Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2025 Jul 1;15:20568. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06442-7

Optimal sizing of hybrid renewable energy systems relying on the black winged kite algorithm for performance evaluation

Sarada Mohapatra 1,, Deepa Kaliyaperumal 1, T Porselvi 2, S V Tresa Sangeetha 3, Roobaea Alroobaea 4, Ahmed Emara 5,6,
PMCID: PMC12217151  PMID: 40594328

Abstract

The hybrid photovoltaic (PV) and wind turbine (WT) system combined with a battery (BT) have emerged as an effective renewable energy solution. As the adoption of hybrid systems gain popularity, determining the optimal system size plays a vital role for achieving cost-effectiveness. This study employs a recently developed Black-Winged Kite Algorithm (BKA) to optimize the size of a PV/WT/BT hybrid system to continuously distribute the electrical power to an educational institution sited in Puri, Odisha, India, with the goal of minimizing the total annual cost (TAC) while considering least levelized cost of electricity (LCOE). To ensure the system reliability, the maximum loss of power supply probability (LPSP) is considered 5%. To validate the performance, the BKA algorithm is compared against four prominent intelligence algorithms, including Harris Hawks Optimisation (HHO), Sine Cosine Algorithm (SCA), White Shark Optimisation (WSO), Arithmetic Optimisation Algorithm (AOA), and Snake Optimiser (SO). The examination focused on estimating the optimum size of the suggested off-grid hybrid system in the context of statistical outcome scenarios. The experimental outcomes demonstrated that the suggested BKA approach in optimization of renewable energy system provided the best results compared to HHO, SCA, WSO, and AOA with a TAC of $7105.23 and LCOE of $0.1874 per kWh at LPSP of 5%, achieving an optimal configuration of 60.4722 kW PV, 23.8337 kW WT, and 13.6159 kWh BT. Additionally, the convergence study reveals that BKA has better convergence and convergence than the other four intelligence algorithms by achieving the optimum solution. As a result, the PV/WT/BT combination evolved as a more realistic choice in designing a reliable and costless hybrid system for satisfying load demand in regional areas.

Keywords: Meta-heuristics, Hybrid renewable energy, Optimal sizing, BKA algorithm

Subject terms: Renewable energy, Applied mathematics, Computational science

Introduction

In the current scenario, the population of many countries throughout the world have progressively grown, which has resulted in an increasing need for electric power for both the industrial and home sectors. For this reason, there is a pressing need to increase the amount of electricity that is being produced in order to keep the fast-growing demand under control. Worldwide, there has been a transition in focus from the use of fossil fuels to the adoption of renewable energy sources. The transition has been motivated by the awareness that using energy from fossil fuels has harmful impacts on the environment such as pollution, emission of greenhouse gases releases, and climate changes1. Renewable energy sources (RES), while environmentally friendly and plentiful, depend on their geographical location and demonstrate variability2. Presently, there is a global trend in the direction of the expansion of renewable energy sources3. Therefore, there exist an increasing demand for the development of renewable and eco-friendly renewable sources of energy. The most renowned RESs such as wind, solar power, small hydroelectric plants, cogeneration bagasse, and biomass, have been shown to make a major contribute to the growth of developing nations4. The use of wind and solar energies as the principal sources of clean renewable energy has generated significant interest and research in electrification initiatives globally. Recent advancements in technology have augmented the energy output of renewable energy systems5. The renewable power industry has experienced a significant rise in investment and regulatory initiatives that encourage the successful utilisation of solar as well as biomass sources of energy. The majority of individuals reside in rural and isolated areas that lack grid connectivity, and the expense of extending the grid to these locations is prohibitively large6. Consequently, decentralised environmentally friendly source of energy that consist of biomass, wind, tiny hydroelectric facilities, and solar panels (PV), together with the amalgamation of diverse sources, can be utilised to electrify these areas7. Recent advancements in mathematical models have enhanced planning for such decentralized solutions, assisting optimize rural electrification plans8. Renewable sources of power possess a fundamental drawback because to their intrinsic variability. Unlike the predictable nature and controllability of energy derived from fossil fuels production, renewable energy generation depends on environmental factors and may exhibit less consistency9,10. To mitigate this difficulty, hybrid renewable energy systems that amalgamate several energy sources may regulate the strengths of one to compensate for the deficiencies of another. However, the advancement of hybrid renewable energy systems (HRES) has emerged as a formidable challenge because of the unpredictable characteristics of energy derived from clean energy sources and several facets associated with system design, encompassing both technical and economic feasibility1113. HRES representations are intended for off-grid applications in distant regions where traditional fossil fuels are unfeasible, although they may also operate in grid-connected mode, so augmenting worldwide protection, economic efficiency, quality, dependability, and perhaps upgrading social indicators14,15. The exploration of hybrid power systems is highly complex owing to the diversity of generating systems involved and necessitates comprehensive examination. The main purpose of renewable-based hybrid operating systems is to optimise operational circumstances, undertake economic assessments, and improve performance to satisfy all physical and technological specifications. An ideal scaling strategy guarantees superior performance and low expenditure while effectively utilising system components16. When the number of factors and variables in HRES escalates, optimisation approaches are essential for scaling the system components. Despite several optimisation strategies explored before to modify various components of HRES, an effective approach for estimating optimal sizing to identify dependable and cost-effective systems is rarely discovered.

Literature review

The optimization of HRES has been widely studied using various techniques, including software tool deterministic method and advanced metaheuristic algorithms. The software simulation tools17 such as Homer, iHOGA, RETScreen, HYBRID2, INSEL, HybSim, SOMES, and many others, which are easy and extensively used due to their commonality and effectiveness. However, the primary limitation of this tools is they do not permit users to modify modelling equations, sizing procedures, or algorithms; they also limit access to calculations18. Conversely, the deterministic approaches19 such as linear programming, iterative method, graphical method, probabilistic method and analytical methods which shown more effective than software tolls. However, these methods have several flaws including trapped in local optimal scenario and suffer to determine the global optima. The last one is metaheuristic methods derived from natural behaviour have been identified as promising method and have the ability to discover optimum solutions and prevent them from getting stuck in local optima, while superior to deterministic approaches in determining the best optimal solutions. Metaheuristic optimization methods are used to efficiently explore intricate search spaces and discover nearly optimum solutions for HRES design problems. Despite this, the NFL (No-Free-Lunch) theorem posits that the best possible outcome may be attained for a certain cost function utilizing a specific meta-heuristic method20. However, it is crucial to acknowledge that the exactly same method may produce poor outcomes when implemented with diverse cost functions21,22. These reasons have prompted researchers to investigate novel metaheuristic approaches for solving the HRES sizing issue. Numerous researchers have endeavoured to establish an appropriate design for the hybrid energy system. Some researchers concentrated on integrating various energy sources in the sizing of energy systems, while others emphasized diverse design methodologies and their goals. Several studies that have been done in this area are reviewed below. Fayza S. Mahmoud et al.23 integrate salp swarm algorithm, grey wolf algorithm, and improved grey wolf optimizer to determine the best size of a hybrid system including WT/PV/DG/BS, aimed at reducing energy cost and loss of power supply probability (LPSP). Moghaddam s. et al.24 presented a hybrid photovoltaic/wind/battery system to improve the load supply dependability while diminishing NPC. They introduced improved crow search algorithm in system design for Zanjan city in Iran. Hongxing et al.25 introduces an optimum design for solar-wind-battery hybrid system aimed at minimizing the total annual energy cost while considering reliability constraint associated with the probability of unsupplied load energy, employing a genetic algorithm (GA). Khan et al.26 introduced two enhanced evolutionary sizing algorithms, along with three metaheuristic algorithm such as teaching learning-based algorithm, enhanced differential evolutionary algorithm, and salp swarm algorithm for optimizing the size of PV/WT/BT hybrid system in a standalone set up, with the goal of minimizing the total annual cost while considering a reliability constraint. Marcel et al.27 implemented an iterative approach to optimize the size of a suggested hybrid PV/WT/BT renewable energy system, aiming to achieve the lowest annualized cost for a Tanzanian village, addressing the issue of electricity availability in developing countries. Abbassi et al.28 projected a modified moth flame optimizer as an innovative size optimization approach for photovoltaic-wind hybrid off-grid systems integrated with a hybrid energy storage system featuring two distinct dynamics. The aim is to enhance reliability by reducing electricity costs, maximizing the use of renewable energy sources, and decreasing the Loss of Power Supply Probability (LPSP). Ayan and Toylan29 modelled a hybrid system combining PV, BT, and WT configuration, optimized for the load demand of a school building in Turkey. They utilized HOMER software tool and the artificial bee colony optimizer to achieve maximum energy generation at minimal cost across different LPSP values. Naderipour et al.30 projected an optimum hybrid renewable energy system incorporating photovoltaic, wind, and battery technologies to reduce total cost. This design incorporates loss of load probability as a reliability constraint, specifically designed for a city in Iran, while also taking into account the components’ outage rates. Arabi-Nowdeh et al.31 used spotted hyena optimizer to benchmark the system size and reliability for a hybrid PV/ WT/BT system operating both off-grid and on-grid modes The study reveal that SHO outperformed PSO in cost minimization and system efficiency in the on-grid mode, which lowered total net present cost and enhanced dependability. Mahmoudi32 et al. introduced a multi-objective optimization strategy employing gravitational search algorithm and non-dominated sorting approach. This approach aims to optimize hybrid renewable energy systems by lowering power supply loss, minimizing costs and reducing CO₂ emissions, and boosting the renewable energy fraction. Sarangi et al.33 integrate EOBMGO to determine the optimal configuration of an off-grid hybrid system, with the goal of minimizing the total annual cost. Furthermore, Table 1 provides an additional overview of research conducted on the size of HRES, focusing on the configuration of system components, optimisation techniques, and design objectives.

Table 1.

List of several studies that optimised HRES using various optimization methods.

SI.no Algorithm Hybrid System Location Objective function
1. NSGA II34 PV-WT-BT Kent, UK Minimize the total system cost and maximize system reliability
2. PSO35

PV-SB, WT-BS,

PV-WT-BS

China Minimize the cost of energy
3. BA36 PV-WT-BT Tunisia Minimize annual cost
4. FA37 PV-WT-SB India Minimize the electricity cost
5. GWO38 PV-DG-BT Algeria Minimize total cost
6. CSA39 PV-WT-DG-BT Saudi Arabia Minimize the overall cost
7. GO40 PV-WT-DG-BT Nigeria Minimize the cost of energy and maximize system reliability
8. ABC41 PV-WT-BS Italy Maximize the energy saving benefits
9. TLBO42 PV-BT Iran Minimize NPC and COE
10. DFA43 PV-WT-Fuell cell-BT India Control Power flow
11. TSA44 PV-WT-BT-DG Abu-Monqar, Egypt Minimize energy cost and satisfying reliability index
12. SSO45 PV-WT-DG-BT Saudi Arbia, Egypt Minimize the cost of energy
13. MBA46 PV-WT-Fuell cell Egypt Minimize annual cost
14. HHA47 PV-WT-DG-BT Saudi Arabia’s Northern region Annualized system cost
15. RIME48 PV-WT-BT Egyptian city of Siwa, Egypt Minimize LPSP
16. HBBCO49 PV-WT-BT Qazvin, Iran Total present cost (TPC)

Depending on the various algorithms applied to address the design challenges of a hybrid system, each with its some advantages and disadvantages. Below we provided examples of some commonly used algorithms. The genetic algorithm is highly effective for optimizing problems involving discrete quantities. However, in scenarios where the search space is comparatively limited, the genetic algorithm exhibits a slower performance in relation to certain other equivalent techniques50. Although PSO has shown several advantages such as a high convergence rate, ability to share information among the individuals, and strong robustness to local optima trapping, it also has disadvantage including premature convergence and poor diversity51. The ABC and CSA demonstrate effective performance in addressing optimization challenges, delivering high computational speed and power, However, when dealing with large scale problems, these methods may get stuck in local optima region and struggle to reach at optimum solution24. The GWO has advantages because it has lesser parameters, simple structure, and is easy to implementation. On the other hand, GWO is slow to converge, poor solution accuracy, and is prone to being stuck in the local optimal52. The TLBO algorithm has gained popularity for its robust global search ability and stability, but it suffers from slow convergence, is prone to local optima, and imbalance between exploration53. The FA algorithm demonstrates efficiency and ease of execution. Still, it has problems with poor solution speed and a tendency to converge in local optima and fails to balance exploration and exploitation54.

After performing a comprehensive literature study, it is observed that competition is about adopting a technique characterized by superior convergence accuracy and speed to obtain the global optimum. Conversely, an algorithm may successfully solve one optimisation problem yet fail to address another. As a result, selecting an effective algorithm with high precision and convergence speed is critical for reaching the ideal size of hybrid systems. Furthermore, having a nonzero reliability constraint can result in considerable cost savings while assuring a sufficient energy supply.

Motivation and contribution

Based on the literature review, meta-heuristic algorithms are more effective and reliability in solving the optimization challenges of HRES design. Moreover, the No-Free-Lunch (NFL) theorem signifies that no single algorithm can effectively address all optimization problems, highlighting the necessity for new approaches. Hence motivating by the above factors this work employs a newly developed Black-Winged Kite algorithm to design an optimal off-grid HRES configuration with the least annual cost and levelized cost of electricity. The current study endeavours to tackle a specific load requirement for an educational system located in Puri, Odisha, India. To generate the continuous power supply, the current research performed a techno-economic evaluation of the HRES system, which includes photovoltaic (PV), wind, and battery. The proficiency of the applied BKA algorithm is verified by comparing it with four prominent intelligence algorithms: the Arithmetic Optimisation Algorithm (AOA), Harish Hawk’s Optimiser (HHO), White Shark Optimiser (WSO), and Snake Optimiser (SO). The primary goal was to determine optimal size HRES, focusing on achieving an effective convergence speed and minimising the system’s annual cost.

The following summarized the significant contributions of this research work.

  • Recently developed BKA algorithm is employed first time to benchmark the sizing of the suggested HRES by minimizing the total annual cost of a system with the intended loss of power supply.

  • Technical and economical estimations have been conducted for the projected HRES integrating photovoltaic, wind turbine and battery (PV/WT/BT) to generate electricity for an educational system of puri, Odisha, India.

  • To demonstrate the effectiveness of BKA algorithm it is compared against four prominent algorithms in terms of the various statistical findings, including best and worst solutions, convergence rate, mean, standard deviation, crest, variance, and discrepancies near the global solution.

  • The experimental findings demonstrated that the projected BKA algorithm outperforms the compared intelligence algorithms in determining the optimal size of HRES.

The remaining sections of the paper are summarised in the following fashion: “Black-Winged kite algorithm” section delivers a comprehensive explanation of the BKA algorithm. “Modeling and methodology of HRES” section outlines the detailed mathematical frameworks of the system components of HRES. “Formulation of objective function” section delineates the construction of the optimisation problem. “Simulation analysis of HRES” section delineates the simulation analysis of HRES. Lastly, “Conclusion” section concludes the study and proposes possible directions for further investigation.

Black-Winged kite algorithm

This study applies an optimization method called Black-winged Kite Algorithm (BKA) for the first time to determine the optimal size of the renewable system with minimum cost. The BKA was primarily presented by the researchers Wang et al. in 202455 and is a swarm-based optimization technique encouraged by the hunting tactics and migration strategy of black-winged kites. This diminutive bird species is distinguished by its blue-grey upper body part and underparts appearing white. Its prey is small animals, such as birds, reptiles, and beetles. They are well-known for their powerful hovering ability and excellent hunting performance. The BKA models its optimization process through two key stages: the attacking behavior, which simulates their hunting systems, and the migration behavior, which reflects their movement patterns. These features serve as a source of inspiration for the BKA.

Mathematical model

This section captures the essence of the Black-winged kite’s migratory and attacking behaviors, skilfully modeling them to shape the BKA algorithm and simulate its optimization prowess.

Initialization of population

In the BKA, population initialization begins with the help of random initiating solutions. The initial position Inline graphic each black-winged kite (bk) is produced by providing the Eq. (1).

graphic file with name 41598_2025_6442_Article_Equ1.gif 1

Here, Inline graphic and Inline graphic designate the lower and upper borders of the search domain, respectively, while Inline graphic represents a random value. The following matrix (Inline graphic) embodies the current location of each black-winged kites (bk).

graphic file with name 41598_2025_6442_Article_Equ2.gif 2

In the Eq. (2), Inline graphic denotes the Inline graphic dimension of Inline graphic black-winged kites. The symbols Inline graphic and Inline graphic signify the size of individuals and dimensionality of the search domain, respectively.

Attacking behaviour

Black-winged kites are highly skilled at hunting little grassland creatures and bugs. Black-winged kites change their wing and tail angles in response to wind velocity while in flight. They float silently to monitor prey species and perform rapid dives to capture it. This approach encompasses various attack patterns for global search and exploration. Figure 1 shows the kite floating through the air, while Fig. 2 displays the kite in attack mode for their prey. The mathematical model for their attack behavior is specified below:

graphic file with name 41598_2025_6442_Article_Equ3.gif 3
graphic file with name 41598_2025_6442_Article_Equ4.gif 4

where Inline graphic and Inline graphic denotes the black-winged kites updated position and current position at Inline graphic and Inline graphic iterations respectively. Symbols, Inline graphic and Inline graphic denote the randomly selected number belongs to [0,1] and constant value 0.9, respectively. Inline graphic and Inline graphic represent the total and current iteration, respectively.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Black-winged kites floating in the air and waiting for attack.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Searching and attacking for potential prey while floating in the air.

Migration behavior

The intricate migratory behavior of birds can be affected by multiple factors related to the environment, especially food availability and climate over time. In response to seasonal variations, many birds migrate from northern to southern parts to find better living conditions and food sources. Leaders typically command the migration process, and the navigational abilities of these individuals are essential to the team’s achievements. The mathematical design for this strategy is outlined below:

graphic file with name 41598_2025_6442_Article_Equ5.gif 5
graphic file with name 41598_2025_6442_Article_Equ6.gif 6

Here, Inline graphic denotes the leader of black-winged kites, Inline graphic epitomizes the fitness value of Inline graphic individuals, while Inline graphic refers to the fitness value of arbitrary black-winged kites. Inline graphic characterizes the Cauchy mutation shown in Eqs. (7) and (8):

graphic file with name 41598_2025_6442_Article_Equ7.gif 7

When the values of Inline graphic and Inline graphic, the above formula is:

graphic file with name 41598_2025_6442_Article_Equ8.gif 8

Modeling and methodology of HRES

The HRES which operates off-grid including photovoltaic panel, wind turbine, and battery is specially designed to deliver a consistently reliable and sustainable energy source in remote or off-grid regions. By utilising the photovoltaic phenomenon, PV systems are able to directly transform sunlight into electrical energy. They generate direct current (DC) power, which may either be utilised immediately to deliver the load or preserved in a battery bank for further usage. Wind turbines are a supplementary source of power, and they are particularly useful in situations when solar energy is not sufficient. These panels are a useful addition to photovoltaic panels since they generate electricity regardless of the weather conditions, ensuring a more consistent and uninterrupted supply of energy. The extra electrical energy that is created by the photovoltaic panels and wind turbines is preserved in the battery bank. Whenever the requirement for energy is surpassing than the capacity of the generation system, this stored energy can be utilised. Direct current (DC) power that is generated from PV and wind turbines, which is stored in batteries, is converted into AC (alternating current) power by the inverter. This type of electricity is typically utilised by the majority of equipment. The incorporation of DC-generated renewable energy into AC-based electrical demands is made possible as a result of this function. The term “load” refers to the many electrical devices and systems that are able to benefit from the power that is produced by the HRES. Figure 3 depicted the off-grid HRES that consists of various components including wind, solar, battery, and other electrical devices.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Graphical design of off-grid HRES.

Framework of PV model

Radiation from the sun has emerged as the major source of energy for a solar-powered system, and it is abundantly accessible in the surrounding atmosphere. However, the probable source of solar radiation differs depending on the region being considered. To effectively replicate the functioning associated with solar energy generation, it is crucial to collect sufficient solar radiation readings to the research area throughout a 1-year time frame, with observation recorded over one-hour gaps. Throughout the year of 2020, solar radiation statistical data were obtained via the NSRDB Power Data Access Viewer. The output (Inline graphic) of a photovoltaic system is mathematically defined by Eq. (9) 56,57:

graphic file with name 41598_2025_6442_Article_Equ9.gif 9

Here Inline graphic represents the rated capacity of the solar panel in Inline graphic, Inline graphic signifies the radiation of solar in (W/m2). Inline graphic stand for the number of solar panels. Inline graphic represents the PV directing factor (Inline graphic). Inline graphic denotes the cell temperature under reference operating circumstances, Inline graphic presents the temperature coefficient (%/0C), Inline graphic is the corresponding solar radiation (W/m2), and Inline graphic stands for ambient temperature is expressed in (0C).

Framework of wind turbine model

Wind turbines are devices that convert wind-generated energy into the electrical energy through the motion of rotation. The wind speed at a specific hub height can be estimated by deploying the power law formula, which is given by Eq. (10) 58 48.

graphic file with name 41598_2025_6442_Article_Equ10.gif 10

The following equation serves as a tool for performing a mathematical calculation to determine the power output from a wind turbine18.

graphic file with name 41598_2025_6442_Article_Equ11.gif 11

Here, Inline graphic and Inline graphic and symbolize the wind speed at specific hub-heights Inline graphic and Inline graphic, respectively. Symbol Inline graphic is a constant number whose value is 0.14. Inline graphic denotes the rated capacity of wind turbine. V(t) epitomizes the speed of wind (m/s), Inline graphic and Inline graphic designate the cut-in and cut-out speed, respectively, Inline graphic signifies the rated wind speed, Inline graphic epitomizes output power (kW).

Framework of battery modelling

Battery storage systems enable incorporation of intermittent sources of renewable energy and endorse more effective utilisation of renewable source of energy. The systems that store energy are designed to regulate the equilibrium between output and demand, thereby improving the reliability as well as stability of renewable energy sources. Multiple types of storage equipment have been employed, including batteries, supercapacitors, fuel cells, and flywheels. The present research work integrates a cost-effective battery bank as a device to store energy, which constitutes a substantial share of the overall cost of the system. Operational strategy of the battery significantly influences its overall lifespan and effectiveness. It is essential that the battery’s charge and discharge states remain within the established upper and lower boundaries. The charging process of the battery initiates during the entire power produced via natural sources (solar and wind) surpasses the load requirement. In the absence of alternative power sources, the battery initiates the discharge of its stored energy to satisfy the requirement. Details mathematical calculation of its state of charge can be performed deploying the Eq. (12) and Eq. (13) 37.

graphic file with name 41598_2025_6442_Article_Equ12.gif 12
graphic file with name 41598_2025_6442_Article_Equ13.gif 13

Here, Inline graphic and Inline graphic epitomizes the energy that is preserved at hour t and Inline graphic, respectively. Inline graphic signifies the generation of total energy through renewable sources, Inline graphic Inline graphic represents the power required at time Inline graphic, and Inline graphic and Inline graphic denote the proficiency of inverter and battery, respectively.

Power converter

For the purpose of ensuring that the flow of energy is maintained in a balanced manner, a hybrid configuration requires the utilisation of a power converter that is composed of AC as well as DC operational factor. There are two ways of power translation (DC/AC and AC/DC) that operate via the load’s requisite frequency. The converter rating corresponding to peak load demand is expressed by Eq. (14) 16:

graphic file with name 41598_2025_6442_Article_Equ14.gif 14

Here, Inline graphic embodies size of the converter. Inline graphic epitomizes the peak power load demand (in kW). Inline graphic characterizes the efficacy of the converter.

Formulation of objective function

The primary objective function of this study aims to decrease the TAC of a hybrid system by figuring out the optimum size of the HRES factors. There are four factors that are associated with TAC of the system: maintenance cost, salvage values, capital cost, and replacement cost. Following describes how to minimise the objective function:

graphic file with name 41598_2025_6442_Article_Equa.gif

where, TAC signifies the total annual cost and is calculated by using Eq. (15) 59.

graphic file with name 41598_2025_6442_Article_Equ15.gif 15

Here, Inline graphic—Number of factors, Inline graphic—Capital cost of the various factors, Inline graphic—Replacing cost of the various factors, CRF—Capacity recovery factor, Inline graphic—Single Payment Present Worth, Inline graphic–Capacity recovery factor, Inline graphic—Components’ operating and maintenance costs, Inline graphic—Salvage cost.

The LCOE (levelized cost of electricity) of the system and CRF can be estimated by executing the Eqs. (16) and (17) 60,61.

graphic file with name 41598_2025_6442_Article_Equ16.gif 16

where Inline graphic denotes the total amount of electricity served in a year.

graphic file with name 41598_2025_6442_Article_Equ17.gif 17

Here, Inline graphic denotes the nominal discount rate, Inline graphic signifies the inflation rate, Inline graphic represents the real discount rate, and Inline graphic symbolizes the system lifetime.

Since, the system that has been designed is a hybrid electrical system, reliability plays an essential factor. This study considers LPSP (loss of power supply probability) to act as reliability constraint. For LPSP = 0 indicates that the installed HRES will always generate sufficient amount of energy to fulfil the recruitment. Without it, the system will lose load and become less reliable. The expression for the LPSP index is outlined by Eq. (18) 56,62:

graphic file with name 41598_2025_6442_Article_Equ18.gif 18

Here Inline graphic indicates the renewable power from wind and solar, Inline graphic symbolizes load demand, Inline graphic embodies the amount of energy retained inside the battery cell at time (t-1), and Inline graphic epitomizes minimum charge of the battery cell.

Simulation analysis of HRES

In this study the selected research site is puri location which is located in the eastern part of Odisha, India, on the Bay of Bengal River. The geographical coordinates of puri lie around the 19.9965 latitudes and 85.8486 longitudes. The NSRDB power data access viewer internet database for 2020 was adopted for getting temperature, speed of wind, and solar radiation data for the chosen location. At this specific location, there is a substantial amount of access to wind and solar resources throughout the whole year. The data that has been collected for the location is displayed in Figs. 4, 5, and 6, which includes information on the ambient temperature, wind speed, and solar radiation. The load requirements are the primary factor that determines the best possible configuration of the HRES, which symbolises the amount of energy that is consumed over the course of a year. Data on the amount of electricity used by educational institutions in Puri are utilised in this work. A representation of the projected daily load profile throughout the year is depicted in Fig. 7. As per the energy consumptions that were acquired for educational loads, the system is recommended for a load requirement of 37,909.4 kWh per year. The purpose of the present study is to generate research findings for the first time in the chosen region, with the goal of achieving minimum energy costs. Table 2 presents a detailed summary of the economic and technical specifications of the various components utilised in this research. The current study operates under the premise that the project will span an estimated time frame of 20 years.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Graphical representation solar radiation (w/m2).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Graphical representation of wind speed (m/s).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Graphical representation ambient temperature (°C).

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Graphical representation yearly load profile (kW).

Table 2.

Summary of the various HRES components and their respective parameter values 16,6368.

Component Parameter Value
Solar Unit capital cost (Inline graphic) 220 $/kw
Reference solar radiation (Inline graphic) 1000 w/m2
Temperature coefficient (Inline graphic) − 0.39%/°C
Rated power (Inline graphic) 1 kw
Lifetime 20 years
Reference temperature (Inline graphic) 25 °C
Operator and Maintenance cost (Inline graphic) 10 $/kw year
Wind Turbine Unit capital cost (Inline graphic) 240 $/kw
Rated Power 1 kw
Shear component (Inline graphic) 0.14 dimensionless
Cut in speed (Inline graphic) 3 m/s
Hub height (Inline graphic) 50 m
Rated wind speed (Inline graphic) 11 m/s
Cut out speed (Inline graphic) 20 m/s
Operator and maintenance cost (Inline graphic) 10 $/kw year
Hub height (Inline graphic) 50 m
Life time 20 years
Battery Capital cost (Inline graphic) 250 $/kw
Replacement cost (Inline graphic) 250 $/kw
Rated capacity 1 kw
Battery type Lead acid
Charging efficiency (Inline graphic 90%
Discharging efficiency (Inline graphic 100%
Life time 5 years
Converter Capital cost (Inline graphic) 3367$/kw
Life time 20 years
Efficiency (Inline graphic) 95%
Operator and maintenance cost (Inline graphic) 20 years
Rated power 1 kw

Result analysis of PV-WT-BT off-grid system

In this research work MATLAB 2022b program has been integrated to experiment the BKA algorithm efficiency for solving optimal sizing of HRES. To investigate the superiority and reliability of the consider BKA algorithm and to figure out the optimal size for HRES, four prominent intelligence algorithms including Arithmetic Optimization Algorithm (AOA)69 Harish Hawk’s Optimizer (HHO)70, White Shark Optimizer (WSO)71, and Snake Optimizer (SO)72 are selected for the comparison purposes. To ensure that all considered algorithms are treated fairly, each intelligence algorithms are runed 25 independent trials with a maximum of fifty iterations and 30 population sizes.

This study is performed for the LPSP (5%) to make sure the reliability of the suggested HRES system.

Off-grid HRES systems provide access to electricity in town and village areas where it may not be feasible to find grid infrastructure. Off-grid systems offer significant advantages in the context of environmental sustainability and the effectiveness of costs, since they can be designed and enhanced to satisfy specific energy requirements, thereby providing versatile in the system design and configuration. The dependability of the source of electrical power is crucial for a completely off-grid energy system, necessitating the integration of alternative solutions to guarantee continuous energy availability. This study employs an off-grid HRES that integrates PV, WT, and BT to mitigate dependability issues. When renewable energy production goes over load demand, excess energy is saved in battery cells until they reach their rated capacity. On the contrary, when renewable energy generation is inadequate, the batteries drain to provide the demand. Photovoltaic panels may create significant amounts of power during the daytime, but they are incapable of producing electricity at night. To mitigate this constraint, wind turbines and solar power panels are connected, as their synergistic functioning guarantees a constant energy supply throughout the day and night.

Table 3 displays the solutions provided by the algorithms for the sizing problem, taking into account the influence of the solar derating factor (0.33). The outcome metrics presented in Table 3 demonstrate the efficiency of the developed hybrid PV/WT/BT (HPWB) system in attaining optimal performance. The experimental outcomes of compared algorithm in Table 3 for different reliability index measurements showed the total annual cost with LPSP 5%. These outcomes demonstration that the lowest annual cost needed for the HRES, employing the BKA intelligence method and 60.4722 kW solar panel, 23.8337 kW turbines for wind power, and 13.6159 kWh batteries, is $ 7105.2316, with a cost of electricity of 0.1874 $/kWh. As compared to the AOA, which has displayed unsatisfactory overall performance, the BKA has delivered a notable enhancement in its statical performance, evidenced by a 22.1144% reduction in TAC and a 1.0037% drop in LCOE. Hence, from the statistical outcomes, it is pointed out that the BKA algorithm generates superior outcomes against the other intelligence algorithms. The LCOE calculated by the BKA indicates that the suggested method provides power to off-grid areas at a cost-effective rate. Consequently, while evaluating the comprehensive study of economic variables and reliability, the results attained by the BKA may be regarded as the most advantageous combination.

Table 3.

Findings of the optimal sizing problem of HRES obtained by the MAs for LPSP (5%).

HPWB LPSP = 5%
Algorithms AOA HHO WSO SO BKA
Best Inline graphic 5.648441 65.7896 58.3964 60.0286 60.4722
Inline graphic 94.48363 13.8249 43.1098 25.1086 23.8337
Inline graphic 95.72957 11.7963 14.2936 14.3024 13.6159
TAC 9122.6477 7176.6299 7550.6970 7144.6137 7105.2316
LCOE 0.2406434 0.1893 0.1992 0.1885 0.1874
LPSP 3.8172489 5.0000 3.0177 4.7170 4.9998
Worst Inline graphic 18.558278 11.8773 16.8846 35.3932 39.6468
Inline graphic 481.44172 55.9792 452.9902 44.6921 79.6463
Inline graphic 7.69638 172.1823 128.2925 53.9867 27.6054
TAC 17,051.354 13,042.0396 23,174.8926 7840.3504 7746.6703
LCOE 0.4497922 0.3440 0.6113 0.2068 0.2043
LPSP 3.9171825 4.5387 0.0000 4.6644 4.9948

Significant values are in [bold].

Convergence analysis

Convergence analysis is one of the important statistical tools for assessing the accuracy and reliability of numerical approaches or algorithms utilised across many disciplines. It requires the analysis of convergence curves, which are essential for evaluating the convergence rate of the suggested method against various intelligence algorithms as well as exploring techniques to get the optimum solution. To determine the proficiency of the BKA method, it is compared against prominent intelligence algorithms including AOA, HHO, WSO, and SO. Figure 8 depicts the convergence curve of various intelligence algorithm for PV/WT/BT configuration. Figure 8 illustrates that the BKA attains the better convergence accuracy after twenty iteration and reached the optimum value before the against algorithms. For algorithm WSO the convergence rate is very poor and attained constant values at every iteration. However, if the convergence curve of HHO attained faster at initial iteration but at the iteration increases it has shown poor performance. Hence, in comparison to existing intelligence algorithms, the suggested hybrid system has been replicated more rapidly, owing to the efficacy of the BKA approach.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

Convergence curve of BKA and other MAs.

Statistical analysis

For the purpose of confirming the optimum conclusions of the algorithm, the statistical analysis for evaluation of data is important. Over the course of 25 runs, a number of statistical assessments, including the mean, standard deviation, variance, and crest factor, for each examined algorithm have been compiled and outlined in Table 4. The outcomes shown in Table 4 demonstrate that BKA algorithms delivers superior performance over all compared algorithms. The statistical examination of the TAC solution reveals that the results of the BKA intelligence algorithm have a low mean, standard deviation, variance and crest value in compared to the results of the AOA, HHO, WSO, and SO algorithms. BKA, on the other hand, has a low standard deviation and more consistently finds a higher value for the objective function. This is in contrast to WSO, which has a big standard deviation and shows that locating the optimal solution may include local optimum positions. Figure 9 illustrates the convergence process and the fluctuation in annual costs across 25 independent trails. An examination of convergence qualities reveals that BKA has superior exploratory capabilities compared to the AOA, HHO, WSO, and SO algorithms. Minimising the standard deviation yields global solutions, distinguished by rapid convergence and less oscillations. A high standard deviation induces more fluctuations around a stable state, hence entrapping local solutions. Moreover, a box plot comparison has been presented in Fig. 10, that further illustrates the efficacy of the projected BKA method in comparison to existing intelligence algorithms for the HRES design issue. Upon doing a box plot analysis, it is obvious that the BKA has a median value below the average, accompanied by a reduced interquartile range. These data demonstrate that BKA displays a strong and reliable performance in the HRES design issue.

Table 4.

Statistical outcomes of optimal sizing problem obtained by the MAs for LPSP (5%).

HPWB LPSP = 5% Algorithms
Measure AOA HHO WSO SO BKA
Mean 1.0824E+04 8.6072E+03 1.4764E+04 7.3301E+03 7.2846E+03
Std 2.0437E+03 1.4437E+03 4.1158E+03 2.2015E+02 1.7969E+02
Variance 4.1766E+06 2.0843E+06 1.6940E+07 4.8467E+04 3.2287E+04
Crest 1.5490 1.4952 1.5142 1.0692 1.0631

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9

Variation of total annual cost of BKA and other MAs.

Fig. 10.

Fig. 10

Boxplot graph for BKA and other MAs.

Conclusion

In this study, the recently designed black-winged kite algorithm (BKA) has been employed to optimize the sizing for an off-grid hybrid renewable energy system (HRES) comprising photovoltaic panel (PV), wind turbine (WT), and battery (BT). The system has been modelled to supply electricity to an educational institute in Puri, Odisha, India, with the goal of diminishing the total annual cost. To statistically benchmark the proficiency of the BKA intelligence algorithm, five key performance metrics, such as best solution, worst solution, standard deviation, mean, variance, and crest, have been calculated and compared with four prominent intelligence algorithms, such as Harris Hawks Optimisation (HHO), Sine Cosine Algorithm (SCA), White Shark Optimisation (WSO), Arithmetic Optimisation Algorithm (AOA), and Snake Optimiser (SO). The statistical results demonstrated that the newly projected BKA method outperformed the comparative intelligence algorithms, establishing the best HRES configuration with the lowest annual cost of $7105.23 and exhibiting a superior convergence rate. The low standard deviation of the BKA also indicated reduced oscillations around the optimal solution, underscoring its robustness and proficiency. In contrast, the WSO and SO algorithms displayed higher standard deviations, suggesting a greater tendency to become trapped in local optima and exhibit increased oscillations around the desired solution. Finally, the statistical results demonstrate the effectiveness and reliability of the suggested approach based on BKA in designing a cost effective and reliable hybrid system. However, this study primarily focusses on a hybrid PV/WT/Battery configuration. In future studies applying the suggested algorithm to optimize other HRESs with various configurations and analysing the outcomes can provide comprehensive an additional guide for energy engineers. Furthermore, the study of optimal sizing through hybrid optimization method paves the way for future research, addressing the complexities and challenges associated with hybrid systems.

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham for supporting this research work. Also, the author extends their appreciation to Taif University, Saudi Arabia, for supporting this work through project number (TU-DSPP-2024-17).

Abbreviations

HRES

Hybrid renewable energy systems

BKA

Black-winged kite algorithm

RES

Renewable energy sources

NFL

No-free-lunch theorem

PV

Solar panel

WT

Wind turbine

BT

Battery

NSGAII

Non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II

DG

Diesel generator

TAC

Total annual cost

LPSP

Loss of power supply probability

BS

Battery storage

PSO

Particle swarm optimizer

BA

Bat algorithm

FA

Firefly algorithm

GWO

Grey wolf optimizer

CSA

Cuckoo search optimizer

GO

Grasshopper optimizer

ABC

Artificial bee colony

TLBO

Teaching learning-based algorithm

DFA

Dragon fly algorithm

TSA

Tunicate swarm optimizer

SSO

Social spider optimizer

MBA

Mine blast algorithm

HHA

Harish hawk optimizer

RA

Rime algorithm

HBBCO

Hybrid big-bang crunch optimizer

EBMGO

Evolved mountain gazelle optimizer

SO

Snake optimizer

WSO

White shark optimizer

Inline graphic

Number of solar panels

Inline graphic

Radiation of solar

Inline graphic

Cell temperature under reference operating circumstances

Inline graphic

Temperature coefficient

Inline graphic

Reference solar radiation

CRF

Capacity recovery factor

Inline graphic

Ambient temperature

Inline graphic

Rated wind speed

Inline graphic

Output power

Inline graphic

Proficiency of inverter

Inline graphic

Proficiency of battery

Inline graphic

Peak power load demand

Inline graphic

Efficacy of the converter

Inline graphic

Capital cost of the various factors

Inline graphic

Replacing cost of the various factors

Inline graphic

Salvage cost

Inline graphic

Wind speed at specific hub-height Inline graphic

Inline graphic

Wind speed at specific hub-height Inline graphic

SPPW

Single payment present worth

Inline graphic

Components’ operating and maintenance costs

Inline graphic

Number of factors

Inline graphic

Total amount of electricity served in a year

Inline graphic

Cut-in speed

Inline graphic

Cut-out speed

Inline graphic

R Rated capacity of wind turbine

LCOE

Levelized cost of electricity

NPC

Net present cost

Inline graphic

Rated capacity

Author contributions

Sarada Mohapatra: Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing-original draft. Deepa K: Visualization, Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Supervision, Writing-review. Porselvi T: Validation, Project administration, Visualization, review & editing. S.V. Tresa Sangeetha: Validation, Project administration, Visualization, review & editing. R.A.: Validation, Project administration, Visualization, review & editing. A.E.: Validation, Project administration, Visualization, review & editing.

Funding

This research was funded by Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia project number (TU-DSPP-2024-17).

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article.

Declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

This article contains no studies with human participants or animals performed by authors.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Sarada Mohapatra, Email: msmohapatra.sarada@gmail.com.

Ahmed Emara, Email: a.emara@ubt.edu.sa.

References

  • 1.Shezan, S. A. et al. Performance analysis of an off-grid wind-PV (photovoltaic)-diesel-battery hybrid energy system feasible for remote areas. J. Clean. Prod.125, 121–132 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sah, S. V., Prakash, V., Pathak, P. K. & Yadav, A. K. Resilient fractional-order fuzzy-based tilt control of renewable-dominated hybrid power system. Neural Comput. Appl.10.1007/s00521-025-11015-w (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Deb, S., Sachan, S., Sinha, S., & Malik, P. Planning and operation of hybrid local energy system through Ant-Lion optimization. In 2023 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Sustainable Energy and Future Electric Transportation (SEFET) 1–6. (IEEE, 2023).
  • 4.Niveditha, N. & Singaravel, M. R. Optimal sizing of hybrid PV–Wind–Battery storage system for net zero energy buildings to reduce grid burden. Appl. Energy324, 119713 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Thirunavukkarasu, M., Lala, H. & Sawle, Y. Techno-economic-environmental analysis of off-grid hybrid energy systems using honey badger optimizer. Renew. Energy218, 119247 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kharrich, M., Abualigah, L., Kamel, S., AbdEl-Sattar, H. & Tostado-Véliz, M. An improved arithmetic optimization algorithm for design of a microgrid with energy storage system: Case study of El Kharga Oasis, Egypt. J. Energy Storage51, 104343 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fares, D., Fathi, M. & Mekhilef, S. Performance evaluation of metaheuristic techniques for optimal sizing of a stand-alone hybrid PV/wind/battery system. Appl. Energy305, 117823 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yazıcı, G., Karasan, O. E., Kocaman, A. S. & Stoner, R. Mathematical programming models for multistage rural electrification planning: Off-grid, grid and mini-grid options. Energy316, 134335 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Babatunde, O. M., Munda, J. L. & Hamam, Y. A comprehensive state-of-the-art survey on hybrid renewable energy system operations and planning. IEEE Access8, 75313–75346 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sah, S. V., Prakash, V., Pathak, P. K. & Yadav, A. K. Virtual inertia and intelligent control assisted frequency regulation of time-delayed power system under DoS attacks. Chaos Solitons Fractals188, 115578 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pathak, P. K., Yadav, A. K., & Kamwa, I. Resilient ratio control assisted virtual inertia for frequency regulation of hybrid power system under DoS attack and communication delay. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications. (2024).
  • 12.Allwyn, R. G., Al-Hinai, A., Al-Abri, R. & Malik, A. Optimization and techno-economic analysis of PV/Battery system for street lighting using genetic algorithm—A case study in Oman. Clean. Eng. Technology8, 100475 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gulzar, M. M., Iqbal, A., Sibtain, D. & Khalid, M. An innovative converterless solar PV control strategy for a grid connected hybrid PV/wind/fuel-cell system coupled with battery energy storage. IEEE Access11, 23245–23259 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Palanisamy, S., & Lala, H. Optimal sizing of renewable energy powered hydrogen and electric vehicle charging station (HEVCS). IEEE Access. (2024).
  • 15.Wang, H. Y. et al. Optimal wind energy generation considering climatic variables by deep belief network (DBN) model based on modified coot optimization algorithm (MCOA). Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess.53, 102744 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Thirunavukkarasu, M., Lala, H. & Sawle, Y. Reliability index based optimal sizing and statistical performance analysis of stand-alone hybrid renewable energy system using metaheuristic algorithms. Alex. Eng. J.74, 387–413 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sinha, S. & Chandel, S. S. Review of software tools for hybrid renewable energy systems. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.32, 192–205 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ahmad, J. et al. Techno economic analysis of a wind-photovoltaic-biomass hybrid renewable energy system for rural electrification: A case study of Kallar Kahar. Energy148, 208–234 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bukar, A. L. & Tan, C. W. A review on stand-alone photovoltaic-wind energy system with fuel cell: System optimization and energy management strategy. J. Clean. Prod.221, 73–88 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wolpert, D. H. & Macready, W. G. No free lunch theorems for optimization. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput.1(1), 67–82 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Salgotra, R., Sharma, P., Raju, S. & Gandomi, A. H. A contemporary systematic review on meta-heuristic optimization algorithms with their matlab and python code reference. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng.31(3), 1749–1822 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Han, M. et al. Walrus optimizer: A novel nature-inspired metaheuristic algorithm. Expert Syst. Appl.239, 122413 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mahmoud, F. S. et al. Optimal sizing of smart hybrid renewable energy system using different optimization algorithms. Energy Rep.8, 4935–4956 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Moghaddam, S., Bigdeli, M., Moradlou, M. & Siano, P. Designing of stand-alone hybrid PV/wind/battery system using improved crow search algorithm considering reliability index. Int. J. Energy Environ. Eng.10(4), 429–449 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Yang, H., Zhou, W., Lu, L. & Fang, Z. Optimal sizing method for stand-alone hybrid solar–wind system with LPSP technology by using genetic algorithm. Sol. Energy82(4), 354–367 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Khan, A. et al. Enhanced evolutionary sizing algorithms for optimal sizing of a stand-alone PV-WT-battery hybrid system. Appl. Sci.9(23), 5197 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Marcel, E. T., Mutale, J. & Mushi, A. T. Optimal design of hybrid renewable energy for Tanzania rural communities. Tanzania J. Sci.47(5), 1716–1727 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Abbassi, A. et al. Improved off-grid wind/photovoltaic/hybrid energy storage system based on new framework of moth-flame optimization algorithm. Int. J. Energy Res.46(5), 6711–6729 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ayan, S. & Toylan, H. Size optimization of a stand-alone hybrid photovoltaic/wind/battery renewable energy system using a heuristic optimization algorithm. Int. J. Energy Res.46(11), 14908–14925 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Naderipour, A. et al. Optimal, reliable and cost-effective framework of photovoltaic-wind-battery energy system design considering outage concept using grey wolf optimizer algorithm—case study for Iran. IEEE Access7, 182611–182623 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Arabi-Nowdeh, S. et al. Multi-criteria optimal design of hybrid clean energy system with battery storage considering off-and on-grid application. J. Clean. Prod.290, 125808 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mahmoudi, S. M., Maleki, A. & Rezaei Ochbelagh, D. Multi-objective optimization of hybrid energy systems using gravitational search algorithm. Sci. Rep.15(1), 2550 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sarangi, P., Mohapatra, P. & Lala, H. Performance evaluation of evolved opposition-based mountain gazelle optimizer techniques for optimal sizing of a stand-alone hybrid energy system. IEEE Access12, 148450 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kamjoo, A., Maheri, A., Dizqah, A. M. & Putrus, G. A. Multi-objective design under uncertainties of hybrid renewable energy system using NSGA-II and chance constrained programming. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst.74, 187–194 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Javed, M. S. et al. Economic analysis and optimization of a renewable energy-based power supply system with different energy storages for a remote island. Renew. Energy164, 1376–1394 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Marsa, N., Houcine, L., Zaafouri, A. & Chaari, A. Optimal sizing of stand-alone hybrid photovoltaic/wind system using bat algorithm. Int. J. Ambient Energy42(8), 920–928 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kaabeche, A., Diaf, S. & Ibtiouen, R. Firefly-inspired algorithm for optimal sizing of renewable hybrid system considering reliability criteria. Sol. Energy155, 727–738 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Yahiaoui, A., Fodhil, F., Benmansour, K., Tadjine, M. & Cheggaga, N. Grey wolf optimizer for optimal design of hybrid renewable energy system PV-diesel generator-battery: Application to the case of Djanet city of Algeria. Sol. Energy158, 941–951 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Mohamed, M. A., Eltamaly, A. M., Alolah, A. I. & Hatata, A. Y. A novel framework-based cuckoo search algorithm for sizing and optimization of grid-independent hybrid renewable energy systems. Int. J. Green Energy16(1), 86–100 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Bukar, A. L., Tan, C. W. & Lau, K. Y. Optimal sizing of an autonomous photovoltaic/wind/battery/diesel generator microgrid using grasshopper optimization algorithm. Sol. Energy188, 685–696 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ciabattoni, L., Ferracuti, F., Ippoliti, G., & Longhi, S. Artificial bee colonies based optimal sizing of microgrid components: A profit maximization approach. In 2016 IEEE congress on evolutionary computation (CEC) 2036–2042. (2016, IEEE).
  • 42.Ashtiani, M. N., Toopshekan, A., Astaraei, F. R., Yousefi, H. & Maleki, A. Techno-economic analysis of a grid-connected PV/battery system using the teaching-learning-based optimization algorithm. Sol. Energy203, 69–82 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Sureshkumar, K. & Ponnusamy, V. Power flow management in micro grid through renewable energy sources using a hybrid modified dragonfly algorithm with bat search algorithm. Energy181, 1166–1178 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Abd El-Sattar, H., Sultan, H. M., Kamel, S., Menesy, A. S., & Rahmann, C. Optimal design of hybrid stand-alone microgrids using tunicate swarm algorithm. In 2021 IEEE international conference on automation/XXIV congress of the Chilean association of automatic control (ICA-ACCA) 1–6 (IEEE, 2021).
  • 45.Fathy, A., Kaaniche, K. & Alanazi, T. M. Recent approach based social spider optimizer for optimal sizing of hybrid PV/wind/battery/diesel integrated microgrid in aljouf region. IEEE Access8, 57630–57645 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Fathy, A. A reliable methodology based on mine blast optimization algorithm for optimal sizing of hybrid PV-wind-FC system for remote area in Egypt. Renew. Energy95, 367–380 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Al-Shamma’a, A. A., Hussein Farh, H. M., Noman, A. M., Al-Shaalan, A. M. & Alkuhayli, A. Optimal sizing of a hybrid renewable photovoltaic-wind system-based microgrid using Harris Hawk Optimizer. Int. J. Photoenergy2022(1), 4825411 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Said, M. Performance of RIME algorithm for optimal sizing of design hybrid wind turbine-photovoltaic-battery system. J. Electr. Syst.20(3), 4284–4297 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Ahmadi, S. & Abdi, S. Application of the Hybrid Big Bang-Big Crunch algorithm for optimal sizing of a stand-alone hybrid PV/wind/battery system. Sol. Energy134, 366–374 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Jamadi, M., Merrikh-Bayat, F. & Bigdeli, M. Very accurate parameter estimation of single-and double-diode solar cell models using a modified artificial bee colony algorithm. Int. J. Energy Environ. Eng.7, 13–25 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Gad, A. G. Particle swarm optimization algorithm and its applications: A systematic review. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng.29(5), 2531–2561 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Teng, Z. J., Lv, J. L. & Guo, L. W. An improved hybrid grey wolf optimization algorithm. Soft. Comput.23, 6617–6631 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Yelghi, A. & Köse, C. A modified firefly algorithm for global minimum optimization. Appl. Soft Comput.62, 29–44 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Dong, H. et al. An improved teaching–learning-based optimization algorithm with a modified learner phase and a new mutation-restarting phase. Knowl.-Based Syst.258, 109989 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Wang, J., Wang, W. C., Hu, X. X., Qiu, L. & Zang, H. F. Black-winged kite algorithm: A nature-inspired meta-heuristic for solving benchmark functions and engineering problems. Artif. Intell. Rev.57(4), 98 (2024). [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Hemeida, A. M. et al. Multi-objective multi-verse optimization of renewable energy sources-based micro-grid system: Real case. Ain Shams Eng. J.13(1), 101543 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Kumar, P. P. & Saini, R. P. Optimization of an off-grid integrated hybrid renewable energy system with various energy storage technologies using different dispatch strategies. Energy Sources Part A Recov. Util. Environ. Effects47(1), 274–303 (2025). [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Tazay, A. F., Ibrahim, A. M. A., Noureldeen, O. & Hamdan, I. Modeling, control, and performance evaluation of grid-tied hybrid PV/wind power generation system: Case study of Gabel El-Zeit region, Egypt. IEEE Access8, 96528–96542 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Khan, A. & Javaid, N. Jaya learning-based optimization for optimal sizing of stand-alone photovoltaic, wind turbine, and battery systems. Engineering6(7), 812–826 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Singh, P., Pandit, M., & Srivastava, L. Optimization of levelized cost of hybrid wind-solar-diesel-battery system using political optimizer. In 2020 IEEE first international conference on smart technologies for power, energy and control (STPEC) 1–6. (IEEE, 2020).
  • 61.Thirunavukkarasu, M. & Sawle, Y. Design, analysis and optimal sizing of standalone PV/diesel/battery hybrid energy system using HOMER. IOP Conf. Series Mater. Sci. Eng.937(1), 012034 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Yang, Y. & Li, R. Techno-economic optimization of an off-grid solar/wind/battery hybrid system with a novel multi-objective differential evolution algorithm. Energies13(7), 1585 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Traoré, A., Elgothamy, H. & Zohdy, M. A. Optimal sizing of solar/wind hybrid off-grid microgrids using an enhanced genetic algorithm. J. Power Energy Eng.6(5), 64–77 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Navaeefard, A., Tafreshi, S. M., Barzegari, M., & Shahrood, A. J. Optimal sizing of distributed energy resources in microgrid considering wind energy uncertainty with respect to reliability. In 2010 IEEE International Energy Conference 820–825. (IEEE, 2010).
  • 65.Mahesh, A. & Sushnigdha, G. Optimal sizing of photovoltaic/wind/battery hybrid renewable energy system including electric vehicles using improved search space reduction algorithm. J. Energy Storage56, 105866 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Güven, A. F., Yörükeren, N. & Samy, M. M. Design optimization of a stand-alone green energy system of university campus based on Jaya-Harmony search and ant colony optimization algorithms approaches. Energy253, 124089 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 67.El Boujdaini, L., Mezrhab, A., Moussaoui, M. A., Jurado, F. & Vera, D. Sizing of a stand-alone PV–wind–battery–diesel hybrid energy system and optimal combination using a particle swarm optimization algorithm. Electr. Eng.104(5), 3339–3359 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Singh, S., Singh, M. & Kaushik, S. C. Feasibility study of an islanded microgrid in rural area consisting of PV, wind, biomass and battery energy storage system. Energy Convers. Manag.128, 178–190 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Abualigah, L., Diabat, A., Mirjalili, S., Abd Elaziz, M. & Gandomi, A. H. The arithmetic optimization algorithm. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.376, 113609 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Heidari, A. A. et al. Harris hawks optimization: Algorithm and applications. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst.97, 849–872 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Braik, M., Hammouri, A., Atwan, J., Al-Betar, M. A. & Awadallah, M. A. White Shark Optimizer: A novel bio-inspired meta-heuristic algorithm for global optimization problems. Knowl.-Based Syst.243, 108457 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Hashim, F. A. & Hussien, A. G. Snake optimizer: A novel meta-heuristic optimization algorithm. Knowl.-Based Syst.242, 108320 (2022). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES