. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Jul 4.

Published in final edited form as: Int J Obes (Lond). 2024 Aug 27;49(1):76–83. doi: 10.1038/s41366-024-01617-0

Table 3.

Per-protocol analysis for weight outcomes.

Change in weight (%)	Time point	Get Social 6 months: n = 151 12 months: n = 156	Traditional^* 6 months: n = 135 12 months: n = 133	Difference get social vs traditional (two-sided 90% CI)	p-value (two-sided)
Change in weight (%)	Time point	M (SD)	M (SD)	Difference get social vs traditional (two-sided 90% CI)	p-value (two-sided)
	12 months	−2.7 (7.7)	−4.3 (7.0)	1.6 (0.2, 3.0)	0.065
	6 months	−2.6 (6.0)	−5.0 (5.8)	2.4 (1.3, 3.6)	<0.001
Change in weight (lbs)		M (SD)	M (SD)
	12 months	−6.3 (17.5)	−9.1 (15.0)	2.8 (−0.4, 6.0)	0.148
	6 months	−5.6 (13.3)	−10.4 (12.3)	4.7 (2.2, 7.2)	0.002
% losing ≥ 5%		%	%
	12 months	33.3	40.6	−7.3 (−16.7, 2.1)	0.203
	6 months	27.8	43.7	−15.9 (−25.1, −6.6)	0.005

Two participants who became pregnant during the intervention were censored.