Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Jul 4.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Obes (Lond). 2024 Aug 27;49(1):76–83. doi: 10.1038/s41366-024-01617-0

Table 5.

Acceptability in the traditional and get social conditions.

Get Social (n = 113), n (%) Traditional (n = 124), n (%) Χ2 (df) P value
Convenience
 Participation was convenient/very convenient.a 73 (65) 54 (44) 10.54 (1) 0.001
 Participation was time consuming.a 32 (28) 52 (42) 4.79 (1) 0.029
 Online groups more convenient than in-person groups. 82 (73) 69 (56) 7.32 (1) 0.007
 In-person groups more convenient than online groups. 18 (16) 32 (26) 3.47 (1) 0.063
Support
 I did not feel connected to the group.a 51 (45) 29 (23) 12.50 (1) <0.001
 The questions I asked were answered.a 82 (73) 100 (81) 2.17 (1) 0.141
 I did not feel comfortable speaking up in the group.a 21 (19) 11 (9) 4.78 (1) 0.029
  I received support from other group members when I needed it.a 60 (53) 78 (63) 2.34 (1) 0.126
 Modality preferences
 Would have preferred hybrid (online and in-person). 69 (61) 74 (60) 0.05 (1) 0.828
 Would have preferred the other modality. 56 (50) 54 (44) 0.86 (1) 0.354
a

Proportion of participants responding with strongly agree or agree versus strongly disagree, disagree, or neutral.