Fig. 8.

Discriminative group MEG ERF components from the CP decomposition for the VIS, AUD, and AV conditions are shown. The ERF components are indicated by solid lines (HP: high performance - blue, LP: low performance - red). The average group ERF timecourses are indicated by dashed lines. Main effect of the subject group (HP vs. LP, $N=170$) on the component loading factors in subject mode is summarized in the boxplots. The boxplots summarize the distribution of the mean values of component loading factors in the subject mode for the HP and LP groups. The median values are represented by black lines inside the boxplot, and the tops of the whisker lines indicate the 25th and 75th percentile values. The mean values are plotted in dark grey. The error bars represent the standard error of the mean. Post hoc analyses with two-tailed $t$-tests (FDR corrected, $p<0.05$) indicate that the mean value of the component loading factors of the HP group was significantly different than for LP group with $p<0.001$ for six ERF components except for the occipital/M150 component in the AV condition (AV/M150: $p=0.864$). (a)-(b) Occipital M150 component. (c)-(d) Right temporal M300a component. (e)-(f) Left central M400 component. $****p<0.0001,***p<0.001$ indicate significant differences (FDR corrected, $p<0.05$). The post hoc $t$-tests results are shown in Table 3.