Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
letter
. 2025 Jul 3;41(4):e70035. doi: 10.1111/phpp.70035

Attitudes and Behaviors Regarding Sun Exposure of Spain Population

Charles Taieb 1,, Alba Crespo‐Cruz 2, Marketa Saint Aroman 2,3, Nuria Perez‐Cullell 2,3, Catherine Baissac 3, Bruno Halioua 4, Magdalena de Troya‐Martín 5
PMCID: PMC12223918  PMID: 40605758

To the Editor,

Exposure to solar ultraviolet radiation (UVR) is a well‐established primary risk factor for nonmelanoma skin cancer and melanoma. In Spain, a country in Europe enjoying around 3000 h of sunshine a year, the annual standardized mortality rate for melanoma was 2.10/100,000 inhabitants over the last known period 2000–2019, while for melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer, it was 1.28/100,000 [1]. Numerous public health actions have been undertaken to change sun protection behaviors and attitudes in Spain to reduce sun exposure and to prevent skin cancer.

In a 2014 study with Spanish students, 60.7% said they were aware of the harmful effects of the sun on their skin [2]. In recent years, numerous public health actions have been carried out in Spain to change sun protection behaviors and attitudes in order to reduce sun exposure and prevent skin cancer.

ALL (All Skins, All Colors, All Dermatoses) is a multinational, cross‐sectional study conducted in 20 countries using a web‐based online survey by a polling company (HC Conseil Paris, France) between January and April 2023. Institutional review board approvals were not required since the study did not involve any clinical examination and used anonymized data. The overall results have been published [3]. In this study, the results in the Spanish population are examined in further detail. For each country, a representative sample of the population aged 16 and over was constructed using the usual quota method (age, gender, geographical location, socio‐cultural level and phototype according to the Fitzpatrick classification). Fitzpatrick skin types were dichotomized based on susceptibility to ultraviolet‐induced erythema, with types I–III categorized as more susceptible to burning [FT I–III] and types IV–VI as less susceptible [FT IV–VI] [4, 5].

The aim of this publication was to investigate the level of awareness of the risks related to sun exposure, attitude toward sun protection, and sun protection behavior in the representative Spain population.

Since the study used anonymized data and did not involve any clinical examination, institutional ethics committee approvals were not required.

The questionnaire gathered information about the individuals' demographic and socio‐demographic profiles. The individuals were asked to specify the times of exposure to the sun, the notion of knowledge of the recommendations of the public health experts who advise against exposure between 11 a.m. and 4 p.m., the reasons for which they were exposed to the sun in that time range, and the use or non‐use of sunscreen products. It was asked to specify the motivations provided by sunscreen users and the justifications given by non‐users. Descriptive analyses using absolute and percentage frequencies were performed.

A population of 4000 was selected, including 1965 (49.1%) males and 2035 (50.9%) females, with a mean age of 44.84+/−15.14 (16–90 years). About 83.8% (3354/4000) were identified as more susceptible to burning according to the Fitzpatrick classification.

About 23.1% of respondents reported no sun exposure, 23.9% of FT I–III people vs. 18.7% of FT IV–VI people (p < 0.005). About 27.6% stated that they had preferred sun exposure before 11 a.m., and 28.3% exclusively after 4 p.m., while 1896 (47.4%) respondents admitted to having been exposed to the sun between 11 a.m. and 4 p.m. The most frequent reason for this risky behavior was that it corresponded to the most convenient hours for their activities (47.0%) and when they were available to do so (48.2%) (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

Reasons given by people who expose themselves to the sun between 11 a.m. and 4 p.m. and who say they are aware of the public health recommendations (n = 1508).

n %
I don't understand 61 4.0%
These are the most convenient times of the day for my activities 709 47.0%
These are the most pleasant hours of the day 425 28.2%
These are the hours when I am available 727 48.2%
I don't believe in prevention messages 77 5.1%

About 80.3% of the respondents declared being aware of public health experts' recommendations against exposure between 11 a.m. and 4 p.m. Those who exposed themselves in that time interval were as well informed of these recommendations as those who were not (79.5% vs. 80.9%, p 0.85). Among the respondents, 2549/3077 (82.8%) used sunscreen products during the sunniest period (39.7% every two hours). The motivation of those who use sun protection products was mainly the desire to avoid sunburn (67.6%) and to reduce the risk of skin cancer (57.4%) (Table 2). On the other hand, the 528 (17.2%) respondents who stated they did not apply sunscreen products explained their behavior mainly because they consider topical application tedious (43.6%) and because they do not think about it (31.9%).

TABLE 2.

Motivations of users of sun protection products and justifications of non‐users, as recommended by public health guidelines.

n %

Rationale for respondents who use sunscreen products n = 2549

To avoid sunburn 1722 67.6%
To spend more time in the sun 410 16.1%
Because of a history of sunburns 447 17.5%
As protection against accelerated skin aging 1177 46.2%
As protection against the risk of skin tumors 1462 57.4%
For other reasons 81 3.2%

Justification for respondents who do not use sun protection products as recommended by public health guidelines

n = 1856

The products are too expensive 353 19%
I don't think about it 592 31.9%
I don't think it is useful 182 9.8%
It is too tedious 809 43.6%
I didn't know about this recommendation 217 11.7%

This study assesses both sun exposure risk behaviors and sunscreen use in the Spanish population. Despite the widespread dissemination of public health messages about the importance of sun protection, almost 47.4% of Spanish adults do not avoid sun exposure between 11 a.m. and 4 p.m. Furthermore, although the majority use sunscreens, there are still people who do not use them for various reasons (the price of the products, they think it is not useful, or they say they do not think about it) Table 2.

These findings highlight the need to implement more relevant educational measures targeting both the general population and, in particular, individuals at high risk of skin cancer, in order to persuade them to modify their behaviors. This includes avoiding sun exposure during peak radiation hours and promoting the effective use of sun protection. It appears essential that health authorities and professionals (such as doctors and pharmacists) collaborate to develop more pertinent and specific methods to enhance prevention efforts.

Ethics Statement

This survey has been carried out according to the ICC/ESOMAR code of conduct.

Conflicts of Interest

Charles Taieb was compensated for rewriting this article. Alba Crespo‐Cruz, Marketa Saint Aroman, Nuria Pérez‐Cullell, and Catherine Baissac are employees of Pierre Fabre. Bruno Halioua has no conflicts of interest in this project. Magdalena de Troya‐Martín has no conflict of interest.

Taieb C., Crespo‐Cruz A., Aroman M. S., et al., “Attitudes and Behaviors Regarding Sun Exposure of Spain Population,” Photodermatology, Photoimmunology & Photomedicine 41, no. 4 (2025): e70035, 10.1111/phpp.70035.

Funding: This project was funded by Patients Centricity of Pierre Fabre, France.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

References

  • 1. Alcalá Ramírez Del Puerto A., Hernández‐Rodriguez J. C., Sendín‐Martín M., Ortiz‐Alvarez J., Conejo‐Mir Sánchez J., and Pereyra‐Rodriguez J. J., “Skin Cancer Mortality in Spain: Adjusted Mortality Rates by Province and Related Risk Factors,” International Journal of Dermatology 62, no. 6 (2023): 776–782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Fernández‐Morano T., De Troya‐Martín M., Rivas‐Ruiz F., et al., “Behaviour, Attitudes and Awareness Concerning Sun Exposure in Adolescents on the Costa del Sol,” European Journal of Dermatology 24, no. 1 (2014): 85–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Lim H. W., Saint Aroman M., Skayem C., et al., “Sun Exposure and Protection Habits: Self‐Reported Attitudes, Knowledge and Behaviours,” Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 38, no. 10 (2024): 2024–2033, 10.1111/jdv.20080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Peeva E., Yamaguchi Y., Ye Z., et al., “Efficacy and Safety of Ritlecitinib in Vitiligo Patients Across Fitzpatrick Skin Types With Biomarker Analyses,” Experimental Dermatology 33, no. 9 (2024): e15177, 10.1111/exd.15177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Thorel D., Delcampe A., Ingen‐Housz‐Oro S., et al., “Dark Skin Phototype Is Associated With More Severe Ocular Complications of Stevens‐Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis,” British Journal of Dermatology 181, no. 1 (2019): 212–213, 10.1111/bjd.17627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.


Articles from Photodermatology, Photoimmunology & Photomedicine are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES