Table 5.

Subgroup analysis between OBS dietary with infertility.

Character	Crude model (95%CI)	Model 1 (95%CI)	Model 2 (95%CI)	Model 3 (95%CI)	p for interaction
Age					0.94
<35	0.97 (0.94,0.99)	0.97 (0.94,1.00)	0.98 (0.95,1.01)	0.97 (0.94,1.01)
>=35	0.98 (0.95,1.00)	0.97 (0.94,1.00)	0.97 (0.94,1.00)	0.97 (0.94,1.00)
DM					0.9
No	0.97 (0.95,0.99)	0.97 (0.95,1.00)	0.97 (0.95,1.00)	0.98 (0.96,1.00)
PreDM	0.92 (0.84,1.01)	0.92 (0.81, 1.04)	0.92 (0.82, 1.02)	0.92 (0.82, 1.02)
DM	0.99 (0.93,1.06)	0.98 (0.88, 1.08)	0.97 (0.88, 1.08)	0.99 (0.89, 1.11)
Hypertension					0.78
No	0.97 (0.96,0.99)	0.97 (0.95,0.99)	0.97 (0.95,1.00)	0.98 (0.95,1.00)
Yes	0.98 (0.94,1.01)	0.96 (0.92,1.01)	0.96 (0.91, 1.01)	0.96 (0.92, 1.01)
Ever pregnant					0.14
No	0.93 (0.89,0.98)	0.95 (0.91, 1.01)	0.95 (0.90, 1.01)	0.97 (0.91, 1.03)
Yes	0.98 (0.97,1.00)	0.97 (0.96,0.99)	0.98 (0.96,1.00)	0.98 (0.96,1.00)
MetS_ATP					0.26
No	0.98 (0.96,1.00)	0.98 (0.95,1.01)	0.98 (0.95,1.01)	0.98 (0.96,1.01)
Yes	0.96 (0.92,1.00)	0.95 (0.91,1.00)	0.96 (0.92,1.00)	0.96 (0.91,1.00)

Crude model: no covariates were adjusted.

Model 1, age, marital status, race, education level, PIR and ever pregnant were adjusted.

Model 2, Model 1+DM and hypertension were adjusted.

Model 3, Model 2+MetS, eGFR, alumin, HDL and HbA1c were adjusted.

*mean p <0.05.