Table 2.
Screening of the liquid additives for Biltz synthesis to Phenytoin (4) by RAM.a)
| Entry | Influence of | Liquid additive | η [μL mg−1] | Time [min.] | Yield [%]b) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LAG solvent | H2O | 0.5 | 180 | 14 |
| 2 | Glycerol | 0.5 | 180 | n.r.c) | |
| 3 | EtOH | 0.5 | 180 | 67 | |
| 4 | η value | EtOH | 0.05 | 90 | 41 |
| 5 | EtOH | 0.1 | 90 | 24 | |
| 6 | EtOH | 0.25 | 90 | 39 | |
| 7d) | EtOH | 0.5 | 90 | 81 | |
| 8 | EtOH | 0.75 | 90 | 99 | |
| 9 | Reaction time | EtOH | 0.75 | 60 | 99 |
| 10 | EtOH | 0.75 | 20 | 98 (79%)e) | |
| 11 | EtOH | 0.75 | 10 | 26 |
Reaction was conducted in a 10 mL screw cap glass vial. Reaction conditions: benzil (5.35 mmol, 1.0 equiv.), urea (5.35 mmol, 1.0 equiv.) and KOH (10.7 mmol, 2.0 equiv.) were accelerated at 90 g during 180 min, except when otherwise specified;
Yields were calculated by quantitative GC‐MS using a linear calibration curve obtained by using commercial phenytoin, except when otherwise specified (see Supporting Information for more details);
n.r. = No reaction;
Pre‐grinded KOH was used;
Isolated yield.