Skip to main content
. 2025 Jul 2;15:23019. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06261-w

Table 3.

Level of evidence according to the GRADE rating system.

Certainty assessment Number of patients Effect Certainty Importance
Number of studies Study design Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Other considerations ridge preservation normal healing Relative (95% CI) Absolute (95% CI)
Need for sinus floor augmentation at implant placement
6

4 RCTs

2 CCTs

not serious not serious not serious not serious none 27/107 (25.2%) 45/76 (59.2%) OR 0.20 (0.08 to 0.38) 367 fewer per 1,000 (from 488 to 237 fewer) ⨁⨁⨁⨁High CRITICAL
Sinus pneumatization
5

3 RCTs

2 CCTs

not serious not serious not serious not serious none 71 65 SMD − 1.01 SD lower (1.38 lower to 0.64 lower) ⨁⨁⨁⨁High CRITICAL
Ridge height
7

4 RCTs

3 CCTs

not serious not serious not serious not serious none 122 91 SMD 0.72 SD higher (0.22 higher to 1.22 higher) ⨁⨁⨁⨁High CRITICAL
Ridge width
4

2 RCTs

2 CCTs

not serious seriousa not serious not serious none 71 58 SMD 0.61 SD higher (0.27 lower to 1.49 higher) ⨁⨁⨁◯Moderatea IMPORTANT

Note that the certainty of evidence was assessed based on the results of the meta-analyses of prospective studies only, to ensure more homogeneity.

CI: confidence interval; OR: odds ratio; SMD: standardized mean difference; RCT: randomized clinical trial; CCT: controlled clinical trial.

aContradicting outcomes from the included studies.