Table 3.
Correlation analysis of village form and environmental factors.
| Average elevation | Average slope | Aspect | RDLS | Landform | Relationship with the river | River width | Distance from river | Per capita GDP | Distance from road | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boundary shape | p | 0.037 | − 0.049* | − 0.062 | 0.060* | − 0.082 | 0.204* | − 0.037 | 0.098* | 0.081 | 0.243* |
| Sig | 0.704 | 0.047 | 0.519 | 0.042 | 0.392 | 0.033 | 0.701 | 0.043 | 0.402 | 0.011 | |
| Fractal dimension | p | 0.013 | − 0.222* | − 0.005 | − 0.056* | 0.034 | 0.188* | 0.037 | − 0.417** | 0.018 | 0.004 |
| Sig | 0.892 | 0.020 | 0.962 | 0.042 | 0.724 | 0.050 | 0.704 | 0.000 | 0.855 | 0.971 | |
The probability of significance is less than 0.01, and the correlation between the two variables is very significant, expressed by "**".
The significant probability is less than 0.05, and the correlation between the two variables is significant, which is represented by "*".
The probability of significance was greater than 0.05, and there was no significant correlation between the two variables.