Table 5.
Comparison of prediction results between variant model and TDMGCN in highway dataset.
| Methods | PEMS04 | PEMS07 | PEMS08 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAE | RMSE | MAPE | MAE | RMSE | MAPE | MAE | RMSE | MAPE | |
| w/o TE | 19.81 | 32.14 | 13.38 | 20.39 | 34.51 | 8.67 | 14.89 | 23.94 | 10.48 |
| w/o Conv | 19.59 | 31.88 | 13.28 | 19.53 | 32.71 | 8.33 | 13.26 | 23.15 | 9.34 |
| w/o P | 19.28 | 30.97 | 12.91 | 20.58 | 34.02 | 9.17 | 14.63 | 24.10 | 10.15 |
| w/o SE | 19.01 | 31.36 | 12.65 | 18.93 | 33.03 | 8.26 | 14.15 | 23.55 | 9.80 |
| w/o d-a | 19.24 | 31.51 | 12.91 | 19.81 | 33.31 | 8.44 | 15.20 | 24.48 | 10.19 |
| w/o f-a | 19.48 | 32.04 | 13.02 | 19.44 | 32.98 | 8.44 | 14.05 | 23.88 | 9.90 |
| w/o f-d | 18.45 | 30.75 | 12.32 | 19.47 | 32.60 | 8.36 | 13.88 | 23.23 | 9.67 |
| TDMGCN | 18.18 | 30.32 | 12.02 | 18.66 | 32.01 | 7.92 | 12.86 | 22.73 | 8.94 |
Significant values are in bold.