Skip to main content
. 2025 Jul 4;26:82. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01249-7

Table 1.

Demographics, AI usage, and education status of participants

Gender, n (%)
 Male 93 (63.3%)
 Female 54 (36.7%)
Age, median (IQR) 39 (35–46)
Years as physician, median (IQR) 14 (10–22)
Years in oncology, median (IQR) 5 (2–14)
Site of practice, n (%)
 University hospital 70 (47.6%)
 Training and research hospital 46 (31.3%)
 Private hospital 20 (13.6%)
 State hospital 8 (5.4%)
 Private clinic 3 (2.0%)
Educational and academic status, n (%)
 Resident, fellow 56 (38.1%)
 Specialist 33 (22.4%)
 Professor 31 (21.1%)
 Associate professor 24 (16.3%)
 Assistant professor 3 (2.0%)
Used any artificial intelligence before, n (%)*
 ChatGPT and other GPT models 114 (77.5%)
 Google Gemini 25 (17.0%)
 Microsoft Bing 16 (10.9%)
 Others** 13 (8.8%)
 Have not used any 33 (22.5%)
Artificial intelligence education status, n (%)
 Not received any education 133 (90.5%)
 Received basic-level education 10 (6.8%)
 Received advanced-level education 3 (2.0%)
 Received intermediate-level education 1 (0.7%)
Will to receive education for artificial intelligence, n (%)
 Yes 139 (94.6%)
 No 8 (5.4%)
Resources used to acquire knowledge about artificial intelligence, n (%)*
 Colleagues 39 (26.5%)
 Academic publications 34 (23.1%)
 Online courses and websites (e.g., Coursera, EDx) 32 (21.8%)
 Popular science publications 29 (19.7%)
 Conferences and workshops 27 (18.4%)
 Other periodicals 7 (4.8%)
 Others*** 8 (5.4%)
 Do not using any resources 57 (38.8%)

*Percentages shown for total participant counts

**Other artificial intelligences, include Meta LLAMA, X Grok, Google Bard, Perplexity, Anthropic Claude

***Other resources include social media and non-academic books

IQR Interquartile range