistant genes. Mol Cell Probes 15:209–215. doi: 10.1006/mcpr.2001.0363 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Bell JM, Paton JC, Turnidge J. 1998. Emergence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in Australia: phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of isolates. J Clin Microbiol 36:2187–2190. doi: 10.1128/JCM.36.8.2187-2190.1998 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Bustin SA, Benes V, Garson JA, Hellemans J, Huggett J, Kubista M, Mueller R, Nolan T, Pfaffl MW, Shipley GL, Vandesompele J, Wittwer CT. 2009. The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Clin Chem 55:611–622. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2008.112797 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Verbyla ME, Symonds EM, Kafle RC, Cairns MR, Iriarte M, Mercado Guzmán A, Coronado O, Breitbart M, Ledo C, Mihelcic JR. 2016. Managing microbial risks from indirect wastewater reuse for irrigation in urbanizing watersheds. Environ Sci Technol 50:6803–6813. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b05398 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. R Core Team . 2017. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. In R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Tay M, Lee B, Ismail MH, Yam J, Maliki D, Gin KY-H, Chae S-R, Ho ZJM, Teoh YL, Ng LC, Wong JCC. 2024. Usefulness of aircraft and airport wastewater for monitoring multiple pathogens including SARS-CoV-2 variants. J Travel Med 31:taae074. doi: 10.1093/jtm/taae074 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Farkas K, Williams R, Alex-Sanders N, Grimsley JMS, Pântea I, Wade MJ, Woodhall N, Jones DL. 2023. Wastewater-based monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 at UK airports and its potential role in international public health surveillance. PLOS Glob Public Health 3:e0001346. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001346 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Fogarty EC, Schechter MS, Lolans K, Sheahan ML, Veseli I, Moore RM, Kiefl E, Moody T, Rice PA, Yu MK, Mimee M, Chang EB, Ruscheweyh H-J, Sunagawa S, Mclellan SL, Willis AD, Comstock LE, Eren AM. 2024. A cryptic plasmid is among the most numerous genetic elements in the human gut. Cell 187:1206–1222. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.01.039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Jones DL, Rhymes JM, Wade MJ, Kevill JL, Malham SK, Grimsley JMS, Rimmer C, Weightman AJ, Farkas K. 2023. Suitability of aircraft wastewater for pathogen detection and public health surveillance. Sci Total Environ 856:159162. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159162 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Rachmadi AT, Torrey JR, Kitajima M. 2016. Human polyomavirus: Advantages and limitations as a human-specific viral marker in aquatic environments. Water Res 105:456–469. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.09.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Strahilevitz J, Jacoby GA, Hooper DC, Robicsek A. 2009. Plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance: a multifaceted threat. Clin Microbiol Rev 22:664–689. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00016-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. von Wintersdorff CJH, Penders J, Stobberingh EE, Lashof AMLO, Hoebe CJPA, Savelkoul PHM, Wolffs PFG. 2014. High rates of antimicrobial drug resistance gene acquisition after international travel, the Netherlands. Emerg Infect Dis 20:649–657. doi: 10.3201/eid2004.131718 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Munk P, Brinch C, Møller FD, Petersen TN, Hendriksen RS, Seyfarth AM, Kjeldgaard JS, Svendsen CA, van Bunnik B, Berglund F, Global Sewage Surveillance Consortium, Larsson DGJ, Koopmans M, Woolhouse M, Aarestrup FM. 2022. Genomic analysis of sewage from 101 countries reveals global landscape of antimicrobial resistance. Nat Commun 13:7251. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-34312-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Hendriksen RS, Munk P, Njage P, van Bunnik B, McNally L, Lukjancenko O, Röder T, Nieuwenhuijse D, Pedersen SK, Kjeldgaard J, et al. 2019. Global monitoring of antimicrobial resistance based on metagenomics analyses of urban sewage. Nat Commun 10:1124. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08853-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Wang J, Chen X. 2022. Removal of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in various wastewater treatment processes: an overview. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 52:571–630. doi: 10.1080/10643389.2020.1835124 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Ahmed W, Bertsch PM, Angel N, Bibby K, Bivins A, Dierens L, Edson J, Ehret J, Gyawali P, Hamilton KA, Hosegood I, Hugenholtz P, Jiang G, Kitajima M, Sichani HT, Shi J, Shimko KM, Simpson SL, Smith WJM, Symonds EM, Thomas KV, Verhagen R, Zaugg J, Mueller JF. 2020. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in commercial passenger aircraft and cruise ship wastewater: a surveillance tool for assessing the presence of COVID-19 infected travellers. J Travel Med 27:taaa116. doi: 10.1093/jtm/taaa116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental material. spectrum.00569-25-s0001.docx.

Tables S1 to S6; Fig. S1 to S3.

DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.00569-25.SuF1

Articles from Microbiology Spectrum are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES