Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Jul 8.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroinformatics. 2022 Aug 24;21(1):115–141. doi: 10.1007/s12021-022-09599-y

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Main effect of the subject group (N=170, HP vs. LP) on component loading factors in subject mode for each stimulus condition. Boxplots summarize the distribution of the mean values of the component loading factors in subject mode for the HP and LP groups. Median values are represented by black lines inside the boxplot, with the top of the whisker lines indicating the 25th and 75th percentile values. Mean values are plotted in white circles. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean. Six components were statistically significant in the post hoc two-tailed t-test results (FDR corrected, p<0.05), except for the occipital component/M150 in the AV condition, which did not differ between the HP and LP groups (p=0.864). The post hoc t-tests results are shown in Table 3. ****p<0.0001,***p<0.001 (post hoc and FDR corrected p<0.05), which means significantly different.