Table 1.
Representative research literature on landscape evaluation and satisfaction (2018–2023).
| Author | Published time | Research object | Research method | Research contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liu et al. (2023) | 2023 | Forest landscape | Attention recovery theory | Analyze how variations in color across different forest environments influence psychological well-being, and propose design strategies to enhance landscape aesthetics and mental health benefits. |
| Fornal-Pieniak and Żarska (2022) | 2022 | Vegetation | Landscape natural resources evaluation | Analyze the influence of vegetation on tourism appeal in Central Europe, offering a scientific foundation for optimizing the development of natural tourism destinations. |
| Das and Basu (2020) | 2020 | Wetland | IPA | Investigating how various ecosystem services influence satisfaction levels and highlighting the significance of wetlands for both urban populations and nearby rural communities. |
| Xiang et al. (2022) | 2022 | Urban park | American landscape performance system | Analyzing environmental, health, and economic performance to identify suitable strategies for optimization and enhancement. |
| Mao et al. (2020) | 2020 | Green spaces | Cultural ecological service systems | Assess the satisfaction levels of residents with urban green spaces and propose recommendations for their planning and design improvements. |
| Huu et al. (2018) | 2018 | Street | Cultural ecological service systems | Analyzing the cultural value of seven major tourist destinations in Vietnam and emphasizing the significant relationship between landscape-derived cultural benefits and individuals’ well-being. |
| Kazemi et al. (2018) | 2018 | Shrub and arboriculture | SWOT | Develop a set of strategic recommendations tailored to support the growth of urban agriculture in developing nations. |
| Weber et al. (2019) | 2019 | Climate change | Scenario planning and landscape visualize | Investigate how climate change influences visitor satisfaction and identify strategies to balance ecological conservation in parks with visitor expectations. |
| Tabatabaie et al. (2023) | 2023 | Street (sidewalk and greening element) | Theory of planned behavior | Investigate the connection between perceived streetscape features and walking patterns among individuals in underserved communities. |
| Xie et al. (2023) | 2023 | Work environment (park, green space) | American customer satisfaction index model | Develop a conceptual framework to examine how the work environment influences entertainment satisfaction, offering insights and recommendations for enhancing the quality of green space services. |
| Chen et al. (2019) | 2019 | Green space | Eight sensory dimensions | Analyzed the effectiveness of eight sensory dimensions in public perception and identified their correlations with individual preferences. |
| Keith and Boley (2019) | 2019 | Greenway | IPA | Emphasize user satisfaction while addressing the research gap in understanding differences in perceptions and preferences for greenways between residential and non-residential users. |
| Zhang et al. (2022) | 2022 | Forest | Eye tracking | By identifying variations in how different spatial perception factors influence tourists’ visual behavior, this study provides practical recommendations for optimizing the design and development of high-quality forest parks. |
| Ding et al., (2022) | 2022 | Mountain | IPA | The perceptual experience is primarily driven by visual perception, with smell playing a secondary role, while touch, hearing, and taste have minimal influence. |